Off-Site Levy Bylaw No. 1086-25
Beaumont, Alberta
· No. 1086-25
· adopted 2025-08-26
· summary & facts
This is the exact embedded text of the captured official document.
Snapshot aa3d7cd16eb0 · verified 2026-10-19 ·
original document ·
archived snapshot ·
unofficial consolidation, the official version is held by the municipal clerk.
BYLAW #1086-25
The City of Beaumont Off-Site Levy Bylaw
Under the Municipal Government Act a Council may by bylaw provide for the imposition of a
levy known as an Off-Site Levy in respect of land to be developed or subdivided, and authorize
an agreement to be entered into for the payment of the levy;
Council for the City of Beaumont desires to establish an Off-Site Levy for the purposes
described in section 648 of the Act;
The City engaged a consultant, Urban Systems, to prepare a report on Off-Site Infrastructure
requirements and to establish a fair and equitable method of calculating Off-Site Levies;
The City consulted in good faith with representatives of the Development industry on existing
and future Off-Site Infrastructure requirements, the methodology on which to base an Off-Site
Levy and the calculation of the levy;
In developing the Off-Site Levy under this Bylaw, the City applied the criteria and principles
specified in the Act and the Off-Site Levies Regulation, and
Council's intention to consider this Bylaw has been advertised in accordance with the Act.
Therefore, Council enacts:
PART I -- DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
Definitions 1 In this bylaw:
(a) "Act" means the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c M-26;
(b)"Bylaw" means this Bylaw, together with all schedules;
(c) "Chief Administrative Officer" means the Chief Administrative
Officer of the City or their delegate;
(d) "City" means the municipal corporation of The City of
Beaumont;
(e) "Council" means the Council for the City of Beaumont;
(f) "Developable Land" means all land contained within the
municipal boundaries of the City:
(i) upon which Development takes place after the date of
passing of this Bylaw; or
(ii) for which a Development Agreement is executed on or after
the date of passing this Bylaw;
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 1
but excludes all Developed Land.
(g)"Developed Land" means all land upon which Development has
taken place or for which a Development Agreement has been
executed prior to the date of passing of this Bylaw;
(h)"Development" means "development" as defined in the Act;
(i) "Development Agreement" means an agreement between the
City and the applicant in relation to Subdivision approval or a
Development Permit in accordance with section 650 or 655 of
the Act;
(j) "Development Permit" means "development permit" as defined
in the Act;
(k)"Growth" shall mean:
(i) the creation of new Lots through Subdivision; and
(ii) the occurrence of Development;
(1) "Lot" means "lot" as defined in the Act;
(m)"Off-Site Infrastructure" means new or expanded:
(i) facilities for the storage, transmission, treatment or
supplying of water;
(ii) facilities for the treatment, movement or disposal of sanitary
sewage;
(iii) roads required for or impacted by a Subdivision or
Development;
(iv) transportation infrastructure required to connect, or to
improve the connection of, municipal roads to provincial
highways resulting from a Subdivision or Development; and
(v) fire hall facilities; and includes
(vi) land required for or in connection with any of the above
categories;
(n)"Off-Site Levy" means the off-site levy or levies established
pursuant to this Bylaw;
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 2
(o)"Report" means the Off-Site Levy Background Report 2025
prepared for the City by Urban Systems, attached as Schedule
"Cc",
(p)"Subdivision" means "subdivision" as defined in the Act.
Interpretation 2 The following rules apply to interpretation of this bylaw:
(a) headings, titles, and margin notes in this bylaw are for ease of
reference only;
(b) gender-specific words, phrases, and references are intended to
be gender-neutral, and the singular includes the plural as the
context requires;
(c) every provision of this bylaw is independent of all other
provisions and if any provision of this bylaw is declared invalid
by a Court, all other provisions of this bylaw remain valid and
enforceable; and
(d) references to bylaws and enactments in this bylaw include
amendments and replacement bylaws and enactments, and
regulations and orders thereunder.
PART II -- OFF-SITE LEVY
Object of Levy 3 The object of the Off-Site Levy is to pay for all or part of the capital
costs of Off-Site Infrastructure required for Growth.
Off-Site Levy 4 An Off-Site Levy is established and imposed in respect of Growth on
Established for all Developable Land, excluding those portions designated as
Developable Land
(a) Environmental Reserve;
(b) Municipal Reserve;
(c) arterial road right of way; or
(d) public utility lots, if excluded at the discretion of the Chief
Administrative Officer.
Off-Site Levy 5 An Off-Site Levy is established and may be imposed in respect of
Established for Growth on Developed Lands, but only for a category of Off-Site
Developed Land Infrastructure for which an off-site levy has not previously been
imposed under this Bylaw or a prior bylaw.
Off-Site 6 For each category of Off-Site Infrastructure, the attached Schedule
Infrastructure "A" identifies the anticipated projects required for Growth and the
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 3
location, cost estimate and allocation of benefits for each project.
Benefiting Areas 7 For sanitary infrastructure, the Off-Site Levy is calculated and
applied based on the specific benefitting area, or Basin, shown on
the Sanitary Infrastructure Map in Appendix "A". For all other
categories of Off-Site Infrastructure, the levies are calculated and
applied on a City-wide basis.
Off-Site Levy Rates 8 Off-Site Levies will be assessed on a per hectare basis using the
rates in Schedule "B", that are in effect on the date of the
Development Agreement.
Amend for Grant 9 If the City receives grant funding for a specific project listed in
Funding Schedule "A", then on the date the grant funding is received,
(a) Schedule A is amended by reducing the project cost by the
grant amount, and
(b) Schedule B is amended by reflecting a recalculated levy rate
based on the adjusted project cost in Schedule A.
Background Report 10 The Off-Site Levy program, categories of Off-Site Infrastructure and
the methodology used to calculate the Off-Site Levy rates are
explained in the Report, attached as Schedule "C" and hereby made
part of this Bylaw.
Payment of Levies 11 Subject to this Bylaw, a condition will be imposed on a Subdivision
approval or Development Permit requiring the applicant to enter a
Development Agreement that provides for payment of Off-Site
Levies, among other things.
12 A Development Agreement that provides for deferred payment of
Off-Site Levies may require security for the deferred payment.
13 Provided the City is satisfied that adequate security is provided for
payment of the Off-Site Levies, and unless otherwise agreed in a
Development Agreement, Off-site Levies are to be paid as follows:
(a) 50% (fifty percent) shall be paid prior to the endorsement of
the Subdivision or in the case of a Development Permit, prior to
the execution of the Development Agreement; and
(b) 50% (fifty percent) shall be paid within one year of the first
payment.
14 Payment of Off-Site Levies imposed under this Bylaw shall be made
in accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement.
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 4
15 Any amount of an Off-Site Levy that is not paid when due is a debt
owing to the City and will be subject to the accrual of interest as
determined by the City's policies. This provision does not affect any
other remedy available to the City for late or non-payment of an
Off-Site Levy.
Accounting 16 All Off-Site Levies collected pursuant to this Bylaw shall be
(a) accounted for in a separate fund for each category of Off-Site
Infrastructure; and
(b) expended only for the purpose for which they were collected as
permitted under the Act.
Annual Report 17 The Chief Administrative Officer or their delegate will present an
annual report to Council on Off-Site Levies received and used
during the year, and the balances retained for each category of Off-
Site Infrastructure.
PART III -- GENERAL
Review 18 The City will review growth projections, Off-Site Infrastructure
requirements and costs, Off-Site Levy calculation and rates, and
this Bylaw at least once every three years, and will amend this
Bylaw as may be needed.
Municipal Discretion 19 Nothing in this Bylaw precludes the City from:
(a) imposing further or different charges or levies, duly enacted by
bylaw;
(b) deferring collection of the Off-Site Levy on any portion of
Developable Lands on appropriate terms and conditions,
including requiring security for payment of such deferred levies;
(c) waiving, reducing or forgiving payment of Off-Site Levies
required under this Bylaw to give effect to the principles set out
in the Report and in the Off-Site Levies Regulation, or
(d) providing credits at the time of assessment or collection of Off-
Site Levies or providing repayments to reflect actual costs
incurred for required Off-Site Infrastructure that is constructed
by a developer.
20 Without restricting any provision of this Bylaw, the Chief
Administrative Officer may
(a) enter into Development Agreements on behalf of the City that
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 5
provide for the payment of Off-Site Levies; and
(b) delegate any powers, duties or functions under this Bylaw to an
employee of the City.
21 Council may from time to time adopt policies to assist or direct the
Chief Administrative Officer or their delegate in administering the
Off-Site Levy program and this Bylaw.
Transitional 22 Except as otherwise provided in a Development Agreement signed
prior to the enactment of this Bylaw, this Bylaw applies to:
(a) any Subdivision where the Development Agreement is executed
on or after the date this Bylaw comes into force; and
(b) any Development Permit where the Development Agreement is
executed on or after the date this Bylaw comes into force.
23 Any Off-Site Levies payable under a Development Agreement
entered into prior to enactment of this Bylaw are confirmed and
shall continue to be payable despite the repeal of the previous off-
site levy bylaw.
Repeal 24 Bylaw 945-19 and any amendments thereto are repealed.
FIRST READING:_ August 26, 2025
SECOND READING:_ August 26, 2025
THIRD READING: August 26, 2025
SIGNED THIS 26 day of August, 2025.
Bill Daneluik
MAYOR
Joanne Dargis
CLERK
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 6
SCHEDULE "A"
OFF-SITE INFRASTRUCTURE MAPS, PROJECTS, COST ESTIMATES
AND ALLOCATION OF BENEFITS
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 7
Sanitary Infrastructure -- Map
aut yee | ian 7] ab a ns BEAUMONT
1 f ee ; ; Pa ; vA « | = SS 5 =I | in al ~ a SE Off-Site Levy Projects
=2 i" = 2 yy a oe) m! J * SOE _ _ : Sanitary
a ; E | |. fe - " e se "yy mn 1 rs i.) Proposed Lift Station
j | ast | a eal >) a ce 2 Den Dh. i Sanitary Main(mm)
| oo Tee my T fe Pasa \ arr ag) sen
z= yee ees ee il.
f Ps 6 ke Hy el Baia
2 : - can | -- = SS a iy BA Fag f Tel -- Gescuaoation fal etaiog kiortoton whethersnomn anne
: (| BR RL ee = a
; (SaaS see eee Se ee
: '| = ij stats Fina SYSTEMS
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 8
Sanitary Infrastructure -- Project List
Project Project Description Estimated Estimated Estimated Project Allocation of Benefit to Assumed Off-Site Levy
ID Start Year End Year Cost ($2025) Benefit to Existing Grants Recoverable
New ($2025)
Development
BASIN 1 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-02 675mm Sanitary Sewer -- Upsizing Portion (Elan LS 2025 2026 $484,914 100% 0% - $484,914
to SERTS)
SAN-08 675mm Sanitary Sewer -- Upsizing Portion (Elan LS 2041 2042 $502,233 100% 0% - $502,233
to TWP 510
SAN-09 600mm Sanitary Sewer -- Upsizing Portion (TWP 2041 2042 $327,130 100% 0% - $327,130
510 into N Annex Lands)
SAN-10 _ Elan Lift Station -- Ultimate 2051 2052 $3,126,030 100% 0% - $3,126,030
BASIN 2 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-01 525mm Sanitary Sewer (along TWP 510 to service 2025 2026 $1,274,557 100% 0% - $1,274,557
Le Reve)
SAN-03 Le Reve Lift Station -- Ultimate Upgrade 2051 2052 $55,620 100% 0% - $55,620
BASIN 5 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-05 675mm Sanitary Sewer -- Upsizing Portion (NE Elan: 2030 2031 $803,572 100% 0% - $803,572
TWP 505 to SERTS
SAN-06 600mm/675mm Sanitary Sewer -- Upsizing Portion 2051 2052 $625,302 100% 0% - $625,302
(East Elan: South of TWP 505)
BASIN 6 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-04 Innovation Park Lift Station -- Ultimate 2036 2037 $3,076,610 100% 0% - $3,076,610
BASIN 8 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-07 525mm Sanitary Sewer -- Upsizing Portion (West 2051 2052 $88,289 100% 0% - $88,289
Elan: South of SERTS)
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 9
Water Distribution Infrastructure -- Map
A } Write i & BEAUMONT
25s fj a Q [== Off-Site Levy Projects
i " : ; . . AWA 26 I a Tl ant a i Water Distribution
: ; = 4 Jal a ~ MM ' : Booster Station
2 = = - & 5 5 .
E at ' mee TOWNSHIP-ROAD 511 -- --_-- = = fa Reservoir
pan ici a Dm Bisa Alle aa Se | 1
oe | A a peed
- ese Le cL ES, Le
& anal ae Hi Tes oH] en)
i © ae ade
: Pee). 2k. 7 all ee eae
i oe | Sel bast Sean Asay) Hi
e 4 JER RULES = a ------
i © |
3 : : f- . &- aes a |» brcloctt: zrerooziot URBAN
3 , } aan - a yr | FIGURES |
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 10
Water Distribution Infrastructure -- Project List
Project ID Project Description Estimated Estimated Estimated Benefit to Benefit to Benefit to Assumed _ Off-Site Levy
Start Year End Year Project Cost New Existing Future Grants Recoverable
| ($2025) Development Window ($2025)
WAT-10 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2036 2037 $319,198 100% 0% 0% - $319,198
NW Elan
WAT-11 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2037 2038 $286,125 100% 0% 0% - $286,125
NW Elan
WAT-15 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2051 2052 $605,554 100% 0% 100% - sO
SE Elan from 50th Ave
WAT-17. 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2036 2037 $549,559 100% 0% 0% - $549,559
NW Elan from 50th Ave
WAT-18 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2042 2043 $912,523 100% 0% 0% - $912,523
TWP 510 connecting NW RPH
WAT-23. 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2051 2052 $1,132,192 100% 0% 100% - SO
N Annex Lands from NW RPH
WAT-24 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2051 2052 $199,057 100% 0% 100% - sO
N Annex Lands
WAT-25 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2051 2052 $253,205 100% 0% 100% - sO
SE Elan
WAT-28 450mm Watermain - Upsizing Portion - 2055 2056 $283,048 100% 0% 100% - sO
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 11
Water Storage and Supply Infrastructure -- Map
oes ! ss Q ' | lias a j "a Off-Site Levy Projects
Gis = r | = . f ie | =" aa g Water Supply and Storage
| 1% in et tees 8) LOPCUECLOVCN OSC T Steet Ke | ies
Pe Foor. a g Bes oe aie, ae ee) NN --_*
'ea Sat aan teed par Seat Al ee ao ee ] . -- 400
t | ie Wetae (papaya cupowelee SY) ae
| oe 5), Pass Socr oo
8 = oo ie = Lest | tf aa : al VestVita --
ieee ae i ES) NeliMie a pee a eee
@ aes ee eee
e 3 'i aie j ; a. bead om aa, Wer D Wii & -- precise location of all existing information whether shown or not.
E BER LIS = a
Paae: SS gs = lo *
Eas: | i at a Oe ns cee a
3 'HWY, 625 Se7s Hib - ----- == =a = ; - Data provided by
: i . j |__| é ; ' ,
5 > | iP " fr " f c autor ZRRODER
4 ; | alr ie ee SYSTEMS
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 12
Water Storage and Supply Infrastructure -- Project List
Project ID Project Description Estimated Estimated Estimated Project Benefit to Benefit to Assumed Off-Site Levy
Start Year End Year Cost ($2025) New Existing Grants Recoverable
Development ($2025)
SVPR
RR 243
RR 243
Elan
Build Out
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 13
Transportation Infrastructure -- Map
iis oN be pe ogee © BEAUMONT
EL Sages : faq LAr LO
; Pe Ly =A : 1 ' | q \f mil ; ; ; Ld. He Off-Site Levy Projects
: Y i -- : -- h c a - eT a. 7 é aa 1 at = Transportation
3 : | Le Rie « UH. aN = AL he =! --_ precise location of all existing information whether shawn ar not
: 'TPT-11-ULT] mn $HWY;6253 es Abb. y r = on: - Data provided by
15 i <= C= =D
; = : er) = ale) statue Final SYSTEMS
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 14
Transportation Infrastructure -- Project List
Project ID Project Description Estimated Estimated Estimated Benefit to Benefit to Benefit to Assumed Off-Site Levy
Start End Project Cost New Existing Future Grants Recoverable
Year Year ($2025) Development Window ($2025)
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 15
Fire Services Infrastructure -- Map
7 o . | | gee Ie BEAUMONT
= . eit = wa te
sos fr ae Re | x if . ae ' Off-Site Levy Projects
TE i ' -- - : = * sear | Je 1 --- tekeve 5 s: Fire Services
: hi +i "| UP f ) i= ie oN Py ex oath & x fe Oo Fire Service Locations
: sk, -- : ame - rr : z come > ' ; Wy 2 © @ Ultimate Service Basins
of 5 . 5 ih ae =F = SS \ eas ai" 6} | | City Boundary
es Oe nes aera i a ae
| ye ge Nas
f ae Pe Baal beste = t-Bacsn=
A; © a | Se ee | steores Ss J i awit, tabs
2 T a 5 Siig . =o eT aA = aM | nae -- pabcea cauon of exisiou lneratcn whether showmornk
is ABE el UL = ------
ce 7 ie Ca le a cer bl
a ss T te :
: : =| Gi oy j Checked: Aa SYSTEMS
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 16
Fire Services Infrastructure -- Project List
Project Project Description Estimated Estimated Assumed Benefit Benefit to Off-site
ID Project Cost Construction Grants to New Existing Levy
($2025) Years ($2025) Development Recoverable
FIRE-01 Fire Hall #2 (North Elan) $15,014,780 2028-2031 $0 78% 22% $11,711,529
FIRE-02 Multi-Service Facility - $12,526,465 2032-2035 $0 37% 63% $4,634,792
Fire Portion
(Innovation Park)
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 17
SCHEDULE "B"
OFF-SITE LEVY RATES
Off-Site Levy Rates for Each Infrastructure Category (per hectare)
Sanitary
Basin 1 $15,687 $16,314 $16,967
Basin 2 $10,858 $11,292 $11,744
Basin 3 $0 $0 $0
Basin 4 $0 $0 $0
Basin 5 $1,185 $1,233 $1,282
Basin 6 $27,964 $29,082 $30,245
Basin 7 $0 $0 $0
Basin 8 $738 $767 $798
Basin 9 $0 $0 $0
Water
Water Distribution $9,727 $10,116 $10,521
Water Supply & Storage $111,212 $115,661 $120,287
Transportation
Arterial Corridor
Improvements & $121,443 $126,300 $131,352
Arterial Intersections
Fire
Fire Services $19,940 $20,738 $21,568
Total Off-Site Levy Rates (per hectare)
Basin 2025 Total Levy Rate 2026 Total Levy Rate 2027 Total Levy Rate *
"Basint | $278,009 | $289,129 | $300,695
"Basin? | $273,180 «| --S«S284,107 |S «8A
"Basins | $262,522 S272,815 | =S«283,72B
"Basin5 | $263,507 |= S274,048 |= 8285,010
* Tf this Bylaw is not amended before 2028 to update the Off-Site Levy rates, then starting on
January 1, 2028, the 2027 rates will be increased by 2% (two percent) to account for inflation.
Bylaw 1086-2025
Page 18
BEAUMONT
Off-Site Levy Background
Report 2025
URBAN SYSTEMS
Off-Site Levy Background Report
Prepared for:
City of Beaumont
5600 -- 49 Street
Beaumont, AB
T4X 1A1
Attention: Trevor Moningka, M.Eng., P.Eng., Long Range Engineer
Prepared By:
Urban Systems Ltd.
Suite 200, 10345 - 105 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T5J) 1E8 | T: 780.430.4041
File: 2720.0021.01
This report is prepared for the sole use of City of Beaumont. No representations of any kind are
made by Urban Systems Ltd. or its employees to any party with whom Urban Systems Ltd. does
not have a contract. © 2025 URBANSYSTEMS®.
Table of Contents
LZ. IMtrOCUCtION .......cccccccessceeeeeeeeseeceeneeeneeeaeeasenseenseaaseassonsaneeaeeassoasaneeanseasseasenesonesensea
1.1.0 PUPPOSC 0. eerie oh
2. GUidING PFINCiPIES .......cccccceeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeeaeeueeeeeaueeaaeeassogseuseaueeauseassneeaeeeaassansesD
3. Anticipated Growth .......cccccsscceseceeeeeeseeecseeseeneeeeeeasseaseneeenseauseasenssaneeeaseassoeeseeseasase®
3.1. GrOWth FOreCaSt ......eccceeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeessaeeessaeesssaeesssaeessseesssseessssesssssesssaeessnaeeee F
3.2. GrOWth Pattern... ..ceececceee etter reece eres eee ee eee sean eesa a eeesaaeeesaaeessaaeessaaeesaaeeesaaeessaeeee D
3.3. Determination of Infrastructure N@CdS.........ccccecceeeesseeeseseeesseeeesseeessseeessseeessseeesseeee Z
4. Off-Site Levy Progralm....ccccsccseesscesscceeeeeeneeceeeueenseeneenaseusenseauseanseussonsaneeaneeassensanees®
4.1. -- Infrastructure INCIUCE" 20... eeeccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeaeeessaeeessaeeessaeesssaeesssaeessseessaeeees LO
4.2. Allocation of Benefit... ccccceeecseeeeeeeeeeseeeeeseeeessaeeessaeeessseesssaeesssaeesssaeessaeessseeees LO
io P< =160)1(-1 8299) 9) 0) (0 § PRRs
4.3.1. City-Wide Vs Area Specific... bl
4.3.2. Build-Out (Capacity) VS. REVOIVING.......cciieecseeeteeeeeseeeeeseeeeseeeeseersneeeeneeeeee bl
Soe PI od £0) | =( 6 Oa ©\0)-) 5: Se
4.4.1. -- CONTINGENCIES 0... ee eeeeeaeeesaneeesaeeresaeeesseeesaeeeeeeee LO
a =) 8 | 6 eee AG
4.5. Application of Levy to Lands ........cccccccsseeesseeeseeeesseeeesaeeessaeeessaeesssaeesssaeesssaeessseeeee Lo
5. Infrastructure CateGOries.......cccccssccsecseeeeeeeeeeseceeneeeneeeusecssosseneeaueeasseassneeanessassane LD
5.1. Sanitary Projects 20... eres LD
oA Co] (=) 0 20 0) [--1 01 > Serre A)
5.2.1. Water DIStriDUtion 00... eceeeceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesaeeeesseeessaaeessaeeessaeeessaeesssaeessaaeeesseeeee LO
5.2.2. Water Supply & Storage......cccccccccecsseeeesseeeseeeeesseeeessseessseeessaeeessaeesssaeessaaeeesneeees Qo
5.3. Tramsportation Projects 0... cece eres reese eeeeeeeeeaaeeesaaeessaneeesaeeeesaeeteeee DO
5.4. Fir [email protected] sees eeeeeeeeeeesaeeeeeesaeesaeeeeaeesaeesaeesaaessaeesaeesaaessaessaessaeessaes oo
6. Levy Calculation ......cccccsccsseseeeceeseeeeesneecnenaeeuseensenaeeaesessaneeneeassogsanseageeasseasseesasss OD
6.1. Levy FUNC Balances 00... ceeececeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeaeeeeeaeeesaaeessaaeessaaeessaaeesaaaeesaaeessaaeess oD
6.2. Financial Model INPuts ..........ccceeeesseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeessaeeesaaeessaeeeesaaeessaeessaaesssaeeesaaees DO
6.3. PAYMENT TIMING «0... cece e eee eee eee eee eee eee eee e eee e a eeeeaaeeesaaeeesaaeessaeeeseaeeeeaaeeseanees 7
6.4. Off-Site Levy Update... eeeecceeeeeseeeeeeeeeeseeeeessaeeessaeessaaeeesaaeessaaeesssesenaeessasees 7
6.5. Cash FIOW Snapshot........cccceeecseeeeeseeeeeseeeeseeeeessaeeessaeeessaeessaaeeesaaeessaeessaeessaeeesaees 7
6.6. Summary of Off-Site Levy Rate 20... cceececseeeeeseeeeeeeeeesaeeeesaaeessaeeessaaeesaaeessnaeesenaeees
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | i
Tables
Table 1: Annual Population and Development Area ProjectiOns .........:::::eseeeeseeeeeeeeeeeee 4
Table 2: Population and Development Area Projections Over a 25 Year Period ............4
Table 3: Anticipated Growth (Gross Development Area in Ha) by Levy Basin...............5
Table 4: Infrastructure Master Plans/Studies .........::cccceeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeseaeeeeeesaeeee 7
Table 5: Summary of Cost Recovery Method by Infrastructure Type@........:sccceesseerereee L2
Table 6: Contingency ASSUMPTIONS ........::ccceesseeeeeeeeeeeeeesaeeeesaaeessaseessaeeessseetssaeessneee LO
Table 7: Sanitary Basin AGjUStMeNts .........:cccceeeeeeeeeeeeeee eee eeeeeeeeaaeeeeeeeeaeeeeesaaeeeeeeseee LG
Table 8: Summary of Sanitary Collection Projects ........:::ccceeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee LZ
Table 9: Summary of Water Distribution Projects ........:::cccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee DL
Table 10: Summary of Water Supply and Storage Projects.........ccccssseessseeeeseeeesseeeenes 20
Table 11: Summary of Transportation Projects ........ccccceeecseeeeeseeeeseeeeseeeeesseeessaeeeenee OL
Table 12: Summary of Projects -- Fire S€rviCeS .......ccsceeeseeeeseeeeeseeeesseeessaeeessaeeesaeee OO
Table 13: Debenture Payments on Existing Debt and Project Repayments ................36
Table 14: Levy FUNd Balances .........cccccccccseceseeeseeeseeeeeeeeseesaeeseeesseesaeesseesseesseeesseees OO
Table 15: Financial Model INPuts ..........cccccececsseeecsseeeeeseeeeeeeeesaeeesseesssaeessaeeessaeetenes DO
Table 16: Sanitary ACCOUNKS.........ccccccesseecseeeseeeseeeseeeeseeeseesaeeseeessaeesaeesseesseesseeesseess OD
Table 17: Water ACCOUNKS .........::cceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaeeeeesaaaeeeseaaaaeeeessaaaeessssaaeeeeesses OO
Table 18: Transportation UPGrades..........ccceccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeaaeeeeeesaaaeeesesaaeeeeesses OO
Table 19: Fire S@rviCes .......cccceccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaeeeeeeaaaaeeessaaaaeesessaaaeesssssaeeeeesses OO
Table 20: Summary of Off-Site Levy RateS ......ccccececseeeeeseeeeeeseeeeaseesseeeessaeeeenaeeesaeee OO
Table 21: Off-Site Levy Totals for 2025, 2026, & 2027 ......cccccccseceseeeeeeeeseeeseeseeeeseees OO
Appendices
Appendix A: Project Benefit Allocation Calculations
Appendix B: Cash Flow Summaries
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | ii
1. Introduction
Over the past decade, the City of Beaumont has emerged as one of the fastest-growing cities in
the Edmonton Metropolitan Region, experiencing rapid population growth and significant housing
and development pressures across multiple growth areas. This expansion has necessitated
updates to the City's overall servicing strategy to ensure sustainable infrastructure development.
To ensure the long-term vibrancy of the community, the City continues to develop a strategic and
proactive approach to growth. The City annexed lands to the north in 2016, further
accommodating its burgeoning population and development needs, and is currently working to
develop a Comprehensive Growth Framework to support decision-making regarding future growth
in the community.
The City's Off-Site Levy (OSL) program enables the collection of levies from new development to
ensure growth pays their fair share for infrastructure. The OSL program was last updated in 2019,
and since then the City has continued to grow, and refine its understanding of the scale, approach
and costs of infrastructure required to service new development going forward.
1.1. Purpose
This Background Report forms part of the Off-Site Levy Bylaw and provides information to support
the 2025 update of the City of Beaumont's OSL program and Bylaw, including the approach and
methods used to calculate off-site levies in Beaumont.
The intent of the 2025 OSL Bylaw update is to update growth assumptions and associated
infrastructure needs, along with reconciling levy reserve balances and financial inputs since the
last update.
As part of this update, a working group of development industry representatives including BILD
Members and other local developers was continuously engaged to obtain feedback throughout
the process. This included several meetings and follow-up communications, alongside City of
Beaumont staff. The community at large will be consulted prior to adoption of the 2025 OSL
Bylaw through a non-statutory public hearing process.
The Background Report is intended to provide transparency to Council, the development industry
and the general public regarding future infrastructure needs along with the levy calculation and
contribution requirements from the City and the development industry, ensuring alignment with
the Municipal Government Act (MGA) and Provincial Off-Site Levies Regulation.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 1
The report is divided into four sections:
1. Off-Site Levy Guiding Principles: Articulates the City's objectives related to the
advancement of growth-related infrastructure.
2. Anticipated Growth: Defines assumptions related to development area needs based on
population and pattern of growth and references the studies completed by the City to
identify future growth-related infrastructure.
3. Off-Site Levy Program: Describes what infrastructure is to be included within the off-
site levy program and provides details on project costs, project timing, allocation of benefit
and cost recovery methodology.
4. Levy Calculation: Articulates cash flow components (inflation, carrying costs, and
interest earned) utilized within the off-site levy calculation and provides the resulting off-
site levy rates for associated benefiting areas.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 2
2. Guiding Principles
Off-site levies are one tool that can be utilized by municipalities to fund growth-related
infrastructure. Off-site levy programs, like other programs utilized by municipalities, should reflect
broader objectives of the community. The following Guiding Principles align with the City's
strategic plans and serve as a benchmark to evaluate future servicing and financing decisions for
growth-related infrastructure.
Financial Balance financial risk to minimize the burden on the
Sustainability Municipality while stimulating sustainable long-term
growth.
e Municipalities generally assume financial risks when they undertake capital projects to
accommodate new development. This is especially true when long-term borrowing is used to
finance capital projects that are required by new development prior to having collected the
necessary off-site levies and other funds from developers to pay for these projects. While the
City feels that it is important to take measures to support and stimulate growth, to take on all
risk for development, assumes too much financial risk for the City. The levy program should
be resilient to changing economic conditions, align with the City's overall financial framework
and contribute to financially sustainable delivery of growth-related infrastructure.
Tie a e( aa Ensure equitable allocation of capital project costs between
existing users and new development.
e Infrastructure costs should be paid by those that benefit. Where a service provides broad based
benefits to the community as a whole, the municipality contributes to the funding of the project.
However, where a service provides a benefit only to new development, the costs should be borne
by development.
eet Ensure a balance between the principle of equity and
PSSULS) administrative efficiency.
elf the principle of equity was the only consideration, complex financial management and cost
recovery procedures can result. The complexities of delivering an equitable levy program should
be balanced with the ability to administer the program efficiently, and cost effectively.
Transparency Demonstrate accountability through clearly articulated
growth-infrastrcuture needs and financial contributions.
eTransparency is essential for ensuring that the calculation, allocation, and utilization of levies are
clear and understandable to all stakeholders. The City aims to foster trust and demonstrate
accountability, ensuring that developers and residents are well-informed about the financial
contributions required for growth-related infrastructure.
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 3
3. Anticipated Growth
3.1. Growth Forecast
Growth assumptions are made to understand what infrastructure needs are required to service
future growth. These assumptions include population growth within the City and the anticipated
location of this growth. Projections for growth are based on the most recent EMRB population
forecasts from present to 2050, with an assumed consistent annual growth thereafter. The
population growth was converted based on people per unit assumptions utilized in the Utility
Master Plan to determine future unit demands. Density targets and a net residential to gross
developable area factor (based on ratios in approved ASP areas) were then utilized to determine
the anticipated gross developable growth (residential & non-residential).
In addition to this growth, assumed build out of the Innovation Park Industrial lands over the
next 25 years was added to establish total annual growth. These growth projections have been
utilized within the off-site levy update and are captured in 7able 1 below.
Table 1; Annual Population and Development Area Projections
: Residential & Industrial Total Gross
rowth Gross Development Development Area (Ha)
Area (Ha) Area (Ha)
2025-2029 4,346 100 23 123
2030-2034 3,860 89 23 112
2035-2039 4,033 93 23 116
2040-2044 4,115 94 23 118
2045-2049 3,927 90 23 113
2050-2090 34,005 781 - 781
Total 54,285 1,246 115 1,362
Table 2: Population and Development Area Projections Over a 25 Year Period
2025 - 2049 21,064 580.95
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 4
3.2. Growth Pattern
The forecasted growth in conjunction with the location of growth (i.e., growth pattern) determines
the City's infrastructure needs to support future growth. A core goal of the City's Municipal
Development Plan is to ensure growth occurs in a logical and financially sustainable manner.
Figure 1 displays the anticipated areas of future growth within the City over the next 25 years.
These areas have been identified based on approved planned lands, logical servicing sequencing,
and input from the development community.
Table 3 provides the assumed distribution of development across the various levy basins over the
25-year development window (2025-2049). This anticipated growth informs the assumed rate of
growth and subsequent anticipated levy collections in the financial model calculations.
Basin 4 is anticipated to develop within the next 20 years, and growth rates were based on input
from City staff.
Basin 6 (Industrial Lands) is anticipated to develop within the next 25 years, and an average
annual growth rate was applied.
The remaining developable lands for each year were split between Basins 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9
based on anticipated development staging as noted by the City.
Table 3: Anticipated Growth (Gross Development Area in Ha) by Levy Basin
Basin Total
Year 8) 8 Total Paying
2025-2029 [ae {-eenneet: ne - y - 123
ier 17 #19 (17/11 «+24 | 23 | 2 | - | - 1122.
Meieey 18 «8922 21 5 26 23 - 116 EEE
2040-2044 19 23 21° «+3 27 23 - - - 118 | 114
AWowwe) 24 #28 #4 1 = 33 ~~ 23 - - - 113 EES)
xii 234 «48 | - | - | 242) --C- - 177. 80 781
339 158 64 25 388 #115 16 115 115 41,362 [ery |
* It should be noted that a separate agreement is in place for the lands within Basin 4, and as
such off-site levies are not assessed on this basin.
See Figure 1 for basin boundaries.
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 5
zzz = | a
IIE a sce | = 3
RRL So i ip
COL eae =~ a) : ; fl
nits =e sa % Pete. | AXBEAUMONT
GNO ee - +. 4, aw )
Own fT ¥ aos = ae AES: " em " = * :
> se ho 3 q
ee ee x = Growth Areas
a 2 i= eee a ---- 5
P62 -- SS g = =
Cc. oO 4 val f 3a :
5 58 : : 3 eS ; | E/REVEIASP 3
BSe See -- - /
3 3 ~ Bese = ; ; :
mo as) on \ ~
348 ae I \ = "2 Approved Planned Areas (ASPs, NSPs)
g--- & re ¥ \ vi! a»
E , = | é Ns , | Anticipated 25 year Growth
TWPRDIS10 i 7 Big ;
g : vm or RI eae ERE eer Ret come | \ ED <p) Gas os ION [__] City Boundary
® con ey 'wh '1% ei i BS oe | , A, aes \ S20 FFF ; Eee | Ly aN }
& ' a Ay 7 =3 + i : | Yn oe ae i eu [ y " \ ¥ 4 Ap * KY | age Y 7
ex. Ge Pes (-- ae ee iy mf Y Kee ee gee Gt!) RS ae Pe ON ete ae ll SH dne
3 pe " 2 SP as "Aas : Ds ty rt Qe ge | PS fg. ee | a a Fa-+ 5 a tae ee i » i PB coal hy
S bw "i & 4 : oar » (haa C D jaa yy cosmug te | ip uaa Xs shi. 'i AR an
a Wary . mote a : ow ) essere) ES J Bi ita f Te <4 AER j oa me GF Noah "4 enero or
-- paeet ace ey Pa: form Giese Ga hla enh Eby prem at) I Ba Ne e" TiNe "El
$ } iat = Gad Sea He tere fi Spe) Pen Wn a
a f iy "ir | ia Z Y MB TE =) i BY Wey GSN a Bae sie: FESEN ES & $
5 By 13 ) iP -( i eee Se es pan ees Ail tg on o Ei
& \ ' f ie Em | > Vea ea Pilea geo tc, bam = ae te Psd ilk Pal eas) Fa 3
: ; > esi P= ieee ere | a eee Wrst
2 = om ee , id STD OO SEL x Ge f gs a pease ew. a) ee) |. ee) | omnes
i 5 ~-- . i A CF tal 2 =e | P ee: a ry Po PA 2 Dee
A ; Ss -" . TWPRDI505 : ELAN ASE Sa Cy paae ba A Gc = eB Px "h i}: Ts a ea
2 s nie " ay y Cee ald ed et ones rsa UCSe 1 fae Ne aS: FOREST LAT (|
a we: ; e\c ee | | Ld DY NE . fa: ; (anaes me ee ar | \ 2 HEIGHTS ASPESs seat
S . A r Je sstigaramonaany i th | ~ pu ¢ '17° CAU hs 'eke | | ee ee SS
Fe ). '4 | Pireceeesieee) [CS > A SF a =f 'G Vig F ae) : { " i V7, ESTATES ASF, ry The accuracy & completeness of information shown on this
g Pi | fo ier A | a h ax CREE) FR. FEY | wt acd F "Db ete on | drawing is not guaranteed. It will be the responsibility of the user
. 4 | | fe Ff oN a o- 7 QeSrse Gaye b- o (mae of the information shown on this drawing to locate & establish the
a ; ; wa! ) ) 2 5 1 on @ woe \ 2 ao | Snmscanenenng precise location of all existing information whether shown or not.
a ; -- ff | \ eee TE een CREE aap atta Sl eer | 5 ms eka ¥ My | ) 250 500 750
N all . ai Ltn! ste SS aeaw e 'a | 2S ne | chs oy cS . 7
8 : ' v ae vie Wa RNS She Cite Se | eee be { wthesanchaeme Coordinate System: Scale: 1:22,000
S $5: genera) ay} Lew Na | (ene aa i (When plotted at 11"x17")
S - , "oad | ~ eee \ per Cae 1] NAD 1983 37M N14
ST } - tBu by x. lt L : eae fea) i> gh aain faisr
3 = Be Fi 7= fs) - oe Fe fad i 3 ' Data Sources:
J -- : e e i ¥ ie,
r s 1 <0 eh a | ae Le oe ---- ee | - Data provided by
Oo - __ = = | L
& ; ' 675 tN a a { | '=
8 7 ¢ = = S |
€ «| ai aor g 1 | INNOVATION |
8 - . asa, PARK(ASP. Project #: 2720.0021.01 URBAN
e 2 = ae a | Author: SDF
g " | Checked: AR s
ra - j Status: Final SYSTEM
c oa Revision: A
5 Date: 2025 /5/13 FIGURE 1
m0)
2 one
3.3. Determination of Infrastructure Needs
The following studies, plans and technical documents outline various growth-related
infrastructure and servicing strategies based on projected and anticipated growth. The
infrastructure required to service future growth identified in these reports informs the
infrastructure included in the City's Off-Site Levy (OSL) off-site levy program. Notably since the
last OSL update, the City updated the Utility and Stormwater Management Master Plan (UMP).
The rate of growth used in developing the UMP is more rapid than the growth needs outlined
above. Timing for the projects identified in the below plans and studies have been updated to
reflect the assumed growth timing.
Table 4; Infrastructure Master Plans/Studies
Arterial Corridor Improvement Projects:
e Township Road 510 Preliminary Design Report (Range Road 241 to Range Road 244), June 2022
e Transportation Master Plan, 2020
e Range Road 241 Improvements (Secondary Highway 625 to Township Road 510), December 2015
e Range Road 243 Improvements (Secondary Highway 625 to Township Road 510), December 2015
Arterial Intersection Upgrades:
e Elan 2 NSP Traffic Impact Assessment, May 2024
e Innovation Park ASP Transportation Impact Assessment, June 2024
e Revised Final Transportation Impact Assessment Le Reve Commercial Development, December
2022
e Township Road 510 Preliminary Design Report (Range Road 241 to Range Road 244), June 2022
e Traffic Impact Assessment Lakeview Area Structure Plan Update, September 2019
e Elan Neighbourhood One Transportation Impact Assessment, June 2018
e City of Beaumont 2025 Approved Budget: 2025-2029 Financial and Capital Plans, December 2024
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 7
Infrastructure needs for future development are well outlined in the above documents. Even so,
many things can influence the City's ability to predict, with certainty, the future cost and methods
of infrastructure servicing to service new development. Factors such as construction cost inflation,
the order of development, technology, and environmental factors and requirements can influence
the cost and shape of the infrastructure required to support growth. Fairness in the off-site levy
is best achieved through keeping the necessary assessments of future infrastructure needs
current.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 8
4. Off-Site Levy Program
Off-site levies (OSLs) are primarily utilized as a funding tool for major off-site growth-related
infrastructure and offer an effective mechanism to ensure costs are shared equitably with those
that benefit. Infrastructure included, allocation of benefit, and the approach to cost recovery are
key components of any OSL program. The method to determine these key components can vary
across infrastructure categories and communities based on a community's context and broader
objectives.
The methodology for determining off-site levies is based on a structured approach designed to
ensure cost recovery for growth-related municipal infrastructure. This process involves analyzing
projected growth, identifying necessary infrastructure projects, and developing a financial model
aligned with the City's long-term development strategy. The diagram below shows the levy
program.
The assessment of infrastructure needs considers servicing requirements, sequencing efficiency,
and the City's financial capacity. The allocation of costs accounts for benefits to existing residents,
and differentiates between projects that provide City-wide benefits and those that are site-
specific.
oo = How much of ee I TRUCT
What the project How will the
GROWTH PLAN infrastructure INFRASTRUCTURE can be CREATE A levy be
What is needed to DELIVERY charged to FINANCIAL MODEL applied to
development serve the PHILOSOPHY growth? How do we development?
are we growth plan? Who builds allow for
planning for? what? inflation, --_ -
interest and --
debt costs?
GROWTH LEVY LEVY
NEEDS PROGRAM CALCULATION
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 9
4.1. Infrastructure Included
Infrastructure that can be considered for inclusion in an OSL program is guided by the Municipal
Government Act. The City has included major off-site infrastructure related to water, sanitary,
transportation, and fire services projects within their program. Actual infrastructure included in
each infrastructure category is captured below in Section 5.0.
4.2. Allocation of Benefit
Allocation of benefit refers to the proportionate distribution of infrastructure costs to those that
benefit from the infrastructure. Allocation of benefit can occur between existing development and
new development, between multiple new developments and even contemplate multi-jurisdictional
allocation, depending on the infrastructure. In determining the allocation of benefit to existing
development or users of the infrastructure, several factors are considered, including capacity,
compliance (i.e., upgrades to meet regulatory requirements), and condition (i.e., asset renewal
of an existing system, and/or improved levels of service). In the case of replacements and
upgrades, if the existing infrastructure is new, relative to its design life, the City may not consider
the project as providing a benefit to existing users as the infrastructure would not need to be
rehabilitated for several years in the future.
In general, for water and wastewater infrastructure, allocation of benefit is determined based on
the portion of the capacity of the upgrade that is required to serve existing development and the
portion of capacity allocated to growth.
For transportation and fire services projects, the benefit allocation can be challenging, as capacity
allocations are more difficult to determine. It is anticipated as new development occurs, the level
of service of existing roads and intersections will decline. As improvements to the transportation
network are implemented (e.g., road widening, upgraded intersection controls, etc.) the level of
service for existing users of the transportation network is expected to marginally improve for a
period of time and then diminish again as growth persists.
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 10
For fire services projects, allocation is based on the ratio of existing to new development area
serviced by each facility in the ultimate build out scenarios.
4.3. Recovery Approach
When determining how infrastructure costs included in the OSL program will be recovered (i.e.,
paid back) from those that benefit there are generally two pieces that require consideration: 1)
the application of the levy (i.e., City-wide or to specific area); and 2) timing of recovery.
Cost recovery of off-site levy infrastructure projects can be calculated and applied on a city-wide
basis or on a specific benefitting area or catchment basis. The decision to apply levies by either
of these methods depends on the infrastructure projects and whether the benefit of the projects
can be definitively allocated to a specific area.
For the purposes of the current levy calculations, a City-wide levy collection
Es method has been selected for all types of water, transportation and fire services
Ee FA infrastructure as it provides the most equitable approach, offers increased funding
flexibility to support orderly and timely construction of projects and provides a
consistent levy for the development industry. The benefiting area is considered the City boundary.
The levy for sanitary infrastructure is calculated on an area-specific basis. The
City is divided into basins for sanitary collection. These basins are demarcated 9
based on anticipated areas of benefit for the specific infrastructure, in alignment
with the sanitary servicing outlined in the Utility Master Plan (UMP).
Generally, off-site levies are determined under one of two cost recovery program methodologies:
a Capacity-based program or a revolving program.
° The Build-Out (Capacity-Based) approach considers all land is potentially
available for development and the total infrastructure required to support full build-
= ¥ out. Under this model, costs are distributed based on the ultimate capacity or
infrastructure needed to accommodate future growth. This approach is best suited
for well-defined build-out areas where a limited number of projects are necessary to provide
essential services. One of the key advantages of this method is its predictability. Since it considers
all required projects required to service an area, developers and municipal planners can anticipate
long-term costs with more certainty. However, this approach may require significant upfront
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 11
funding, as infrastructure must often be built in advance of full development. Depending on the
speed of growth and benefiting area, it can also be a significant period of time to recover these
upfront costs. As such, financing costs and carrying capacity should be considerations to ensure
the long-term financial sustainability of the program.
The Revolving Timeframe approach considers development within a set
number of years and includes only those projects that are anticipated to start
within that timeframe. Rather than planning for full build-out from the beginning, oC
the Revolving Timeframe allows for periodic reassessments and adjustments
based on changing development trends. The intent of this approach is to provide greater
adaptability and to help minimize fluctuations in levies over time. It is particularly useful when
many projects are planned over a long horizon and where development patterns may shift. By
spreading costs across a revolving window, municipalities can ensure that infrastructure funding
aligns more closely with actual growth, reducing the financial burden on early-stage developers.
For Beaumont's levy calculations, a 25-year revolving program is used, as this typically matches
the long-term infrastructure planning horizon for the City.
For the current levy calculations, the approach for each infrastructure type is indicated in 7able
5.
Table 5: Summary of Cost Recovery Method by Infrastructure Type
Infrastructure Type City- Area Build-Out Revolving
Wide Specific (Capacity) Timeframe
Find 9 S
Sanitary Collection Projects Y Y
Water Distribution Projects VY Vv
Water Supply & Storage Projects Y Vv
Transportation Projects VY Y
Fire Services Projects VY Vv
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 12
4.4. Project Costs
Estimated costs for projects are based on the technical studies and documents referenced in
Section 3.3. Project costs were inflated from the time of original estimate to 2025 dollars, and
the following principles were applied as it pertains to contingencies:
e Engineering and Design Fees were estimated at 15% of base capital costs, unless more
detailed and up to date information on engineering and design costs was available.
e Contingency was applied based on the Class of project cost estimate, as follows:
Table 6: Contingency Assumptions
Class of Estimate Percentage Applied
Class A 10%
Class B 20%
Class C 25%
Class D/E 30%
The City may receive project specific and/or discretionary grants that may be utilized to help fund
off-site levy projects. Application of all project specific grants within the off-site levy program will
be applied to the total project costs. Both the City and developers will share the benefit of these
grants based upon the allocation of benefit of the project. Of note, discretionary grant funding
provided to the City such as through the Local Government Fiscal Framework or otherwise are
part of the City's funds and may be applied to the City's portion of off-site levy project costs, at
the City's discretion. At the time of this update, the City has not identified any secured grants for
the off-site infrastructure projects included in the levy program.
4.5. Application of Levy to Lands
The land area to be charged levies includes all lands within the development area, excluding
Environmental Reserve, Municipal Reserve, and Arterial Road Right-of-Way (the area of land
required to provide additional road right-of-way for divided rural arterial roads, above the width
of a major residential collector; based on City standards this is 31.0 m). Basin 4 is also excluded
from the application of the levies.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 13
Of note, the Leblanc Canal runs through several future development areas, and is currently
defined as PUL (public utility lot). PUL lands are normally required as part of servicing future
development, and included in the land area charged a levy. However in Beaumont's context, the
Leblanc Canal functions more similar to an environmental feature that cannot be moved or
developed otherwise, and is pre-existing. As such, PUL lands for the Leblanc Canal only will be
excluded from levy charge calculations for developments.
This total area to be charged levies is termed the Gross Developable Area, as referred to in
Section 3.0 above, and is used in estimating levy collections in the financial model.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 14
5. Infrastructure Categories
5.1. Sanitary Projects
Based on the nature of the City's wastewater system and in accordance with the Utility Master
Plan (UMP), sanitary collection trunks extend from new developments and flow to lift stations
which then pump the effluent to the South East Regional Trunk Sewer South (SERTS) pipeline
that moves the effluent out of the City.
Infrastructure Included
- Lift Stations: The ultimate design of lift stations that service new growth areas. All three
anticipated lift stations in Beaumont service catchments solely consisting of new
development areas. Developers are anticipated to build the majority of this infrastructure
in stages as developments come online and trigger incremental upgrades to the lift
stations. As such, interim lift station costs are not included in the levy, as they are
considered part of development. However, moving forward, proportionate elements of
interim lift station infrastructure that meet the ultimate design criteria are included (i.e.
building, wet wells).
¢ Sanitary Collection Extensions: For the purposes of the off-site levy, regional trunks
are defined as those with a diameter greater than or equal to 525mm based on the City's
network assessment. The upsizing portion of regional trunks (the incremental cost to
increase the pipe size beyond 300mm as per the UMP) is included in the levy and are
allocated to specific basins. Sanitary collection extensions less than 525mm in diameter
are excluded from the off-site levy program as they are anticipated to mostly be delivered
by the development community as growth progresses, and will serve fewer developments
compared to the larger diameter mains. It is acknowledged sanitary collection extensions
between 300mm and 525mm in many cases will be oversizing required by the developer;
these infrastructure contributions will be addressed outside of the off-site levy program.
Allocation of Benefit
All projects included within the levy are new additions to the network that only provide benefit to
new development. As these projects consist of brand-new infrastructure to add additional capacity
for growth, 100% of the benefit is allocated to growth for all sanitary projects.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 15
Recovery Approach
9 Site Specific
Benefit for the identified sanitary projects is delineated on a catchment (i.e., basin) basis. All
sanitary projects are site-specific and provide a direct benefit to growth within the basin.
Build-Out (Capacity)
The basins have been adjusted based on the updated sanitary servicing outlined in the UMP.
Table 7 below shows the previous levy basins in comparison to the new ones outlined, and Figure
2 shows the updated basin boundaries. The total remaining benefiting hectares to contribute to
the area-specific projects is outlined in 7ab/e 3, above.
Table 7: Sanitary Basin Adjustments
2019 Off-Site Levy Sanitary Basins 2025 Off-Site Levy Sanitary Basins
Basin 1
Basin 2
Basin 1 Basin 3
Basin 7
Basin 9
Basin 5
Basin 2
Basin 8
Basin 3 Basin 5
Basin 4 Basin 4
Basin 5 Basin 6
As the sanitary collection infrastructure required to service the full build-out of growth in each
catchment is well understood, and is required to be constructed in advance of future development
occurring, a Build-Out (Capacity) approach to cost recovery has been applied.
Grants
There are no grants assumed for sanitary projects.
AS BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 16
Table 8: Summary of Sanitary Collection Projects
Project Project Description Estimated Estimated Estimated Project Class Allocation of Benefit Assumed Off-Site Levy
ID Start Year End Year Cost ($2025) Estimate Benefit to to Grants Recoverable
New Existing ($2025)
Development
BASIN 1 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-02 675mm Sanitary Sewer -- 2025 2026 $484,914 Class C 100% 0% - $484,914
Upsizing Portion (Elan LS to
SERTS)
SAN-08 675mm Sanitary Sewer -- 2041 2042 $502,233 Class D/E 100% 0% - $502,233
Upsizing Portion (Elan LS to TWP
510)
SAN-09 600mm Sanitary Sewer -- 2041 2042 $327,130 Class D/E 100% 0% - $327,130
Upsizing Portion (TWP 510 into
N Annex Lands)
SAN-10 Elan Lift Station -- Ultimate 2051 2052 $3,126,030 Class D/E 100% 0% - $3,126,030
BASIN 2 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-01 525mm Sanitary Sewer (along 2025 2026 $1,274,557 Actual Costs 100% 0% - $1,274,557
TWP 510 to service Le Reve)
SAN-03 Le Reve Lift Station -- Ultimate 2051 2052 $55,620 Class B 100% 0% - $55,620
Upgrade
BASIN 5 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-05 675mm Sanitary Sewer -- 2030 2031 $803,572 Class D/E 100% 0% - $803,572
Upsizing Portion (NE Elan: TWP
505 to SERTS)
SAN-06 600mm/675mm Sanitary Sewer 2051 2052 $625,302 Class D/E 100% 0% - $625,302
-- Upsizing Portion (East Elan:
South of TWP 505)
BASIN 6 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-04 Innovation Park Lift Station -- 2036 2037 $3,076,610 Class D/E 100% 0% - $3,076,610
Ultimate
BASIN 8 -- Build-Out (Capacity)
SAN-07 525mm Sanitary Sewer -- 2051 2052 $88,289 Class D/E 100% 0% - $88,289
Upsizing Portion (West Elan:
South of SERTS)
Bd BEAU MONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 17
aad al SSeS -- -- = : ; it
_A_ 'Gea - PS ce
--(f eee 2 SSS ) yA AXBEAUMONT
coe E -- _--_s * - 22> a matt he "57a f | ° °
coe = eae eo [= Be 8 = =e J ee Off-Site Levy Projects
2 Qe = SET j hs 5 eS * Wed " - .,' --- ae e -~ . | °
B28 x of oe, we. "y a k a -- =| ie~ i = i Rave aa \
: 58 ct ef 4 p RTS S| |) Sa 5 8 nN | Fi ie tae | Legend
ra ee hs (<4 == + ~ le SSS = ges! rea) 4 ; Proposed Lift Station
a Ree, a Wed oat 422 = ' ? " .
2 B} es Os = a, a a : | | Basin Boundary
g ] <iwa, ; 2 wo ha 4 ere Sanitary Main(mm)
EEE - = , =<TOWNSHIPIROADISTO [ a - : = . ie
o ~m v: Mert # 2, i | ay a | aa Ary | { iN & i ' y. - eum 600mm
© lee ; : ¥ We sid Ss as Ca Guszy, SAN-10 g f ] PW, en =e = mi , o--a" x | saint
ee.) tees 7" a a a a ey ee eS HS le
-- ae ACRWC-WW-UPG.1) ACRWC-W.W.ULT,UPG- | lamer ~ eS a -- me \ Ys cs
~ in . Paihia | } q Wei | nt a | alae weal, { woe "emay | #\~a\% <pl | | - »
» a oe Mi HW im ie inane i # i I z ae | i yf ian bet ; take 7 pred | Som set <A SS ae
Ps att" Ae i aad 8X2 Gal RT are saarend oper) sang mt Kr -_ a
fo} -- -- eet at | < ot Bi Fam | | ; ae pea =) | a QA =F oat a
¢ ) a Hl " eh ee eas fe A ei ww |] | \ i &
rol As = il eb H | 7 , 4 : x 1 Qane gare Sot \ } F | -_ | Quit) 5 ; t a!
iS #¢ ] ¥ I nas aif ed rad Hh i | Damo et a | b if | 8 a rrr aon a ® 5 & Ses ~:
A el » Qeensieery : / a eee ra hed aS AVENUE re nl rac -- MLOWNSHIP) ROAD. 505 |
a maou t ; ------_ ' q atid \ r < oust] te ee by Se r 4 = on mute pn 1 ! oe | T aad 'reer t
- z Ue 'et =e ke eo ', Lk) pai { fa 3 ol eV (or paral : 3 Th & f inf h h
2 eeper yee es ; = ; Ce. Se T io Ww wd! yf awa ie @ accuracy & completeness of information shown on this
2 er | | m, | in | I ,_ q Le 1 i g mal pis. 7 drawing is not guaranteed. It will be the responsibility of the user
, ee ~ i x ; se i, td a ees "A am of the information shown on this drawing to locate & establish the
€ gt) ee y) -- _. uel iy @ ate STEN a5 \ 9 bree oT | (( i | , F precise location of all existing information whether shown or not.
2 Wee e- = a i | p & za. | Ab) fe > PaaS fn : 's ae ai / | ° 250 500 750, 1,000
g <de Nixa eS Seo Et BY, = a a. x | Coordinate System: Scale: 1:22,000
Sy ieee - 3 LS XS pe, NaF en ig (When plotted at 11"x17")
> = = a 2 ey --_ | ez NAD 1983 3TM 114
mt ae | : es .. 76 i i i } * : m1 al = | } » Station f' . Data Sources:
SE - ---------- ---- ---~\ ~ -- ae | S| = A. | - Data provided by
is ey ae ----_ = Fin 'is -- = & ea 1 =
E i el Pe . ; Project #: | 2720.0021.01 URBAN
Z J &k Ing " Author: SDF
_ wedi | Checked: AR
& eo" LA . | Status: Final SYSTEMS
5 } Snes P »| | Revision: A
3 oe | is : _----<---- -- mq Sseeea| | Date: 2025/7/11 FIGURE 2
5.2. Water Projects
Infrastructure Included
The current water distribution system is an interlinked network of pipes that together provides
necessary water pressure, fire flow distribution and water flow to deliver water to users and fill
all water storage reservoirs in the City.
Many municipalities determine a certain size of main within a development that would be the
developer's sole responsibility to construct. Any pipe size installed above this base diameter is
considered oversizing. Based on the work completed through the UMP and the City's General
Development Standards, water distribution lines 300mm or less are generally required to service
local developments. Lines greater than 300mm provide a distribution function that feeds the
overall system, or more than one development. As such, water mains 300mm or less are
considered developer constructed projects and not included in the off-site levy. Any pipes that
are not dedicated supply lines that require oversizing are included within the levy. The incremental
cost associated with increasing the pipe size greater than 300mm diameter is considered required
to supply water beyond an individual development, and thus has been included in the off-site
levy for new development.
Allocation of Benefit
All projects included within the levy are new infrastructure added to the network that only provide
benefit to new development. These projects will add additional capacity for growth, and as such,
are allocated 100% to growth.
Recovery Approach
gael City-Wide
Projects related to water distribution benefit the broader system due to its looped nature and
planned evolution of pressure zones and servicing strategy over time. All improvements will
continue to be allocated City-wide.
oS Revolving Timeframe
As the water distribution network will be built out in tandem with developing growth areas, the
exact progression and timing will vary with actual growth. As such, a revolving timeframe of 25
years is being utilized for water distribution projects.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 19
Grants
There are no grants assumed for water distribution projects.
4 BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 20
Table 9: Summary of Water Distribution Projects
Project Project Description Estimated Estimated Estimated Class Benefit to Benefit Benefit Assumed Off-Site Levy
ID Start Year End Year Project Cost Estimate New to to Future Grants Recoverable
($2025) Development Existing Window ($2025)
WAT-10 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2036 2037 $319,198 Class D/E 100% 0% - - $319,198
WAT-11 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2037 2038 $286,125 Class D/E 100% 0% - - $286,125
WAT-15 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2051 2052 $605,554 Class D/E 100% 0% 100% - XO)
Portion - SE Elan from 50th
Ave
WAT-17. 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2036 2037 $549,559 Class D/E 100% 0% - - $549,559
Portion - NW Elan from 50th
Ave
WAT-18 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2042 2043 $912,523 Class D/E 100% 0% - - $912,523
Portion - TWP 510
connecting NW RPH
WAT-23. 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2051 2052 $1,132,192 Class D/E 100% 0% 100% - SO
Portion - N Annex Lands from
NW RPH
WAT-24 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2051 2052 $199,057 Class D/E 100% 0% 100% - XO)
Portion - N Annex Lands
WAT-25 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2051 2052 $253,205 Class D/E 100% 0% 100% - XO)
Portion - SE Elan
WAT-28 450mm Watermain - Upsizing 2055 2056 $283,048 Class D/E 100% 0% 100% - SO
Portion - N Annex Lands
Note: Projects highlighted grey are not within the 25-year revolving window, and as such, are not included in the current levy.
4 BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 21
a) Se | J <= Se J ~ . : Z
-5 2 haz é 'oe > Fae: Bs aaa ie < SS , )
a eau) i: SS ore = ry ie ees : paracks ve ra (a4 ° .
es) Se ee a - -- Off-Site Levy Projects
a ee =| (ee pee WAT. 24 --_-- 2 Water Distribution
o> ie a SS aaah te a4 ' he ites a apa i es =|
oo Z pte See ; ae > ao - ae | \
a i SS | Se ee Bg RD ae) \
a Scere Sa Se cn
> ae st a | (a 7 Se eee o 2" oa \ "5 Legend
4 re Hess = ise eS A, a ee \ a Booster Station
= ry ie) i aS a _ \ jae Oe
1 * ' . ' _~ na \ ; ° .
en ane ; WaAT.18 = D------T0WNSHIP-ROAD:510--= = SS ie SS no [e] Reservoir
ee eee aa cee Sa | A. -_ ed Siar is in ---- - Node aa bay ee me b » w
g : "| | . Swowk ae A PR Acspetices ven pan Bi. N ast Ri . ay ' yi. DR ~~ a Oi .
cr fos (epee d 3 * ' a ape : z , age [al 'oleh eservolr | a: ass \ Y <Y 1g Oh aeat F ee .< S| - Watermain (mm)
fin mes giorno, en Tl Oe e = pita $ Sent Be ey "AR re?
3 (ee ce et eae "Ao |) Gam * " iow. = alee St | r( y ease | re ey oy Neieat Ee Yecihiia maul at late " vi) i ee
. St . 'ony = * ---- -- 2. = 5 = P = ae S| z | 5 dat --- ----ns > D>. : | Seog oy
o Paes me a tht, ot Sl a el > ETS ; -.- SEROR <o:o ii Fit \; ime" s,28 oy : im | tell
S as G3 AVENUE, at 7 "Glee a = | H 3 en = os i ro if _ | goad! | oY Ry ~ v2 gs i 274 aN 2 q ie
ceo «ke aN | Sess el 7 ee Ee 1 fe | OO BAe rh att} | ANAS fe i
| ie | -- ft oe Se So eee ll 4 Titer (ey vee i . ae nad Bot Rt Ce
a i | Lal TES Ne ages =) Wi Lei Gina CNeeins UY
Aa nt A) 'ae LUE "iene f ie : a } f PA =] | ke} SS ae ome aN Gs || edi,
> mv cee : 5 u¢|| dou fH A '| | =--<7> Te ae .
a F - | ee Pepe vd OO 1 11) SoM S fates oY 5 AVS ras Fil ae oS i hi =? ' ae = AS
fo) -- eee SERS & ens ae > Peat ye | | SS St
2 ani . . JW | 7 | \ ' Q a t se --% -
le Ss e € is) i ee | cues | em | & ; a a Reservoir & 2 Station'! Rumphouse)
-- = HL = ln pay | |S Beg eres Bet i | Z Skoeakarl ; -
A 3 i (Lone WNSHIP ROAD:50 ase =) oe aS bees PUMBROUSE saw an Tn BILOpS 'TOWNSHIP ROADI505
S * = nn A -- a ___ TOWN: Di 7 in a Tn patina V2 " e = fr /| 1a Gs Ym, Mh @ =o | Gem | guaataig/
2 ; i oh s ea) hol SeawS OF og B'S Ge 0 Ges Go
G i . 'in mar © x \ eat et .S ome ia ea x ;
3 bz i] = ; } een) a i > me, f t W Pe Bearer] LA] i f |
o a x ra i 3 as GANT % a ) rn ; w, \ Ls aa \' Vr - ae So a
° oe = . ws j wom, "(200 me hy =
Cz Fd ce } ; = is _ a [ACoee | } Wig A , ne \ i = fg ) + a The accuracy & completeness of information shown on this
S : | rama Ae @ \ "I te ®& Bit i ih ; FM en! 7 D to. is drawing is not guaranteed. It will be the responsibility of the user
oe acai alate -- ee . cha of piaenisteen- some "ea 1 . eo je 4 - of the information shown on this drawing to locate & establish the
c a BEERS - = i eax --- @ -- = iN. pcr 9 Bees wy ic | = : precise location of all existing information whether shown or not.
oy x > at ean 5 Meee 7 re . he, | anal i \ = ie f 1
«PE ae Se . PT pet) Rem fe TET ?
6 rn oe = BI 5 ae 4 i tO BaD yi Flathee 4 Wy = y) ° an 208 7°
6 ea | =< ay ~ ie y) ANC Te eee if aN '=. a8 --
a <@e \cx ® gp nat lee <2 4 : en | le A oe fe | 2 == -- 4 Coordinate System: Scale: 1:22,000
iS) yz" pitas , r a A | & ag | = a (When plotted at 11"x17")
2 = og 4 2 =< eee mel IA a NAD 1983 3TM 114
' k os | Pa3 Seen a -- ,) | a a Data Sources:
& ---------- - -- - =~ . a 625 HIGHWAY, = - --; a ; 7 - Data provided by
a 4 Pt RA a =F s " " om
g se eS oa Flas ra | ts SS e ca =
€ _ & ' : g Project #: 2720.0021.01
rd ris a | <3 = Author: SDF
o ee pesent Sp Checked: AR
5 Pe : j Status: Final SYSTEMS
5 Pay os | | Revision: A
3 . | : ae | : = ord -- Date: 2025/5/13 FIGURE 3
Infrastructure Included
Major water supply lines that directly feed reservoirs or provide dedicated supply to growth areas
from existing reservoirs are included within this infrastructure category. Based on the City's
context, water supply projects generally include pipe diameters greater than 600mm. The full
scope of these projects has been included in the levy, as these projects would not be built to
service individual developments and instead benefit the broader network (compared to the
upsizing approach used for water distribution mains). The exception is for the supply lines along
50" Ave (projects WAT-8 and WAT-16) that extend to service new development; only the upsizing
portion beyond 300mm for these two projects has been included as the initial phases are
anticipated to service individual development areas and are expected developer contributions.
For storage, the City has also included the full cost of all future reservoirs, pumphouse projects
and booster stations within the levy to support future development.
Allocation of Benefit
When a water supply project provides capacity and/or improved supply to existing development,
that portion of the project is allocated as benefit to the existing City-at-large. The required water
supply projects in the levy, except for one, are solely required to support new development and,
thus allocation of benefit is 100% to new development.
e Project WAT-03 (400mm supply from Main Pumphouse to St. Vital Pumphouse) provides
benefit to existing development as it allows for redundant supply to the St. Vital
Pumphouse so that both facilities can service the main pressure zone. The calculation
approach to determine the benefit allocation between new and existing development was
based on land areas of existing development versus future development within the main
pressure zone at full build-out of the City. See Appendix A for calculation detail.
Due to the layout of the City's water systems and the work done in the UMP, the storage and
facility upgrades required serve several development areas around the City, and are triggered by
new development. As such it can be said that any project costs for additions of reservoirs or
pumps required for new development are to be allocated 100% to new growth. However, there
are two projects where there is noted benefit to the existing development and allocation has been
calculated accordingly.
e WAT-01 Main Pumphouse Upgrades: A portion of the project costs are attributed to
renewal of existing assets, primarily related to pump replacements and electrical
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 23
upgrades. In this instance, the rehabilitation cost of the project was calculated, and
remaining costs have been allocated to benefit growth. See Appendix A for details.
e WAT-05 Centre-Ville Booster Station: Currently, there are areas in the City of Beaumont
operating outside of the City's acceptable pressure range of 350-550 kPa. Some areas
experiencing low pressure issues, primarily in Centre-Ville, while high pressures are being
seen in the west and north of the City and within new development areas (Elan and NW
Annexation Lands). The construction of this booster station would result in the creation
of a new pressure zone that will resolve the issues in Centre-Ville and in the north and
west development areas. A calculation based on land area serviced in the proposed new
pressure zones was done to understand the allocation of benefit to existing areas versus
new development areas. See Appendix A for calculation detail.
Recovery Approach
Biel City-Wide
Projects related to water supply and storage benefit the entire system due to its looped nature
and planned evolution of pressure zones and servicing strategy over time. As the City develops,
it intends to establish two new pressure zones (Northwest Pressure Zone and Centre-Ville
Pressure Zone) in addition to the Main Pressure Zone that currently exists. As development comes
online and the new pressure zones are introduced, progression of the servicing strategy results
in water storage projects benefiting various areas across the City. All improvements will continue
to be allocated City-wide.
Build-Out (Capacity)
The water supply and storage projects in the City's UMP are limited in number, well understood,
and clearly communicate the progression of water supply requirements over time, and
incremental staging and ultimate storage volumes required for build-out of the City. The planned
Northwest Reservoir and Pumphouse will be a new facility with substantial cost, with a sizable
portion of that cost being required beyond 25 years. Most of the projects included will be required
upfront, with future development beyond 25 years benefiting from the infrastructure. Recovering
with full build-out in mind versus a revolving timeframe helps to avoid large fluctuations in levy
rates as the reservoir and future upgrades are included in the levy from the outset, and is
considered the most equitable recovery approach.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 24
Grants
At this time no grants have been received for water supply or storage projects. The City has
recently submitted a project specific grant for the St. Vital Reservoir Expansion (WAT-09) from
the Canada Housing and Infrastructure Fund (CHIF). The project specific grant would be 50% of
the total project costs if successful. Given there are no guarantees of receiving a grant for this
project, total project costs have been assumed. The outcomes of the grant application will be
reflected in the next levy update.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 25
Table 10: Summary of Water Supply and Storage Projects
Project ID Project Description Estimated Estimated Estimated Class Benefit to Benefit to Assumed Off-Site Levy
Start Year End Year Project Cost Estimate New Existing Grants Recoverable
($2025) Development ($2025)
WATER SUPPLY -- Build-Out (Capacity)
WAT-03 400mm Supply Feed - MPR to SVPR 2025 2026 $5,124,147 Class C 74% 26% - $3,799,177
WAT-04 600/350mm Supply Feeds - West and East 2027 2028 $3,350,004 Class C 100% 0% - $3,350,004
from SVPR
WAT-06 600mm Watermain - Upgrade - SVRP to MPR 2029 2030 $4,876,427 Class D/E 100% 0% - $4,876,427
WAT-07 600mm Watermain - Upgrade - 50th Ave, 2031 2032 $4,673,371 Class D/E 100% 0% - $4,673,371
MRP to RR 243
WAT-08 600mm Watermain - Upsizing - 50th Ave, 2036 2037 $2,230,081 Class D/E 100% 0% - $2,230,081
West of RR 243
WAT-16 600mm Watermain - Upsizing - 50th Ave, 2036 2037 $726,234 Class D/E 100% 0% - $726,234
Central Elan
WAT-18A 750mm Watermain - Supply from NW 2043 2044 $384,576 Class D/E 100% 0% - $384,576
Reservoir
WAT-20 Supply to NW Reservoir and Pumphouse 2043 2044 $5,800,000 Class D/E 100% 0% - $5,800,000
WATER STORAGE - Build-Out (Capacity)
WAT-01 Main PH Upgrades 2025 2026 $1,203,751 Class A 43% 57% - $516,960
WAT-02 St.Vital PH Upgrades - New Pumps 2026 2027 $2,213,037 Class C 100% 0% - $2,213,037
WAT-05 Centre-Ville Booster Station & Isolation 2028 2029 $1,446,007 Class D/E 59% 41% - $853,497
Valves
WAT-09 St.Vital Reservoir Expansion 2028 2029 $16,000,000 Class D/E 100% 0% - $16,000,000
WAT-12 Main PH&R - Pump Upgrades 2037 2038 $1,230,644 Class D/E 100% 0% - $1,230,644
WAT-13 St.Vital Reservoir Expansion 2038 2039 $7,691,525 Class D/E 100% 0% - $7,691,525
WAT-14 St.Vital Pump Upgrades 2039 2040 $1,230,644 Class D/E 100% 0% - $1,230,644
WAT-19 Northwest Reservoir and Pumphouse - 2043 2044 $20,563,581 Class C 100% 0% - $20,563,581
Phase 1
WAT-21 Isolation Valve Installation 2044 2045 $846,068 Class D/E 100% 0% - $846,068
WAT-22 Isolation Valve Installation 2051 2052 $153,831 Class D/E 100% 0% - $153,831
WAT-26 Main Pump Upgrades 2046 2047 $876,834 Class D/E 100% 0% - $876,834
WAT-27 St.Vital Pump Upgrades 2047 2048 $876,834 Class D/E 100% 0% - $876,834
WAT-29 St.Vital Reservoir Expansion 2051 2052 $7,691,525 Class D/E 100% 0% - $7,691,525
WAT-30 Northwest Reservoir and Pumphouse - 2062 2063 $28,219,940 Class C 100% 0% - $28,219,940
Ultimate Build Out
Ad BEAU MON T Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 26
=== / aa Fee ae) 2 4 eed & oa zy
aad | J Via i - iz E i < >
as ---- i = bak dee SP =z er 7 a8 Off-Site Levy Projec
oat ~ ee Sir Sete ee a8 + is: : : * i | ----
SAR j = =--2- > ee o> oe ----_ ~~ Dp S ge
- | Ssaee eee NS "EAS 228 ---- = tora
= at ef fo em --< 2 || | Water Supply and
oO. ge | eee Sa = --\
o - > Be = Ss Po a oo ian) r. . ¥ . ~? a, i \ |
E Sok : -- > ae PF Foe : 7° SS " TT aa | \
606 as iF ie a ee Sey | 3S im
55 = a Seer SS at ee eg SS g | = ey, > Legend
B85 3 oe (a. er oS 8 | Sa we Booster Station
e225 eee ee ney ; e : = SSS iS oa \ ne,
7) - : = tage mf . aS Sa coe > > = \ & .
a oa fy . ss Soe) i $ yrs ae [] Reservoir
P= \ es tf ot a [a4 pi \ et aa 7
3 oe i S : a ay ee = = Northwest 4 (21) FEY : a . Se 7. " i ' @ Water Valves
EE ar = inl gan pecan : mm Sal a a Veal F a oaas } cy gy 4 ) ed ¥ froin
= et 2) j rE ee mene i 3] + <a of a i 2 q "+ | ated Yh baits ig 5 4 i é =a A | , mms Sasi / MO "5 k> Bs i ie iceeaie= emp 400
| i peace | MELE x. Die , a> 4--¥ } -- Ref alt XN (0s) ae -- \ ph le SO, u > , a
# ae cea os A = & eee : 4 : te LPN 'a. ae. lee } ss J 6. , od Ee & 4 & is 3 750
BON | ei ee, x) oe "se , "JR ia Om i ~ tae, i gps faZeut MMA ee) ~ --
5 Bh ee 'plea ame wae, PP > ; - : : ' HS ee of re fet | pee 8 ek SS 1 as i
g st asa ¥. 4 he | ir a i _ ae 3 : 4 pie z. ant 5 Once acaea 4 y) \Y "ae F ---- Not in Levy
° \ % ae" g } @ "a : : fy ;
si | Car aoe al manta yt i "f tS ha' toe ee A fi Ese \\ =} gids!
' : nt ya ai Thi aa' t » Q y i 2 pes | 7j zt. as » | FN ' -
ac. i A a Bae is | = ae ) a v) centr ile ce > | aa) |
| Do a EA ee Ries | 1a ah anes, ss I ete =e eT | ) | oe 4 | es eg c = ker ;
g Ny , ae iii jj apebit y LEBUAE S, Hie 4 zs ] Lc] g i ea bee, ied | BS) f ic = a, "35, , ae
g f i -- ; a: f eae t ba i a EF { t pestrhoir.& Ay 2 ee 8 ij SEL shh © AVENU TOWNSHIP'ROAD)S0
-- . Stine en fai 4 eral | He oe ite fi aN) WAT-03 D = |ARATEE™ e | . ae ,
€ < ---- Gh ueeS O bail ib] = pa me "Has | 1 pkumphouse War-o4 == WAT-06 z LY) ~ ie StVital: Wec i cme |
2 eee a Fae = (ae) *WAT-07 yr yl, wee iy aj Wis) ea sd
| RE 3 € pt a waro8 i ee aw. i=) gt) Oh | % Ba (G2 @ Reservoir
= ro anomie a Bs mo - \ eae aos : e | a oe 6 : aa aad iki
nN 5 ~ j | inne Kerr serner N ~~ \ 29 Norm | ae | eee "
iS) bee Mpc : ; | ----§ ee ees m/l | seth wg @5) Hib e@ @ Lam cpa Ge
3} 3 -6 ~~ "Lean i erty : j : hy } Cr a a s ;
= -- am { J a? ii 0 = oe Setetin! (fe = this
g a = i! 7 ohare? i, 29 9 CS A enenead a) Ea" ea PD re The accuracy & completeness Cibo the woconetblin of the user
3 a Rk a @ ie KY fig var | [riage ff =) | La a ee a a ing is not guaranteed. It will be th to locate & establish the
g \ 3 3 3 ; wae VE Bye | 7) ff, Pf -" ex { ii - Le / fe G26 , crow information shown on this crowing whether shown or not.
2 a - | : see = a 4 R p A . | on, } K ne LE if ~ . : precise location of all existing informati
£ " ; ig = een (Atoae ' Sah o ee neo ' -
a ; ] a) Saar ea \ Yipee Re if j
oe Late 4 -- == i \ = Mee Svea 500 750 4
@ a a oot
e : =) AS ! a ee \ H fe y
«(RE --_-- fo 2 ee eee eee |e sapauent |
ag t SS va mie. 4 ea i Rp .G5 amu a a" @ eo y) = Meters le: 1:22,000
- (ee | vA ; a | ba -) tie yf ey aa ih hy ae | | coordinate system: (When plotted at 1"x17")
mm. Gai Ve al : ie I Nees | 7 y 5a 3 : 2S AD 1983 3T™ 114
S Xt a ' = : Set ae ee A s ided b
N X As 5 .. . i ; = SS -- => | ! A ec" = 2D Leann ie -- -- aenneees | - Data provided by
S le HE - os '. : | 2 Tey _ =
. | | = aye | : : P|
3 . a et RE mgt aig! 2 > = SS ' = St Project #: 2720.0021.01 URBAN
-------------- = i ee fe a 5 ss 3 Author: SDF EMS
ge i + ee > 0 --
% na ae te to =<" 45 = TT << Checked: a SYST
3 4 2 SS ee cree Xt Status: in
¢ -- ------ "| | --Lat ie 2025/5/13 FIGUR
wi - ) oe f Ke ' 7 ---- - - rm iy aa?
= | : ais
3 ---- os
5.3. Transportation Projects
Generally, it is difficult to isolate specific development areas that benefit from transportation
infrastructure. Lower classification roads are intended to provide access to properties while higher
classification roads are intended to move traffic through development areas. Higher classification
roads provide more regional or City-wide benefit than lower classification roads.
Infrastructure Included
Major Residential Collector roadways are typically recognized as the highest classification of
roadway that is the responsibility of the local developer as their function is to provide access to
properties (direct benefit to adjacent properties). As such, the funding and construction of Major
Residential Collectors is the requirement of local or boundary developers and is not included in
the off-site levy. Developers and existing development are required to contribute to roads abutting
their developments (boundary roads), ensuring that those adjacent to developing areas share the
responsibility for necessary infrastructure improvements.
For example, for an upgrade of an existing road to a Major Residential Collector standard which
is abutted by existing development on one side and new development on the other; the City
would contribute proportionally to cover the benefit provided to existing development. This could
be accomplished using a variety of mechanisms through the development agreement, or
otherwise.
Beyond this, Divided Arterials, arterial-to-arterial intersections and _arterial-to-highway
intersections are typically recognized as the classification of roadway that provide benefit both to
the local/boundary developer but are also seen to have a regional benefit. As such, the following
infrastructure has been included:
e Arterial Corridor Improvements (Upsizing)
Given the regional nature of arterial corridors, capacity improvements to bring a Major
Residential Collector to a Divided Arterial standard provides benefit to the overall
transportation network. The upsizing of arterials from a Major Residential Collector
standard to a Rural or Urban Divided Arterial is included in the off-site levy. These projects
involve the construction of additional lanes and associated required right-of-way, as
defined in the City of Beaumont's Engineering and Design Standards. This upgrade
typically consists of adding the final two lanes (including but not limited to grading, storm,
road structure and paving, curb and gutter, etc.). Note the urbanization of corridors such
as the addition of pathways on both sides would be contributions from adjacent
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 28
developers and not considered part of the off-site levy project. Upsizing projects often
also require the acquisition of extra land to meet the ultimate standard for Divided Arterial
Roads. The difference in right-of-way widths between a Divided Rural Arterial and a Major
Residential Collector as outlined in the City's Engineering and Design Standards was used
to estimate the additional land required to accommodate the ultimate cross-section. A
linear meter land cost rate was established using recent land costs provided by the City
and applied to the overall project cost, and is included in the levy program.
e Arterial Intersections
Intersection improvements are necessary to ensure that these intersections align with the
enhanced arterial standard, facilitating smoother traffic flow and greater capacity. The
upsizing portion of arterial-to-arterial and arterial-to-highway intersections are included
within the levy.
Allocation of Benefit
The expansion of corridors and intersection geometry from Major Residential Collectors to Divided
Arterials is solely a capacity improvement to accommodate future growth, and as such, is 100%
allocated to growth. In other terms, without growth, no capacity improvements to the existing
transportation network would be required. One exception is TPT-04-UPG, which notes a benefit
allocation to existing; calculation details can be found in Appendix A.
Finally, some of the transportation projects along roads that straddle the City boundary (for
example RR 241 and RR 244) should explore contributions from regional partners. Neighbouring
areas are also planning for and experiencing growth that would benefit from these road upgrades,
and as such recovery of provided benefit should be sought in future updates.
Recovery Approach
Bing City-Wide
Corridor and intersection oversizing to a Divided Arterial standard provides benefit to the overall
transportation system in the City; as such, all projects are allocated City-Wide.
oS Revolving Timeframe
There are currently several transportation projects identified in the next 25-year window; the rate
and pattern of new development will ultimately dictate the precise timing of these projects. Due
to the number of projects within this infrastructure category and the potential variations in project
timing as growth progresses, a revolving timeframe of 25 years has been applied.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 29
Grants
No grants have been assumed for transportation projects.
4 BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 30
Table 11: Summary of Transportation Projects
Project ID Project Description Estimated Estimated Estimated Class Benefit to Benefit Benefit Assumed Off-Site Levy
Start End Project Cost Estimate New to to Grants Recoverable
Year Year ($2025) Development Existing Future ($2025)
Window
ARTERIAL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS - 25 Year Revolving Timeframe
(50 Ave)
HWY 625
243
244
Note: Projects highlighted grey are not within the 25-year revolving window, and as such, are not included in the current levy.
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 31
a a ve t
- 7 ; -- ear \ Ie 4 T
[Sy I | | Le a&BEAUMON
arene bane OS Paley be ag ple J : {Se : : < Beiteg. ~
| a FESS | Sa wp | 258 | Off-Site Levy Projects
ee gs ame 2 eae ges Se -- | | L- 5 al Transportation
eee es oe = \_ = aay an , 'y * 'a 5 ams ---- i | \
5 oe ' = 5 = a pe eae : 3 SS RY Es, | - |
4 a Se ee a, ht as a ~ SS Sa i > -- '| aS = alin ee
ome 5 N 2 =" =f Psi, | #5 -- ---- Sa a4 as | = = ps ~ Legend
ae) 2 aa i oxy Biss Hie So eS | A be! TPT-04-UPG TPT-09-ULT1 na [__] Road/intersection Upgrade
ie | Sy SSS See &|(TPT-02-uPG TPT-07-ULT | ae tae
2 Re te Shree ee SS TPT-10-ULT --- \\_/ Les) ed.
? i iat ty Se > =A 0 Sa |
§ | TS ows ; is as 3 aN Sa ---- -- 7 on a aaa q rem we Oke i, we eee ag © lg Bm \s i \ »
ao a pn wits 2 SE | ty oh ene | ~, Zoe \] bene) te Fretas-ucr All| ° eee
rey Ga AR eR oe / | i>, ery iP, ont ae nm gunmen a, OE x | oe
c E- x x Bene. s oe 1G. 5 Dy comely 3 i hf | ear i | matters" 4 S Ae -) " a\! »
aa 6h TT aN
of a RR BSL neat ask bevallen grt) Hc a if |e Ls Pt | Sal {hoff ~ i hee 4 '| |S Sa x \ |
aa be a Re meatn Pat r a | ime ig So ipe © 4 ana | T] | of Frer2ur
2 . Perera Sif ea ja j TPT-19-ULT TPT18-ULT yell Hm | 3 { 4 ea tae f = i Saas = __ Ie
5 ae a = i -20-ULT | | / aay | a ' ao 4 i ot i sree AVENUE emma LoS @ RE oo A ae | ea ;
! & Osos ee wy, noe = iL ey f cy
: = | . | eee a | cs a oe a al | H j Se Se TPT-13-ULT) |
° be ie | TPT-15-U HH Be RLF a af, re Be -- Pass Ca J = >] EY ae racy & completeness of information shown on wn or
g "tonal TPT-17-ULT | Le fen | (i /p 2 ras eee ee ae } hy ine {| drawing isnot quarenteed, It willbe the eebonatbly oft igh th
-- ' | "iz a NAY @ og or Stl fe é Cae Hi SL [is Ne et Growing is Not guarantees. | this drawing to locate & establish the
4 . A | | oon oe | rif Ss '| \. oe. ' Pinan a WAN -- t Th precise location of all existing information whethe
° iz ; | } a . y ' : Sere aA, (7 allel § ;
- ee ore, ---- in =- ag aa | ae 'en ot binuma Va NSIT sealed 750
o uy ee - | | f _ \\ 4 Ties i On" y ly 0 250 500 4
5 < : © ge 3 | f |. --- f Pose : ee SI ; rat Sas Pak ee | Meters le 122.000
aes | a | 7 mo | | Sault f yi i in < |i Coordinate System: (when plotted at 117"
oN ef SSS II a4 » Va eae | ia Re ~ D 1983 3TM 114
2 AN = = : = 4 | A Cf : = a {TPT-03-ULT | | TPT-06-UPG NA
e s ee) Pi i SS ==! \ a { Ba bs ar) en y L ls Data Sources:
me ote Nx dos ------ = Se 4 "ein =. =e rh bis A} = - Leseeum™ | - Data provided by
CQ ab : ets x anal af | )F ' ¥¥
= Pres e- ~~ = =) ( Si - Seah | & ---- nd = ae | =p] . = \ ag
tl | =e ie" N ae Ass a HWV/625 54) =) 75 HGH VLU E _
4 aad ce A ieee Ts| he : TPT-O1-UPG 9 f'757-01-ULT : = | Project #: P0070) URBAN
> om |X Ss Be ee ae 33 S Author: -
2 os - = ue i SA ot g ie 2 Checked: AR SYSTEMS
'i "ha & : S a ¢ 4% =" . 5 = | Status: Final
fs - t & phe | Sa = | = | a me Py | ee 2025 /5/13 FIGURE 5
® , Wh 3 j*? ee & = - Faye
5.4. Fire Services
Infrastructure Included
The costs associated with new firehall facilities and the required land are included. At this time,
expenses for fire apparatus are not included. Additionally, only the portion of costs related to the
fire services within the Multi-Service Facility are included.
Allocation of Benefit
The allocation is determined on a project-by-project basis, with a designated percentage assigned
to growth. This benefit assigned to growth is based on the proportion of future growth area
compared to existing development within the ultimate service basin (see Figure 6). Both fire
services projects will ultimately provide benefit to existing and future development areas. As such,
this approach reflects ultimate benefit allocation for each facility. See calculation in Appendix A.
Recovery Approach
EA City-Wide
The fire services projects in the levy are allocated City-wide. Improvements made at full build-
out will benefit the entire City.
Build-Out (Capacity)
Cost recovery for growth-related expenses is based on the ultimate City build-out. The
improvements required for the City's full buildout are well-defined and breaking these into
incremental improvements would be challenging, as it would be difficult to determine which areas
benefit and which do not. As such, the capacity (buildout) approach has been utilized.
Grants
No grants have been assumed for fire services projects.
Table 12: Summary of Projects -- Fire Services
Estimated : . :
Project Project Project Class Concta acon Weta to Ne Benefit to Slew
1D Pesci etal ie Sul s3 Years ($2025) Development Existing Recoverable
rine-o1 Fite Hall#2 eae o1a780 ClassC ~--»«-2028-2031 $0 78% 22% $11,711,529
(North Elan)
Multi-
Service
FIRE-02 Foon fire $12,526,465 ClassC | 2032-2035 $0 37% 63% $4,634,792
(Innovation
Park)
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 33
pete T
ll ee: | * ASBEAUMON
4 | " x 4 by |
. ee es
. rm ; i | rl . ts
-- mE Se | : ojec
- = =" -- ceed - : 5 | i" eaeemt ake °
z22 Ce ie pie & a ----" L ' Ices
ff = |
he =I < t=" ae a. oe os as ae) fi ix |
a5 : at, +-= ne rt) . s . iF Set a i.
38 3 f = Sa eta eS ; = . = 5 a Aq : Legend
BSx + ---- , by . = - 3 == (ps Locations
. =a par * = SS ! . ia ire Service Lo
255 | be -- 2 ~ My en Se > aR, 0 Fire Se
c.s ; oe Sa. po, 'ye oid: > eos "a a 2 --_ \ a be . .
sos = / ut tes io. ' « f 2 =: = -- fos > i , " a - SS -- eae U
232 ata PES >. ~ ; ems \ ao j * anaes dary
go5 = jiwp --0F-} ; Sen ly see 5 § Pm \ Re. et ae SXP "I ity Bounda
7 ; ae 5 af = Si 1 1, _ =e 7 "aa Ug : Pee
oe g ey {: = , ; ea fe w5 Fn -- ie ) rae a cy ~ te ° P ets, mn Aen '
pot A' = am -- il 7 5 era remere ( pair m 'a / 4 , so a Salsa aes or
g 4 5 | i | -- = FIRE-O1 ay : bed "pe 7 y ks, | et ' eee } = t = met 4 &, & " oF a | Oke
ne} | a a weak + | ei de eh? lead -- Ei ql ,/@ i bo I al " fi f S= =e i. ee Fy 5 ee he
o i : "2 r Ay? ~ ere" ; : a 42 : 2 | . -- 'J ; ~ | in a2 < | 7 omit i fe 3 a { | | 4 he era E \ Ni 2 A a8 r¢ { =
-- = oe = = ae atte ~~ i |e . : a =) ' os "eal == : ? '
\ iat Fy Poi enn we st 5 j = "ae i oe ft aot, pap oa rhs: X - .
R i Jum ian By a ABV me | 1 gel Bh it |S 0 gran Be Decommissio gh wes
Si |) bee Pan abd NAH | é E- ier an i Coo 2 Oe ea wine SF is Built) fe Pras =
id nal, 2% i I if ih hy 1 + er I at SO OT, )} ip | & ry ER ines Fy oO When MSF.Is.Bu = ae Se oP ry | |
2g ao . ; Ne Bi \ j oft | | i i df ¢ | 2) --Aul ee ' 8 > | ao 7 tt i SOYAVE = 4 ff yh in, te raters ba a |
2 r " | Ppa Sos ---- bt I i hv Uh "Se || Ie 5 | eS 1 meee tl i pan Loig iA a 0 em r , Nese: i |
5 ; are ini | ee SMe a ee ee = 5 - al pple fie, p ge 4 :
c = - a 5 hy ' iH ' ; aa uu Hi Ne L | oat gars = Be at adh on on 2
a \. - " OF ek Sik! TWE)RD'505 "4 iy ue te | i '4 ce | ast i / ed =\5 ety: § | a x i ; Fi : f information shown on f the user
-------- ay / Z ; Sen AVE, | ees jf ped XS 1 a ain (Oe | ,, : | drawin ation shown on «is drawing to locate
el a 7 --_--__--____ 4 : 1 8 t- an 7 7 ' @ A + the In
5 a : | sie 3 bf foe A, Sec . : Op em / ay , b of ne information shown g infor
rol a ' Ne = | : Ti : -- KL 6 p 4 J ox cy ime g |, ees aa prec
g eer 2A were =
o be Ao " ag = heal hs La a BN 4 ins 1 | jase cay. °
2 oe a8 -- 'se cx . A ee . fe)
9 e pat " & or] im | @% a fi pe: pated ul A | ; © tem: Seale: 1:22 at 11"x17")
g 4 an some... @ = bad ehig ra ---- Coordinate Sys (When p
nh \ d | Ga rt BID ' ar a pe dd ') ei %
Bie. = De es es Po --
a a fo ae mae REY ; fi Aa i: aah ef I 3} 4 es:
ale eS ; 3 . | | Wj haat a oe 8 ay | oo f "kg a | ae Data Source of Beaumont
re) x 7 --% | a = BRAS ire | bere \ ' ta provided by Town
5 q i an = t Seal Reo EE W & = i Aaa tp ~ er -Datap
= Pesny Ns c~ ras Oe i =a | =
8 uk +. - ---- = = | } Lp a) | a . ; -- _--_ | '.
2 Wied Hl | * Z ~ Kone oe ar; x A ----= i
a ss ee Sees sos a | - ot ea & FIRE-02
qi ON en | # x -- a | ow eS anQ Vil
8 %; . ¥ - ~ : xt | 3 na 7g ----s 5 WY 7 = 0 Multi-Service , 2720.0021.01 URBAN
mm, 86 Seal ; i | ---- cility Project #:
8 b> (a i, 2 eee ark Fa Author: no SYSTEMS
A i ---------- = 2 = Checked: .
w a =<=--_ = bi Status: Final 06
q sy : ager te iar = | we
g OS, aa a espe 4 ;' iz at Se TT | J Revision: o028/8/18 FIGURE
fa Fae ; fs i ee ss tes cope L | na Ba 1 | pate:
a _F . } 3 = : scieegeall 3 4 | -- =~
€ + ~
fe} Ly ! e
5 } --
5 | :
6. Levy Calculation
The off-site levy calculation is based on a cash flow projection that incorporates assumptions for
levy collections, project expenditures, interest rate returns, borrowing costs and inflation to
determine levy rates. All costs are then allocated across the determined benefiting area. This cash
flow approach ensures full cost recovery to support fairness and equity of the levy rates over
time. Calculation of the off-site levy charges is based on four key components and can be
simplified as follows:
Existing Fund cP Anticipated cP Anticipated
Balance Project Costs Carrying Costs
Benefiting Hectares
Anticipated growth (hectares of development) and project expenditures (costs and timing) are
captured in Sections 3.0 and 5.0 of this report. The overview of the remaining components
that are a part of the calculation are discussed in this section.
6.1. Levy Fund Balances
To properly account for previous levy collections and levy project costs incurred to-date, off-site
levy fund balances are brought forward into the levy calculation model. This ensures that funds
collected to-date contribute to future projects, while any deficits observed are fully recovered by
the City as levies are collected.
In Beaumont's context no deferred or carry-forward revenue is expected in the levy accounts.
However, the City has advanced debentures for water supply and storage projects in the past. As
such, the levy update accounts for the remaining principal and interest payments in the
appropriate accounts. Below is a summary of the future debenture payments on existing debt
and anticipated project repayments that are included in the levy calculation.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 35
Table 13: Debenture Payments on Existing Debt and Project Repayments
Water 2009 Water Programs Draw 1 $ 37,833.72 2025 -- 2029
Distribution 2009 Water Programs Draw 2 $ 15,278.06 2025 -- 2029
$ 7,639.03 2030
400mm Watermain (prior OSL Project 12) $1,909,718.65 2026
Water Storage 2009 Reservoir Phase 2 Draw 1 $ 72,120.16 2025 -- 2030
& Supply 2009 Reservoir Phase 2 Draw 2 $ 55,431.60 2025 -- 2030
The status of each of the infrastructure category fund balances as of December 24, 2024 is
displayed in 7able 14 below. Note, fire services is a new levy, and as such, is starting with a
fund balance of zero.
Table 14; Levy Fund Balances
Sanitary $ 1,471,696.45
Water - $ 1,920,033.13
Transportation $ 4,729,867.33
Fire Services $ 0.00
6.2. Financial Model Inputs
Financial model inputs include interest earned, carrying costs and inflation. When a projected
positive fund balance occurs, interest earned is applied to the positive balance. Conversely, when
a fund balance is negative (e.g., the City front-ends infrastructure prior to collecting enough funds
to cover the project costs) a borrowing cost is applied to the negative balance.
An annual inflation rate is applied to future project costs and to levy collections separately. The
following are the assumptions used in the model and are based on current and historical trends:
Table 15: Financial Model Inputs
Interest Earned on Positive Fund Balances 2.0%
Debt Cost on Negative Fund Balances 4.4%
Inflation Rate 4% for the first 2 years, 2% thereafter
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 36
6.3. Payment Timing
The financial model for determining levies must also account for the timing of off-site levy
payments. The City is shifting to a two-year payment schedule, with the initial 50% of off-site
levy payments due prior to subdivision endorsement or release of a development permit, and the
second payment of the remaining 50% due one year thereafter.
6.4, Off-Site Levy Updates
The off-site levies will be periodically reviewed and updated. This ensures the City is meeting
their obligations as laid out in the MGA. Minor updates include updates to fund balances, interest
and borrowing costs, project costs, received grants, and timing updates. Major off-site levy Bylaw
updates are the result of a significant shift in methodology or substantial changes to anticipated
project lists. Periodic updates will occur to ensure levy information remains current and to help
ensure fairness and equity. Off-Site Levy Bylaw updates may occur to all infrastructure types or
to only one infrastructure type at a time.
6.5. Cash Flow Snapshot
Future account balances capture all anticipated revenues, expenditures for project costs after
accounting for annual inflation, interest earned, and carrying costs from January 1, 2025 onward.
The duration of the calculation is based on the specific recovery methodology discussed in
Section 6.0. The below tables provide a snapshot of the anticipated cash flows, summary tables
for each infrastructure category are provided in Appendix B.
Table 16: Sanitary Accounts
Basin 1 Basin 2 Basin 5 Basin 6 Basin 8 |
Starting Balance
211,399 211,399 1,048,898 0 0
(Jan 1, 2025) $ $ $ $ $
Future Project Costs $6,928,002 $1,394,054 $1,952,936 $3,863,632 $149,222
F Antic
uture Anticipated $995,238 $0 $329,847 $182,646 $0
Interest Earned
Future Anticipated
5,156,832 1,868,623 389,857 608,337 192,875
Borrowing Costs $ $ $ $ $
Total A
otal Amount'to be 511,648,196 $3,051,278 $964,047 ~--=«$4,289,322-~--=«$342,097
Recovered
Anticipated Levy
$11,648,196 $3,051,278 $964,047 $4,289,322 $342,097
Revenue
4 BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 37
Table 17: Water Accounts
Distribution Supply & Storage
Table 18: Transportation Upgrades
Transportation Upgrades
Table 19: Fire Services
Fire Services
Ad BEAU MONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 38
6.6. Summary of Off-Site Levy Rates
The following levy calculations are based on assumptions provided in this report. The levies will
be effective as of the passing of the Bylaw.
Table 20: Summary of Off-Site Levy Rates
Infrastructure Category Off-Site Levy Off-Site Levy Off-Site Levy
2025 2026 2027
Santry
Water
[Transportation TC
Arterial Corridor Improvements & $121,443 $126,300 $131,352
meewlinessdoe
re
Table 21: Off-Site Levy Totals for 2025, 2026, & 2027
| ss Basind $278,009 $289,129 $300,695
| Basin2 $273,180 $284,107 $295,472
| Basin3 $262,322 $272,815 $283,728
| Basin5 --s| $263,507 $274,048 $285,010
$290,285 $301,897 $313,973
$262,322 $272,815 $283,728
$263,060 $273,582 $284,526
$262,322 $272,815 $283,728
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 39
APPENDIX A:
BENEFIT
ALLOCATION
CALCULATIONS
Background
To provide additional information and ensure the calculation of Beaumont's off-site levies are
transparent for the development community and all stakeholders, this memorandum provides a
description of the allocation calculations for each of the off-site levy infrastructure projects that
are not attributed 100% to new development.
Allocation of Benefit Calculations
WAT-03 400mm Supply Feed - MPR to SVPR
This project includes the installation of a supply feed from the Main Pumphouse and Reservoir to
the St. Vital Pumphouse and Reservoir (SVPR). This project is required to provide a dedicated
supply to the SVPR so it can also be used a primary pumpstation to service growth. This will also
allow operational changes such that both pumphouses will be able to serve the main pressure
zone and support ultimate build-out of the community.
The calculation approach to determine the benefit to new versus existing development is based
on the ratio of gross developable land area of existing development to new development, at full
buildout. Per Table 1 in the Background Report, there are approximately 475 hectares of existing
development, with 1362 hectares anticipated to be developed at full build-out. Applying a
proportional allocation methodology, it is determined that 74% of this project will benefit new
development.
Benefit to Growth:
e 1362 ha / (475 ha + 1362 ha) = 74%
WAT-O1 Main Pumphouse Upgrades
In conversations with the City of Beaumont on the scope of work defined for the Main Pumphouse
Upgrades project (WAT-01 in the Off-Site Levy Program) scheduled for 2025, the following
information was shared:
e 70% of electrical upgrades are to renew old infrastructure. The remaining 30% is to
accommodate the larger pumps being installed to support growth.
4> BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 1
e Two of the five pumps are overly due for replacement based on their age (asset renewal),
whereas the remaining three pumps are operating well but require upsizing due to the
growth of the water system.
The following cost breakdown was provided by the City for Project WAT-01.
WAT-01 Project Component Cost
Services!
Total Project Cost $ 1,203,751.00
Since engineering fees are already captured under the project costs above, no engineering fees have been applied in the OSL Model.
The following shows the calculation for the benefit to new development:
Electrical Upgrades Scope
¢ 30% x $684,301 = $205,290.30
Pump Replacement Scope
e 3/5 x $519,450 = $311,670.00
Total
e $205,290.30 + $311,670.00 = $516,960.30
Benefit to Growth:
e $516,960.30 / $1,203,751.00 = 43%
Therefore, allocation of benefit to growth for Project WAT-01 is 43%. This is the value used in
the OSL Model.
AXBE AUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 2
WAT-05 Centre-Ville Booster Station & Isolation Valves
Per the 2023 Utility and Stormwater Management Master Plan (UMP), the City of Beaumont's
acceptable pressure range is 350-550 kPa. In discussions with the City, they have confirmed the
construction of the booster station will introduce a new pressure zone and increase the pressure
in Centre-Ville, benefiting the existing development in that area. However, the introduction of this
booster station also directly impacts existing and new development areas in Beaumont that
currently have water pressures over 550kPa. The City currently adjusts the pressure to be higher
in the overall system so that Centre-Ville has adequate pressure, but with the installation of this
new booster station and isolation valves, overall operating pressures can be lowered so that the
existing and new development areas currently experiencing high pressures will be within an
acceptable range. This alleviates the need to install PRVs or find another solution to deal with the
high-pressure issues in existing and new development areas, meaning there is a benefit to these
neighbourhoods and new development areas in constructing the Centre-Ville booster station. The
existing neighbourhoods experiencing high-water pressure are west of 57 Street before RR 243.
As for new development areas, the Elan development area and quarter sections in the northwest
would also experience higher water pressures without the construction of the Centre-Ville Booster
Station, based on the elevation matching or being lower than the existing residential areas
experiencing high water pressure issues. See Figure 2 below from the UMP.
£2
fa = ae a
CP so eee
ce | | i aS 'grew: 2 "2 By Ct Beste tele Pianos
2023 Utility and Stormwater Management Master Plan -- Figure 2: Topography DEM
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 3
The existing residential areas benefiting from the Centre-Ville Booster Station project were
identified and are highlighted in red on the map below. The new development areas benefiting
from the Centre-Ville Booster Station (primarily consisting of the west and northwest development
lands) were also identified and are highlighted in blue. Land areas were calculated for each See
the markups of Figure 17 of the UMP below to see the total amount of hectares of each area
highlighted.
2 i7% T TS ST SS | |) Sa, a i kan,
ae a ; NE A (ORG «Tes Sa ee ee
oS pe ol ee ee se
Ms Swag toe oh iba BT TNS PT | | De ae ecckadeingieon
a al jet. ao | (pel UDRP pe zs EE | ctv
at we west Pa ee ioe yo : camases Gas) SEs ue : PHD Vital Pressure
tT ae ey hee 2 SUSE "U0 ee sae 3S) Syn Uy CAS ee udayy a q «| © 450-5:
ee 5). Tp | a
eee an ewe 7k el
my paw aes a es
Slave J NO iicret so baaita \) Oe J « Zz f igure 17: 'Ing Water Distribution
i y =o 5 Re fe { yy ba Sat 3 EY es RB c= 3 Jy HS p La 3 Re System PHD Vital rea
s i eee i Ti i hola
eed lt a oe acs met Ee ru | Ct a
ee erro =
2023 Utility and Stormwater Management Master Plan -- Figure 2: Topography DEM
From the figure above, the following table summarizes the areas and calculation for the benefit
to growth of the Centre-Ville booster station.
Existing Development Benefiting 252 ha Measured developed land area according to pressure map
in UMP.
Growth Areas Benefiting 363 ha Elan ASP land use statistics were utilized to get the net
residential area.
For the 1.5 quarter sections in the NW of the City, the
conversion factor of net residential density to gross density
of 48% from the growth calculations was used.
Total Area Benefiting from Project Siar)
AX BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 4
Benefit to Growth
e 363 ha / 615 ha = 59%
Based on the philosophy applied, a 59% proportion of benefit to growth was applied for the
Centre-Ville booster station project as part of the City's OSL update.
TPT-04-UPG Township 510 & 50 Street Arterial Intersection Upgrade
This project comprises interim upgrades to the intersection, focused on enhancing turning
movements and addressing safety-related deficiencies. It is expected that these safety
improvements and turning movements will also provide benefit to future development in the City.
Based on the completed growth forecasts, approximately 123 hectares of new development are
anticipated by 2030, in comparison to approximately 475 hectares of existing development when
the project is initiated in 2029. Applying a proportional allocation methodology, it is determined
that 21% of the project benefit should be attributed to new development.
Benefit to Growth
e 123 ha/ (475 ha + 123 ha) = 21%
Projects FIRE-O1 and FIRE-02
Benefit for each project is based on the ultimate service basins, as defined by the City. The
percentage was determined based on the proportion of total new growth area in each ultimate
service basin, compared to existing development. Using total land area was deemed most
appropriate (versus population or gross development area of existing versus new), as the fire
stations will ultimately provide services to all land areas, even if not a developed residential area
(e.g. parks and open spaces, etc.).
It should be noted the levy is applied using a City-Wide recovery approach; the service basins
have only been used in the calculation of benefit to growth for each project.
Project Total Basin Area(ha) Total Growth in Service Basin (ha) % Benefit to New Growth
4 BEAUMONT Off-site Levy Background Report 2025 | 5
APPENDIX B:
CASH FLOW
SUMMARIES
Sanitary Basin 1
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear $ 15,687 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee Reserve
Reserve Fund Expenditures | Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Fund Closing Balance
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00%
2026 to 2027, then a -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
P2025 TS 2399S 24st FST IS aS 8,3901S BS S13, 657 |
| 2026 = TS es7 {So 5aasst | St Set Sta SONS (146,407)
| 2027, |S two) 8S te9e7 Ss 8579318 sea S S667) S (63,281)
| ozs TS 3,zgaytS S306 Seam tS 3.2055 aS S13, 469 |
| o29 tS zoo tS Ot esz ts 88,933] too [SoS S104, 450 |
| 2030S toss ts BRS t005 Ss 9329S 96,779 S 8986S 200,715 |
| 203, tS owasfs 8S 366 Sao Ss 278,2041S5 5 SHAT SS 283,768 |
| 2032, TS tsznrostS 18,7338 5552118 839,289/5 8G SS 846,074 |
| 2033, Sera tS tts s53266 1S 99,3415 87S 407,328 |
| 03a TS to32sts Stag SBA Seer S 2385S S70, 996 |
| 2035, tS age JS 8H Sts 573028 58,2985 too SS 588,864 |
| 2036. tS seats 8S 2277S 9,037] wo, Sass SS 620,059 |
| 2037,--'_--s fs wns }s 8S 283s 78642158 w9,7ortS 3974 SS 712,675 |
| 2038 tS e7stS 8H Soe S936 TS 9 tS tz tS 807,953 |
| 2039S o53ts 8S sz sto tS 890,97 S oz SS (907,919 |
| ogo, tS oa Saga sez tS 9957815 tte TS S05, 697 |
| 04a TS tnse97|S$ 509,269] | 23s O9|S 47S tsa tS S85 2,878 |
| oa2 tS szgs7a{s sgaesa4{ | S235 SHI S865 |S aS 70,344 |
| 20ag tS aa tS 8292S 86,523] 6857/5 887 TSS 159,994 |
| oda tS tsa TS 8B Ss 79a tS 289,442S 89S S284, 231 |
| 04s tS aga SS 2233S 80,6218 82485215 7S S88, |
| oes Sis t03,096 |S tas |S eB SS 43, 1344 |
| 2047 Saaz tS Sze Ss t26,987]S8 5721S ton SS 581,524 |
| oa tS asa sO Sse tS t29,802 1S 7326S 1227S 725,552 |
| ogg tS 7sss2ts 2623S tzz7a ts 857.4235 tetas SS 874,571 |
| oso, TS as7itS 755s twao2 |S 2,039,173 5 20,783S S059, 957 |
| 20s tS tsg,9s7|s2eass78t | HS 290 7603018 (4 379,5911S TS (60,702) $$ (1,440,293)
| 2052, TS (4,440,293)1$ 267,889] | HS 83 TS t58,798]S (3,949,384)S (473,773) $4,123,157)
| 2053S (4tz,as7tS tS 28393 Ste g7a tS (3, 962,83)1S (474,292) $8 4,135,475)
| 0sa TS (4tz5amsytS Sen Ss 65,213] (3, 970,262)/5 (474,692) (4,144,954)
| oss, TS (4 taagsaytS Sto Ss t5i8}s (3, 976,436)/S (474,963) (4,151,399)
| ose STS (4tsazo9)f SS 8034S tazzg ts 3, 979,501/S (475,098) $8 (4,154,610)
| 20s7_ tS (4 tsaonotS 80,733 $175,326] (3, 979,284)S (475,089) $8 4,154,373)
| oss TS (4tsaz73zfs S834 t78,8321S (3, 975,541S (474,924) (4,150,464)
| oso, TS (4 tsoaea)tS TS 8975S 82409] (3,968,058)/S (474,594) (4,142,650)
| oc TS (4 tazesotS 8S 8ST S 86,057] (3,956,593)/S TS (474,090) $8 (4,130,683)
| oe TS (4 tz0e93z)f$ 83,267] 89,7788 (3,940,905)1S (473,400) $8 4,114,305)
| 2062S (4ttazosfS_ 83,932 S 193,574] (8,920,731S (472,522) $4,093,243)
| 2063 TS (4093,2az)fs STATS 97445 TS (8,895,798)15 (47,415) $8 (4,067,213)
| oe TS (4oe7,2a3)fS_ 85308 20,3894 (3, 805,819)/S (170,096) $8 (4,035,915)
| oes TS (4035,gasfS HS 86009] 205,422] (3, 830,494)1S TS (268,542) (3,999,035)
| oes (3,999,035)]S 86,729] 209,530] (3,789,505)/S TS (266,738) (3,956,243)
| 2067, TS (3,956,243)1S Sea 23,721]8 (3,742,522)15 (464,672) (3,907,193)
| oes TS (3,907,093)]$ 88,203 S995 1S (3,689,198)/S (262,325) (3,851,522)
| oso TS (3,854,5221S 88,977 $8 222,355] (3, 629,67)1S (159,683) (3,788,851)
| 070, TS (37gssats 87ST S 226,802] (3,562,048)1S TS (156,730) $8 (3,718,778)
| 2072 tS (37g77ets_ sz 2,338] (3 87.440)fS (153,447) (3,640,887)
| 2072, fs (364nga7fs S363 235,965]S (3, 404,922)15 (249,817) (3,554,739)
| 2073, TS (3554739)1S S90 Sess tS (3, 324,05aS (245,818) (3,459,872)
| 2074 TS (3asgs7ayts S803 S598 TS (3,204,374)S (240,432) (3,355,807)
| 2075 TS (33s5go7fs S95 50,408] ST (3,105,398)/S TS (16,638) (3,242,036)
Sanitary Basin 1
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear $ 15,687 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee Reserve
Reserve Fund Expenditures Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Fund Closing Balance
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00%
2026 to 2027, then a -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
| ove SS 322036) S$ PC S77 SAG TS (2,986,620)/5 S08 ATS (3,118,031)
| ov? [SC ttgosyfS PC Sa eB TS 260,525]S 857, 506)/S OS (925,730)f$ (2,983,237)
| 2078S 993,237fS CO Se 8S 265,735] S 77 SONTS OS 9,570f$ 2,837, 072)]
| 079 TS zzovayfs PC SS oso Ss 566,022)]$ S41, 905)f 2,678,927)
| ogo [ST (7gg27)fS oO - --'iSC( Ses TS 276,471 (oS) S OS (005,708)[$ (2,508, 164)
| 20g fs ostes)f SC S89 83S 282,000] SRG teH)S S995 S (2,324,115)
| 2osz2 TS atasyfS SaaS 87640 S036, ATH) S OS C89,605)f$ (2,126,079)
| 203, Ss tGo7gfS ff --'iSC SoS 293,393] S a 832,686)/$ dS C*(80,638)PS (4,913,324)
| ose Sz zz SS 99,261] aos) S SCS (4,685,082)
| oss SC asogzyfs CO S88 SOT TS 805,246] St 379,836)/S dS C6,793)P S$ (4,440,549)
| ose Sasa SP STS 8851S tag) S S685) (4,178,883)
| 20s7_-- tS agpa3zyfs CC Seo] S 87S (864,305)JS SCC ,BJS (899,202)
| oss, tS 899,202) SC SG 7824S 823,930] 575,272) S534) (600,584)
| osn-- fs CaS CO Sav Ss 830,408]S (270,176) S$ Sa 888)f $282, 064)
| 2090S Co) SC S87 S 2592S SG B7APS SBOP (58, 852)|
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
S 6,928,002 S 11,648,196 S 225,238 § (5,156,832)
Sanitary Basin 2
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear $ 10,858 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee Reserve
Reserve Fund Expenditures | Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Fund Closing Balance
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00%
2026 to 2027, then a -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
P2025 TS 2399S 37,278{ CT 8H Sts TS 1823718 (407,642) S47, 936) S$ (425,578)|
| 2026 TS (425,578)1S won770] | TS tzgz S90S (aagzssy}s S45, 974) (1,090,832)
| 2027, |S (tog,g32yfs_ to Staats 84s tS (tosgpa7ifS S45 604) Ss (1,105,791)
| 2028 TS (ators Stags 83,0828 (t72,7ofS_ dS t99)} $$ (4,119,909)
| 029 TS (atg,go9)f sz Ss 53108 1S (t06802)f$ S46, 939)] $8 (0,113,740)
| 2030S (atz,7aots Stes S55 5201S (4,058,230)/$ 4 S62) S$ (1,104,792)
| 2031 TS (atoaroayts 8H tz 536018 (sagas S252) (1,097,443)
| 2032, TS (aog7gazytS 8S tes S94 TS (tsanagytS S264) (1,097,713)
| 2033, TS (aog7,7a3zfs_ 818,226 Stems (t053,sae)fS S46, 358)]$ (1,099,944)
| 2034 TS (toga) SBS zag S593 1S (tsassats S443) S$ (1,101,264)
| 2035, TS (atonzeaytS 8S zoo ATO TS (4,053,795)1S S46 367)] S$ (1,100, 162)
| 2036. TS (atone) Sos StS (tags S45 894) (1,088,861)
| 2037,--' |S (aosgserfs tz Sta tS (4023,713)1S 45,043) $1,068,757)
| 2038 tS (aoeg57fS_ OS toon S506] S$ (t02,95)fS S44 30) S$ (1,047,081)
| 2039 TS (aoazogafs tases tS 79rd 43,077)] $1,022,092)
| 2040S (aozzogayfs stn 7,786 1S (949306)/S S469) (991,076)
| 04a tS otra TS 79,2038 ns73zyfS 4,422) 952, 995)]
| oaz2 tS osagosfS toe S82 tS s7aszszy{S TS 088,362) S$ (910,215)
| 204s TS 9t2asyfs Ste tzz Soo Ss (838,54e)fS S86, 896)}S (875,442)
| oda tS (875aayts 8S twas Sie |S (809,627)/5 S85 624] S (845,250)
| 204s TS (845250 ot 773 S798 778,463)fS S84, 252)PS (812,715)
| 04g tS 8,asfS Stoo Ss 8506S 727,309) 082,002) S$ (759,311)
| 2oa7_ tS (sgn3aayts Stas t0598 Saaz S278) (682,894)
| oa tS oszsoayS oe Stoo t07,529] 8 575,365)1S S256) S$ (600,681)
| ogo tS (0oesyfs eS tte tS t09,243 1S nz S (2,623) (5 13,061))
| oso, TS (53,06) S tsi Sz 442g SS 9,723) 8 467,970)
| 20s tS (4e7970)fS 538] | oS t90 Satz tS (495 386)/S S797) S (517,183)
| 20s2_ TS (57t93z)fs ato | Stem StS (5452zfS S28, 959) (568,482)
| 2053S (Sgaszts tess 20532] asztS StS (572,061)
| osa TS (572,06yf Sts S92 TS ssazoytS Sa) S (575,369)
| oss TS (575,369)1S Sa Sens oo) SS 243576) S (578,385)
| ose STS (578,385)fS Sse Saaz} s TT ssesosfS SONS (582,088)
| 20s7_ tS saogsy}S oS 273222238 ssi seatS S24 S90) (583,454)
| oss TS ss3satS Sos Sess S,787)15 TS 675)PS (585,461)
| oso TS (5854etS oS 2tzz tz tS (562,340)1S S273) S (587,083)
| 2oco, TS szogzyfs oS 2s S358 503,499) S794 S (588,293)
| oe tS (588,293)1S 28,026 FS ss TS (54,238)1S TS (2826) (589,065)
| 2062 TS (59,06s)fS_ Sas 536 |S (504,528)fS S839) (589,368)
| 2063S TS (589,368)1S 97S 5027S (564340)1S S834) (589,171)
| oe tS 39,a7aytS Sse TS 5,528] (53,64) S S24 BOON] (588,444)
| oes Sagas Sra 6038]S 52,40) SS 27S) S (587,152)
| oe, szasayts Saez Sw 559] (50,593)/S SH) S (585,259)
| 2oe7,---- TS 585,259)S S93 sop ssto)fS S59) S (582,728)
| oes TS 5z,zsts_ aso 32 Sse) S$ SaaS (579,521)
| op tS 5szayts S979 tvs S55 z3e)fS S59) (575,595)
| 2070 TS (575595)PS oS es S748 SG 8ae)fS Sea (570,908)
| 207 tS 570,908)f$-- Sees 29,328 spats S23, 830) (565,414)
| 2072, TS 55a Sts StS (535,505)fS (28,562) (559,067)
| 2073, tS spoof S203 Ss 80,508] (52ssafS S28, 257)P S$ 551,815)
| 07a tS ssasasyfs Sez tz tS S297)$S S95 43,608)
| 2075 TS 5azosyfS oS 80,383 S 840 tS sess ES 2522) (534,390)
Sanitary Basin 2
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear $ 10,858 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee Reserve
Reserve Fund Expenditures | Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Fund Closing Balance
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00%
2026 to 2027, then a -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
| 2076 TS (534,390) 8990] 82,375] 502,01) S S289) (524,103)
| 2077,-- [Ss (524tozfS Sets 8,028 atogoy{S S608) Ss (512,688)
| 2o78 tS Szossts 8242S 83,683] (4 9,00)$S (2076) (500,081)
| 2079, TS (S0008yfS oS e784 57]S 45,724) S292) S486, 216)
| oso, TS (486,2a6)S 83545 S 85,044 SaaS S852) 471,024)
| cosa tS atonaytS S82 TS 85,745 1S (485,279) Satz (454,431)
| os tS assays tS 800 SG AGO |S a7 S S839) 486,362)
| 2083 TS (4386,362)1S SBS tS 399,973) SaaS 416,737)
| osa tS 4w737fS S86 320 87,933] 378,804)S St se7)f S$ 895,471))
| oss S357 SS 8B SIS 85G,7B801S S98) $872,478)
| ose, tS 3727S STITT 89,05 |S (83,003) Sz) (347,666)
| osm, tS 347os) SS 88533S ss tS 3074S TS 08,526)]S (820,937)
| oss, tS (320,937)1S to 89308 Stoo tS 279g7efS S935) (292,192)
| oso TS (agzagayts Sos sss (250,342)fS Stony (261,325)
| 2090S (ea 3asfS_ gga S222 ts tsoayfS SSNPS (122,674)
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
S 1,394,054 S 3,051,278 $ - § (1,868,623)
Sanitary Basin 5
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear > 1,185 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Reserve Fund Expenditures | Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then a -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
| 2025S toaggos {Ss 8S 8s SAS 053,583]S 72S S074, 654
| 026 tS orasatS zs 03856 1S sono ts OOS S206, 711 |
| 2027, tS toe7aafs oS sz tS az tS ts753 S25 TS S138, 068 |
| 028 TS tzaoos S08 Set Steg S$ 2923S 269,051 |
| 2029 tS atoposats OR 8384S 9873S 79,42 tS 23,568 S S201, 993 |
| 2030S 201993]S azeoat Set S73 89S 536215 783,482 |
| 203, tS 783a2tsasave{ | zest Stems 839,725 8S S845, 956 |
| 2032 tS SoS 8H tS sz ts so7[S eS S858, 844 |
| 2033, tS ssa tS 8S atta tS 804457 1S 7289S 87,747 |
| 03a tS aa7ztS 8B az 8787S 877A TS SOS S885, 033 |
| 2035S 885,0331S son Sz 9o72 1S 8a S398, 894 |
| 2036 tS soa SS zz see S070 S823 SS 14,293 |
P2037, fs aaz93 tS BS se Sess sgztS 0 8452TS S882, 033 |
| 2038 tS atopzs Sas 83728 89,405 |S 88S S48, 194 |
| 2039S azo tS Sere Seo SG 853/S 7S S65, 990 |
| ogo, tS tesg90 JS tess eo 5250/5 OSS S84, 755 |
| o4a tS asasstS Store Sto ts zzz tS 87S S804, 728 |
| oaz2 tS azsts SS te TS 2a tS tz SS 525,223 |
P2043 TS 55,2231S Seo tz S843 tosz@ SS 845,028 |
| ogg tS sors S Ss tS 8873S 553,401 Sos tS S844 |
| as, tS Seto SS za sez tS zee [Stas SS 584,425 |
| og StS agastS Ses Stes tS 55,2915 to FS S807, 197 |
| oa tS S Ogos Ss 33884 tS wos tz tS S882, 992 |
| oases tS wzz,g92 SOR Sas 380 Ss 4G6721S 1933S S85 9,606 |
| ogg tS wsgncoo JS zz ts 3898S 73,504 S 3470S S886, 974 |
| oso, tS wea tS tS or2TS twp tS 03,8705 or7 TS S747, 947 |
| 0sa tS aga7 ts 523,a96f SSeS as TS t97 [StS S214 911 |
| os2_ Staats 533,660] | SS tos 3831S (806,366)/S SABO] S819, 846)
| 2053S 39,8ae)fS Sts Sosa Ss 307,2a5PS S857) S$ (820,732)
| osa tS (320,732) Stes zat s 307,8as)fS S855) S$ (821,394)
| oss TS 3239S Sz Sata tS (308,252)1S S563) 821,815)
| ose tS 3zasasfS Seton tS 308,4tS S570) 821,981)
| osm, tS 3zaggyts S822 S672 8 (3808,309)1S S856) S$ (821,875)
| oss, tS 3zagmsyfS SSeS 3946 TS 307,929) S859) (821,478)
| oso TS 3ztvytS Sa Seas tS (307,253)1S S859) (820,772)
| oco TS 320,772) Sea Stason Ss (3806,263)/S S88 A7HNPS (819,739)
| ocean tS 3,739) Sta tao S 304,940)fS SaaS (818,357)
| oe2 tS (38,357PS Seat |S (803,262)1S S834) S38 16,605)
| 2063S TS (32G605)fS Ss TS 539718 304,208) S98, 253) S83 14,461)
| ocd tS 3oytS Sees S705] (z975e)fS S845) S821, 901))
| oes TS 30S Seats wor tS (asf S019) $808, 902)
| oes tS 308,90) S$ SSS 6340] (a9 sefS S987) (805,434)
| oe7_-- tS 3053S StS tees TS (28,767S S706) S$ (801,473)
| oes tS 3073S Sez ooo S73 SS 57S (296,990)
| op TS (ae) Ss S40 2795S TS 92,305)P $8 (29,955)
| 2070 TS faggssyfS S80 TS aozz tS 2 74269)fS S068) (286,336)
| 2072 tS (286,336)fS 84S oan tS (28,296)/$ S805) S$ (280,101)
| 2072, [Sentosa 8S or Ro 7ootS S55) (273,215)
| 2073S (273,zastS 88S e9 Ss zsaas)S Sa t96)f S265, 642)
| 2074 TS (esas S852 ta tS (two S S846) S257, 343)
| 2075 TS (as3aazfS S89 27tS (2sae)fS Ste) (248,279)]
Sanitary Basin 5
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear > 1,185 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Reserve Fund Expenditures | Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then a -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
| 2076 TS (hart 8 88BTS ta tS (228, 362)P SS (10,048) S (238,409)
| 2077, fs (agootS SS 8S 2036 |S (2,93) S596) S$ 227,689)
| 2078 tS 2aosgts 8520S 20,7238 (2G 67)$S TS (to7)P (216,073)
| 2079 TS (teva) 8ST S zt tage) SS 8577S (203,513)
| oso, TS (203,5a3)fs SS 82S seo tS assays (8,006) $189,960)
| os tS tse) SS 8ST Sg Stoo) S S89) (175,359)
| os tS t5359)S SS 81S aS asz,gasyfS S729) (059,657)
| oss tS tsgnes7fS S888 S 79S 778) S028) 8 142,796)
| cosa tS t,o) S884 23,837]S8 ts SS 5256) S$ 124,715)
| oss tS twastS Sas, 804 Ss toga SAO S (105,352)
| ose TS (5352S Stazzo ts (toys 8567S (84,639)
| osm? tS (Sosy So Sos TS ssa S (2634S (62,508)
| oss, tS a,sosyfS StS et Sa (39) (88,886)
| oso tS sge)fS SETS eG |S (3,20) SSS (13,698)
| 090 tS (azo) te Sezer ts SSS 851)
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
S 1,952,936 S 964,047 S 329,847 $ (389,857)
Sanitary Basin 6
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ) 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear $ 27,964 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Reserve Fund Expenditures Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then + -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
Po 202s tS StS TS 23S 4523S 90S S813 |
| ome [SSC 29082 Saenz Stag SS S201, 389
| orm [Ss zsg fs | tS 8245S 6892S 888,281 18 GS S85, 047 |
| ove [Sa OMT TS | C S8850]S gz SGI |S 7201S 95,7389 |
| ong [S973 SP Stes rons 89,530] tS S52, 321|
| 030s s {Ss szzas TC S897 [Ss ee7 SC 79,988]S 5980S SCC, 968
| 039s [S tos SC 8 739|S aot HSeB|S 9291S S883, 860
| 032_----s [S88 BCO TS | --"'~iSSC 888938 S 52593] S 36,452] 2729S Ss 159,181 |
| 2033 [S$ sgasas CO 8G YS SoMa SS 34,826/S9 26297 [SS 841,12 |
| 03a Saatzz sO 8S 757/15 taggszo {Ss 9998S OS, 529,87 |
| 2035 (s[ SS sagg77 {Ss CO S85 BTS ts932 Ss toagziz0{S$ ss 88,8386[S S725, 646 |
| 2036 [Sa esode |S gizeso| CE 8G MG Stes Say TS (96S (22, 835)
| 2037/_---- [S$ (2,835) 950943 | CE SG BGS waa Ss (1,805,303)18 TS C79,4383)] S$ (1,884,736)
| 2038s [Sa 884736)S | CC SOS azn ST (7z,gg2yf$_-- TS 5367) S$ (1,788,259)|
| 2039s [ST 7pgzzsoyfs TC 883858 S 5281] (42,979) TS 70,974) (1,683,950)
| oo [SC opzgsoyfs TC 8G S786 ST (4,505,163)1$ S66 ,227)} S$ (4,571,390)
| oan [SS s7a390)f S| CO tS 89,908 S$ 182,3621S (4,389,028) S67) SS (4,450,145)|
| oaa2-- [Sa tsaasys | S06 |S 86009] (4,264,136)18 S852) (4,319,758)
| 20a [Sa zagy7sayis TC sos 89,730 S$ (4,430,028) TS 49,724) (,179,750)|
| oa [SS agn75oyfs | 85S 93,524 TS (986,225)18 TS 48,394) Ss (1,029,619)
| 20s [Stones TC StS 97,395] S$ (832,225)18 dS (86618) (868,842)
| one [SC egazys TC oz S033 S750] S29, 3570)F S$ (696,870)
| 0a7_--ss [SC o9870)fS CO az tS 05369] (494,500) S26) S513, 126)
| oag-- [Stef TC Sats 9477S (303,650) S836) (827,010)
| oan [Sonos CC S59 S BEES (403,344) SATIS (207,891)
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
S 3,863,632 S 4,289,322 S 182,646 §$ (608,337)
Sanitary Basin 8
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear > 738 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Reserve Fund Expenditures | Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then a -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
Po 2025S SS 88S
| ome SS es
Porm? ts St 8
| ors SS ot ts
Pom SS 880
P2030 fs St es
P03 SS oo et
P2032 soo 8st
P2033 SS oo 99
Pog SS ot
P2035 SS 8 Ss
| ose SS ss
P0s7----_ SS oo 88 ss
Poss SS oo es
P2039 SS oo oe ss
| oan fs So sz
Pon SS too sz ss
Poaa SS oo ore ss
Poa SS oo tos ss
Poa SS a ss
Pas SS to so
| ote SS oo toe Ss
Poa ss Soo tse ss
Poa SS of
RE a GG 0 P70 0
| oso SS sz ss
| osa tS ST 3,872f at Sess 32S (ogo S826) S (74,166)
| 20s2 tS (74 tos) S 75,350] Tt 09S 20S zpos) TS (6327) S$ (150,123)
| 2053S (tstng23yfS te 885s 888518 azpsyts TS (6,349) (150,637)
| cosa tS tstnos7fS te Sez StS aaossyfS (6366) (151,051)
| oss TS astosayfS te zz ovo tngs SS 63579)] $8 (151,360)
| ose Sasson} te Satz tS astosfS 6 387)] $8 (151,556)
| osm, Sass) S et Saas S826 TS says S639) 15,631)
| oss TS tstozyfS te Saat waaz Sassi (6, 388) $151,577)
| oso TS tsas77tS te soa sts soos) SS 6380) (151,386)
| coco tS tsazze)fS te za 02 TS atosatS TS (6,366) (151,050)
| ocean tS astosoy}S te ses tS 838618 zat S684) S$ (150,559)
| oe2-- tS tstnssgyfS te Sse S973 spe TS (6,828) SS 149,904)
| 2063S tango) te ters tz tS tors 6,283) (149,074)
| ocd tS tazovaytS te eco ess sta sznytS S240) (148,060)
| oes Stagg) St twas oo tS toot S89) 146,849)
| oe tS tw sags te Seats 39,302)fS S629) (145,40)
| oe7-- Sts St Sen S99 S773) (6060) 8 143,792)
| oes Sago te 7853S as 939)S S598) (141,920)
| op TS taza 833s on 33,0) 5892) $139,803)
| 070 tS (t39,803)fS te rots to aos S792) 137,424)
| 207 Saaz Ss et om S833 tga S S580) 14,771)
P2072 tS s7ytS at as S500 wmf 5556S 11,827))
| 2073S assamts tt sats 70S aS SSA S128, 5:76)
| oma tS tse)fS te Sorat 8843S tn732)fS 5268) (125,000)
| 2075 TS (aso) et Sea Snag S503) $122,083)
Sanitary Basin 8
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear > 738 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Reserve Fund Expenditures | Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then a -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
| ove SSC (tosszyfs Sto S201 S(t 882)fS S923) (116,805)
| 2077, [Ss (ttwsosyfS tt tas 385 tS togzoytS S27 S112, 247)
| os tS tas te tt zz ston, s5fS 4523) (107,088)
| 2079 TS (toopsyfs te sso 97,324 S482) 8 (101, 606)
| oso, tS (toto) Se Ses sos (teat S (4,032) $$ (95,679)
| ost SoS te 8825S tz S85 52S S763) (89,284)
| os tS 9,z9aytS tt Sas te TS (792s S873) S (82,395)
| oss tS (8z,395)PS et aS tse tS (sz S Sto S (74,987)
| osa tS (agp S tt eS tots (64206) S825) (67,032)
| oss tS ozzyts et Sse tS tgp FS (56036) SH) S (58,501)
| ose Sots tS eZ TS zt tS 42a) S08) (49,366)
| osm? tse) S et Sez ttgo ts ga) S Sen) (389,595)
| oss tS ssyfS et Seo too tS gas (4229) (29,155)
| oso StS te Sra goz TS (azz SS (28,012)
| 090 tS (gongs tS tgs sss sz) (6,130)
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
S 149,222 S 342,097 S 0 $ (192,875)
Water Distribution
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 3) 7 8 9 10 11
Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear $ 9,727 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Year Beginning --_ Reserve Fund Expenditures | Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then + -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
S 2,748,026 $ 2,182,917 S 7,183,542 S 0 $s (1,612,588)
Water Storage and Supply
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 ) 7 8 ) 10 11
Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear > 111,212 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Year Beginning --_ Reserve Fund Expenditures Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then + -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
Water Storage and Supply
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear > 111,212 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Year Beginning --_ Reserve Fund Expenditures Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then + -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
S 171,133,335 $ 765,311 S 307,780,956 $ - § (134,602,289)
Transportation
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ) 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for HectaresPerYear $ 121,443 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Reserve Fund Expenditures Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then + -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
Pes Srgor]S aS Sastre zasaa|s aguas LS 370,862]
| 2026S [Ss G370,862|S 383,200] CEC 88S 126,300] 3,803,789]S 829,451 1S t5829]$ S88, 457,280 |
| 2027 [Ss 8.457,280|/S --ae7oos| | SS 8352S 2, 979,9721S 970,244 S 39,405 ]S8 OS, 109,649 |
| 2028S topos 540,234{ CE 8S 183,979]S 2,738,929 1S 5,838,444 1S 0G,769|$ SS 445,213
| 2029 [Ss 545,213 [S$ g9z,aa3| CT S859] S$ 3,097,239 5 6 650,3391S 33,0078 dS «783,346 |
| 2030S iG 783,346]S5 329,038] | 87S 19,3928 8,204,153 ]S 9,658,461] 93,069] dS (9,851,630 |
| 2031, [Ss ssaezo{s-- | eS tetzo Ss 3,106,892] 5 2,958,52218 59,0708 S13, 217,693 |
| 2032S 13,217,693 8,973,062] CEC 882 S152 |S 2,817,733]S SS 7,862,364]S 7247S dS «8,019,611 |
| 2033, [Ss ote {s 8,336,523] | tt Stag |S 2,780,526/5 aes ota {S$ .272/8 S512, 887 |
| 03a tS sazzgm7{S | CC 8G ST tt882]$ 2,838,965 ]S 5 854,852]S to7,037$ SS 458,889 |
| 203s [Ss aszzag {Ss | tS 53,900] $2,945,228 5 A047 {Ss t082{S S88, 572, 199 |
| 2036. [S799 {S| S156, 978 1S 8,298,562 ]S 4,870,762 1S 23745 |S OS 12,108,177 |
| 2037, [Ss ttogaz7{s_-- |e Stet ts 8,593,201] 5 25,701,378[S 84028 |S OS 16,015,405
| 2038S |S twoas,gos{S | CC 28S 163,320]$ SS 3,643,420]S 9,658,825 ]S 393,176 18 CS 200,052,001 |
| 2039 [Ss 2,0sz001]$_ | CT 8.07 St 586 |S 8,747,9521S 23,799,9531S a999 |S S24, 275,952 |
| 200 S$ 275,95218 | AS t69,918 |S 8,935,657] $ 28,211,608 ]S 56423218 OS 28,775,841 |
| 2041 [Ss 2,775g4i{s 14 33agis| 5D TS 73,317 1S 80,914 S 8,617,936 [S$ 87,3598 OS 18,990,295 |
| 2042S 8,990,295|S 14e2ssoa] | 8S 17678315 24,855 |S 8,607,555]$ sats OS 8,779,707 |
| 2043 [Ss 779,707|8 --84enz64| tS 80,319] 3,989,52215 07,9645 8,59] SS, 394,123 |
| oa [Ss 4 394,223/S 8.630490 CE 78S 183,925 1S 8,824,757] aon) S$ S483) 429,720)
| 20s [Ss (429,720)/8 ty726525| CT tc tS 87,6031$ 3,889,895 (7,206,556)1S LS 819,728)]$ (7,586,285)
| oases [SS (7,586,285)/$ Ss tgazoss{ CE St 85S |S 1402711 (4,387,069)1$ CS 633,031)]$ (15,020,100)
| 2047, [Ss asozo,noots_-- | tS 9583S 422,773 5 (0,597,328)1S S46 6,282)$ (11,063,610)
| 2oag, [SS (atoezerofS_-- | CEC Stone |S 4 58,865]S (6,544,745)1$ OS 287,969)1S 6,832,714]
| 20a [Ss wza7aaiS | 8S 203,068 Sa 594,5821S (2,238,032) dS (98,478) S$ (2,336,610)
| oso, [Ss 3660)fS_ | 98S 28386600 SSS
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
S 96,814,824 S 89,689,130 S 4,219,427 $ (1,823,599)
Fire Services
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for | Hectares Per Year $ 19,940 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Reserve Fund Expenditures Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then + -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x 6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
Poss SS tno Sagas tags SS 253,913
2006 fs sagisfs SS --C<dT SSCSCSCSCSCSCSTT_ | 2st SiS SSCSCSC~S~S BBS --SCSCSC~S OS ----C~*C~*~'~'sGBD:'S--SCSC~SS DBS SCSC~C~C~CSCSCSCSSC*dSSSSSCSCSC~S LD, 31
[2007s siasiofs_----- +i SCS] ~S--S~--ta Cid CSCS SBS --~SCSCSC~«BW,BOS ----SC~C~*~*~s BOSS ~~~ SSCSCSC~SCSCSSC*dSS SSSCSCSC~«, 0A
[2008s 1,327,642 |$ _3,go7oaz]------S--SC~CSCS| SCS 'O--~--~dCS SSCSCSCSCS~C~S 9S SCSC~w SQ --CSCSCSC~«w«G,TDVS----SCS~SCSSC*idSSSCSCSCSC~S~S~S~SS SBI ----_--~=*,«3888, 236)
[2009 [$s ___(1,388,236)|$ 3,109,234] --------------~d SSCS; --S~SC~idS SSCSCSC~C~« BOYS ~C~SC~C*~S OWS |S ~C~C*~*~*~*«O_GTSYYTS SSCS SSSCSCSC~W ASD) S| (4,227,067)
[2030 [$s ____(4,227,067)|$ 3,232,618] ----------*+d| 373 --~«dS SCS, YS ~C~C~*~«S OLS --_----~C~C~«wS93B_STN SSCS «dS SSSCSCSC~--305,077)$ (7,238,653)
P2031 +s ___(7,238,653)[$ 3297271] <i SCS SS~C~*dS SCSCSC~«B,MS YS CSCSC~*~SNWA]S _----(0,025,78ayS ----S--SCSC~CS*dS SS SSCSCSC~«R, AQ) S ----_--(00, 066,918)
[2032 [$s aoaseoua)[$ 1,330,980] --------------~di|----S--s'22--S--~dS SSCSCSC~S BTS --CSC~C~*~« GD, ~SCSC~«BGDBTNE'G SSCS dS SSCSCSCS~9 TSS (01,833,987)
[2033s ____(a1,833,987)[$ 1357509] <i ----S~--s9S SC*dS SS SCSCSC~« OS SCSC~C~«SSS TS SCSCSC~««TBGOBHYY'S SSCS dS SSSCSCS~S 00,342) $ (03,295,377)
P2038 +s (3,295,377 $ 138751] _------------S~d SSC~S~Ss'2GSSC~dS SCSCSCSC~« TS CC~C~« BTS SCSCSC~«A 2B SSCS dS SSSCSCSC~«25 IS) S (14,839,396)
P2035 [s __(a4,839,306)[$ __1aizaae] ----------S--~d SSCSC~S~--s.----SCiédS SS SCSCSCSCS~«S TOS --C*~"'*é BSS CSCSC~C~*~«SSTOW,DTNE'G SSS SSSSCSS~«6 93,803) $ (16,462,050)
[2036s __(a6a62,050f$ Ss ~<| SSCS SSCS~--S'3--SSC~dS SSSCSCSC~«SWTS T'S CSCSC~S A, PS ------~C~SC~wS 920.ABBYS ~~~ «dS ~----SCSCSCSCS~ 700,499) $ (16,620,938)
[2037s (16,620,938) _-_|------~+i| 2270 +s 26a1fs_____589,990]$ _(16,03094a)[$ [$s _(705,362)|$ (16,736,309)
[2038 _[s __(16,736,309[$ '| --------S--S--~d SS. --S--~dS SSSCSCSC~« BT'S SCSCSC~S DB, DBS ------CSC~C~wG ABBOTTS SSCS «dS SSS~-- 710,075) $ (06,848,149)
[2039s __aaaarayfs--------- | SSCS SSCS~--S'7_--i«dS SSCS PS SSCSC~ SBS _--_----~--~=iG 2,7 SS «dS SSSCSCSCSC~-- a2) $ (16,946,990)
[2000s ___a69a6900[$ '| S--~d SS. A_------i*dS --SCSCSCSCS~S 00S ------~--~--iG 2S _--_----_--(16 300,770) § (dS (7.238) $$ (07,018,004)
[2001s __ta7,o1go0af$--- -*i| --S--~dSSS~S--S.O--«dS SS CSCSCSC~« SBS CSCSC~*~« BAS ~CSCSC~«G BBT,STNS SSS SSSSCSCS~-- S87) $ (07,050,101)
[2002s ___tavosoronfs '| _------diSSCS--#9----S--~dS SCSCSCSCSC~« SWOT --CSCSC~«NG GS ----~SCSC~«G 35 ,AMOYPS ------------S--SCSC*dS S79, $ (07,072,991)
[2003s _azoraoonfs '| ----«di--SS--.2--S~--~dS SSSCSCSC~«SWSOB YS --C~C~*~*~«SSW OS ~CSCSC~C~«G ASN SSCS SSS 72,389) $$ (07 140,316)
P2000 fs _azaaozie[s | ----~«diSS~-- «dS SOS ----SCSC~S~S OTS ----~SCSC~wG S,B05)S--------S--S--SC~--*dS SS SCSCSCSCSC~S 2 Sa) S (07,238,847)
P2005 _s __avzaeear[s '| ------~di SSCS. ------<dS --SCSC~SOBOM YS --CSC~*~*~« BB, ----C~C~C*C*~«G GOAN SSCS SSSS-- 780,408) $ (07,330,582)
[2006s ___(a7s30se)[$ '| --------S~dS SS. ----S--~dS SSCSCSCSC~C~SO'S --CSC~C*~*~w TOV' --~C~C~C~*~«GSGHO,TGYS SSCS SSSS-- 782,638) $ (07,383,399)
[2007s ____ta7ae3,309[$ ----- --*| SSCS SS~--aT_--SCS--~*dS SSSCSCSCS~S~S MBS --SCSCSC~RG DOS _--_--_--_--_--(06,657,096)§ dS SSS, $$ (07,390,113)
[2008s _azaso1i3)[$_ '| --------S--~di--SS~S 3 SiS SSCSCSC~C~,GBOYS--SC~C~C~S, TS ----~CSC~«G GB, ABNTS SSS dS S732, 58)] $$ (07,380,650)
[2009s __avseoesnfs '| SSCS--~Sd --SS.1_----~dS SS SSCSCS~--SB, NBS SCSCSC~«S BS --_--~C~C~«G«GGDBTNE' GSC ~dS S78, 558) $ (07,357,792)
[2050s ____azasz,7onf$ '| ----S--~dS SS is ----S--~--i TS --SCSC~C~w8G DS _------~C~=*G«GHB,ITON SSS «dS SSS 733,408) $$ (07,801,778)
[2051s __aaoa7vayfs----- -*| SC~d St «dS SSCSCSC~SO YS --SCSCSC~w BLS --CSCSC~wG T,BOINS SSC --~*dS SSSSC-- 7.585) $ (07,500,886)
[2052s _avsoogee[s_----- -~|----SS--~dSS--S~S «dS SCSCSC~«S BS C~*~*~« TQS _--~C*~*~*«SSBB,TOTNL'S SSS SSSSCSCS~ an) $ (07,569,264)
[2053s ___ta7.5ea,26a[$ '| ------S--~d SS «dS --SCSCSC~SG ODS --CSC~C~*~ SWS --CSC~C~*~«GSBHG, BY ----SCSC~SCSS*dS SSSCSCSCSCS~« BMY] S --_--_--_--_--(07,626,618)
[2054s __a7,e26ea)[$ '| ----SS--~dSS--9 «dS ~--SCSCSCS~SG BIBS ----~SCSC~C~w9GQ 2S ------~CSC~C~«G 9DT,BTNYS SSCS <i SSSCSCS~ a, 805) $ (07,672,181)
P2055 _[s __azerais[s | --------~diSS-- «dS SSS --SCSCSCS~sB,22G TS _----C~C~C~«S 9B.GSHYS SCS dS SSCSCS~--~7b 198) $ (07,705,149)
[2056s ___azvosaayfs_--------- *id| SCSCSCS| ~S--S~--s9 dS SSCS SSCS JS ------~CSCSC~wG 97 T.GSBYS----------S--SCSCS--~dS Sr. §$ (07,724,675)
[2057s ____azaaers)fs ----- -+| S~d SS «dS SCSCSCSC~9QGGT YS --SCSC~« A, PS ------~CSCSC~«G 98,GBAYTS SSC «dS SSSSS-- 77,236) $$ (07,729,870)
[2058s _aznaaermfs '| +i Sts --i«dS CSCSCSC~«OWBMB YS ~CSCSC~« SITS _--_--~C~C*wG 9G) ----------S--SCSC*dS SSSCSCSC~ hr) $ (07,719,800)
[2059s __az7igaonf$ '| --~diSS--s dS SCSCSC~«O SS T'S SSCSCSC~S 7S (06,947,781) § dS --------SS---- 75,702) $$ (07,693,483)
[2060s ____taveoa.aeay[$_------- +i SCS] ~S--S~--s id CSCS SS SSCS |S ------=i 6 906,024) § SSC ~dS SSCSCSCS~ 3,865) $ (07,649,889)
[2061s _aveasaen[s----- -*| SSCS~Sd SS~--s ----~«dS SCSCSCSC~S~Szs7 TS --~SCSC~« OB, 20S ------~=*G BG SBOYTS SSCS dS SSSCSCS--~, 25a) S$ (07 587,934)
[2062s ___avsezoaa[$_---------*+| SSCS] ~S--S~--9t iS SSCSCS~wBB YS SCSCSC~S GQ --C~C~*~«G TSUN SSCS SSS .8 20) $ (07,506,483)
[2063s ___a7soeaaay[s_------- '| --SSCS~d SS SiS SCS, YS CSC~C~*~*~« SWS --~C~C~*~*«GSGTOWBDNTS SSCS «dS SSSCSC~--t33, 56) $$ (07,804,341)
P2068 fs _azaoazanfs '| S--~dS SS «dS SSCSCSCSC~SBTS T'S CSCSCSC~=« SD, SG --_----~C~C~«G SHT,QQNS SSCS (dS SSSCSC~--~28 287) $ (07,280,256)
[2065s _tavzeo2se[$_--- +| --SS--~dS SS id SSSCSCSC~S7BSC~C~*~«é AICS C~C~C*~*~*«GAWBBTN'G SSCS Sd SSS 722,077) $$ (07,132,914)
[2066s _avasaoiafs '| --~di Sst ----C*dS SSCSCSC~«G BB'S ~CSC~*~*~« BGO' --_----~C~*~*G 2G AGS SCS dS SSCSCSCS~1, 829) $ (16,960,935)
[2067 [s ___(a6960,935)[$ - | ----------~di----S--st Sid SSCS TS --~SCSC~C~« OSS _----~C~*~*~«GSOG BQN ------SCS~CSCSCSS*dS SSSCSCSCSC~« ORT) S| _--_--_--_(06,762,873)
[2068s __(a6,762,873)[$ | ----di----S~--st ----C«dS SCSCSCSC~S~S S'S --~CSC~« QS ------~CSC~C~«S BOLDBNS ------------S--SCSC~--«dS SSCSCSCS~0 96,971) $ (16,537,209)
[2069s (6,537,209 - | ----------SdiS--S-- dS CSSCSC~wSWS G'S SCSCSC~«S ROBT PS ----~--S~«S SG ADDN ----------S--SC--~diS SCSCSCS~C~« 8229) $ (16,282,352)
[2070 [$s __(46,282,352)[$ - _|----------~«di----S--st SiS SCSCSCSC~S~SS STS --CSCSC~« WQS --_--~C~C~C~wS BD,AMYS SSCS «dS SSCSCSCSCSC~C~w6 74,187) S$ (05,996,630)
[2071s __a5996630[$ '| ----SS--~d SS dS SSCS SBS SSCSC~=t SABO PS --------SOTISDANS SC «dS SSSCSCS~S 07S (05,678,295)
[2072s ___a5e7e205)[$ | ------~diSS9t «dS SSCS --CSC~C~*~=t WSBT _----~C~C~«'G79,GDGYS SSC --~dS SSSSS~ 5,903) $ (05,325,508)
[2073s ___(a5,325,508)[$ '| ----S--~dS SS Sid SSCSCSC~C~S~S GBS _------~=isB, GBS _--_----(04 306,806) § --------S--SC--~dS SSSCSCSC~029,50) $ (04,936,347)
[2074 fs _aasaeaats | +d Sas «ds SCS, 0 PS ------~CSC~=ts039036 JS ----------S--ta BST SSCS YS SSSSS-- aa) $$ (04,508,792)
Fire Services
OSL Account Cashflows
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Year Beginning Off-site Levy Fee Growth-related Principal & Interest for | Hectares Per Year $ 19,940 Anticipated Fee Cumulative Surplus RF Interest Accural Off-site Levy Fee
Reserve Fund Expenditures Debentures Payments inflated at Revenue (Deficit) Reserve Fund Closing
Opening Balance Inflated at: 4.00% Balance
2026 to 2027, then + -
2.00% 2.0% 4.40%
4% then 2% 2028 onwards [5 x6] [2-3-4+7] [8+9+10]
| 2075 TS sores tts tS s797{S tosgza7 {Ss (a,4ao7efS TS 594,755) (14,040,731)
| ove STS toa73zayis tts tS 3S sorts (tgsg7i7its TS 570,228) (13,529,945)
| 2077), [Sa sagoasyis tts tS 5805S 02,6339 (42,.427,312)15 TS (546,802) S$ (12,974,113)
| ova tS ao7aaays tts S522 [Sa tegese [s(t zaga27its TS 52,375) (12,370,802)
| 2079 |S 370,802)f3 tts S396 [Sa tastzo ts (0,223,622)15 TS (493,839) (1,717,462)
| oso tS aa7izaeayis tts Stoo tS 70,2235 (t0,547,3391S TS (464,083) $ (1,011,421)
| 20s TS aoraazayyfs tts Swe {Ss 93,526[5 i 8t7gge)fS S48, 987)1 S$ (10,249,883)
| 2os2 tS tzgggsayis tts Soo tS 27,3965 9,032487)15 TS 897,429) (9,429,916)
| oss, tS (9azgoie)f Sts S375 Sa 2a7aats (888,175 TS (860,280) (8,548,452)
| 2osa tS (85azasayis tts tS weesz tS 26657918 28287215 TS (820,402) 8 (7,602,275)
| oss tS (7027s tts tS wore [Strong ts 6300364)1S TS 277,656)1 5 (6,588,020)
| ose [ST (esago2fs tts tS 9376S 3779s S270,270[S TS (28,892) $5,502,163)
| 2os7 tS (5502,te3)fS tts 70,7648 4 3844t0a tS 458,0591S TS (182,955) $4,342,014)
| oss tS (4 34norayts tts S79 Ss 3709869 (2 970,028)15 TS (180,681) $ (3,100,709)
| 2osn-- tS (3,t00,709)f Sts tS 73,6238 4 398,4061S (4 702,303)15 TS 74,900) S (4,777,205)
| 20900 TS (777z05ys ts 5095S 53,0938 (SoS TS (23,056) (547,068)
Project Costs Levy Collections Interest Earned Borrowing Costs
s 18,291,992 s 55,185,351 s 46,939 $ (36,940,297)