This is the exact embedded text of the captured official document.
Snapshot 2d81d9e71f62 · verified 2026-06-09 ·
original document ·
archived snapshot ·
unofficial consolidation, the official version is held by the municipal clerk.
ORIGINALLY
PREPARED BY
TOWNSHIP OF CARLING
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
DECEMBER 2013
Updated July 1, 2022
by Township Staff
PROJECT No. 13-4011
CONTINUING RECORD OF REVISIONS MADE
TO THE
TOWNSHIP of CARLING ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
This page should be retained permanently in this page sequence in the asset management plan. All
revised material should be inserted as soon as approved and the relevant entries made by hand in the
spaced provided below to show who incorporated the Revision and the date it was completed.
Revision
Entered By
Date
No.
Dated
1
January 22, 2015
Brad Laking
January 22, 2015
2
January 22, 2019
S. Phillips
January 22, 2019
3
July 1, 2022
S. Roy
July 1, 2022
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1
2.0
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3
3.0
State of Local Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 5
3.1
Roads ............................................................................................................................................. 6
3.1.1
Method of Condition Evaluation ........................................................................................... 6
3.1.2
Inventory ............................................................................................................................... 9
3.1.3
Policies ................................................................................................................................ 11
3.2
Structures .................................................................................................................................... 11
3.2.1
Method of Condition Evaluation ......................................................................................... 11
3.2.2
Inventory ............................................................................................................................. 12
3.2.3
Policies ................................................................................................................................ 12
3.3
Buildings ...................................................................................................................................... 13
3.3.1
Method of Condition Evaluation ......................................................................................... 13
3.3.2
Inventory ............................................................................................................................. 13
3.3.3
Policies ................................................................................................................................ 14
3.4
Facilities....................................................................................................................................... 15
3.4.1
Method of Condition Evaluation ......................................................................................... 15
3.4.2
Inventory ............................................................................................................................. 16
3.4.3
Policies ................................................................................................................................ 16
4.0
Expected Levels of Service .............................................................................................................. 17
4.1.1
Risk Assessment .................................................................................................................. 17
4.1.2
Performance Measurement ................................................................................................ 17
4.2
Roads ........................................................................................................................................... 17
4.3
Structures .................................................................................................................................... 19
4.4
Buildings ...................................................................................................................................... 20
4.5
Parks & Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 20
5.0
Asset Management Strategy ........................................................................................................... 22
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
5.1
Planned Actions & Option Analysis ............................................................................................. 22
5.1.1
Roads ................................................................................................................................... 22
5.1.2
Structures ............................................................................................................................ 23
5.1.3
Buildings .............................................................................................................................. 23
5.1.4
Facilities ............................................................................................................................... 24
5.2
Risk Assessment .......................................................................................................................... 24
5.3
Procurement Methods ................................................................................................................ 24
5.4
Schedule of Priorities .................................................................................................................. 25
5.4.1
Roads ................................................................................................................................... 25
5.4.2
Structures ............................................................................................................................ 25
5.4.3
Buildings .............................................................................................................................. 25
5.4.4
Parks & Facilities ................................................................................................................. 26
6.0
Financing Strategy ........................................................................................................................... 27
6.1
Roads ........................................................................................................................................... 29
6.2
Structures .................................................................................................................................... 30
6.3
Buildings ...................................................................................................................................... 32
6.4
Facilities....................................................................................................................................... 33
7.0
Closure ............................................................................................................................................ 35
8.0
Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... 36
LIST OF APPENDICIES
Appendix A - Capital Asset Summary
Appendix B - PSAB Information
Appendix C - Road Reference Information
Appendix D - Structure Reference Information
Appendix E - Building Reference Information
Appendix F - Facilities Reference Information
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 1
1.0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As with most Municipalities across Ontario, The Township of Carling has undertaken the development of
an Asset Management Plan in response to the Ontario Government's provincial capital funding
requirements. The purpose of this Asset Management Plan is to assist with prioritizing needs over
wants to ensure that infrastructure funding, whether generated through local or senior levels of
government, be applied to projects with a greater priority. This Asset Management Plan has been
structured to adhere to the requirement described in the Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure's Building
Together, Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans.
As the following Asset Management Plan will outline, the Municipality's existing infrastructure is aging
and deteriorating while demand grows for better infrastructure facilities. This demand is in response to
higher standards of safety, accessibility, health, environmental protection, and regulations. The solution
to this issue is to examine the way the Municipality plans, designs and manages infrastructure to meet
changing demands. This Asset Management Plan is expected to assist:
-
Council in making service level and investment decisions;
-
Staff with the planning and management of the assets;
-
Taxpayers by sustaining value for the services provided.
As presented in this Asset Management Plan, the total replacement cost of the Municipality's assets was
calculated to be approximately $35.0 million dollars (2013 Dollars), for assets providing transportation,
administration, tourism, and recreation. The Municipality is not required to budget for the full
replacement value of all these assets simultaneously, as portions of assets only require an initial
investment followed by further re-investment to maintain acceptable levels of service.
With that in mind, it was calculated that the annual reinvestment should be an average of $ 0.66 million
into municipally owned assets as they reach their maximum potential useful lives, in order to sustain
existing services at an appropriate level of service. The actual investment value will vary from year to
year depending on the scope and size of the planned capital works. Projects will need to be shuffled
from year to year based on the availability of funding.
This plan will address the replacement and planned expansion priorities of the Municipality, however it
is imperative that current maintenance activities be continued and expanded as recommended. The
ability for the Municipality to leverage its knowledge of infrastructure and by applying the best Asset
Management practices at the time will result in very positive improvements in infrastructure. A brief
summary of the sections contained within this report is presented as follows.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 2
Section Two of the Municipality's Asset Management Plan provides an introduction to the assets
included in the plan as well as how the plan was developed and the goals of the Asset Management
Plan. The Third section summarizes the asset types and quantities as well as their characteristics,
condition and replacement values which were quantified by the Municipality's current asset inventory
and for some assets, supplemented with visual inspections.
Section Four outlines the expected levels of service for each asset, and provides an indication of the
minimum acceptable standards for an asset. Service levels were developed through consideration of
industry standards, generally accepted levels of operation and safety. Consideration of the risk
associated with achieving the established target levels was given. Additionally, policy recommendations
for condition rating updates for each asset are presented.
The asset management strategy for each asset type is presented in section five along with potential
procurement methods to finance the strategy. The strategy and scheduling of asset renewal activities
has been laid out by establishing planned actions through options analysis and risk assessment to
maximize lifespan and minimize cost in a sustainable way. In addition, the priority assets for each
category are presented within this section.
The final section of the plan consists of the financial plan required to support the asset management
strategy by summarizing the cost per year, per asset to ensure sustainability of the asset. Comparisons
are made to past expenditures and funding sources to identify the funding gaps in the proposed plan.
Although this comprehensive Asset Management Plan has been created beginning in 2014, it is expected
to be a living document that is updated regularly as priority's shift or as work is completed. In addition,
improvements to the methodologies of data collection for developing more accurate inventory
information and evaluation will only serve to bolster the content of the plan. An Asset Management
Plan that is not adhered to or not updated will quickly become obsolete and be of little to no benefit to
the Municipality.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 3
2.0
INTRODUCTION
This Asset Management Plan (AMP) was prepared by Tulloch Engineering Inc. (Tulloch) in cooperation
with the Township of Carling (Municipality) to meet the requirements of a Municipal Asset Management
Plan as presented by the Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure in their "Building Together - Guide for
Municipal Asset Management Plans" (2012).
The intention of the AMP is to provide answers and guidelines to the following questions.
1) What do you have and where is it?
2) What is it worth? (Current and Estimated Replacement Costs)
3) What is its condition and expected remaining service life?
4) What is the level of service expectation?
5) When do you need to do it?
6) How do you ensure long-term affordability?
Asset management planning is meant to aid municipalities in making cost effective decisions with
regards to operating, maintaining, renewing, replacing and disposing of their infrastructure assets. The
decisions and directions laid out in the asset management planning process are intended to ensure that
the Municipality will be capable of providing the levels of service needed to meet their desired plans,
goals and objectives.
The assets considered within this AMP are the following municipal assets:
-
Roads;
-
Bridges;
-
Buildings
-
Facilities;
Each municipal asset was divided into its respective category based on type and was assessed for
current condition, financial accounting valuation and replacement cost valuation. The condition of each
of the assets was assessed using sound and accepted methods - which are outlined in the following
sections of the report.
This AMP has been developed to cover a ten (10) year window but is intended to be updated on a
regular basis as operating conditions and municipal goals change. A key aspect of this plan is the
ongoing evaluation of asset performance and value that will be required in future years. The
development of this plan involved continued communication between Tulloch and Municipal Staff. The
policies and strategies presented are based upon discussions with Municipal representatives and
accepted practices for the management of infrastructure assets.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 4
This Asset Management Plan is a tool to help ensure that measures are taken to maintain an acceptable
performance level for years to come. The quality and condition of infrastructure assets are of great
importance as they help to support economic activity and improve general quality of life. This plan is
not intended to change the Municipality's existing processes and procedures with regards to their
infrastructure assets but rather improve the decision making process by using long range vision to
dictate resource allocation and use performance based analyses to determine if desired goals and
objectives are being met.
The Municipality's Capital Asset Summary information as found in Appendix A, presents the inventory,
current and projected condition ratings, as well as known or projected replacement/rehabilitation costs
on a per asset type basis in a digital format.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 5
3.0
STATE OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE
This Section of the report outlines the quantity and quality of assets owned and managed by the
Municipality. In addition, the current age, condition, financial valuation and replacement cost valuation
of the assets included is presented.
The two following figures provide a comparison of the Municipality's capital assets based on 2013 Public
Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) values and 2013 replacement values. The PSAB values are based on
currently accepted historical costs and depreciation values, which were extracted from the current
Municipal inventory presented as the Tangible Capital Asset Continuity Schedule (PSAB Inventory) in
Appendix B. The 2013 replacement values were generated based on the assets physical characteristics
and benchmark costs established from recent construction projects. The benchmark costs per asset
type are presented in the corresponding asset management spreadsheets in Appendix A.
Figure 1 - Capital Asset PSAB 2013 Values ($10.6M)
$8,195,351.42
$600,000.00
$1,831,515.77
$11,238.00
Roads
Bridges
Buildings
Parks & Facilities
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 6
-
NOTE: Replacement Costs are presented in 2013 Dollars
Figure 2 - 2013 Asset Replacement Costs ($35.0M)
3.1
ROADS
The Municipality's road network consists of approximately 88.6 km of roads, of which all are year-round
maintained roads. The roadway inventory and condition ratings were based on the completion of a
complete review of the road network in August 2013 - the completed road appraisal forms are
presented in Appendix C.
3.1.1
METHOD OF CONDITION EVALUATION
Appraisal of the Municipality's local road system was carried out in the summer of 2013, in accordance
with procedures outlined in the MTO Methods and Inventory Manual. The system was divided into 123
road sections (intersection to intersection, or change in surface type) and a standard MTO Road
Appraisal Sheet was completed for each section. Each road section was identified and assigned a
number, and then its location, length, geometrics, roadside environment, and surface type were noted.
Traffic volumes were also estimated. The condition of each road section was assessed and
improvement needs and associated costs were then identified.
Each road section has been given a subjective condition rating from 1 to 10 based on current surface
condition, surface type and drainage conditions. Condition ratings greater than 5 are considered
$28,324,880.00
$1,590,650.00
$4,195,130.00
$903,000.00
Roads
Bridges
Buildings
Parks & Facilities
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 7
acceptable and are expected to require only normal maintenance. A condition rating of 5 or less has
been established to be considered unacceptable and a road improvement is to be evaluated for cost.
The road condition for each section is projected over ten years to allow review of road deterioration and
forecasting of required future work. This method of evaluating road surface deterioration relies on
estimating the life cycle of various road surfaces.
For the purpose of this AMP, the life cycle for gravel roads was assumed as ten years, resulting in a
decrease in rating of 0.5 per year, although severe spring breakup may affect the condition rating.
Surface treated roads typically have a seven year life cycle, resulting in a decrease in rating of 0.7 per
year, and asphalt roads typically have a twenty year life cycle, resulting in a decrease in rating of 0.25
per year. It should be noted that these life cycles are dependent on their use, the structural condition of
the road and the timeliness of routine maintenance.
For the purposes of this study, the following assumptions were made for road deterioration rates:
-
Loose Top Roads Condition rating reduced by 0.8 per year until it drops to 5.0
-
Low Class Bituminous Roads Condition rating reduced by 0.7 per year until it drops to 5.0
-
High Class Bituminous Roads Condition rating reduced by 0.25 per year until it drops to 5.0
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 8
The following table describes the current state of the roads compared with the projected conditions
over the next ten years.
Surface Type
(AADT)
TOTAL
LENGTH
(km)
2013 Weighted
Average Condition
2018 Weighted Average
Condition
2023 Weighted Average
Condition
GRAVEL
26.2
6.4
8.3
7.0
0-49
11.7
6.9
8.1
7.8
50-199
14.5
6.0
8.6
6.3
L.C.B.
52.9
7.8
7.5
7.0
0-49
14.6
7.4
7.5
6.6
50-199
16.6
8.5
6.6
7.7
200-399
16.6
7.7
8.0
7.1
400-999
5.1
7.0
9.3
5.8
H.C.B.
9.5
9.0
8.1
6.8
0-49
0.6
5.2
9.1
7.8
50-199
0.1
7.0
9.8
8.5
200-399
2.9
9.7
8.4
7.2
400-999
2.1
9.0
7.8
6.5
1000+
3.8
9.0
7.8
6.5
Grand Total
88.6
7.5
7.8
7.0
Figure 12 - Road Infrastructure Condition Rating Forecast
Further detail on how the future ratings are achieved can be found in the Municipal Road Inventory
spreadsheets completed as part of this planning exercise - located in Appendix A of this report.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 9
The following is a measure of the condition of the existing road system as outlined in the Methods and
Inventory Manual:
Condition Rating
System Condition
8 to 10
good structural condition; some local
improvement may be needed
5 to 7
average structural condition; continued
improvement needed
Less than 5
poor structural condition; substantial
improvement needed throughout
total road segment
3.1.2
INVENTORY
A summary of the Municipality's road system is presented in the following figures and is based on the
Municipality's Tangible Capital Asset Summary, supplemented with information collected during the
field inspections. The complete inventory is presented in Appendix A, including all assumptions used to
arise at the given ratings and projected costs. It should be noted that L.C.B. denotes low class
bituminous (surface treatment) and H.C.B. denotes high class bituminous (asphalt surface). In addition,
a weighted condition rating per surface type based on length was generated to accurately reflect the
average condition of the respective surface type.
Figure 3 - Road Length by Surface Type
26.2
53.1
9.5
6.39
7.79
8.96
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
GRAVEL
L.C.B.
H.C.B.
Total Length (km)
Surface Type
TOTAL LENGTH (km)
Average Condition Rating
(Weighted)
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 10
Figure 4 - Road Length by Traffic Volume
Figure 5 - Condition Rating Summary by Surface Type
27.0
31.1
19.5
7.2
3.8
7.17
7.29
8.01
7.59
9
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
0-49
50-199
200-399
400-999
1000+
Total Length (km)
Traffic Volume
TOTAL LENGTH (km)
Average Condition Rating
(Weighted)
0.4
4.0
12.5
6.1
1.0
2.3
0.2
1.4
4.6
21.9
7.7
9.4
7.9
0.5
0.1
0.1
6.8
2.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total Length (km)
Condition Rating
GRAVEL
L.C.B.
H.C.B.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 11
3.1.3
POLICIES
In accordance with the Guide, it is recommended that a data verification policy and condition
assessment policy be established to outline when and how the Road Asset state of infrastructure is
updated. It is recommended that an annual cycle be established to update condition ratings and cost
projections in accordance with the procedures outlined in the MTO Methods and Inventory Manual.
3.2
STRUCTURES
The Municipality's structure inventory currently consists of one bridge, however an additional structure
which is currently owned by MTO will be downloaded into the Municipality's jurisdiction. The structure
inventory and condition ratings are based on the Ontario Structure Inspection Manual inspections
completed by Tulloch Engineering Inc. in August 2013 - the OSIM forms are presented in Appendix D.
3.2.1
METHOD OF CONDITION EVALUATION
Appraisal of the Municipality's Structures was carried out in August of 2013, in accordance with
procedures outlined in the Ontario Structure Inspection Manual. In general, the structures were divided
into the primary structural elements with the dimensions and general condition of each component
identified. For components in need of improvement, the needs and associated timing were also
reported.
Each structure has been given a subjective rating of Excellent, Good, Fair or Poor, based on current
overall condition of the structure. More detailed evaluation notes are included in the OSIM reports
provided in Appendix D. A condition rating greater than Poor is considered acceptable and is expected
to require only normal maintenance, with the exception of specific element improvements as may be
identified. A condition rating less than Poor is considered unacceptable and an improvement or
replacement is to be evaluated for cost. For the purpose of forecasting, structures were estimated to
have a lifespan of 75 years with an average condition rating assigned based on age as follows:
Rating
Age
Excellent
Less than 5 years old
Good
Between 5 years old and 50% of its life expectancy
Fair
Between 50% and 75% of its life expectancy
Poor
Between 75% and 100% of its life expectancy
Replace
Beyond its life expectancy
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 12
3.2.2
INVENTORY
A summary of the Municipality's structure inventory is presented in the following figures outlining the
age and overall condition ratings. The inventory is based on the Municipality's Tangible Capital Asset
Summary, supplemented by detail asset information evaluated through the completion of the OSIM
inspections. The complete inventory is presented in Appendix A, including all structure elements and
assumptions used to arise at the given ratings and projected costs over the ten year range. It should be
noted that the Nobel Road Bridge has been included in the inventory - however, ownership of the
structure has not yet been assumed by the Municipality.
Figure 6 - Condition Rating Summary by Structure Type
Figure 7 - Year of Construction by Structure Type
3.2.3
POLICIES
In accordance with the Guide, it is recommended that a data verification policy and condition
assessment policy be established to outline when and how the structure infrastructure information is
updated. As the OSIM Inspection frequency is currently legislated as once every two calendar years, it is
recommended that the legislated frequency, as may be amended, be followed. In addition, it is
recommended that the inspections be completed with the currently utilized OSIM Inspection Forms to
permit equal comparison of subsequent inspection reports.
1
1
0
1
2
EXC
GOOD
Number of Structures
Condition Rating
1
1
0
1
2
1989
2011
Number of Structures
Year of Construction
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 13
3.3
BUILDINGS
The Municipality owns and operates a total of seven buildings which serve a variety of departments and
services; Public Works, Administration, Fire Rescue, and Recreation.
3.3.1
METHOD OF CONDITION EVALUATION
The Municipality's buildings were evaluated based on the inventory and information provided by the
Municipality. Each of the seven buildings were reviewed by Tulloch and Municipal Staff and assigned an
identification number, along with location, floor space and year of construction being noted. In
addition, the buildings were divided into the major categories which make up the overall structure with
the dimensions and general condition of each component identified. For components in need of
improvement, the needs and associated timing were also reported.
For the purpose of forecasting, each building asset was given a subjective rating of Excellent, Good, Fair
or Poor, based on the current overall condition of the asset. A condition rating greater than Poor is
considered acceptable and is expected to require continued maintenance. A condition rating less than
Poor is considered unacceptable and an improvement or replacement is to be evaluated for cost. All
building assets were estimated to have an overall lifespan of 75 years with an average condition rating
assigned based on age as follows. Individual building components were subject to varying lifespans
which can be reviewed in detail as presented in the detailed inventory provided in Appendix A.
Rating
Age
Excellent
Less than 5 years old
Good
Between 5 years old and 50% of its life expectancy
Fair
Between 50% and 75% of its life expectancy
Poor
Between 75% and 100% of its life expectancy
Replace
Beyond its life expectancy
3.3.2
INVENTORY
A summary of the Municipality's building inventory is presented in the following figures outlining year of
construction and condition ratings. The inventory is based on the information provided by the
Municipality. The complete inventory is presented in Appendix A, including all building components as
well as assumptions used to arise at the given ratings and projected costs.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 14
Figure 8 - Building Count by Year of Construction
Figure 9 - Building Count by Condition Rating
3.3.3
POLICIES
In accordance with the guide, it is recommended that a data verification policy and condition
assessment policy be established to outline when and how the building infrastructure information is
0
1
2
1981
1982
1990
1996
2010
2012
2013
Number of Buildings
Year of Construction
3
2
2
0
1
2
3
4
EXC
GOOD
FAIR
Number of Buildings
Condition Rating
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 15
updated. It is recommended that a 2 year cycle be established to update condition ratings and cost
projections in accordance with the current inventory forms, as well as to recommend further
investigations where warranted. Problematic buildings or those over 50 years in age should be reviewed
on a more frequent basis.
3.4
FACILITIES
The Municipality's facilities asset category is comprised of six facility's assets located throughout the
Municipality that serve a variety of recreational purposes. The facilities included in this Asset
Management Plan are the following:
-
Carling Rink;
-
Dillon Boat Launch and Public Docks;
-
Sawdust Bay Boat Launch and Dock;
-
Pengally Bay Boat Launch and Dock;
-
Blind Bay Boat Launch and Dock;
-
Snug Harbour Dock;
3.4.1
METHOD OF CONDITION EVALUATION
The Municipality's facilities were evaluated based on the inventory and information provided by the
Municipality. Each of the six assets were reviewed by Tulloch and Municipal Staff and assigned an
identification number, along with location, list of primary components and year of construction being
noted. In addition, the assets were divided into the representative components with the dimensions
and general condition of each component identified. For components in need of improvement, the
needs and associated timing were also reported.
Each asset was given a subjective rating of Excellent, Good, Fair or Poor, based on the current overall
condition of the asset. A condition rating greater than Poor is considered acceptable and is expected to
require continued maintenance. A condition rating less than Poor is considered unacceptable and an
improvement or replacement is to be evaluated for cost. Individual asset components were subject to
varying lifespans which can be reviewed in detail as presented in Appendix A.
Rating
Age
Excellent
Less than 5 years old
Good
Between 5 years old and 50% of its life expectancy
Fair
Between 50% and 75% of its life expectancy
Poor
Between 75% and 100% of its life expectancy
Replace
Beyond its life expectancy
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 16
3.4.2
INVENTORY
A summary of the Municipality's facilities inventory is presented in the following figures outlining year of
construction and condition ratings. The inventory is based on the facilities identified by the Municipality
for inclusion in this plan. A sample inspection form is provided in Appendix F for future use. The
complete inventory is presented in Appendix A, including all asset components as well as assumptions
used to arise at the given ratings and projected costs.
Figure 10 - Parks & Facilities Count by Construction Year
Figure 11 - Parks & Facilities Count by Condition Rating
3.4.3
POLICIES
In accordance with the guide, it is recommended that a data verification policy and condition
assessment policy be established to outline when and how the infrastructure information is updated.
Facilities should be reviewed on a 2 year cycle utilizing the inspection forms included in Appendix F of
this report.
0
1
2
3
4
1990
2013
Number of Assets
Year of Construction
3
1
2
0
1
2
3
4
FAIR
GOOD
EXC
Number of Assets
Condition Rating
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 17
4.0
EXPECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE
Levels of Service are statements of performance criteria which provide an indication of the minimum
acceptable standard for an asset.
Desired levels of service within the Township of Carling were developed in consultation with Township
staff and through consideration of a number of documents and industry recognized standards to meet
generally accepted levels of operation and safety. The target levels of service should be reviewed on a
regular basis to determine if they are appropriate, and achievable. Consideration should be given to
risk, and cost in the development of target levels of service.
4.1.1
RISK ASSESSMENT
All assets carry a level of risk for their users. Generally when conducting a risk assessment, two key
factors that come into consideration are frequency of use and cost of improvement. Acceptable levels
of risk may vary depending on the frequency of use of an asset. For example, if a rarely used asset and a
frequently used asset do not meet today's minimum standards, the risk is higher for the frequently used
asset and therefore, rehabilitation of this asset should be prioritized ahead of a rarely used substandard
asset.
It is desirable to limit risk by replacing/improving the condition of all assets to meet today's minimum
standards; however, the cost of doing so is not always feasible. The Municipality attempts to achieve a
manageable
level
of
risk
by
completion
of
condition
reviews
and
prioritization
of
replacement/improvement projects.
4.1.2
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
To optimize an Asset Management Plan and ensure target levels of service are appropriate,
performance measures or indicators are established and should be reviewed on a regular basis.
Performance measurement of the assets will provide an indication as to whether the rehabilitation and
replacement strategies are effective or whether changes need to be made. Performance benchmarks
for the various asset groups are described in the following sections.
4.2
ROADS
The Municipality has established a target level of service for roads by classifying road segments based on
their surface type and estimated traffic volume. The municipal road network has been evaluated by
Tulloch Engineering Inc. through completion of the 2013 Road Appraisals. In this plan, all road segments
have been rated using the MTO Road Appraisal forms. The rating system utilized consists of a number 1
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 18
through 10 (where 10 represents a road in excellent or new condition, and a rating of 5 or less
corresponding to poor condition).
The desired level of service for Municipal roads is to maintain an average condition rating of 7.0 for the
entire road network. The goal of this level of service is to develop and maintain uniformity for users of
the road network and to ensure that roads meet the minimum standards across the municipality.
The following strategies have been selected to achieve the target however as a general rule, when a
roadway reaches a condition rating of 5 or less it is scheduled for improvement the following year.
1. Improvements to Poor condition roads (condition rating of 5 or less) with Average Annual Daily
Traffic (AADT) count of 50 vehicles per day or more;
2. Hard-top surfacing of loose-top rural high traffic volume roads and of loose-top roads in urban
and semi-urban environments;
3. Widening of critically substandard width roads;
4. Improvements to roads with other critical needs (eg. Grade raise of road in flood plain, poor
sightlines at intersections, excessively steep grades);
5. Remaining improvements generally prioritized on the basis of condition rating;
These improvements and repairs were incorporated into the road condition inventory spreadsheets
which project the condition of road segments over the next 10 years. The condition of a road will
degrade with time; the rate of degradation is a function of the adequacy of the roads design, the quality
of construction, the traffic volume it serves, the maintenance effort it receives and its surface type.
The performance of the road network should be evaluated by completing condition assessments on an
annual basis; the actual condition ratings collected in 2018 should be compared to the projected ratings
to determine whether or not the target level of service is being achieved. Adjustments to the plan
should be made as necessary either by increasing the annual budget for road improvements, or by
revising the target level of service.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 19
4.3
STRUCTURES
Bridges and structural culverts consist of many different components with varying life expectancies. The
overall condition of a bridge is evaluated by completing mandatory biennial (every 2 years) OSIM
inspections which provide detailed condition ratings of all the components of each structure. The
condition of the various components is described by one of four ratings:
-
Excellent;
-
Good;
-
Fair; and
-
Poor;
In general, components of a bridge are recommended for rehabilitation or repair once a large
percentage reaches a condition of 'Poor'. If a number of components are rated poor, the structure is
typically recommended for a major rehabilitation or replacement within a specified timeframe.
The desired level of service for municipal bridges has been established through review of the current
OSIM inspection data. The target level of service for Municipal bridges is to maintain all bridges such
that they do not require a load limit posting, and that the structure capacity is sufficiently serving the
associated road traffic volume. This should be achieved by continuing to complete rehabilitation and
repair recommendations outlined in the OSIM inspection within the suggested timeframes.
Condition ratings over the next ten (10) years have been forecast by making the following assumptions;
-
Excellent Component age is less than 5 years old;
-
Good Component age is less than half of its life expectancy;
-
Fair Component age is greater than ½ of its life expectancy;
-
Poor Component age is greater than ¾ of its life expectancy;
-
Replace Component age is beyond its life expectancy;
It should be noted that the results of the biennial inspections should be compared with the forecasted
condition of the structure and should supersede the forecasted condition in all cases. Currently the
Dillon Road Bridge requires some minor repairs to maintain its integrity. These repairs have been
scheduled for completion in 2015. All rehabilitations and repairs shall be completed in accordance with
the current Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 20
4.4
BUILDINGS
The overall condition of a building is evaluated by completing visual inspections which provide detailed
condition ratings of all the components of each structure. The condition of the various components is
described by one of four ratings:
-
Excellent;
-
Good;
-
Fair; and
-
Poor;
In general, components of a building are recommended for rehabilitation or repair once a large
percentage reaches a condition of 'Poor'. If a number of components are rated poor, the structure is
typically recommended for a major rehabilitation or replacement. Additionally, the performance
measures can be evaluated as an effectiveness measure similar to that used in the Financial Information
Returns, such that the number of buildings where the condition of primary components are rated good
to very good is compared to the number of total buildings.
The target level of service for Municipal buildings is to maintain all buildings such that they do not
restrict access, intended use, and provide for a safe user environment. This should be achieved by
continuing to complete upkeep and maintenance on various building components as well as completing
recommended repairs identified through annual inspections.
Achievement of the levels of service for the buildings can easily be determined by reviewing the
performance of the existing infrastructure, i.e. is the building serving its intended purpose without
restrictions? The municipality does not currently keep records of the number building service
interruptions (leaking roof, broken HVAC systems etc.), however a policy should be implemented as part
of the new asset management strategy.
4.5
PARKS & FACILITIES
Municipal Facilities support the recreational and leisure needs of both the residents of the Township
and the large volume of tourists and seasonal residents. The desired level of service for the municipal
facilities includes having a clean, safe space for all residents to make use of.
The most appropriate method of confirming the adequacy and user satisfaction/dissatisfaction with
these facilities is through regular inspections. To supplement the results of inspections, the Township
could send out user surveys for the residents of the Municipality on an annual basis to gather feedback.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 21
Results of the surveys can be reviewed and considered for future planning purposes. Alternatively, the
number of complaints received could be monitored with a target set for the maximum permissible.
Achievement of the desired levels of service for the facilities can easily be determined by reviewing the
performance of the existing infrastructure, (i.e. is the facility serving its intended purpose without major
interruptions in service?) The municipality does not currently keep records of the number service
interruptions; however a policy should be implemented as part of the new asset management strategy.
Confirming achievement of this level of service will require the Municipality to keep records and review
them on an annual basis as a minimum.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 22
5.0
ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
5.1
PLANNED ACTIONS & OPTION ANALYSIS
As referenced in the Guide, "the asset strategy is the set of planned actions that will enable the assets to
provide the desired levels of service in a sustainable way." All assets have a limited life expectancy and
to some degree the rate of deterioration can be estimated. A decision made at any point in time in the
lifecycle of an asset has an effect on the remaining life and may have operational implications and
related costs.
The following sections summarize the planned actions and option analysis for each asset type to
maximize lifespan and minimize costs, in a sustainable way.
5.1.1
ROADS
Roads require regular roadside maintenance activities such as ditching and brushing to ensure adequate
drainage of the road subgrade. Poor subgrade drainage will lead to premature deterioration of the road
base which will directly impact the deterioration of the surface.
Maintenance of an asphalt road surface is typically completed through activities such as crack sealing or
application of a slurry seal. These maintenance activities are generally not carried out in smaller
Municipalities as they can be quite costly and require a large "volume" of work to make the activities
economical to undertake. Surface treatment roads would receive an application of single course surface
treatment overlay to extend its life, however if the road surface is uneven, the overlay will also be
uneven. As such, these maintenance costs which may be possible depending on actual conditions at the
time of rehabilitation or replacement were not evaluated at great length. Full pulverizing of the road
top and resurfacing was considered for cost evaluation and projection of future costs.
Integrated infrastructure planning was considered, however the Township of Carling does not own any
buried infrastructure beneath its roadways. Typically integrated infrastructure planning involves
reviewing the condition of buried infrastructure along with the roadway to ensure that all failing
infrastructure is replaced through the same project.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 23
5.1.2
STRUCTURES
As with all assets, bridges and structural culverts require regular maintenance activities such as
sweeping and pressure washing to clear winter sand buildup, painting, as well as debris removal to
ensure proper flow hydraulics to minimize erosion and scouring potential.
Renewal and rehabilitation activities of bridge and structural culverts are carried out in accordance with
the OSIM Inspections Forms, completed by or under the direction of a Professional Engineer on a
biennial basis. These activities are typically evaluated by the Professional Engineer at the time to ensure
the costs are economical.
Replacement activities are generally considered once maintenance, renewal and rehabilitation activities
are no longer feasible or economical to undertake. As can be seen in the Capital Asset Summary in
Appendix A, when replacement is considered, the replacement asset does not need to be identical to
the existing asset, such as replacing a single lane concrete bridge with a double lane structural culvert.
An increase in level of service should always be considered at the time of replacement.
5.1.3
BUILDINGS
As with all assets, buildings require regular maintenance activities such as cleaning, painting, repairs to
roofs, and HVAC systems to maintain proper functioning of the asset. Renewal and rehabilitation
activities of buildings should be carried out in accordance with the inspection recommendations.
The following maintenance practices should be employed on a regular basis to help prolong the lifespan
of structure assets.
-
Annual cleaning of drainage components (eaves trough, downspouts, etc.);
-
Painting of deteriorating wood surfaces (decks, siding, etc.);
-
Sealing of cracks in concrete surfaces;
Replacement activities are generally considered once maintenance, renewal and rehabilitation activities
are no longer feasible or economical to undertake. As can be seen in the Capital Asset Summary -
Appendix A, when replacement is considered, the replacement asset does not need to be identical to
the existing asset, such as replacing older windows and doors with new more energy efficient ones.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 24
5.1.4
FACILITIES
Facilities, like all other assets require regular maintenance activities such as trimming, cleaning and
landscaping to maintain proper functioning of the asset. Renewal and rehabilitation activities of
facilities should be carried out in accordance with the inspection recommendations.
The following maintenance practices should be employed annually to help prolong the lifespan of
structure assets.
-
Painting of deteriorating wood surfaces (decks, siding, docks, etc.);
-
Sealing of cracks in concrete surfaces;
Replacement activities are generally considered once maintenance, renewal and rehabilitation activities
are no longer feasible or economical to undertake. As can be seen in the Capital Asset Summary -
Appendix A, when replacement is considered, the replacement asset does not need to be identical to
the existing asset, such as replacing old docks with new docks that have greater longevity.
5.2
RISK ASSESSMENT
All assets carry a level of risk for the Municipality. The options above were not only evaluated based on
the lifecycle costs and benefits, but also on the potential risks. Due to the uncertainty in assigning a
reasonable estimate of probability and cost associated with a risk event, a qualitative approach was
applied to the management plan of the assets.
The scheduling of asset improvements took into consideration the risk associated with the volume of
use that the assets received. Acceptable levels of risk will vary depending on their frequency of use.
5.3
PROCUREMENT METHODS
The Municipality currently has procurement by-laws in place for use when considering various projects;
however, additional investigations and discussions could be undertaken to pool resources with
neighboring municipalities. The creation of an amalgamated tender would allow for a higher volume of
service by a supplier, which would reduce the overall cost per municipality. This approach would be
applicable to road resurfacing projects which are short duration and easily divisible by municipality.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 25
5.4
SCHEDULE OF PRIORITIES
This Asset Management Plan identifies the schedule of projects based on asset type for the next ten
years. Options were considered for each type of asset as outlined above, with the options being
evaluated for risk and lifecycle costs.
The following is a schedule of priorities by asset type as presented in the Capital Asset Summary found
in Appendix A.
5.4.1
ROADS
Year
Asset ID
Asset Name
2014
CAR - RD - 425
Pengally Bay Road No. 2
2015
CAR - RD - 175
Blind Bay Road
2016
CAR - RD - 475
Remy Bay Road
2017
CAR - RD - 575
Snug Harbour Road
2018
CAR - RD - 250
Dillon Road
** Note - The availability of funding will determine the extent of the reconstruction on these roads.
5.4.2
STRUCTURES
Year
Asset ID
Asset Name
2015
CAR - BR - 002
Dillon Road Bridge
5.4.3
BUILDINGS
Year
Asset ID
Asset Name
2015
CAR - BLD - 007
Old Municipal Complex
** Note - Old municipal complex is tentatively planned to be renovated and re-used as the new Fire
Hall.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 26
5.4.4
PARKS & FACILITIES
Year
Asset ID
Asset Name
2014
CAR - FAC - 001
Carling Rink
2014
CAR - FAC - 004
Pengally Bay Boat Launch/Docks
2015
CAR - FAC - 005
Blind Bay Boat Launch/Docks
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 27
6.0
FINANCING STRATEGY
Establishment of a financial plan is critical to the successful implementation of an asset management
plan. The following section summarizes the Municipal expenditures over the past three years and
details the financial commitment required in order to keep the Municipal infrastructure at acceptable
levels of service.
In conjunction with developing the Asset Management Plan, the replacement cost of all the
Municipality's assets was estimated. Replacement costs for linear assets were generated through use of
local competitive bid construction costs for projects of similar scope and size. Replacement costs for
non-linear assets such as buildings, bridges, and facilities were estimated using recent purchase prices
and construction costs for major components (buildings, and bridges).
The total replacement cost of the Municipality's assets was calculated to be approximately 35.0 million
dollars (2013 Dollars). A breakdown of the total replacement costs is provided in the schematic below.
Figure 13 - 2013 Asset Replacement Costs ($35.0M)
The Municipality is not required to budget for the full replacement value of all its assets, as portions of
assets only require an initial investment followed by further re-investment to maintain acceptable levels
of service.
$28,324,880.00
$1,590,650.00
$4,195,130.00
$903,000.00
Roads
Bridges
Buildings
Parks & Facilities
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 28
It was also calculated that the annual reinvestment should be an average of $ 0.66 million per year into
various assets as they reach their maximum potential useful lives, in order to sustain existing services at
an appropriate level of service.
The figure presented below provides a forecast of the required annual expenditures into Municipal
infrastructure for the 10-year period of 2014 through 2023.
Figure 14 - Municipal Assets - 10 Year Capital Expenditures
Over the past three years, the Municipality has invested approximately $ 5,203,257.28 into the renewal
and replacement of assets. The table presented below describes the budgets over the past three years
and details the source of the monies allocated to each.
Source
2010
2011
2012
Now
Future
Municipal
Funds
$ 46,323.00
$ 65,821.00
$ 129,421.00
$ 238,186.00
$ 47,535.00
Grants
$ 1,686,798.00
-
-
$ 41,687.00
$ 187,719.00
User Fee's
-
-
$ 166,071.00
Debentures
$ 1,250,000.00
$ 619,334.00
$ 1,239,490.67
$ 1,177,930.00
$ 424,746.00
TOTAL
$ 2,983,121.00
$ 685,153.61
$ 1,534,982.97
$ 1,457,803.00
$ 660,000.00
The following sections present a more detailed breakdown of the required reinvestment for each of the
asset groups included in this comprehensive asset management plan.
$-
$200,000.00
$400,000.00
$600,000.00
$800,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,200,000.00
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Scheduled Improvements
Expenditure Forecast (Excluding
Grants)
Expenditure Forecast (Including
Grants)
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 29
6.1
ROADS
Reinvestment in the municipality's roads is a required expenditure to maintain an acceptable average
condition rating for the entire road network. It was calculated that the Municipality should be
reinvesting an average of $ 570,000.00 per year to resurface and reconstruct road infrastructure.
The figure presented below provides a forecast of the required annual expenditures into roadway
infrastructure for the 10-year period of 2014 through 2023.
Figure 15 - Road Infrastructure - 10 Year Capital Expenditures
Over the past three years, the Municipality has invested approximately $ 3.82 million into capital
roadway projects. The table below details the source of all funds contributing to capital roadway
projects.
Source
2010
2011
2012
Now
Future
Municipal
Funds
-
$ 4,597.00
-
$ 94,504.00
$ 13,676.00
Grants
$ 1,686,798.00
-
$ 166,071.00
$ 41,687.00
$ 261,450.00
User Fee's
-
-
-
-
-
Debentures
$ 1,250,000.00
-
$ 708,824.00
$ 177,930.00
$ 294,874.00
TOTAL
$ 2,936,798.00
$ 4,597.00
$ 874,895.00
$ 314,121.00
$ 570,000.00
A commitment by the Municipality to contribute the required reinvestment into roadway projects will
ensure that the road network remains at the established level of service. Failure to make an annual
$-
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$500,000.00
$600,000.00
$700,000.00
$800,000.00
$900,000.00
$1,000,000.00
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Recommended Improvements
Expenditure Forecast (Excluding
Grants)
Expenditure Forecast (Including
Grants)
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 30
contribution will result in the road network quickly deteriorating below the acceptable level of service.
In the unlikely event that the Municipality contributed no funds towards roadway capital projects, it
would take only five years for the condition of the road network to deteriorate to an average condition
of less than 5.0 (poor). The table below shows the effect of contributing no effort to road rehabilitation.
LENGTH
(km)
2013 Weighted
Average Condition
2018 Weighted Average
Condition (No Improvements)
GRAVEL
26.2
6.4
3.9
0-49
11.7
6.9
4.4
50-199
14.5
6.0
3.5
L.C.B.
52.9
7.8
4.3
0-49
14.6
7.4
3.9
50-199
16.6
8.5
5
200-399
16.6
7.7
4.2
400-999
5.1
7.0
3.5
H.C.B.
9.5
9.0
7.75
0-49
0.6
5.2
3.95
50-199
0.1
7.0
5.75
200-399
2.9
9.7
8.45
400-999
2.1
9.0
7.75
1000+
3.8
9.0
7.75
Grand Total
88.6
7.5
4.55
6.2
STRUCTURES
Reinvestment in the municipality's bridges and culverts is a required expenditure to maintain their
structural integrity for the future. Through completion of the 2013 OSIM inspection, some minor
rehabilitation work on the Dillion Road Bridge was identified and is scheduled for completion during
2015. Currently there is no requirement to make a large capital investment into the municipal
structures, however some minor repairs are required.
The figure presented below provides a forecast of the required annual expenditures into bridge and
culvert infrastructure for the 10-year period of 2014 through 2023.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 31
Figure 16 - Bridge Infrastructure - 10 Year Capital Expenditures
Over the past three years, the Municipality has not invested into capital bridge and culvert projects. The
table below details the source and value of all funds for the next year.
Source
2010
2011
2012
Now
Future
Municipal
Funds
-
-
-
-
$ 1,200.00
Grants
-
-
-
-
-
User Fee's
-
-
-
-
-
Debentures
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
-
-
-
-
$ 1,200.00
-
Note: $ 1,200 is the 10-year average - work may be completed all at once thereby requiring a
larger one time expenditure.
$-
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,000.00
$8,000.00
$10,000.00
$12,000.00
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Recommended
Improvements
Expenditure Forecast
(Excluding Grants)
Expenditure Forecast
(Including Grants)
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 32
6.3
BUILDINGS
Reinvestment in the municipality's buildings is a required expenditure to maintain their structural
integrity for the future as well as ensure the comfort of their users. Building assets support services
such as recreation and culture, protection (fire) and also support many administrative functions that are
required to provide all services the Municipality provides. The Township's has plans to complete one
major building infrastructure project (Old Municipal Office Renovations) in the next ten years. This
project will involve a one-time expenditure of approximately $ 0.5 million dollars. Continuation of
regular maintenance and upkeep to the existing buildings is also required however this type of work is
not considered to be a capital expenditure.
The figure presented below provides a forecast of the required annual expenditures into municipal
buildings for the 10-year period of 2014 through 2023.
Figure 17 - Building Infrastructure - 10 Year Capital Expenditures
Over the past three years, the Municipality has invested approximately $ 1.31 million into new buildings,
major repairs and replacements of building components. The table below details the source and value
of all funds contributing to these capital projects.
$-
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$500,000.00
$600,000.00
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Recommended Improvements
Expenditure Forecast (Excluding
Grants)
Expenditure Forecast (Including
Grants)
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 33
Source
2010
2011
2012
Now
Future
Municipal
Funds
$ 46,323.00
$ 61,223.00
$ 52,459.00
$ 34,388.00
$ 4,312.00
Grants
-
-
-
-
-
User Fee's
-
-
-
-
-
Debentures
-
$ 619,333.61
$ 530,667.67
$ 1,000,000.00
$ 47,688.00
TOTAL
$ 46,323.00
$ 680,556.61
$ 583,125.67
$ 1,034,388.00
$ 52,000.00
A commitment by the Municipality to contribute the required reinvestment into existing buildings will
ensure that the infrastructure retains in structural integrity and can continue to serve its intended use.
6.4
FACILITIES
Reinvestment in the municipality's parks and facilities is a required expenditure to maintain appropriate
service levels for users. The Township's has plans to complete one major facility infrastructure project
(Carling Rink Roof) in the next ten years. This project will involve a one-time expenditure of
approximately $ 0.4 million dollars. Continuation of regular maintenance and upkeep to the existing
facilities is also required however this type of work is not considered to be a capital expenditure.
The figure presented below provides a forecast of the required annual expenditures into municipal
buildings for the 10-year period of 2014 through 2023.
Figure 18 -Park and Facility Infrastructure - 10 Year Capital Expenditures
$-
$50,000.00
$100,000.00
$150,000.00
$200,000.00
$250,000.00
$300,000.00
$350,000.00
$400,000.00
$450,000.00
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Recommended Improvements
Expenditure Forecast (Excluding
Grants)
Expenditure Forecast (Including
Grants)
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 34
Over the past three years, the Municipality has invested approximately $ 76,962.00 into new facilities,
upgrades, repairs and replacements of components. The table below details the source and value of all
funds contributing to these capital projects.
Source
2010
2011
2012
Now
Future
Municipal
Funds
-
-
$ 76,962.00
$ 109,294.00
$ 41,000.00
Grants
-
-
-
User Fee's
-
-
-
Debentures
-
-
-
TOTAL
-
-
$ 76,962.00
$ 109,294.00
$ 41,000.00
A commitment by the Municipality to contribute the required reinvestment into existing parks and
facilities will ensure that the existing infrastructure is kept in a satisfactory condition to adequately serve
its intended use. Failure to make an annual contribution will result in the condition of the parks
deteriorating below the acceptable standards whereby the users safety end enjoyment will be
jeopardized.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 35
7.0
CLOSURE
This comprehensive asset management plan will require on-going updates, and improvements to the
methodologies of data collection for developing more accurate inventory information. The ability for
the Municipality to leverage its knowledge of infrastructure and by applying the best Asset Management
practices at the time will result in very positive improvements in municipal infrastructure. This
document will also provide the means to effectively apply for external funding opportunities as they
may become available.
The municipality has significant backlog of projects, the implementation of this plan will require the
Municipality to find additional funds from various. Continued contribution of municipal funds, as well as
contributions from Government grants into capital projects will help ensure the sustainability of the
Municipality's infrastructure assets for years to come.
QUALIFICATIONS
This comprehensive asset management plan has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Township of
Carling by Tulloch Engineering Inc. This plan is intended to be a living document, updated on an annual
basis to project future costs and expenditures on a planning basis only. This plan is not intended to
establish annual budgets but rather act a guide to identify the priority projects. All cost projections
presented in this report must be verified through detailed cost estimation at time of consideration for
the works and subsequent budgeting.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SUPPORT
The Township of Carling acknowledges the financial support of the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food
and Rural Affairs in the preparation of this comprehensive asset management plan. The views
expressed in this plan are the views of the Township of Carling and do not necessarily reflect those of
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
Township of Carling
Asset Management Plan
P a g e | 36
8.0
DEFINITIONS
AMP - Asset Management Plan
AADT - Average Annual Daily Traffic Count
Expenditure Forecast - Average Annual Historic Expenditure projected over 10 years with inflation;
Guide - Ministry of Infrastructure - Building Together - Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans
HCB - High Class Bituminous Surface (Hot Mix Asphalt)
Historic Expenditure - Average of expenditures made over the past three years
LCB - Low Class Bituminous Surface (Surface Treatment)
OSIM - Ontario Structure Inspection Manual Bridge Inspections
APPENDIX A
2014
Reporting Year Start
2013
Benchmark Cost Reference Year
2%
Inflation Rate
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Roads
Scheduled Improvements
8,195,351.42
$
28,324,880.00
$
720,071.55
$
388,581.60
$
896,454.40
$
749,724.99
$
783,050.82
$
418,594.57
$
539,055.21
$
572,355.61
$
294,907.02
$
319,047.41
$
Bridges
Scheduled Improvements
600,000.00
$
1,590,650.00
$
11,000.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
Buildings
Scheduled Improvements
1,831,515.77
$
4,195,130.00
$
-
$
520,200.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
Parks & Facilities
Scheduled Improvements
11,238.00
$
903,000.00
$
397,500.00
$
15,606.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
TOTAL
10,638,105.19
$
35,013,660.00
$
Recommended Annual Improvement Expenditure
1,128,571.55
$
924,387.60
$
896,454.40
$
749,724.99
$
783,050.82
$
418,594.57
$
539,055.21
$
572,355.61
$
294,907.02
$
319,047.41
$
Asset Type
Task
Net Asset
Value (PSAB)
2013 Replacement
Value
Improvement Investment Forecast
$28,324,880.00
$1,590,650.00
$4,195,130.00
$903,000.00
Capital Asset Replacement Costs
Roads
Bridges
Buildings
Parks & Facilities
$8,195,351.42
$600,000.00
$1,831,515.77
$11,238.00 Capital Asset Present Value (PSAB)
Roads
Bridges
Buildings
Parks & Facilities
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Roads
308,550.00
$
314,721.00
$
321,015.42
$
327,435.73
$
333,984.44
$
340,664.13
$
347,477.41
$
354,426.96
$
361,515.50
$
368,745.81
$
376,120.73
$
Structures
1,200.00
$
1,224.00
$
1,248.48
$
1,273.45
$
1,298.92
$
1,324.90
$
1,351.39
$
1,378.42
$
1,405.99
$
1,434.11
$
1,462.79
$
Buildings
52,000.00
$
53,040.00
$
54,100.80
$
55,182.82
$
56,286.47
$
57,412.20
$
58,560.45
$
59,731.65
$
60,926.29
$
62,144.81
$
63,387.71
$
Parks & Facilities
41,000.00
$
41,820.00
$
42,656.40
$
43,509.53
$
44,379.72
$
45,267.31
$
46,172.66
$
47,096.11
$
48,038.03
$
48,998.80
$
49,978.77
$
Total Annual Investment (Excluding Grants)
402,750.00
$
410,805.00
$
419,021.10
$
427,401.52
$
435,949.55
$
444,668.54
$
453,561.91
$
462,633.15
$
471,885.82
$
481,323.53
$
490,950.00
$
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Roads
570,000.00
$
581,400.00
$
593,028.00
$
604,888.56
$
616,986.33
$
629,326.06
$
641,912.58
$
654,750.83
$
667,845.85
$
681,202.76
$
694,826.82
$
Structures
1,200.00
$
1,224.00
$
1,248.48
$
1,273.45
$
1,298.92
$
1,324.90
$
1,351.39
$
1,378.42
$
1,405.99
$
1,434.11
$
1,462.79
$
Buildings
52,000.00
$
53,040.00
$
54,100.80
$
55,182.82
$
56,286.47
$
57,412.20
$
58,560.45
$
59,731.65
$
60,926.29
$
62,144.81
$
63,387.71
$
Parks & Facilities
41,000.00
$
41,820.00
$
42,656.40
$
43,509.53
$
44,379.72
$
45,267.31
$
46,172.66
$
47,096.11
$
48,038.03
$
48,998.80
$
49,978.77
$
Total Annual Investment (including Grants)
664,200.00
$
677,484.00
$
691,033.68
$
704,854.35
$
718,951.44
$
733,330.47
$
747,997.08
$
762,957.02
$
778,216.16
$
793,780.48
$
809,656.09
$
Asset Type
Notes
2014 Investment
Including Grants
Financial Forecast Summary (Using 2014 Data)
Asset Type
Notes
2014 Investment
Excluding Grants
$-
$200,000.00
$400,000.00
$600,000.00
$800,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,200,000.00
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Municipal Assets
10-Year Capital Expenditures
Recommended Improvements
Expenditure Forecast
(Excluding Grants)
Expenditure Forecast
(Including Grants)
$-
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$500,000.00
$600,000.00
$700,000.00
$800,000.00
$900,000.00
$1,000,000.00
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Road Infrastructure
10-Year Capital Expenditures
Recommended Improvements
Expenditure Forecast
(Excluding Grants)
Expenditure Forecast
(Including Grants)
$-
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,000.00
$8,000.00
$10,000.00
$12,000.00
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Bridge Infrastructure
10-Year Capital Expenditures
Recommended Improvements
Expenditure Forecast
(Excluding Grants)
Expenditure Forecast
(Including Grants)
$-
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
$300,000.00
$400,000.00
$500,000.00
$600,000.00
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Building Infrastructure
10-Year Capital Expenditures
Recommended Improvements
Expenditure Forecast (Excluding
Grants)
Expenditure Forecast (Including
Grants)
$-
$50,000.00
$100,000.00
$150,000.00
$200,000.00
$250,000.00
$300,000.00
$350,000.00
$400,000.00
$450,000.00
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Expenditure Value
Year of Expenditure
Parks and Facilities
10-Year Capital Expenditures
Recommended Improvements
Expenditure Forecast (Excluding
Grants)
Expenditure Forecast (Including
Grants)
2014
Reporting Year Start
2013
Benchmark Cost Reference Year
0%
Inflation Rate
ASSET ID
MUNICIPAL ID
ASSET NAME
MAJOR CLASS
CONSTUCTED
YEAR
IMPROVMENT
YEAR
DATE REVIEWED
(M-Y)
CONDITION
EXPECTED
USEFUL LIFE (YEARS)
KNOWN
IMPROVEMENTS
KNOWN
COSTS
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
UNIT RATE
UNITS
REPLACEMENT
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
CAR - BR - 001
-
Dillon Road Bridge
Bridge
1989
2014
-
GOOD
75
2014
11,000.00
$
EXC
EXC
EXC
EXC
EXC
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
L.S
445,700.00
$
11,000.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
CAR - BR - 002
-
Nobel Road Bridge
Bridge
2011
2011
-
EXC
75
-
$
EXC
EXC
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
L.S
1,144,950.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
TOTAL 2013 Replacement Cost
1,590,650.00
$
Annual Improvement Investment
11,000.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
DEPRECIATING CONDITION (WITH IMPROVMENTS)
2013 COSTS
NEEDS
ASSET NAME & NUMBER
ASSET CLASS
ACQUISITION
CONDITION ASSESSMENT
2014
Reporting Year Start
2013
Benchmark Cost Reference Year
2%
Inflation Rate
ASSET ID
MUNICIPAL ID
ASSET NAME
CONSTUCTED
YEAR
IMPROVMENT
YEAR
2013
CONDITION
EXPECTED
USEFUL LIFE (YEARS)
KNOWN
IMPROVEMENTS
KNOWN
COSTS
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
UNIT
RATE
UNITS
REPLACEMENT
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
CAR - BLD - 001
-
Municipal Office
2012
2012
EXC
75
EXC
EXC
EXC
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
734,675.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
CAR - BLD - 002
-
Public Works Garage
2013
2013
EXC
75
EXC
EXC
EXC
EXC
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
1,009,945.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
CAR - BLD - 003
-
Fabric Salt Dome
2010
2010
EXC
75
EXC
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
105,000.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
CAR - BLD - 004
-
Sand Storage Building
1990
1990
GOOD
75
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
225,000.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
CAR - BLD - 005
-
Fire Hall
1996
1996
FAIR
75
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
557,185.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
CAR - BLD - 006
-
Recreation Hall
1982
1982
GOOD
75
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
FAIR
FAIR
FAIR
FAIR
878,680.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
CAR - BLD - 007
-
Old Municipal Office/Garage
1981
2015
FAIR
75
2015
500,000.00
$
EXC
EXC
EXC
EXC
EXC
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
684,645.00
$
-
$
520,200.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
TOTAL 2013 Replacement Cost
4,195,130.00
$
Annual Improvement Investment
-
$
520,200.00
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
DEPRECIATING CONDITION (WITH IMPROVMENTS)
2013 COSTS
NEEDS
ASSET NAME & NUMBER
ACQUISITION
CONDITION ASSESSMENT
2022
2023
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
Next Year/Type/Road
KM
Last Year
Prior Yr-
InComplete
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Year 11
Year 12 Year 13
2020
GRAVEL
Fred Dubie Rd
1.0
2010
$32,987
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $37,521
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Fred Dubie Rd (E - Fork)
0.3
2010
$9,055
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,867
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Fred Dubie Rd (W - Fork)
0.4
2010
$12,289
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9,319
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2021
GRAVEL
Carling Station Rd
1.6
0
$0
$38,808
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$47,595
$0
$0
Ritchie Dr.
0.7
2015
$0
$47,569
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$30,077
$0
$0
H.C.B.
Dillon Road
9.5
2013
$0 $3,515,550
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2022
L.C.B.
Blairs Landing Road
2.5
2014
$0
$0 $206,591
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $66,117
$0
$0
$0
$0
Brooks Landing Road
0.9
2013
$0
$0
$14,444
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$59,442
$0
$0
$0
Harrison Landing Road
0.5
2015
$0
$0
$36,902
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $11,901
$0
$0
$0
$0
Mill Road
0.6
2012
$0
$0
$12,839
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$53,205
$0
$0
$0
Sawdust Bay Rd. N.
0.5
2014
$0
$0
$11,127
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$46,111
$0
$0
$0
Sawdust Bay Rd. S
0.3
2014
$0
$0
$6,420
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$26,603
$0
$0
$0
2023
GRAVEL
Beech Avenue
0.6
2008
$0
$0
$0
$16,121
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Donna Dr.
0.3
2013
$0
$0
$0
$7,556
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Richmonds Rd.
0.5
2013
$0
$0
$0
$13,992
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $17,160
L.C.B.
Christie Road
0.4
2016
$0
$0
$0
$30,877
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9,951
$0
$0
$0
Deep Bay Dr.
0.2
2010
$0
$0
$0
$3,271
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$13,460
$0
$0
Dent Bay Rd
0.2
2010
$0
$0
$0
$2,907
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,965
$0
$0
Indian Grove
0.4
2016
$0
$0
$0
$28,501
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9,121
$0
$0
$0
Iroquois Dr.
0.2
2016
$0
$0
$0
$12,955
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,146
$0
$0
$0
Islandview Dr.
0.6
2016
$0
$0
$0
$39,409
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,612
$0
$0
$0
Littles Lane
0.8
2016
$0
$0
$0
$61,753
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$19,901
$0
$0
$0
Matthew Bay Dr.
0.1
2016
$0
$0
$0
$6,866
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,197
$0
$0
$0
Old Carling Road
0.3
2016
$0
$0
$0
$17,489
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,597
$0
$0
$0
Parkway Dr.
0.2
2010
$0
$0
$0
$3,053
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,563
$0
$0
Pine Valley Dr.
0.4
2016
$0
$0
$0
$24,355
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,795
$0
$0
$0
Ramsay Rd. N.
0.5
2016
$0
$0
$0
$34,398
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,438
$0
$0
$0
Ramsay Road S.
0.4
2016
$0
$0
$0
$26,367
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9,453
$0
$0
$0
Ridgeway Dr
1.1
2016
$0
$0
$0
$87,057
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$27,862
$0
$0
$0
Rockcliffe Dr. North
0.8
2016
$0
$0
$0
$48,080
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$15,486
$0
$0
$0
Rockcliffe Dr. South
0.6
2016
$0
$0
$0
$43,113
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$13,898
$0
$0
$0
2024
L.C.B.
1
Carling - 15 Year Capital Roads Plan
Updated 2022
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Alves Road
1.6
2017
$0
$0
$0
$0 $137,290
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$43,938
$0
$0
Beacon Point Dr.
1.2
2017
$0
$0
$0
$0 $112,736
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$36,080
$0
$0
Philip Dr.
0.1
2010
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,741
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,213
$0
Woods Rd.
2.9
2012
$0
$0
$0
$0 $496,539
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$78,265
$0
$0
2025
GRAVEL
Lagoon Rd.
0.3
2015
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,971
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Remy Bay Rd.
3.3
2015
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $736,651
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
L.C.B.
Conservation Dr.
2.7
2016
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $236,079
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $75,555
$0
Corduroy Bay Rd
0.2
2016
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$16,031
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,166
$0
Grand Total
39.6
2017
$54,331 $3,601,927 $288,324 $508,118 $748,306 $996,732
$0 $53,707
$0 $78,018 $335,817 $273,943 $87,933 $17,160
2
Carling - 15 Year Capital Roads Plan
Updated 2022
APPENDIX B
CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CARLING
2021
COST
ACCUMULATED AMORTIZATION
Jan 1/2021
DEC 31/2021
OPENING NBV
OPENING
DISPOSALS
CLOSING
OPENING
AMORTIZATION
DISPOSALS
Closing
CLOSING NBV
TCA
DEPARTMENT
Year In Service
Disposition Yr
LIFE SPAN
BALANCE
BALANCE
QTY
ACQUISITIONS
& W/O'S
BALANCE
BALANCE
& W/O'S
Balance
BALANCE
Land
Admin
$38,353.00
38,353.00
-
-
38,353.00
-
-
-
-
38,353.00
7 West Carling Bay Rd
Konoval Property
2019
$200,604.11
200,604.11
-
200,604.11
-
-
-
-
200,604.11
Woods Property
2015
$303,620.50
303,620.50
-
-
303,620.50
-
-
-
-
303,620.50
Docks
$6.00
6.00
-
-
6.00
-
-
-
-
6.00
Recreation/Parks
319 Highway 559/old rec hall land
2019
$0.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Recreation/Parks
$11,238.68
11,238.68
-
-
11,238.68
-
-
-
-
11,238.68
Snug Harbour Lighthouse
2018
$179,550.00
179,550.00
-
-
179,550.00
-
-
-
-
179,550.00
Parry Sound Dr. Property
50% o
2018
$216,761.75
216,761.75
-
-
216,761.75
-
-
-
-
216,761.75
PW
$34,429.00
34,429.00
-
-
34,429.00
-
-
-
-
34,429.00
Land Total:
$984,563.04
984,563.04
-
-
984,563.04
-
-
-
-
984,563.04
Land Improveme Admin
Paved Parking Lot
2013
25.00
$12,294.96
17,564.32
-
-
17,564.32
5,269.36
702.57
-
5,971.94
11,592.38
Admin Total
$12,294.96
17,564.32
-
-
17,564.32
5,269.36
702.57
-
5,971.94
11,592.38
Cemetery
Land Improvements
2012
20.00
$12,610.31
21,930.80
-
-
21,930.80
9,320.49
1,096.54
-
10,417.03
11,513.77
Cemetery Total
$12,610.31
21,930.80
-
-
21,930.80
9,320.49
1,096.54
-
10,417.03
11,513.77
Landfill
Landfill Mining - Killbear
2014
25.00
$33,133.05
44,774.40
-
44,774.40
11,641.35
1,790.98
-
13,432.33
31,342.07
Recreation/Parks
Land Improvements -Ballfield
2017
20.00
$87,098.84
105,574.35
-
-
105,574.35
18,475.51
5,278.72
-
23,754.23
81,820.12
Recreation/Parks
Land Improvements -Ballfield Fencing
2017
15.00
$17,216.02
22,455.68
-
-
22,455.68
5,239.66
1,497.05
-
6,736.70
15,718.98
Recreation/Parks
Land Improvements -Ballfield Lighting
2018
15.00
$136,240.08
163,015.58
-
163,015.58
26,775.49
10,867.71
-
37,643.20
125,372.38
Recreation/Parks
Access Points Parking Lots
2014
15.00
$16,363.89
28,877.44
-
-
28,877.44
12,513.55
1,925.16
-
14,438.72
14,438.72
Recreation/Parks
Community Centre Parking Lot
2019
25.00
$370,016.49
393,634.56
-
393,634.56
23,618.07
15,745.38
-
39,363.46
354,271.10
Land Improvement Total:
$684,973.63
$797,827.13
-
-
797,827.13
$112,853.49
38,904.10
-
151,757.60
646,069.53
Buildings (Structures)
PW
Steel Storage Building
2000
50.00
$5,624.24
9,532.75
1.00
-
-
9,532.75
3,908.51
190.66
-
4,099.16
5,433.59
PW
Sand/Salt Shed
2008
50.00
$182,762.46
243,430.00
1.00
-
-
243,430.00
60,667.54
4,868.60
-
65,536.14
177,893.86
PW
Fabric Dome
2010
50.00
$32,843.44
41,573.98
1.00
-
-
41,573.98
8,730.54
831.48
-
9,562.02
32,011.96
PW
New PW Building
2013
50.00
$856,539.79
1,007,693.88
1.00
-
-
1,007,693.88
151,154.09
20,153.88
-
171,307.97
836,385.91
Total Public Works Buildings
$1,077,769.93
1,302,230.61
-
-
1,302,230.61
224,460.67
26,044.61
-
250,505.28
1,051,725.33
Admin
Municipal Office
2012
50.00
$1,066,772.15
1,354,712.39
1.00
-
-
1,354,712.39
287,940.24
27,094.25
-
315,034.49
1,039,677.90
Admin
Electronic Sign
2018
25.00
$47,995.43
53,328.26
1.00
-
53,328.26
5,332.83
2,133.13
-
7,465.96
45,862.30
Admin Total
$1,114,767.58
1,408,040.65
-
-
1,408,040.65
293,273.07
29,227.38
-
322,500.44
1,085,540.21
Fire
Fire Hall
1986
50.00
$24,540.93
71,159.47
1.00
-
-
71,159.47
46,618.54
1,423.19
-
48,041.73
23,117.74
Fire Total
$24,540.93
71,159.47
-
-
71,159.47
46,618.54
1,423.19
-
48,041.73
23,117.74
Recreation/Parks
Roof Over the Rink
2017
25.00
$305,420.93
$355,140.61
1.00
-
-
355,140.61
49,719.69
14,205.62
-
63,925.31
291,215.30
Recreation/Parks
Roof Over the Rink/End Walls
2018
25.00
$0.00
$0.00
1.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Recreation/Parks
New Community Centre
2019
50.00
$2,049,315.55
$2,112,696.45
1.00
-
-
2,112,696.45
63,380.89
42,253.93
-
105,634.82
2,007,061.62
Snow Breaks
2020
25.00
$42,979.33
$43,856.46
-
-
43,856.46
877.13
1,754.26
-
2,631.39
41,225.07
Recreation/Parks Total
$2,397,715.81
$2,511,693.52
-
2,511,693.52
113,977.71
58,213.81
-
172,191.52
2,339,502.00
Building Total:
$4,614,794.26
5,293,124.25
-
-
5,293,124.25
678,329.98
114,908.99
-
793,238.97
4,499,885.27
Vehicles
Fire
Heavy Duty Tanker (1997)
2016
3.00
$0.00
10,176.00
10,176.00
10,176.00
-
-
10,176.00
-
Fire
Mini Pumper (2015)
2016
10.00
$128,166.72
233,030.40
233,030.40
104,863.68
23,303.04
-
128,166.72
104,863.68
Fire
Heavy Duty International Pumper
2006
25.00
$103,919.76
247,428.00
1.00
-
-
247,428.00
143,508.24
9,897.12
-
153,405.36
94,022.64
Fire
Light Duty Ford F250
2008
10.00
$0.00
30,827.36
1.00
-
-
30,827.36
30,827.36
-
-
30,827.36
-
Total Fire Vehicles
$232,086.48
521,461.76
-
-
521,461.76
289,375.28
33,200.16
-
322,575.44
198,886.32
PW
2019 Freightliner Tandem Truck
2018
10.00
$177,340.80
236,454.40
1.00
-
236,454.40
59,113.60
23,645.44
-
82,759.04
153,695.36
PW
Heavy Duty 2012 WS Tandem
2012
10.00
$28,559.51
190,396.78
1.00
-
-
190,396.78
161,837.27
19,039.68
-
180,876.95
9,519.83
PW
Heavy Duty Sterling Tandem
10.00
$0.00
173,113.45
1.00
-
-
173,113.45
173,113.45
-
-
173,113.45
-
PW
Heavy Duty Sterling Tandem
2008
10.00
$0.00
-
1.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PW
Heavy Duty Ford Louisville
2018
10.00
$0.00
-
1.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PW
Heavy Duty Ford F550
2009
2019
10.00
$0.00
-
1.00
-
-
-
0.00
-
-
0.00
-
0.00
PW
Med Duty 2012 Chev 4x4
2012
10.00
$9,593.91
63,959.34
1.00
-
-
63,959.34
54,365.43
6,395.93
-
60,761.36
3,197.98
PW
Chev Equinox
2017
10.00
$15,563.10
23,943.22
1.00
-
-
23,943.22
8,380.13
2,394.32
-
10,774.45
13,168.77
PW
2019 Ford F-550
2019
10.00
$76,856.85
90,419.82
1.00
-
-
90,419.82
13,562.97
9,041.98
-
22,604.96
67,814.87
2020 Ram Half Ton Truck
2020
10.00
$38,226.51
40,238.43
1.00
-
-
40,238.43
2,011.92
4,023.84
-
6,035.76
34,202.67
Total PW Vehicles
$346,140.68
818,525.44
-
-
818,525.44
472,384.77
64,541.20
-
536,925.97
281,599.48
Vehicle Total:
$578,227.16
1,339,987.20
-
-
1,339,987.20
761,760.05
97,741.36
-
859,501.41
480,485.80
Machinery & Equipment
PW PW
Fuel Tanks
2004
15.00
$0.00
22,984.57
1.00
-
-
22,984.57
22,984.57
-
-
22,984.57
-
PW
JD Riding Mower
2008
10.00
$0.00
12,729.50
1.00
-
-
12,729.50
12,729.50
-
-
12,729.50
-
PW
JD Tractor
2003
25.00
$0.00
-
1.00
-
-
-
0.00
-
-
-
0.00
-
0.00
PW
Marten Tandem Axle Trailer
1992
25.00
$0.00
13,542.02
1.00
-
-
13,542.02
13,542.02
-
-
13,542.02
-
PW
Steam Jenny
10.00
$0.00
7,793.35
1.00
-
-
7,793.35
7,793.35
-
-
7,793.35
-
PW
Aluminum Gravel Kat
2009
15.00
$2,961.00
12,690.00
1.00
-
-
12,690.00
9,729.00
846.00
-
10,575.00
2,115.00
PW
Boss XT Plow
2009
15.00
$1,877.40
8,046.00
1.00
-
-
8,046.00
6,168.60
536.40
-
6,705.00
1,341.00
PW
Heavy Duty Case Backhoe
2011
25.00
$71,290.48
114,984.73
1.00
-
-
114,984.73
43,694.25
4,599.39
-
48,293.64
66,691.09
PW
Fuel Distribution System
2014
15.00
$9,059.51
15,987.35
1.00
-
-
15,987.35
6,927.85
1,065.82
-
7,993.67
7,993.68
PW
Kubota Tractor
2014
15.00
$22,791.12
40,219.62
1.00
-
-
40,219.62
17,428.50
2,681.31
-
20,109.81
20,109.81
PW
Yamaha 60 Outboard Motor
2015
10.00
$3,835.08
8,522.40
1.00
-
-
8,522.40
4,687.32
852.24
-
5,539.56
2,982.84
PW
1999 Champion Grader
2018
10.00
$30,528.00
40,704.00
1.00
-
-
40,704.00
10,176.00
4,070.40
-
14,246.40
26,457.60
PW
Storage Container
2020
10.00
$8,434.63
8,878.56
1.00
-
-
8,878.56
443.93
887.86
-
1,331.79
7,546.77
PW Machinery & Equip Total
$150,777.22
307,082.10
-
-
307,082.10
156,304.88
15,539.42
-
171,844.30
135,237.80
Fire Fire
Pulsecraft Boat & Mercury Motor
2009
25.00
$23,507.28
43,532.00
1.00
-
-
43,532.00
20,024.72
1,741.28
-
21,766.00
21,766.00
Fire
Bearcat 550 Snowmobile
10.00
$0.00
10,044.40
1.00
-
-
10,044.40
10,044.40
-
-
10,044.40
-
Fire
Arctic Cat ATV
10.00
$0.00
7,561.33
1.00
-
-
7,561.33
7,561.33
-
-
7,561.33
-
Fire
Kemp Boat & Yamaha
2011
25.00
$57,175.76
92,218.98
1.00
-
-
92,218.98
35,043.22
3,688.76
-
38,731.98
53,487.00
Fire
Excalber Trailer 876000T
2011
10.00
$190.80
3,816.00
1.00
-
-
3,816.00
3,625.20
190.80
-
3,816.00
-
Fire
Excaliber Trailer T616LS7
2011
10.00
$180.57
3,612.48
1.00
-
-
3,612.48
3,431.91
180.57
-
3,612.48
-
Fire
2012 Polar 75 Rescue Boat
2012
10.00
$801.36
5,342.40
1.00
-
-
5,342.40
4,541.04
534.24
-
5,075.28
267.12
Fire
Equipment & Supplies
2009
12.00
$2,992.97
133,686.48
1.00
-
-
133,686.48
130,693.51
2,992.97
-
133,686.48
-
Fire
Bunker Gear
2003
12.00
$0.00
28,215.19
-
-
28,215.19
28,215.19
-
-
28,215.19
-
Fire
Bunker Gear
2011
12.00
$1,637.70
7,860.96
-
-
7,860.96
6,223.26
655.08
-
6,878.34
982.62
Fire
Breathing Apparatus
2003
12.00
$0.00
37,301.78
-
-
37,301.78
37,301.78
-
-
37,301.78
-
Fire
Fire Hose & Appurtenances
2003
12.00
$0.00
35,141.05
-
-
35,141.05
35,141.05
-
-
35,141.05
-
Fire
VSK Struts (Extracation Tools)
2014
12.00
$1,865.60
4,070.40
-
4,070.40
2,204.80
339.20
-
2,544.00
1,526.40
Fire
ERT Suits
2012
12.00
$1,254.78
4,302.16
-
-
4,302.16
3,047.39
358.51
-
3,405.90
896.26
Fire
Bunker Gear
2013
12.00
$3,402.36
9,694.81
-
-
9,694.81
6,292.45
807.90
-
7,100.36
2,594.46
Fire
Argo
2019
25.00
$41,388.06
44,029.85
1.00
-
44,029.85
2,641.79
1,761.19
-
4,402.99
39,626.87
Fire
Enclosed Trailer
2019
10.00
$10,417.57
12,255.97
1.00
-
12,255.97
1,838.40
1,225.60
-
3,063.99
9,191.98
Fire
Portable Pump
2019
12.00
$11,352.60
12,974.40
1.00
-
12,974.40
1,621.80
1,081.20
-
2,703.00
10,271.40
Fire
Generator
2019
12.00
$36,417.36
41,619.84
1.00
41,619.84
5,202.48
3,468.32
-
8,670.80
32,949.04
Fire
Water Reservoir
2019
12.00
$26,947.95
30,797.66
1.00
30,797.66
3,849.71
2,566.47
-
6,416.18
24,381.48
Fire
Gated WYE and accessories
2019
12.00
$4,192.80
4,791.77
-
4,791.77
598.97
399.31
-
998.29
3,793.48
Fire
Yamaha Boat Motor for Marine 1
2020
25.00
$20,797.61
21,222.05
1.00
-
-
21,222.05
424.44
848.88
-
1,273.32
19,948.73
Fire
Turnout Gear
2020
12.00
$7,438.57
7,761.99
-
-
7,761.99
323.42
646.83
-
970.25
6,791.74
Fire
PPV Fan
2020
12.00
$4,742.20
4,948.38
1.00
-
-
4,948.38
206.18
412.37
-
618.55
4,329.84
Fire
Storage Container
2020
10.00
$8,434.65
8,878.56
1.00
-
-
8,878.56
443.93
887.86
-
1,331.79
7,546.77
Fire
Rope Rescue Equipment
2021
10.00
$0.00
-
13,162.40
-
13,162.40
-
658.12
-
658.12
12,504.28
Fire Total
$265,138.56
615,680.89
-
-
615,680.89
350,542.36
25,445.47
-
375,987.83
252,855.46
LandLandfill
Bear-proof bins
2000
15.00
-
70,384.68
2.00
-
-
70,384.68
70,384.68
-
-
70,384.68
-
Landfill
Compaction Bins (Carling Garbage)
2021
15.00
-
-
4.00
95,886.52
-
95,886.52
3,196.22
-
3,196.22
92,690.30
Landfill
Compaction Bins
2010
15.00
54,044
180,145.73
2.00
-
180,145.73
126,102.04
12,009.72
-
138,111.75
42,033.98
Landfill Total
$54,043.69
250,530.41
95,886.52
-
346,416.93
196,486.72
15,205.93
-
211,692.65
134,724.28
Faci Recreation/Parks
KEMP boat & fixtures
2010
25.00
$9,589.69
16,564.99
1.00
-
-
16,564.99
6,975.30
662.60
-
7,637.90
8,927.09
Recreation/Parks
Equipment & Supplies
2006
10.00
$0.00
17,120.14
-
-
17,120.14
17,120.14
-
-
17,120.14
-
Recreation/Parks
New Tables
2012
10.00
$1,265.03
8,433.87
24.00
-
-
8,433.87
7,168.84
843.39
-
8,012.22
421.65
Recreation/Parks
Playground Equipment
2009
15.00
$6,223.13
26,670.98
1.00
-
-
26,670.98
20,447.85
1,778.07
-
22,225.91
4,445.07
Recreation/Parks
Playground Retaining Wall
2009
20.00
$2,082.50
4,900.00
1.00
-
-
4,900.00
2,817.50
245.00
-
3,062.50
1,837.50
Recreation/Parks
Ramps
2012
20.00
$21,356.88
37,142.40
1.00
-
-
37,142.40
15,785.52
1,857.12
-
17,642.64
19,499.76
Recreation/Parks
Netting & Bleachers
2013
15.00
$2,519.06
5,038.14
-
-
5,038.14
2,519.08
335.88
-
2,854.96
2,183.18
Recreation/Parks
Docks & Ramp Replacements
2014
20.00
$144,652.85
219,544.96
-
-
219,544.96
74,892.11
10,977.25
-
85,869.36
133,675.60
Recreation/Parks
Kitchen
2019
15.00
$111,943.15
124,381.28
-
-
124,381.28
12,438.13
8,292.09
-
20,730.21
103,651.07
Recreation/Parks
Audio & Video Equipment
2019
10.00
$41,933.26
49,333.25
-
-
49,333.25
7,399.99
4,933.33
-
12,333.31
36,999.94
Recreation/Parks
Ice Resurfacer
2013
15.00
$4,259.43
8,318.88
1.00
-
-
8,318.88
4,059.45
554.59
-
4,614.04
3,704.84
Storage Container
2020
10.00
$4,217.32
4,439.28
1.00
-
-
4,439.28
221.96
443.93
-
665.89
3,773.39
Launch Ramps
2020
20.00
$16,469.86
16,892.16
-
-
16,892.16
422.30
844.61
-
1,266.91
15,625.25
Snug Harbour Dock and Sign
2021
20.00
1.00
27,732.14
-
27,732.14
693.30
-
693.30
27,038.84
Fac Parks & Rec Total
$366,512.15
538,780.33
27,732.14
-
566,512.47
172,268.16
32,461.14
-
204,729.29
361,783.18
Storage Container
2020
10.00
$4,217.32
4,439.28
1.00
-
4,439.28
221.96
443.93
-
665.89
3,773.39
Admin Total
$4,217.32
4,439.28
-
-
4,439.28
221.96
443.93
-
665.89
3,773.39
Cemetery
Carling cemetery
Aerator
2019
10.00
$3,546.33
4,172.16
1.00
-
4,172.16
625.82
417.22
-
1,043.04
3,129.12
Cemetery Total
$3,546.33
4,172.16
-
4,172.16
625.82
417.22
1,043.04
3,129.12
Machinery & Equipment Total:
$844,235.27
$1,720,685.17
136,781.06
-
1,857,466.23
876,449.90
89,513.10
-
965,962.99
891,503.24
Furniture
Fire
Office Equipment
2006
20.00
$489.64
1,720.20
-
-
1,720.20
1,230.56
86.01
-
1,316.57
403.63
Fire
Storage Bins
2009
15.00
$1,403.34
6,240.00
-
-
6,240.00
4,836.66
416.00
-
5,252.66
987.34
Fire
Radios
2012
10.00
$694.23
4,628.49
-
-
4,628.49
3,934.26
462.85
-
4,397.10
231.39
Fire Total
$2,587.21
12,588.69
-
-
12,588.69
10,001.48
964.86
-
10,966.33
1,622.36
PW
Radios
2005
10.00
$0.00
10,400.00
13.00
-
-
10,400.00
10,400.00
-
-
10,400.00
-
PW
Desk
2007
20.00
$398.59
1,226.41
1.00
-
-
1,226.41
827.82
61.32
-
889.14
337.27
PW
Chairs
2006
20.00
$116.29
423.34
2.00
-
-
423.34
307.05
21.17
-
328.21
95.13
PW
Filing Cabinet
2006
20.00
$74.99
273.01
1.00
-
-
273.01
198.02
13.65
-
211.67
61.34
PW Total
$589.87
12,322.76
-
-
12,322.76
11,732.89
96.14
-
11,829.03
493.73
Admin
Council Chairs
2007
20.00
$522.93
1,609.13
-
-
1,609.13
1,086.19
80.46
-
1,166.65
442.48
Admin
Air Conditioner
2001
20.00
$97.14
5,830.84
1.00
-
-
5,830.84
5,733.70
97.14
-
5,830.84
-
Admin
Filing Cabinets
2007
20.00
$488.77
1,610.24
-
-
1,610.24
1,121.47
80.51
-
1,201.98
408.26
Admin
Desks
2007
20.00
$1,339.87
3,865.76
3.00
-
-
3,865.76
2,525.89
193.29
-
2,719.18
1,146.58
Admin
Water Filtration System
2012
10.00
$1,919.66
12,798.06
1.00
-
-
12,798.06
10,878.40
1,279.81
-
12,158.21
639.85
Admin
New Office Furniture
2012
20.00
$16,198.53
28,171.33
-
-
28,171.33
11,972.79
1,408.57
-
13,381.36
14,789.97
Admin
Property Tax Filing Cabinets
2018
20.00
$13,077.12
14,945.28
-
14,945.28
1,868.16
747.26
-
2,615.42
12,329.86
Admin Total
$33,644.03
68,830.64
-
-
68,830.64
35,186.61
3,887.03
-
39,073.64
29,757.00
Recreation
Cabinets
2019
20.00
$16,897.85
18,267.95
-
18,267.95
1,370.10
913.40
-
2,283.49
15,984.46
Recreation
Tableware
2019
10.00
$10,911.87
12,837.49
-
12,837.49
1,925.62
1,283.75
-
3,209.37
9,628.12
Recreation
Table
2019
20.00
$12,123.69
13,106.69
-
13,106.69
983.00
655.33
-
1,638.34
11,468.35
Recreation
Chairs
2019
20.00
$10,764.31
11,637.10
-
11,637.10
872.78
581.86
-
1,454.64
10,182.46
Recreation
Blinds
2019
20.00
$5,411.18
5,849.93
-
5,849.93
438.74
292.50
-
731.24
5,118.69
Recreation
Stage
2019
20.00
$7,747.73
8,375.93
-
8,375.93
628.19
418.80
-
1,046.99
7,328.94
Rec Total
$63,856.64
70,075.09
-
-
70,075.09
6,218.44
4,145.63
-
10,364.07
59,711.02
Furniture
$100,677.75
163,817.18
-
-
163,817.18
63,236.55
9,093.66
-
72,233.07
91,584.11
Computers
Admin
Base Radio
2007
10.00
$0.00
4,000.00
1.00
-
-
4,000.00
4,000.00
-
-
4,000.00
-
Admin
Server
2011
5.00
$0.00
5,888.75
1.00
-
-
5,888.75
5,888.75
-
-
5,888.75
-
Admin
Virtual Server
2016
5.00
$1,529.23
15,292.27
1.00
-
15,292.27
13,763.04
1,529.23
-
15,292.27
-
Admin
Asyst Software
2007
10.00
$0.00
24,129.90
1.00
-
-
24,129.90
24,129.90
-
-
24,129.90
-
Admin
Computers
2010
5.00
$0.00
38,479.74
8.00
-
-
38,479.74
38,479.74
-
-
38,479.74
-
Admin
Acrobat Software
2005
10.00
$0.00
1,026.00
1.00
-
-
1,026.00
1,026.00
-
-
1,026.00
-
Admin
Telephone System
2012
10.00
$6,152.18
41,020.52
1.00
-
41,020.52
34,868.34
4,102.05
-
38,970.39
2,050.13
Admin
Microsoft Office 2007
2008
10.00
$0.00
4,968.00
1.00
-
-
4,968.00
4,968.00
-
-
4,968.00
-
Admin
New Website
2014
5.00
$0.00
9,712.64
1.00
-
-
9,712.64
9,712.64
-
-
9,712.64
-
Admin
Old Canon Copier/Printer
2012
10.00
$0.80
1.00
1.00
-
1.00
0.20
0.10
-
0.30
0.70
Admin
Computers
2014
5.00
$0.00
2,579.90
2.00
-
2,579.90
2,579.90
-
-
2,579.90
-
Admin
Computers
2014
5.00
$0.00
1,772.54
2.00
-
1,772.54
1,772.54
-
-
1,772.54
-
Admin
New Copier/Printer
2018
5.00
$5,482.32
10,964.64
1.00
-
10,964.64
5,482.32
2,192.93
-
7,675.25
3,289.39
Admin
Land Manager Software
2018
10.00
$17,981.67
23,432.84
1.00
-
23,432.84
5,451.17
2,343.28
-
7,794.45
15,638.39
Admin
2019 Website - Stradea
2019
5.00
$15,625.66
20,671.54
1.00
-
-
20,671.54
5,045.88
4,134.31
-
9,180.19
11,491.35
Imaging Project for Property Files
2019
10.00
$32,231.45
37,919.36
1.00
-
37,919.36
5,687.90
3,791.94
9,479.84
28,439.52
Admin Total
$79,003.32
241,859.64
-
-
241,859.64
162,856.33
18,093.84
-
180,950.16
60,909.48
Computers Total:
$79,003.32
241,859.64
-
-
241,859.64
162,856.33
18,093.84
-
180,950.16
60,909.48
Linear Assets
PW
Culverts
$149,057.18
274,063.38
-
-
274,063.38
125,006.21
5,280.24
-
130,286.45
143,776.93
PW
Roads
$5,190,186.92
10,716,087.64
327,304.46
11,043,392.10
5,525,900.72
164,226.05
-
5,690,126.77
5,353,265.33
PW
Amortization Adjustment
-
-
-
PW
Opening Balance Adjustment
-
-
PW
Current Year adjustments
-
-
Linear Assets Total:
$5,339,244.09
$10,990,151.02
327,304.46
-
11,317,455.48
5,650,906.93
169,506.29
-
5,820,413.22
5,497,042.26
GRAND TOTAL
$13,225,718.51
$21,532,014.63
464,085.52
-
$21,996,100.15
8,306,393.23
537,761.34
-
8,844,057.43
13,152,042.71
Total by Department
Admin
1,786,505
2,283,312
-
-
2,283,312
496,807
52,355
-
549,162
1,734,150.07
Fire
524,353
1,220,891
-
-
1,220,891
696,538
61,034
-
757,571
463,319.48
PW
6,948,951
13,464,741
327,304
-
13,792,045
6,515,790
275,728
-
6,791,518
7,000,527.59
Environment
87,177
295,305
95,887
-
391,191
208,128
16,997
-
225,125
166,066.35
Health
16,157
26,103
-
-
26,103
9,946
1,514
-
11,460
14,642.89
Recreation
3,862,576
4,241,663
27,732
-
4,269,395
379,087
130,135
-
509,221
3,760,173.93
$13,225,718.51
21,532,015
450,923
-
21,982,938
8,306,296.09
537,761.34
-
8,844,057
13,138,880.32
PSAIPB
1,115,615
1,951,069
-
-
1,951,069
835,454.00
44,891.00
880,345
1,070,724.00
TOTAL CONSOLIDATED
$14,341,334
23,483,084
450,923
-
23,934,007
9,141,750
582,652
-
9,724,402
14,209,604.32
APPENDIX C
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
1 a
5. Length
0
67 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 _x__ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Section No.
1 a
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Carling Bay Rd. East
Hwy 559
Little's Lane
($,000)
Reconstruction & HMA
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
1 b
5. Length
1
55 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 _x__ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Section No.
1 b
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Carling Bay Rd. East
Little's Lane
Old Carling Road
($,000)
Reconstruction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
1 c
5. Length
0
9 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x__
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 _x__ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Section No.
1 c
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Carling Bay Rd. East
Old Carling Road
Harrison Landing Road
($,000)
Reconstruction & HMA
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
1 d
5. Length
0
63 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x__
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Section No.
1 d
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Carling Bay Rd. East
Harrison Landing Road
Bayview Dr.
($,000)
Reconstruction & HMA
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
2
5. Length
2
0 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
1
4
5
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Section No.
0
0
2 a
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Carling Bay Rd West
Highway 559
Alves Road
($,000)
Full Length 2019
2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
2 b
5. Length
2
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
1
5
8
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Section No.
2 b
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
West Carling Bay
Alves
East Carling Bay Road/Bayview
($,000)
Full Length 2019
400m Subexcavation
Double Surface Treatment
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
3
5. Length
0
3 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Old Carling Rd
Collins Bay Road East
End
($,000)
Overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
4
5. Length
0 0
4 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Harrison Landing Road
Carling Bay Road East
Blairs Landing Road
($,000)
overlay (micro seal)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
5
5. Length
2
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB x___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
4
0
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Blairs Landing Road
Harrison Landing Road
Sawdust Bay Road N/S
($,000)
Full Length 2015
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
6 a
5. Length
0 48 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 __x_ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
5
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Sand Bay Road N.
Blair's Landing
End
($,000)
√
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
6 b
5. Length
0 48 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
5
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
2
5
0
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Sawdust Bay Rd S.
Blairs Landing
Mill Road
($,000)
Full
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
6 c
5. Length
0 08 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
5
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Sawdust Bay Rd. S.
Mill Road
End
($,000)
√
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
7
5. Length
0 0
6 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Mill Rd
Sawdust Bay Road S.
End
($,000)
2 x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
8 a
5. Length
1
32 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Bayview Dr
East/West Carling
Beacon Point Dr.
($,000)
HMA & Reconstruction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
8 b
5. Length
0 23 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Bayview Dr.
Beacon Point
Deep Bay Dr.
($,000)
HMA & Reconstruction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
8 c
5. Length
0 57 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
HMA & Reconstruction
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Deep Bay Dr.
Dent Bay Dr./Ridgeway
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
8 d
5. Length
0 17 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
HMA & Reconstruction
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Bayview Dr.
Dent Bay Dr./Ridgeway
Pine Valley Dr.
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
8 e
5. Length
0 37 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Bayview
Pine Valley Dr.
Island View
($,000)
HMA & Reconstruction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
8 f
5. Length
0 14 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Bayview Dr.
Island View
Matthew Bay Dr.
($,000)
Reconstruction & HMA
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
8 g
5. Length
0 26 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Bayview Dr.
Matthew Bay Dr.
Rockcliffe Dr.
($,000)
Reconstruction & HMA
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
0
9 a
5. Length
0 54 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
8
0 m
10. Surface Width
7
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
3
8
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Beacon Point Dr.
Bayview
#13 - #15 (HMA) 100m #1 Driveway
($,000)
Full Length 2017
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
9 b
5. Length
0
1 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
8
0 m
10. Surface Width
7
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
4
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
1
4
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Full Length 2017
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Beacon Point Drive
Driveway #13
Driveway #15
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
9 c
5. Length
0 68 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
8
0 m
10. Surface Width
7
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
4
7
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Beacon Point Drive
Driveway #15
End
($,000)
Full Length 2017
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
0
5. Length
0
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
4 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Deep Bay Dr
Bayview Dr.
End
($,000)
Granula A & Double Surface Treatment
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
1 a
5. Length
0 51 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
4 m
10. Surface Width
6
4 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Ridgeway Drive
Bayview
Indian Grove
($,000)
Overlay
A & 2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
1
1 b
5. Length
0 54 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
4 m
10. Surface Width
6
4 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Ridgeway Drive
Indian Grove
End
($,000)
Overlay
A & 2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
2 a
5. Length
0 36 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Indian Grove
Ridgeway
Parkway Dr.
($,000)
when required (seal)
2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
1
2 b
5. Length
0 04 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB __x_ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Indian Grove
Parkway
End
($,000)
when required (seal)
2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
3
5. Length
0
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
2 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Parkway Dr
Indian Grove
End
($,000)
Full length (pulverize, add 'A' resurface)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
4
5. Length
0
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB x___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
3
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
4
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Dent Bay Rd
Bayview
End
($,000)
Overlay 2015
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
5
5. Length
0
4 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
2 m
10. Surface Width
4
7 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Pine Valley Dr
Bayview
End
($,000)
Overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
6 a
5. Length
0 42 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
1 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Islandview Dr
Bayview Dr.
Iroquois Dr.
($,000)
overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
1
6 b
5. Length
0
# km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB __x_ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Islandview Dr.
Iroquois Dr.
End
($,000)
overlay when required
2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
7
5. Length
0
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
9
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
4
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Iroquois Dr
Islandview
End
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
8
5. Length
0
1 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
3 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Matthew Bay Dr
Bayview
End
($,000)
overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
1
9
5. Length
1
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
5
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Rockcliffe Dr. North
Bayview Dr.
Curran Trail
($,000)
All
Pulverize & 250m subexcavation
2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
0 a
5. Length
0 27 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
8
0 m
10. Surface Width
7
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
0
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Rockcliffe Dr. South
Bayview Dr.
Phillip Dr.
($,000)
2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
2
0 b
5. Length
0
1 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
5 m
10. Surface Width
5
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Rockcliffe Dr. S.
Phillip
#16
($,000)
Pulverize & asphalt
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
2
0 c
5. Length
0 34 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
3 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Rockcliffe Dr. S.
#16
End
($,000)
Overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
1
5. Length
0
1 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
7 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Philip Dr
Rockcliffe Dr. S.
End
($,000)
Overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
2
5. Length
1
6 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB __x_ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _X_ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
7
3
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Alves Rd
W. Carling Bay Road
End
($,000)
2017
Tar & Chip
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
3
5. Length
0
6 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Hares Rd
Hwy 559
End
($,000)
As required
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
4 a
5. Length
0 42 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB x___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
8
5 m
10. Surface Width
7
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 x___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
3
2
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Dillon Rd
Hwy 559
Shawanaga Road
($,000)
2018 Full Length
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
2
4 b
5. Length
6 75 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x__
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB x___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
8
5 m
10. Surface Width
7
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
4
2
4
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Dillon Road
Shawanaga Road
Wawanaisa Road
($,000)
Full Length 2018
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
2
4 c
5. Length
1 05 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x__
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB x___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
8
5 m
10. Surface Width
7
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
7
9
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Dillon Road
Wawanaisa Road
Sand Bay Road
($,000)
Full Length 2018
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
2
4 d
5. Length
0 68 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB x___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
4
4
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Dillon Road
Sand Bay Road
Corduroy Bay
($,000)
Full Length
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
2
4 e
5. Length
0 61 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x__
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB x___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
4
5
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Dillon Road
Corduroy Bay
End
($,000)
Full Length 2018
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
5
5. Length
1
3 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _X (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Shawanaga Rd S
Highway 559
End
($,000)
As required
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
6 a
5. Length
1 61 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Wawanaisa Rd
Dillon Road
Hi Lin Road
($,000)
Under construction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
6 b
5. Length
0 19 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Under construction
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Wawanaisa Rd
Dillon Road
Hi Lin Road
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
7
5. Length
0
4 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No x___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
4
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Hi Lin Rd
Wawainaisa
End
($,000)
2014
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
8
5. Length
0
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Tom Coopers Rd
Dillon Road
End
($,000)
2017
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
2
9
5. Length
0
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
1
2
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Corduroy Bay Rd
Dillon Road
Ramsay Road N/S
($,000)
Overlay 2016
2x S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
0 a
5. Length
0
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Ramsay Rd N.
Corduroy Bay Road
End
($,000)
Cul de sac 6" Gran 'B'
6" Gran 'A'
S.T.
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
3
0 b
5. Length
0 16 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Ramsay Road S.
Corduroy Bay Road
Christie Road
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
3
0 c
5. Length
0 22 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No _x__
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Ramsay Road S.
Christie
End
($,000)
As required
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
1
5. Length
0
4 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
2
4
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
9
6
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Christie Rd
Ramsay Road
End
($,000)
Full Length 2017
new
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
2 a
5. Length
2 34 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2 /13
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Sand Bay Rd
Dillon Road
Brook's Landing Road
($,000)
Reconstruction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
3
2 b
5. Length
1 59 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2 /13
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Sand Bay Road
Brook's Landing
Palmer's
($,000)
Overlay
Reconstructed
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
3
2 c
5. Length
1 73 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2 /13
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Sand Bay Road
Palmer's
Forsyth
($,000)
Reconstruction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
3
2 d
5. Length
1 73 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2 /13
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Sand Bay Road
Forsyth's
End
($,000)
Reconstruction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
3
5. Length
0
9 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB __x_ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Brooks Landing Rd
Sand Bay Road
End
($,000)
Tar & Chip
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
4
5. Length
1
0 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Palmers Rd
Sand Bay
End
($,000)
Tar & Chip
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
5
5. Length
0
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _X__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
5 m
10. Surface Width
5
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Forsyths Rd
Sand Bay Road
End
($,000)
Tar & Chip
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
6
5. Length
1
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Inverlochy Rd
Hwy 559
End
($,000)
√
rock 250m
√
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
7
5. Length
0
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Richmonds Rd
Hwy 559
End
($,000)
New gravel
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
8 a
5. Length
1 02 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
1
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Fred Dubie Rd
Hwy 559
End Fork
($,000)
Rock Ditching
2017
Gravel
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
3
8 b
5. Length
0 38 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
5
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Fred Dubie (W - Fork)
Fork
End
($,000)
√
rock both sides
Tar & Chip
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
3
8 c
5. Length
0 38 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x__
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
5
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Fred Dubie (E - Fork)
Fork
End
($,000)
All
Rock ditching
Tar & Chip
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
9 a
5. Length
2 66 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 _x__ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
9
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Snug Harbour Rd
Hwy 559
Jacknife Road
($,000)
√ 1/2 Length
√ 1/2 Length
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
9 b
5. Length
1
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 _x__ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
9
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
√ 1/2 Length
√ 1/2 Length
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Snug Harbour Rd
Jacknife Road
Fitzgerald Bay Road
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
9 c
5. Length
0
8 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 _x__ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
9
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
√ 1/2 Length
√ 1/2 Length
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Snug Harbour Rd
Fitzgerald Bay Road
Snug Haven Road
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
9 d
5. Length
0
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 _x__ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
9
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
√ 1/2 Length
√ 1/2 Length
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Snug Harbour Rd
Snug Haven Road
Remy Bay Road
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
3
9 e
5. Length
0 24 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 _x__ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
9
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
√ 1/2 Length
√ 1/2 Length
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Snug Harbour Rd
Remy Bay Road
End
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
0 a
5. Length
2 28 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Jacknife Rd
Snug Harbour Road
Gowar Bay Road
($,000)
Clearing
200m (rock)
√
√
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
4
0 b
5. Length
1 42 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Jacknife Road
Gowar Bay Rd.
Keyhole Road
($,000)
Clearing
200m (rock)
√
√
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
1
5. Length
0
7 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Gowar Bay Rd
Jacknife
End
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
2
5. Length
1
3 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural X
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel X_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _X__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
2
4
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Fitzgerald Bay Rd
Snug Harbour Road
End
($,000)
2014
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
3
5. Length
0
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
0 m
10. Surface Width
4
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Snug Haven Rd
Snug Harbour Road
End
($,000)
√
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
4
5. Length
3
3 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
5
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Remy Bay Rd
Snug Harbour Road
End
($,000)
Rock ditching 500m
Full
Full 6 inches Gran 'A'
100m on hill
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
5
5. Length
0
3 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Old Killbear Rd
Hwy 559
End
($,000)
As required
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
6
5. Length
1
1 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
1
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Pengally Bay Rd No. 1
Hwy 559
William McKenzie
($,000)
Overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
7 a
5. Length
1
4 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Pengally Bay Rd. No. 2
Pengally Bay Road No. 1/William McKenzie
Beech
($,000)
clearing
√
Rock 500m
500m
Road widening to 6.0 platform
Full length
250m
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
4
7 b
5. Length
0 57 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
5
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
250m
Full length
clearing
√
Rock 500m
500m
Road widening to 6.0 platform
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Pengally Road No. 2
Beech
Linda Lane
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
8 a
5. Length
0 35 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
1
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
William McKenzie Dr
Pengally Bay Road
Conservation Drive
($,000)
Overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
4
8 b
5. Length
0 15 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
0
5 m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
William McKenzie
Conservation
Partridge
($,000)
√
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
4
9
5. Length
0
4 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Partridge Bay Rd
William McKenzie
End
($,000)
As required
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
0
5. Length
2
7 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
8 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 _x__ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
1
7
5
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
1
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Conservation Dr
William McKenzie
End
($,000)
Pulverize & 2x S.T. 2020
overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
1 a
5. Length
0 73 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Linda Lane East
Pengally Road #2
End
($,000)
As needed
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
5
1 b
5. Length
0
5 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Linda Lane West
Pengally Road #2
End
($,000)
√
As needed
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
2 a
5. Length
0 27 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
1
0
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Beech Avenue
Pengally Road 2
Donna Drive
($,000)
As required 2014
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
5
2 b
5. Length
0 36 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
1
3
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
0
8
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Beech Avenue
Donna Dr.
End
($,000)
As required 2014
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
3
5. Length
0
3 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
4
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 x___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
7
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
1
1
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Donna Dr
Beech Ave.
End
($,000)
As required 2014
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
4
5. Length
2
6 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No x___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
5
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
3
0
0
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Blind Bay Rd
Hwy 559
End
($,000)
2015 Reconstruction
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
5 a
5. Length
2 36 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _X__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Overlay
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Woods Rd
Shebeshekong Road
Crawford
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
5 b
5. Length
0
3 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _X__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Section No.
0
5
5 b
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Woods Rd
Crawford
Ritchie
($,000)
2018 (MTO - Paving)
Overlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
5
5 c
5. Length
0 19 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _X__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Wood's
Ritchie
Hwy 69
($,000)
2018 (Paving - MTO)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
6
5. Length
1
4 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Woods Rd
Shebeshekong
Crawford
($,000)
2018 (MTO - Paving)
Ovrlay
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
7
5. Length
0
7 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Ritchie Dr
Helen Crawford
Wood's
($,000)
2018 (MTO) Paving
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
8
5. Length
1
0 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Eglund Dr
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
5
9
5. Length
0
3 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
MTO Capital
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Lagoon Rd
Hwy 69
End
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
6
0 a
5. Length
0 55 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
1
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Shebeshekong Est. Rd
Shebeshekong Road
Shebe Est. N/S
($,000)
Resurfaced
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
6
0 b
5. Length
0 51 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
7
0 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
1 0
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
3
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Shebeshekong Est. Road N.
Shebeshekong Road Est Road
End
($,000)
Resurfaced
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
6
0 c
5. Length
0 54 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
1
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Shebeshekong Est. Road S.
Shebeshekong Road Est Road
End
($,000)
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
6
1
5. Length
1
6 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No _
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
4
5 m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x _ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x _ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
2
1
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Carling Station Rd
Shebeshekong Road
End
($,000)
As required
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
6
2
5. Length
0
6 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
0 m
10. Surface Width
5
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Holly's Lane
Shebeshekong Road
End
($,000)
Tar & Chip
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
6
3
5. Length
0
2 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No X
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural _x
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
3
5 m
10. Surface Width
m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
9
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
2
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
1
2
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
8
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
3rd Concession Road
Shebeshekong Road
End
($,000)
2019
New gravel
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
0
6
4
5. Length
2
0 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x_
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB _x__ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
8
0 m
10. Surface Width
7
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes _x__ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 ___ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 _x__ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
1 0
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Nobel Rd
Hwy 559
Marsh Lake Road
($,000)
new 2011
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
2
3
5
5. Length
km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No x__
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel x_ (3) LCB ___ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
5 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No _x__
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
8
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Crawford (Helen)
Wood's
Ritchie Dr.
($,000)
MTO Work 2018
Full upgrade
IDENTIFICATION
1. Municipality
2. Road Description/Name
3. From
To
4. Section No.
3
9
0
5. Length
0
8 km
6. Boundary Rd. (1) Yes ___ (2) No __
7. Roadside Environment (1) Urban ___ (2) Semi-urban ___ (3) Rural x_
8. Surface Type (1) Earth ___ (2) Gravel _ (3) LCB _x__ (4) HCB ___ (5) RAP ___
9. Platform Width
6
5 m
10. Surface Width
6
0 m
11. Right of Way Width
m
12. School Bus Route (1) Yes ___ (2) No ___
13. Traffic Range (1) 0-49 _x__ (2) 50-199 ___ (3) 200-399 ___ (4) 400-999 ___ (5) 1000 Plus ___
14. Drainage Feature (1) Open Ditch x_ (2) Sewer ___ (3) Combined ___
15. Spring Load Restriction (1) Yes x_ (2) No ___
16. Condition Rating - Maximum 10 Points
6
0
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
SPOT ROAD AND DRAINAGE
17. Right of Way
18. Culverts
19. Major Ditching
20. Raise Grade
21. Patching
22. Other
23. Total Spot Costs
SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE
24. Surface Treatment
25. Gravel Resurfacing
26. Other
27. Total Specific Maintenance
CONSTRUCTION
28. Hot Mix Resurfacing
29. Base and Surface
30. Resurface and Widen
31. Reconstruction
32. Storm Sewer/Road Reinstat.
33. Total Recommended Costs
34. Year Last Improved
35. Type of Last Improvement
36. Date
M 0
Y 1
3
Section No.
ROAD APPRAISAL SHEET
Carling
Littles Lane
East Carling Bay Road
End
($,000)
√
overlay
APPENDIX D
Ontario Structure Inspection Manual - INSPECTION FORM
MTO Site Number:
FIELD INSPECTION INFORMATION:
Date of Inspection:
September 5, 2013
Type of Inspection:
OSIM
Enhanced OSIM
Inspector:
Tom Pepper, P.Eng
Others in Party:
Brad Laking, E.I.T
Access Equipment
Used:
Hammer, Camera, Tape,
Weather:
Clear
Temperature:
15 Celcius
ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED:
Priority
None
Normal
Urgent
Material Condition Survey
X
Detailed Deck Condition Survey:
X
Non-destructive Delamination Survey of Asphalt-Covered Deck:
X
Concrete Substructure Condition Survey:
X
Detailed Coating Condition Survey:
X
Detailed Timber Investigation:
X
Post-tensioned Strand Investigation:
X
Underwater Investigation:
X
Fatigue Investigation:
X
Seismic Investigation:
X
Structure Evaluation:
X
Monitoring:
X
Monitoring of Deformations, Settlements and Movements:
X
Monitoring Crack Widths:
X
Investigation Notes: Monitor crack on SW girder.
OVERALL STRUCTURE NOTES:
Recommended Work on
Structure:
None
Minor Rehab.
Major Rehab.
Replace
Timing of Recommended Work:
1 to 5 years
6 to 10 years
Overall Comments:
Date of Next Inspection:
2015
Ontario Structure Inspection Manual - Inspection Form
HISTORICAL DATA:
Year Built:
189
Year of Last Major Rehab:
Last OSIM Inspection:
2011
Last Evaluation:
Last Enhanced OSIM Inspection:
Current Load Limit:
(tonnes)
Enhanced Access Equipment:
(ladder, boat, lift, etc.)
Load Limit By-Law #:
Last Underwater Inspection:
By-Law Expiry Date:
Last Condition Survey:
Rehab History (date/description):
MTO Site Number: 44-232
INVENTORY DATA:
Structure Name:
Dillon Road Bridge
Main Hwy/Road #:
On
Under Crossing
Navig. Water
Non-Navig Water
Rail
Type:
Road
Ped.
Other
Hwy/Road Name:
Dillon Road
Structure Location:
6km West of Highway 559
Latitude:
Longitude:
Owner (s):
Township of Carling
Heritage
Not Cons.
Cons./not App.
List/not Desig.
Designation:
Desig./not List
Desig. & List
MTO Region:
Northern
Road Class:
Freeway
Arterial
Collector
Local
MTO District:
Huntsville
Posted Speed
50km/h
No. of Lanes
1
Old County:
Parry Sound
AADT
% Trucks
Geographic Twp:
Carling
Inspection Route Sequence:
Structure Type:
Precast Concrete Box Girder
Interchange Number:
Total Deck Length:
(m) Interchange Structure Number:
Overall Str. Width:
(m) Min. Vertical Clearance: (m)
Total Deck Area:
(sq.m) Special Routes:
Transit
Truck
School
Bicycle
Roadway Width:
(m) Detour Length Around Bridge: (km)
Skew Angle:
(degrees) Direction of Structure:East-West
No. of Spans:
Fill on Structure: 0 (m)
Span Lengths:
(m)
Ontario Structure Inspection Manual - Inspection Form
MTO Site Number:
SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS:
Regional Priority
Number
Programmed Work
Year
2014
Nature of Program Work:
Minor concrete repair work
Guiderail repair
Bridge cleaning
APPRAISAL INDICES:
COMMENTS
Fatigue
Seismic
Scour
Flood
Geometrics
Barrier
Curb
Load Capacity
ELEMENT DATA
Element Group:
100 - Decks
Length:
50
Element Name:
101 - Wearing Surface
Width:
7
Location:
Height:
Material:
2 - Asphalt
Count:
1
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
350
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
350
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
100 - Decks
Length:
16.1
Element Name:
102 - Deck Top
Width:
6.1
Location:
Height:
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
1
Element Type:
3 - CIP Concrete on supports
Total Quantity:
98
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
98
Comments:
4 narrow longitudinal crask along the length of the deck between box beam girders (monitor)
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
02
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
100 - Decks
Length:
16.1
Element Name:
103 - Soffit - Thin Slab
Width:
6.1
Location:
Height:
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
1
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
98
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
98
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
ELEMENT DATA
Element Group:
200 - Joints
Length:
Element Name:
201 - Seals
Width:
Location:
Height:
Material:
Count:
2
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
2
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
2
Comments:
Joint seals are curling upwards, collection water and debris
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Repair seal drainage, clean out sediment
Maintenance Needs:
02
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
200 - Joints
Length:
6.1
Element Name:
202 - Concrete End Dams
Width:
0.5
Location:
Height:
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
4
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
24.4
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
24.4
Comments:
Slight snowplow damage.
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
200 - Joints
Length:
6.1
Element Name:
203 - Armouring
Width:
0.15
Location:
Height:
Material:
Count:
6
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
5.5
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
5.5
Comments:
Slight snowplow damage.
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Cut off damaged area to prevent puncture of vehicle tires.
Maintenance Needs:
02
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
ELEMENT DATA
Element Group:
400 - Barriers
Length:
16.1
Element Name:
401 - Barrier Wall
Width:
0.3
Location:
Height:
0.9
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
2
Element Type:
5 - Safety Shape w/ Single Railing
Total Quantity:
68
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
68
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Repair SE end post
Repair large spall on South wall near mid span
Maintenance Needs:
08
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
500 - Beams/MLE's
Length:
15.6
Element Name:
501 - Girders
Width:
1.22
Location:
Height:
0.7
Material:
12 - Precast Concrete
Count:
5
Element Type:
1 - Box Girders
Total Quantity:
203
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
200
3
Comments:
Crack on exterior face @ SW corner. Signs of leaching. No recommended repair at this time.
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
900 - Abutments
Length:
Element Name:
901 - Abutment Walls
Width:
6.1
Location:
East and West
Height:
1.35
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
2
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
16.5
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
16.5
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
ELEMENT DATA
Element Group:
900 - Abutments
Length:
Element Name:
902 - Ballast Walls
Width:
6.1
Location:
Height:
1
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
2
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
12.2
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
12.2
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
900 - Abutments
Length:
6
Element Name:
903 - Wingwalls
Width:
Location:
Height:
2.35
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
4
Element Type:
6 - Reinforced Concrete
Total Quantity:
56.4
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
56.4
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
900 - Abutments
Length:
Element Name:
904 - Bearings
Width:
Location:
East and West
Height:
Material:
3 - Elastomeric
Count:
20
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
20
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
20
Comments:
Clean Bearing Seats
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
ELEMENT DATA
Element Group:
1100 - Retaining Walls
Length:
Element Name:
1101 - Walls
Width:
10
Location:
Height:
2
Material:
Gabions
Count:
2
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
40
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
40
Comments:
Some loss of material on SW wall.
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Repair basket
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
1300 - Foundations
Length:
Element Name:
1301 - Below Ground Level
Width:
Location:
Height:
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
1
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
1
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
1
Comments:
No settlement evident
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
1400 - Embankments & Streams
Length:
Element Name:
1401 - Streams & Waterways
Width:
Location:
Height:
Material:
Count:
1
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
1
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
1
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Remove Beaver Dam
Maintenance Needs:
02, 11
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
ELEMENT DATA
Element Group:
1400 - Embankments & Streams
Length:
Element Name:
1402 - Embankments
Width:
Location:
Height:
Material:
Count:
4
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
4
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
1
1
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
1400 - Embankments & Streams
Length:
Element Name:
1403 - Slope Protection
Width:
Location:
Height:
Material:
Count:
1
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
1
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
1
Comments:
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
1500 - Accessories
Length:
Element Name:
1501 - Signs
Width:
Location:
Height:
Material:
Count:
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
Comments:
MTO Hazard Marker (WA-33) signs missing @ all four quadrants.
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
1600 - Approaches
Length:
6
ELEMENT DATA
Element Name:
1601 - Wearing Surface
Width:
5.6
Location:
Height:
Material:
2 - Asphalt
Count:
2
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
67.2
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
84
Comments:
Clear sand windrow on edge of approach to improve drainage, place RAP to prevent erosion.
Settlement on East approach, padding required.
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
02
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
1600 - Approaches
Length:
5.6
Element Name:
1602 - Approach Slabs
Width:
6
Location:
Height:
Material:
4 - CIP Concrete
Count:
2
Element Type:
Total Quantity:
67.2
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
67.2
Comments:
Minor settlement on East approach - padding required.
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
Element Group:
1600 - Approaches
Length:
6
Element Name:
1606 - Barrier
Width:
0.3
Location:
Height:
0.9
Material:
Count:
4
Total Quantity:
Environment:
Benign
Moderate
Severe
Limited Inspection
Protection System:
Perform.
Deficiencies
Condition
Data:
Units
Exc.
Good
Fair
Poor*
m2
m
each
%
all
24
Comments:
Some rotten posts require replacement, replace SW quadrant approach guiderail.
Recommended Work:
Rehab
Replace
1-5 years
6-10 years
Maintenance Needs:
Urgent
1 Year
2 year
APPENDIX E
Page 1 of 5
Building Maintenance Checklist
Inspection Date:
Location:
GROUNDS
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Playground
Equipment
Inspect for loose cracked
parts, sharp edges, rot and
fall protection
Annually
Planting
Inspect for plant and tree
growth against building
Annually
Concrete Patios
and Retaining
Walls
Inspect for cracks, shifting,
water damage and
drainage
Annually
Sidewalks and
Driveways
Inspect for cracks or trip
hazards
Annually
BUILDING EXTERIOR
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Crawlspaces,
Concrete
Foundations
Inspect for dampness,
vermin, inspect beams and
posts for rot. Inspect
foundations for cracks,
shifting, water damage
Annually
Masonry Veneer Inspect for efflorescence
(white powder), inspect
sealants
Annually
Porches and
Balconies
Clean and inspect for
cracks, rot, trip hazards,
secure railings and steps
Annually
Wood Siding,
Fascias and Trim
Inspect for cracks, water
damage, deteriorated
finishes and vermin
Annually
Eaves trough,
Roof Drainage
Check for damage, broken
downspouts
Annually
Attic Roof
Sheathing
Inspect for water damage,
mildew, condensation
Annually
Attic Insulation
Inspect for moisture,
vermin, voids, compressed
insulation
Annually
Attic Ventilation
Inspect for obstructions,
rot, vermin
Annually
Page 2 of 5
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Vinyl Decks
Check for lifting, water
damage, damaged
flashing
Annually
Stucco
Check for signs of water
leakage, mould, mildew
and staining
Annually
Roof Shingles
Check for curled or
missing shingles,
excessive moss, damaged
flashing, clean gutters
Annually
Vinyl Siding
Inspect for damaged
siding and water damage
Annually
Steel Siding &
Roofing
Inspect for water damage
and damaged sheets
Annually
Flat Roofs
Inspect for ponding, loose
flashing, plugged drains,
air pockets, blisters, debris
Annually
Roof Hatch
Inspect for forced entry,
hardware operation, leaks
and weather stripping
Annually
Metal Doors and
Frames
Inspect for forced entry,
correct hardware
operation, weather
stripping and sealants
Annually
Wood Doors and
Frames
Inspect for forced entry,
correct hardware
operation, weather
stripping and sealants
Annually
Automatic Door
Openers
Inspect for damage, forced
entry, wear and test all
safety features
Semi-
Annually
Overhead
Parkade Doors
Inspect for proper
operation and damage to
components, test safety
features
Semi-
Annually
Aluminum
Entrances and
Storefront
Inspect for forced entry,
hardware operation, closer
adjustment
Semi-
Annually
Windows and
Doors
Inspect for leaks,
hardware operation,
sealing
Annually
Page 3 of 5
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Hose Bibs
Inspect for damage and
winterize in advance of
freezing temperatures
Semi-
Annually
Outdoor Outlets
Test ground fault plugs
Semi-
Annually
Dryer Vents
Clean bird screens
monthly and vents as
required
Monthly
Floor and Trench
Drains
Clean out drains and
trenches
Annually
Chimneys
Clean and check for
cracks, loose bricks, leaks
or damage. Include
fireplaces and woodstoves
Annually
Septic
Check for general
condition of bed for break-
outs.
Should tank be pumped?
Annually
Well /
Water Source
Type of well
Dug
Drilled
Other
BUILDING INTERIOR & SERVICES
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Door Handles,
Hinges and
Closures
Check hardware for proper
function, check and test
fire exit hardware
Semi-
Annually
Appliances
Check fridge seals and
drain tubes. Check stove
burners and wires for
electrical shorting or
grease building up. Check
hood fans for filters,
venting, grease building up
and fire hazards
Semi-
Annually
Walls and
Ceilings
Inspect for mould, water
damage, holes, cracking,
paint and humidity levels
Annually
Carpets and
Flooring
Inspect carpets for rips,
tears and wear.
Inspect flooring for lifting
and cracking
Annually
Page 4 of 5
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Cabinetry and
fixed furniture
Inspect for chipped/broken
finishes, broken drawers,
shelves
Annually
Baseboard and
Trim
Inspect for missing/broken
trim
Annually
Plumbing
Inspect traps, faucets,
toilets for wear, leaks
Annually
Elevators
Have an elevator
contractor service and
maintain the elevator
equipment
Monthly/
Quarterly -
Subject to
licensing
requirement
Boiler-Large
Building
Service monthly, including
circulating pumps. Adjust
for seasonal temperatures
Monthly
Boiler/Furnace-
Small Building
Service annually, plus filter
changes 3 to 4 times per
year. Adjust for seasonal
temperatures
Annually
Air Conditioning
Inspect for damage, icing,
noise, leaks. Clean
condenser
Annually
Ductwork
Clean and inspect for rust
or damage
Annually
Gas Piping
Inspect for leaks and
clearance between gas
fired fixtures and
combustibles
Annually
Hot Water Tank
Open drain, inspect
pressure reducer valve for
leaks
Annually
Electrical Panel
and Wiring
Inspect for loose, frayed,
exposed or overloaded
wires/plugs. Test ground
fault plugs monthly
Monthly
Electrical
Radiant Heater
Inspect for damage
Annually
Page 5 of 5
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Fire Alarm
System,
Extinguishers,
Hoses,
Sprinklers, Heat
and Smoke
Detectors
Inspect annually using a
qualified a qualified
inspection firm. Have staff
conduct daily, weekly and
monthly checks from Fire
Safety Plan
Daily/
Weekly/
Monthly/
Annually
Emergency
Generators
Run emergency
generators once per week
for 20 minutes, and have
inspected by a qualified
firm every 6 months.
Maintain fuel supply
Weekly/
Semi-
Annually
DOCKS, WHARFS, PIERS & RAMPS
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Floating Docks
Inspect floatation devises
for cracks, leaks and
deterioration
Inspect for cracked, split or
rotted decking
Annually
Walkways,
Ramps including
all decking
surfaces
Inspect split, cracked, and
rotted decking. Concrete
surfaces for spalling and
ramps for structural
deterioration
Annually
Boat Launch
Ramps
Inspect ramp surface for
erosion, broken concrete.
Is fill required to level
surface around ramp
Annually
P:\General - Building\BUILDING MAINTENANCE\Building Maintenance Checklist Master.docx
APPENDIX F
Page 1 of 5
Building Maintenance Checklist
Inspection Date:
Location:
GROUNDS
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Playground
Equipment
Inspect for loose cracked
parts, sharp edges, rot and
fall protection
Annually
Planting
Inspect for plant and tree
growth against building
Annually
Concrete Patios
and Retaining
Walls
Inspect for cracks, shifting,
water damage and
drainage
Annually
Sidewalks and
Driveways
Inspect for cracks or trip
hazards
Annually
BUILDING EXTERIOR
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Crawlspaces,
Concrete
Foundations
Inspect for dampness,
vermin, inspect beams and
posts for rot. Inspect
foundations for cracks,
shifting, water damage
Annually
Masonry Veneer Inspect for efflorescence
(white powder), inspect
sealants
Annually
Porches and
Balconies
Clean and inspect for
cracks, rot, trip hazards,
secure railings and steps
Annually
Wood Siding,
Fascias and Trim
Inspect for cracks, water
damage, deteriorated
finishes and vermin
Annually
Eaves trough,
Roof Drainage
Check for damage, broken
downspouts
Annually
Attic Roof
Sheathing
Inspect for water damage,
mildew, condensation
Annually
Attic Insulation
Inspect for moisture,
vermin, voids, compressed
insulation
Annually
Attic Ventilation
Inspect for obstructions,
rot, vermin
Annually
Page 2 of 5
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Vinyl Decks
Check for lifting, water
damage, damaged
flashing
Annually
Stucco
Check for signs of water
leakage, mould, mildew
and staining
Annually
Roof Shingles
Check for curled or
missing shingles,
excessive moss, damaged
flashing, clean gutters
Annually
Vinyl Siding
Inspect for damaged
siding and water damage
Annually
Steel Siding &
Roofing
Inspect for water damage
and damaged sheets
Annually
Flat Roofs
Inspect for ponding, loose
flashing, plugged drains,
air pockets, blisters, debris
Annually
Roof Hatch
Inspect for forced entry,
hardware operation, leaks
and weather stripping
Annually
Metal Doors and
Frames
Inspect for forced entry,
correct hardware
operation, weather
stripping and sealants
Annually
Wood Doors and
Frames
Inspect for forced entry,
correct hardware
operation, weather
stripping and sealants
Annually
Automatic Door
Openers
Inspect for damage, forced
entry, wear and test all
safety features
Semi-
Annually
Overhead
Parkade Doors
Inspect for proper
operation and damage to
components, test safety
features
Semi-
Annually
Aluminum
Entrances and
Storefront
Inspect for forced entry,
hardware operation, closer
adjustment
Semi-
Annually
Windows and
Doors
Inspect for leaks,
hardware operation,
sealing
Annually
Page 3 of 5
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Hose Bibs
Inspect for damage and
winterize in advance of
freezing temperatures
Semi-
Annually
Outdoor Outlets
Test ground fault plugs
Semi-
Annually
Dryer Vents
Clean bird screens
monthly and vents as
required
Monthly
Floor and Trench
Drains
Clean out drains and
trenches
Annually
Chimneys
Clean and check for
cracks, loose bricks, leaks
or damage. Include
fireplaces and woodstoves
Annually
Septic
Check for general
condition of bed for break-
outs.
Should tank be pumped?
Annually
Well /
Water Source
Type of well
Dug
Drilled
Other
BUILDING INTERIOR & SERVICES
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Door Handles,
Hinges and
Closures
Check hardware for proper
function, check and test
fire exit hardware
Semi-
Annually
Appliances
Check fridge seals and
drain tubes. Check stove
burners and wires for
electrical shorting or
grease building up. Check
hood fans for filters,
venting, grease building up
and fire hazards
Semi-
Annually
Walls and
Ceilings
Inspect for mould, water
damage, holes, cracking,
paint and humidity levels
Annually
Carpets and
Flooring
Inspect carpets for rips,
tears and wear.
Inspect flooring for lifting
and cracking
Annually
Page 4 of 5
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Cabinetry and
fixed furniture
Inspect for chipped/broken
finishes, broken drawers,
shelves
Annually
Baseboard and
Trim
Inspect for missing/broken
trim
Annually
Plumbing
Inspect traps, faucets,
toilets for wear, leaks
Annually
Elevators
Have an elevator
contractor service and
maintain the elevator
equipment
Monthly/
Quarterly -
Subject to
licensing
requirement
Boiler-Large
Building
Service monthly, including
circulating pumps. Adjust
for seasonal temperatures
Monthly
Boiler/Furnace-
Small Building
Service annually, plus filter
changes 3 to 4 times per
year. Adjust for seasonal
temperatures
Annually
Air Conditioning
Inspect for damage, icing,
noise, leaks. Clean
condenser
Annually
Ductwork
Clean and inspect for rust
or damage
Annually
Gas Piping
Inspect for leaks and
clearance between gas
fired fixtures and
combustibles
Annually
Hot Water Tank
Open drain, inspect
pressure reducer valve for
leaks
Annually
Electrical Panel
and Wiring
Inspect for loose, frayed,
exposed or overloaded
wires/plugs. Test ground
fault plugs monthly
Monthly
Electrical
Radiant Heater
Inspect for damage
Annually
Page 5 of 5
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Fire Alarm
System,
Extinguishers,
Hoses,
Sprinklers, Heat
and Smoke
Detectors
Inspect annually using a
qualified a qualified
inspection firm. Have staff
conduct daily, weekly and
monthly checks from Fire
Safety Plan
Daily/
Weekly/
Monthly/
Annually
Emergency
Generators
Run emergency
generators once per week
for 20 minutes, and have
inspected by a qualified
firm every 6 months.
Maintain fuel supply
Weekly/
Semi-
Annually
DOCKS, WHARFS, PIERS & RAMPS
Inspection/Maintenance
Procedures
Frequency
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
Floating Docks
Inspect floatation devises
for cracks, leaks and
deterioration
Inspect for cracked, split or
rotted decking
Annually
Walkways,
Ramps including
all decking
surfaces
Inspect split, cracked, and
rotted decking. Concrete
surfaces for spalling and
ramps for structural
deterioration
Annually
Boat Launch
Ramps
Inspect ramp surface for
erosion, broken concrete.
Is fill required to level
surface around ramp
Annually
P:\General - Building\BUILDING MAINTENANCE\Building Maintenance Checklist Master.docx