Extension of Municipal Water and Wastewater Services Policy
Thames Centre, Ontario
· adopted 2023-02-13
This is the exact embedded text of the captured official document.
Snapshot a8e848963257 · verified 2026-06-10 ·
original document ·
archived snapshot ·
unofficial consolidation, the official version is held by the municipal clerk.
MUNICIPALITY
OP
Policy: Extension of Municipal Water and Wastewater Services Policy
Policy Number: CP- F- 1 . 4 -
ES- WW- 01. 1 (
Resolution #
28- 2023)
Effective Date: November 10, 2008, as revised May 9, 2016
Revised Date: February 13, 2023
To establish a policy for outlining methods of extending and connecting to Thames
Centre' s Municipal Water and Wastewater Services.
Municipalities
throughout Ontario are enabled to undertake works as a Local
Improvement and assess costs to the properties that derive benefit from such works
including the extension of Municipal Water and Wastewater Services.
Under the
legislation, a Municipality initially pays the costs associated with the works and then
recovers the required funding from the benefitting properties by way of the special
levies. The charge that is imposed to property owners is based on the final actual costs
of the work.
To establish a policy for outlining methods of extending and connecting to Thames
Centre' s Municipal Water and Wastewater Services.
Policy
1.
Methods of Connection
Under this policy there are two methods where a property owner can access and
ultimately connect to municipal water and wastewater services.
These are:
i)
The extension of these services to existing premises within the urban service
area;
ii)
The servicing agreements as provided for under a series of Development
Charge policies and by- laws;
These methods are described in detail in the following sub-sections:
i)
Extension of Municipal Water and Wastewater Services to Existing Premises
This process is where the Municipality extends these services to existing
premises, or the process where owners of existing premises who wished to
have these services extended to their property. Property owners have the
right to petition either for or against a proposed work. The premise for
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-WW-01. 1)
Page 2
undertaking the extension of municipal water and wastewater services under
this policy is that properties extended these services is for the most part pre
or established
The areas that are eligible for these
existing
premises.
extensions are non- development in nature.
ii)
Provision of Municipal Water and Wastewater Services to New Development
Development Charges servicing agreements provide the alternative method
for accessing and connecting to municipal water and wastewater services.
This policy is applied for cost recovery purposes in response to development
applications for newly created lots and premises, including subdivision
agreements and building permits.
In the context of this policy, these charges
recover net growth- related capital costs for extending municipal water and
wastewater services. Virtually all costs associated with supplying new
premises with water and wastewater services are recovered through
development charges or paid for directly by the developer as part of their
servicing agreement with Thames Centre.
2. On- going Water and Wastewater System Calculations
To justify maximizing the project cost recoveries associated with water and
wastewater services extensions, it should be noted property taxes are not used to
fund
component
of the water and wastewater
or capital costs. Funds
any
operating
required for the capital replacement, repair/ maintenance and operation of these
systems are derived exclusively from water and wastewater user rates paid by
existing connected system users.
Further, past capital infrastructure associated with new development, funded through
the imposition of development charges, has not been supported or subsidized by
existing ratepayers or property taxes.
3.
Enabling Legislation
All possible options for dealing with petitions for the extension of Municipal Water
and Wastewater Systems and other municipal services are dealt with under the
Municipal Act. In particular, Section 391 of the Municipal Act governs by- laws for
special services, including application of new municipal water and wastewater
services.
Fees and Charges under section 391 of the Municipal Act, are regulated by
O. Reg. 584/ 06 and 586/ 06 which includes the following qualifications:
Special fees and charges cannot be applied to capital expenses if previously
paid for/ charged, as in the case of development charges.
In other words, the
over-recovery for infrastructure is prohibited;
Fees and charges cannot be imposed for the allocation of water and
wastewater plant capacity directly under this section of the Municipal Act, but
will be recovered under an alternative methodology ( addressed later in this
policy);
Permission for a municipality to impose a charge for capital costs related to
sewage or water services on persons who do not receive immediate benefit
but will receive benefit at a later point in time; and
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-ww-01. 1)
Page 3
Allows the municipality to initiate a Notice of Intention to pass a charge that is
sent to the owners of lots liable for the charge. The Notice of Intention must
contain detailed information about the proposed works.
For the works to
proceed, a minimum of two-thirds of the owners representing at least one half
of the lots by value must agree to it. In the event a majority of owners with at
least one- half of the value of the lots do not agree to designating the works as
a local improvement they have the right, after submitting a Petition to the
Municipality ( meeting the criteria), to prevent the works from being undertaken
for a period of two years.
4. Project Eligibility, Request Initiation and Approvals
This policy outlines the process to be followed if the Municipality receives a Petition
in favour of undertaking the extension of municipal water and wastewater services
as a local improvement.
A Petition must be signed by at least two thirds of the
owners of the lots that represent
at least one half of the lots ( 50%) by value.
4. 1
Extension of Services Eligibility
As previously noted, the extension of municipal water and wastewater services
is available to existing, developed properties within the defined urban service
areas of the Municipality.
The purpose of the process is to provide for the
engineering and construction of water and wastewater mains which are
undertaken to benefit and improve the quality of life to the ratepayers
the extension of these services in
communities.
It is not
petitioning
pre- existing
intended to be used as a vehicle for facilitating property development.
Such
service agreements would be achieved through servicing agreements
determined under the Development Charges By- Law.
4. 2 Initiation by Petition
For works not initiated by the Municipality, all Petitions requesting the extension
of municipal water and wastewater services must be initiated by the ratepayers
within the
the service( s).
community requesting
Preliminary information
requests from ratepayers regarding the extension of municipal services will be
answered by municipal staff, but all requests are to be initiated by members
who are
the extension of the services. To facilitate
for
considering
the process,
the ratepayers, staff, when appropriate to do so, will prepare a high level
feasibility review regarding preliminary enquiries for the extension of municipal
water and wastewater services that would include:
Consideration of planning requirements to ensure compliance with the Official
Plan,
Conducting an overview of project technical viability; and,
Development of a general, high level, estimate of the project cost, including
cost apportionment.
In addition, staff may provide some information and advice on the proposed
project boundaries.
Prior to the extension of municipal water and wastewater
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-ww-01. 1)
Page 4
services, the residents in the proposed project boundaries must successfully
submit a Petition to the Clerk.
The extension of municipal water and wastewater services may proceed if a
Petition in favor of the proposed project is received for at least two-thirds of the
property owners representing
one half ( 50%) of the value of the property liable
to be specially assessed for the works.
Should the Petition for the work be considered sufficient by the Clerk, staff shall
arrange for a public meeting to address a variety of possible questions and
issues as well as provide clear instructions on formalities, intent and legal
obligations arising from submitting a formal request for the extension of
municipal water and/ or wastewater services.
4. 3 Extension of Services Formal Petition Process
Staff will only consider a request for the extension of municipal water and
wastewater services upon receipt of a bona fide Petition.
A bona fide Petition
includes the signatures of a minimum of two thirds of the property owners
representing
at least one half ( 50%) the assessed values of those properties
abutting and benefiting from the requested services.
Staff will continue to be
responsible for validating the sufficiency of the project requests, based on the
most recent tax roll as returned by the Municipal Property Assessment
Corporation ( MPAC), and ultimately for advising residents of the outcome of the
Petition.
Depending on the status of the Petition ( whether or not it meets the
statutory requirements), staff will prepare either a formal proposal to proceed
further with the processing of the request or advise of its unsuitability for further
action.
It should be noted, that at any time prior to project funding being approved as
part of the current year Capital Budget, a sufficient Petition for the extension of
services as outlined above ( one which meets or exceeds the established
sufficiency
criteria), can be rescinded by the requesting community.
This would
require individual signatories to the original project request list, having their
signatures removed from this list. Should the removal of signatures bring the
original request list below the required sufficiency parameters, the Petition
would then be considered insufficient and be withdrawn.
4. 4
Report Development &
Project Prioritization
Further to receipt of a sufficient Petition ( as outlined above), the Environmental
Services Department undertakes the preparation of a report to Council,
coordinating input from the Planning, Community Services, Transportation,
Protective Services and Finance Departments regarding project timing and
viability. The report covers issues such as community needs, the limits of the
proposed work, number of service connections, estimated total project cost,
assignable costs, extraordinary project attributes and estimated apportionment
costs.
of project
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-WW-01. 1)
Page 5
Based on the recommendations
in the Director' s Report, Thames Centre
Council decides whether or not the requested service extension will be included
in the subsequent
year' s Capital Budget and Forecast. Historically, a newly
added project takes several years to move from the Petition stage to completed
construction.
4. 5
Project Costing --Recoverable
Costs
Currently, the final project costing is not normally known until after the one year
maintenance
construction.
period following project
At this point, all valid project
costs will be tallied and assigned to all benefiting properties at an equal rate per
metre according to a designated size of lot frontage with increases and
reductions for lots greater or less than the designated size. This ensures that
all lots having equal benefit from the project pay the same costs.
Since specific cost recoveries are not stipulated
in section 391 of the Municipal
Act ( with the exception of plant infrastructure / capacity provisions) the recovery
level will remain comprehensive and include the following items:
All costs related to the design and construction of the local water and
wastewater mains,
Laterals from the local mains to the property line,
Costs associated with fire hydrants and the increased sizing of water mains
in conformity with municipal fire flow requirements,
Cost for all intersection work incurred in the course of constructing the
extension of service; and,
Any necessary ancillary property acquisition costs.
Based on the preceding list of recoverable costs, the Municipality would
maintain a level of recovery that would also ensure retaining a level of equity
with cost recoveries realized under the Development Charges by- law. This
ensure that the Municipality' s existing ( connected) water and wastewater
system ratepayers would continue to be excluded from contributing to/ or
subsidizing system infrastructure cost components which relate exclusively to
the benefit of newly connecting properties.
It should also be noted that the recovery of all eligible costs further to the
extension of services policy are to be specially assessed to all benefiting
properties whether or not they elect to connect to the water/wastewater system
at the time of project completion. A decision to not connect to the newly
provided system extension will not exempt a property from contributing to
overall project costs.
The charge imposed by the Municipality can only recover the owner's share of
the total cost and where the owners do not benefit from the works equally the
charge must reflect that.
4. 6
Special Assessment -- Cost Apportionment
With respect to the basis for cost recovery and apportionment, the permissive
provisions of section 391 and O. Reg. 584/ 06 of the Municipal Act will be used.
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-WW-01. 1)
Page 6
Properties can be designated and assessed in a manner differing from normal
assignment of properties.
The recovery apportionment for the extension of
municipal water and wastewater services initiatives, are in accordance with
following protocol:
That for projects benefiting both residential and non- residential premises,
total assessable costs will be allocated based on benefit to properties on a
just and equitable basis.
The assessed cost would be based on the cost of
the requested service
the cost of laterals. The cost of the laterals
excluding
would be added to each of the residential and non- residential project cost
apportionments, according to the actual cost of providing these laterals to
each of the respective component groups.
That project costs assessable to residential premises are apportioned on a
just and equitable basis, taking into account the lateral cost components
identified above with residential lots having multiple service connections,
assigned additional costs related to the lateral charge and additional plant
infrastructure/ capacity charges. An example of multiple servicing provided to
one lot, would occur if one lot accommodated a pre- existing duplex
2 separate service connections.
Given the nature of the eligible
requesting
communities requesting the extension of these municipal services ( pre
in the urban service area), occurrences of multiple
existing premises
laterals/connections to one lot are exceptionally rare.
That project costs attributable to non- residential premises benefiting from the
project will have costs apportioned between them on an equal rate per metre
on a just and equitable basis, with any necessary reductions and increases,
taking into account the lateral cost components identified above.
All properties abutting the project are subject to the special assessment of
the project charges whether or not they: i) were signatories to the approved
Petition for the extension of these services or ii) elect to connect to these
services at the time of project completion.
With respect to the properties subject to special assessment for the recovery
of project costs, non- residential properties include churches, schools, parks
and commercial businesses.
Farms are to be considered residential.
A park is considered assessable and chargeable if it can benefit from the
project, but acreage- based apportionment charges would be determined on
a fair and equitable basis.
In the case of very exceptional circumstances, where lot configurations vary
widely, the Municipality shall assess these properties in a manner differing
from the normal assignment of frontages due to their irregular shape.
Properties that have flankage on the work with frontage on a previously
improved street will not be specifically assessed.
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-WW-01. 1)
Page 7
5.
Exemption from Charges
5. 1
General Case
Under Section 391 of the Municipal Act, and the accompanying regulations of
O. Reg. 584/ 06, there are no stipulated exemptions from contributing to these
projects.
However, in keeping with the objective of optimizing fairness and
equity in the apportionment of project costs, it is believed that the principle of
just and equitable benefit should guide the overall application of the charges.
All properties abutting a project are to be assessed and rated, with the
exception of right-of-way for utilities and transportation which are non-
assessable ( as they cannot be developed and benefit from these services) and
as such are exempt from charges.
5. 2 Relief for Hardship Cases
In recognition of legitimate financial distress arising from the apportionment of
project costs, a provision for hardship cases is outlined as follows: the
Municipality will defer all or part of the recoverable project costs until such time
as the property is either sold or a change in ownership takes place by another
means.
With the owner' s concurrence ( as a condition of the relief), the charges
would be registered on title as a lien against the property.
It would be the
owner' s responsibility to demonstrate to Council' s satisfaction the basis of their
request. Costs associated with registering the lien against the property will be
the responsibility of the property owner and form part of the lien if not paid in
advance.
Interest, at the rate set for a twenty year debenture, will apply to the
deferred project cost and form part of the lien against the property.
6. Collection of Fees and Charges
Further to completion of the extension of Municipal Water and Wastewater Services
initiatives, a number of benefiting properties may not elect to connect to the
respective system( s) at that time, preferring to connect their individual property at a
later date.
Costs associated with extending Water and Wastewater Services are generally
categorized as either a) relatively inexpensive operating cost recoveries, or b) more
substantial capital cost recoveries. The timing for the collection of these fees and
charges are determined by Council in keeping with precedent, along with balancing
the needs of different interests
those of the
including
Municipality.
The following
outlines the collection of fees and charges based on voluntary and mandatory
connections:
Fees and Charges
Voluntary Connection
Mandatory Connection
Fees & Charges
Fees & Charges
Assessment Charges
Upon Connection
One year after
of
Option for Payment
substantial completion
For the provision
water and/ or
Method Letters to be
of construction
wastewater mains
issued within 60 days of
Option for Payment
and
final tabulation of
Method Letters to be
corresponding
lateral/ service
construction costs.
issued one year after
connections to the
substantial completion of
line.
construction.
property
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-WW-01. 1)
Page 8
Fees and Charges
Servicing Fees
Group C Building
Permit --
service/ lateral
inspection( s) for
water and
wastewater as
required;
Water Connection
and Meter Installation
Fee;
Meter Reader Wire
Installation Fee;
New Water Account
Administration
Fee.
Servicing Charges
Plant Infrastructure /
Capacity Charges
On- going charges
For
water
on- going
and/ or wastewater
or
provision
servicing.
Voluntary Connection
Fees & Charges
Upon Connection
Fees to be assessed and
paid in accordance with
the current Fees &
Charges By- Law in place
at the time of connection.
Upon Connection
Option for Payment
Method Letters to be
issued within 60 days of
final tabulation
of the
cost.
project
Upon Connection
Bi- monthly billing for
water and/ or wastewater
services to be issued.
Mandatory Connection
Fees & Charges
Upon Connection
Fees to be assessed and
paid in accordance with
the current Fees &
Charges By- Law in place
at the time of connection.
One year after
substantial completion
of construction
Option for Payment
Method Letters to be
issued one year after
substantial completion of
the project.
One year after
substantial completion
of construction
Bi- monthly billing for
water and/ or wastewater
services to be issued.
The costs outlined above do not include the private responsibility items for all costs
incurred on private property from the curb stop ( property line) into the premises, for
connection to the municipal system( s).
6. 1 Option for Payment Method Letters
Option for Payment Method Letters shall be issued for Assessment
Charges and
Servicing Charges within the timeframes identified within section 6. 0 Collection of
Fees and Charges.
Option for Payment Method Letters shall include the following:
The name of the construction project
The by-law authorizing completion of the construction project
The total cost of the construction project
Any grants or special funding applicable to the construction project
The legal description of the assessed property, property roll number, current
owner name
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-ww-01. 1)
Page 9
The total cost assessed to the property
5 yr., 10 yr., 15 yr. and 20 yr. annual debenture billing amount
5 yr., 10 yr., 15 yr. and 20 yr. interest rates
The property tax billing year debenture payments will commence
Five options for payment shall be provided to property owners:
OPTION 1:
Lump Sum Payment -- for the total cost assessed to the property
to be paid within 60 days of the Option for Payment Method Letter
date.
OPTION 2:
5 Yr. Debenture Plan -- with 50% of the annual debenture
to be included on the interim
tax bill and 50% of
payment
property
the annual debenture payment to be included on the final tax bill
until the debenture is paid in full.
OPTION 3:
10 Yr. Debenture Plan -- with 50% of the annual debenture
to be included on the interim
tax bill and 50% of
payment
property
the annual debenture payment to be included on the final tax bill
until the debenture is paid in full.
OPTION 4:
15 Yr. Debenture Plan -- with 50% of the annual debenture
to be included on the interim
tax bill and 50% of
the annual debenture payment to be included on the final tax bill
until the debenture is paid in full.
payment
property
OPTION 5:
20 Yr. Debenture Plan -- with 50% of the annual debenture
to be included on the interim
tax bill and 50% of
payment
property
the annual debenture payment to be included on the final tax bill
until the debenture is paid in full.
Once the debenture is in place it cannot be paid off in advance or reversed.
If a
property owner sells their property before the debenture charge is fully paid off, the
new property owner assumes responsibility for making the remaining payments.
Property owners are encouraged to consider third party financing through financial
institutions as they may be able to offer more favourable interest rates and flexible
repayment
options.
7.
Extension of Municipal Services Project for Inclusion
in the Capital Budget
and Forecast
A portion of Thames Centre' s urban areas are serviced with wastewater. As
development of trunk sewer infrastructure is extended into the existing community,
adjacent
streets is made
servicing
possible.
The most common drivers for extending
local sewers includes the capital road program or a collection of residents with septic
systems all failing at a similar time.
For this reason a coordinated approach within
the capital budget process is the most effective manner for planning these works.
8.
Municipal Water and Wastewater Services -- List of All Connection- Related
Costs
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-WW-01. 1)
Page 10
Staff's communication to property owners for the extension of municipal water and
wastewater services should clearly reference all associated costs that would
ultimately be payable by any property owner deciding to connect to these services.
The total compendium of costs would include:
Assessment Charges --for the provision of water and/ or wastewater mains
and corresponding lateral connections to the property line.
Servicing Fees:
o
Service lateral inspection( s) for water and wastewater as required -- in
accordance with the current Fees & Charges -- By- Law in place at the
time of connection;
o
Water meter deposit ( for water services); and
o
Plant infrastructure / capacity charges.
On- going charges -- for on- going water and/ or wastewater provision or
servicing.
Private responsibility for all costs incurred on private property from the curb
stop ( property line) into the premises, for connecting to the municipal
service( s).
Providing this complete list of cost liabilities to property owners requesting the
extension of municipal services, up front, enhances the transparency of the entire
process.
Further, it provides them with a clear indication of what the full cost impact
of their request for service availability and connection will ultimately be.
9.
Cost Apportionment Appeal Process
It will be recalled that under the proposed policy guidelines, project recovery charges
are to be apportioned/ specially assessed at an equal rate per metre will be assessed
against properties benefitting from the work, at a rate unique to each completed
project. Based on staff's experience with a per lot ( based on an equal rate per
metre) for a lot size established by the Municipality), there have been virtually no
issues raised at the Courts of Revision
the apportionment. ( The Court of
challenging
Revision is made up of Council Members charged with responsibility for
adjudicating, exclusively, on disputes arising over the apportionment of project
charges, as specifically assessed, on a property-specific basis.)
The municipality will determine a cost on a per metre basis for a designated lot size
and adjustments will be made for lots either greater or smaller to ensure that costs
are allocated to all benefiting properties on a just and equitable basis.
Throughout the entire extension of municipal services process, staff is regularly in
communication with project property owners, regarding process issues, cost
estimates and projected construction timelines.
Cost estimates,
remain one of the
key communication components, and as such, the majority of property owners'
questions will have dealt with perceived calculation errors and omissions as
identified in the many communications and final assessment notices provided to
them by staff. Staff would, of course, endeavor to satisfy any ratepayer enquiries so
as to limit the possible need for ratepayers to appear as delegations further to
completion of these projects.
Policy No. CP- F- 1 . 4 ( Es-WW-01. 1)
Page 11
10. Policy Implementation
This Extension of Municipal Water and Wastewater Services policy, is to be
implemented immediately upon Council approval and shall apply to all current
unbilled and future requests/ petitions as well as for those currently being evaluated,
but not
reviewed.
yet fully