Development Charges Background Study, Watson & Associates, May 16, 2022

Leamington, Ontario · summary & facts

This is the exact embedded text of the captured official document. Snapshot 90215baf31fe · verified 2026-10-23 · original document · archived snapshot · unofficial consolidation, the official version is held by the municipal clerk.

Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 905-272-3600 May 16, 2022 [email protected] Development Charges Background Study Municipality of Leamington Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of this Document ....................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Summary of the Process ......................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Changes to the D.C.A.: Bill 73 - Smart Growth for our Communities Act, 2015 ........................................................................... 1-3 1.3.1 Area Rating ................................................................................ 1-3 1.3.2 Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure ......................... 1-3 1.3.3 60-Day Circulation of D.C. Background Study ........................... 1-4 1.3.4 Timing of Collection of D.C.s ...................................................... 1-4 1.3.5 Other Changes ........................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Further Changes to the D.C.A.: Bill 108, 138, 197, and 213 ................... 1-4 1.4.1 Bill 108: More Homes, More Choice Act - An Act to Amend Various Statutes with Respect to Housing, Other Development, and Various Matters ............................................ 1-4 1.4.2 Bill 138: Plan to Build Ontario Together Act, 2019 ..................... 1-6 1.4.3 Bill 197: COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act .............................. 1-6 1.4.4 Bill 213: Better for People, Smarter for Business Act, 2020 ...... 1-9 2. Anticipated Development in the Municipality of Leamington ...................... 2-1 2.1 Requirement of the Act ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Basis of Population, Household and Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Summary of Growth Forecast ................................................................. 2-2 3. The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge ........................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Services Potentially Involved .................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Increase in the Need for Service ............................................................. 3-1 3.4 Local Service Policy ................................................................................ 3-6 Table of Contents (Cont'd) Page Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3.5 Capital Forecast ...................................................................................... 3-7 3.6 Treatment of Credits ............................................................................... 3-7 3.7 Classes of Services ................................................................................ 3-8 3.8 Existing Reserve Funds .......................................................................... 3-9 3.9 Deductions ............................................................................................ 3-10 3.9.1 Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling ...................... 3-10 3.9.2 Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity .......................... 3-11 3.9.3 Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development ........................ 3-11 3.9.4 Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions ............................................................................ 3-12 3.10 Municipal-wide vs. Area Rating ............................................................. 3-12 3.11 Allocation of Development .................................................................... 3-13 3.12 Asset Management ............................................................................... 3-13 3.13 Transit ................................................................................................... 3-13 4. D.C.-Eligible Cost Analysis by Service and Class of Service ...................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Service Levels and 10-Year Capital Costs for Leamington' D.C. Calculation .............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2.1 Parks and Recreation Services .................................................. 4-2 4.2.2 Library Services ......................................................................... 4-4 4.2.3 Growth Studies .......................................................................... 4-5 4.3 Service Levels and 20-Year Capital Costs for Leamington' D.C. Calculation .............................................................................................. 4-7 4.3.1 Fire Protection Services ............................................................. 4-7 4.3.2 Policing Services ........................................................................ 4-9 4.3.3 Services Related to a Highway ................................................ 4-11 4.3.4 Public Works (Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment) .................. 4-13 4.3.5 Water Services ......................................................................... 4-15 4.4 Service Levels and Fully Serviced Area (Urban) 20-Year Capital Costs for Leamington's D.C. Calculation .............................................. 4-18 4.4.1 Wastewater Services ............................................................... 4-18 5. D.C. Calculation ............................................................................................... 5-1 6. D.C. Policy Recommendations and D.C. By-law Rules ................................ 6-1 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 D.C. By-law Structure ............................................................................. 6-2 6.3 D.C. By-law Rules ................................................................................... 6-2 6.3.1 Payment in any Particular Case ................................................. 6-2 6.3.2 Determination of the Amount of the Charge ............................... 6-3 Table of Contents (Cont'd) Page Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 6.3.3 Application for Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) ................................................................................ 6-4 6.3.4 Exemptions (full or partial) ......................................................... 6-4 6.3.5 Phasing in .................................................................................. 6-5 6.3.6 Timing of Collection ................................................................... 6-5 6.3.7 Indexing ..................................................................................... 6-6 6.3.8 The Applicable Areas ................................................................. 6-6 6.4 Other D.C. By-law Provisions ................................................................. 6-6 6.4.1 Categories of Services/Classes for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes ......................................................................... 6-6 6.4.2 By-law In-force Date .................................................................. 6-7 6.4.3 Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter-Reserve Fund Borrowing ................................................... 6-7 6.4.4 Area Rating ................................................................................ 6-7 6.5 Other Recommendations ........................................................................ 6-9 7. By-law Implementation ................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Public Consultation Process ................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 7-1 7.1.2 Public Meeting of Council........................................................... 7-1 7.1.3 Other Consultation Activity ......................................................... 7-1 7.2 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development ................................. 7-2 7.3 Implementation Requirements ................................................................ 7-3 7.3.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 7-3 7.3.2 Notice of Passage ...................................................................... 7-3 7.3.3 By-law Pamphlet ........................................................................ 7-3 7.3.4 Appeals ...................................................................................... 7-4 7.3.5 Complaints ................................................................................. 7-4 7.3.6 Credits ....................................................................................... 7-5 7.3.7 Front-Ending Agreements .......................................................... 7-5 7.3.8 Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions ................... 7-5 Appendix A Background Information on Residential and Non-Residential Growth Forecast ............................................................................................. A-1 Appendix B Level of Service .................................................................................. B-1 Appendix C Long-Term Capital and Operating Cost Examination ...................... C-1 Appendix D Development Charge Reserve Fund Policy ...................................... D-1 Appendix E Local Service Policy ............................................................................E-1 Appendix F Asset Management Plan ...................................................................... F-1 Table of Contents (Cont'd) Page Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix G Proposed Development Charges By-law .......................................... G-1 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym Full Description of Acronym A.M.P. Asset management plan CANSIM Canadian Socio-Economic Information Management System (Statistics Canada) C.B.C. Community Benefits Charge D.C. Development charge D.C.A. Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended E.A. Environmental Assessment F.I.R. Financial Information Return G.F.A. Gross floor area L.P.A.T. Local Planning Appeal Tribunal M.O.E.C.P. Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks NAICS North American Industry Classification System Codes N.F.P.O.W. No Fixed Place of Work O.L.T. Ontario Land Tribunal O.M.B. Ontario Municipal Board O.P.A. Official Plan Amendment O. Reg. Ontario Regulation P.O.A. Provincial Offences Act P.P.U. Persons per unit sq.ft. square foot Executive Summary Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE i H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Executive Summary 1. The report provided herein represents the Development Charges (D.C.) Background Study for the Municipality of Leamington required by the Development Charges Act, 1997 (D.C.A.). This report has been prepared in accordance with the methodology required under the D.C.A. The contents include the following: - Chapter 1 - Overview of the legislative requirements of the Act; - Chapter 2 - Summary of the residential and non-residential growth forecasts for the Municipality; - Chapter 3 - Approach to calculating the D.C.; - Chapter 4 - Review of historical service standards and identification of future capital requirements to service growth and related deductions and allocations; - Chapter 5 - Calculation of the D.C.s; - Chapter 6 - D.C. policy recommendations and rules; and - Chapter 7 - By-law implementation. 2. D.C.s provide for the recovery of growth-related capital expenditures from new development. The D.C.A. is the statutory basis to recover these charges. The methodology is detailed in Chapter 4; a simplified summary is provided below: 1) Identify amount, type and location of growth; 2) Identify servicing needs to accommodate growth; 3) Identify capital costs to provide services to meet the needs; 4) Deduct: - Grants, subsidies and other contributions; - Benefit to existing development; - Amounts in excess of 10-year historical service calculation; - D.C. reserve funds (where applicable); 5) Net costs are then allocated between residential and non-residential benefit; and Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE ii H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 6) Net costs divided by growth to provide the development charge. 3. The D.C. process needs to address a number of items that were put in place through the Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 (Bill 73). These items have been incorporated throughout the report and in the draft by-law, as necessary. These items include: a. Area-rating: Council must consider the use of area-specific charges. b. Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure: The D.C. background study must include an asset management plan (A.M.P.) that deals with all assets proposed to be funded, in whole or in part, by D.C.s. The A.M.P. must show that the assets are financially sustainable over their full lifecycle. c. 60-day Circulation Period: The D.C. background study must be released to the public at least 60 days prior to passage of the D.C. by-law. 4. Further, changes to the D.C.A. were introduced through four bills passed in the Ontario legislature: Bill 108, Bill 138, Bill 197 and Bill 213. The following provides a brief summary of the recent changes. Bill 108: More Homes, More Choice: Ontario's Housing Supply Action Plan In May 2019, the Province introduced Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 which would make changes to the current D.C. legislation. The Bill was passed and given Royal Assent on June 6, 2019. While the legislation has been passed, much of the detailed changes were to be implemented by Regulation which were not yet passed. The following items are currently in effect: a. Effective January 1, 2020, rental housing and institutional developments shall pay D.C.s in six (6) equal annual payments commencing at first occupancy. Non-profit housing developments shall pay D.C.s in 21 equal annual payments. Interest may be charged on the installments, and any unpaid amounts inclusive of interest payable shall be added to the property tax roll and collected in the same manner as taxes. b. Effective January 1, 2020, the D.C. amount for all developments occurring within two years of a Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment planning Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE iii H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx approval (for applications made after January 1, 2020), shall be determined based on the D.C. by-law in effect on the day of Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment application. Other key elements of the changes that were not proclaimed and were dealt with subsequently through Bill 197 are provided below: - The D.C. would be refined to only allow for the following services to remain within the D.C.: water, wastewater, storm water, roads, fire, policing, ambulance, waste diversion, parks development, recreation, public libraries, long-term care, public health. - The mandatory 10% deduction would be removed for all services that remain eligible in the D.C. - A new community benefits charge (C.B.C.) would be introduced to include formerly eligible D.C. services that are not included in the above listing, parkland dedication and bonus zoning contributions. Bill 138: Plan to Build Ontario Together Act, 2019 On November 6, 2019, the Province released Bill 138 which provided further amendments to the D.C.A. and Planning Act. This Bill received Royal Assent on December 10, 2019 and was proclaimed which resulted in sections related to the D.C.A. (schedule 10) becoming effective on January 1, 2020. With respect to the D.C.A., this Act removed installment payments for commercial and industrial developments that were originally identified in Bill 108. Bill 197: COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020 In March 2020, Canada was impacted by the COVID-19 global pandemic. As a result, the economy was put into a state of emergency in an effort to slow the spread of the virus. In response, the Province tabled legislation on July 8, 2020 which amended a number of Acts, including the D.C.A. and the Planning Act. With this Bill, many changes proposed in Bill 108 have now been revised. With respect to the above noted changes from Bill 108, the following changes are provided in Bill 197: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE iv H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx - Eligible Services: The list of eligible services for the D.C. has now been expanded to include most services eligible under the D.C.A. prior to Bill 108. - Mandatory 10% Deduction: The mandatory 10% deduction is removed (consistent with Bill 108). This applies to all D.C.-eligible services. - Community Benefits Charges: a municipality may, by by-law impose a C.B.C. to pay for the capital costs for formerly-eligible D.C. services in addition to parkland dedication and bonus zoning contributions. However, based on the list of D.C.-eligible services under the new legislation, all current services are D.C.-eligible, thus a C.B.C. has not been prepared for the Municipality at this time. Bill 213: Better for People, Smarter for Business Act, 2020 On December 8, 2020, Bill 213 received Royal Assent. One of the changes of the Bill that took effect upon Royal Assent included amending the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities Act by introducing a new section that would exempt the payment of D.C.s for developments of land intended for use by a university that receives operating funds from the Government. These changes to the D.C.A. were proclaimed on September 18, 2020 and are further discussed in Section 1.4 of this report. 5. The growth forecast (Chapter 2) on which the Municipal-wide D.C. is based, projects the following population, housing and non-residential floor area for the 10-year (2022 to 2031) and 20-year (2022 to 2041) periods, for the purposes of calculating the Municipal-wide D.C.s.Table ES-1 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE v H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table ES-1 Summary of Growth Forecast by Planning Period Measure 10 Year Municipal- Wide 2022 to 2031 20 Year Municipal- Wide 2022 to 2041 20-Year Urban Wastewater Serviced Area 2022 to 2041 20-Year Water Serviced Area 2022 to 2041 (Net) Population Increase 6,492 12,006 8,544 12,006 Residential Unit Increase 3,856 7,190 3,734 7,190 Non-Residential - Greenhouse Gross Floor Area Increase (sq.ft.) 69,000,000 131,080,000 0 131,080,000 Non-Residential - Industrial, Commerical & Institutional Gross Floor Area Increase (sq.ft.) 1,244,700 2,111,600 1,729,200 2,111,600 Total Non-Residential (sq.ft.) 70,244,700 133,191,600 1,729,200 133,191,600 Source Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Forecast 2022 The Municipality is undertaking a D.C. public process and anticipates passing a new by-law for eligible services. The mandatory public meeting has been set for May 31, 2022 with adoption of the by-law anticipated for July 26, 2022. 6. This report has undertaken a calculation of charges based on future identified needs (presented in Schedule ES-3 for residential and non-residential). Charges have been provided on a Municipal-wide basis for all services, excluding wastewater services, which has been provided on an urban-area basis and water services, which has been provided on a municipal-wide (serviced) basis for greenhouses and bunk houses and Municipal-wide basis for all other growth. The corresponding single detached unit charges are as follows: a) Municipal-wide (excluding wastewater services): $9,222 b) Urban Area (including water and wastewater services): $9,823. For non-residential charges per sq. ft. of building area, the charges are as follows: a) Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (excluding wastewater services): $3.119; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE vi H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx b) Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (including water and wastewater services): $3.366; c) Greenhouses (including water services): $0.480. Note that the residential charges vary by type of unit and there is a rate for on- farm bunk houses (refer to Table ES-3). These rates are submitted to Council for its consideration. 7. The D.C.A. requires a summary be provided of the gross capital costs and the net costs to be recovered over the life of the by-law. This calculation is provided by service and is presented in Table 5-6. A summary of these costs is provided below: Table ES-2 Summary of Operating Expenditures Anticipated Over the Life of the By-law Summary of Expenditures Anticipated Over the Life of the By-law Expenditure Amount Total gross expenditures planned over the next five years $87,507,785 Less: Benefit to existing development $9,793,952 Less: Post planning period benefit $0 Less: Ineligible re: Level of Service $0 Less: Grants, subsidies and other contributions $0 Net costs to be recovered from development charges $77,713,833 This suggests that for the non-D.C. cost over the five-year D.C. by-law (benefit to existing development, ineligible services, and the grants, subsidies and other contributions), $9.79 million (or an annual amount of $1.96 million) will need to be contributed from taxes and rates or other sources. Based on the above table, the Municipality plans to spend $87.51 million over the next five years, of which $77.71 million (89%) is included in the D.C. calculation. Of this net amount, $14.25 million is recoverable from residential development and $63.46 million from non-residential development, including greenhouses. It is noted also that any exemptions or reductions in the charges would reduce this recovery further. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE vii H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 8. Considerations by Council - The background study represents the service needs arising from residential and non-residential growth over the forecast periods. The following service is calculated based on an urban 20-year forecast: - Wastewater Services - Facilities. The following service is calculated based on a 20-year serviced area forecast: - Water Services - Distribution systems: The following services are calculated based on a Municipal-wide 20-year forecast: - Services Related to a Highway; - Fire Protection Services; and - Policing Services. The remaining service is calculated based on a Municipal-wide 10-year forecast: - Parks and Recreation Services. In addition, classes of services have been established for the following: - Public Works (Facilities, Vehicles & Equipment): calculated based on a Municipal-wide 20-year forecast; and - Growth Studies: calculated based on a Municipal-wide 10-year forecast. Council will consider the findings and recommendations provided in the report and, in conjunction with public input, approve such policies and rates it deems appropriate. These directions will refine the draft D.C. by-law which is appended in Appendix G. These decisions may include: - adopting the charges and policies recommended herein; - considering additional exemptions to the by-law; and - considering reductions in the charge by class of development (obtained by removing certain services on which the charge is based and/or by a general reduction in the charge). Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE viii H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx As the D.C.A. does not allow for any exempted or reduced amount to be made up through higher development charges from other development, any such decision would require the consideration of an alternative (i.e. non-D.C.) funding source provided by the Municipality. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE ix H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table ES-3 Schedule of Development Charges NON-RESIDENTIAL Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Special Care/Special Dwelling Units On-Farm Bunk Houses (per capita) Industrial, Commercial & Institutional (per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Greenhouse (per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Municipal Wide Services/Class of Service: Services Related to a Highway 3,758 2,189 1,908 1,475 1,232 1,120 1.562 0.062 Public Works 191 111 97 75 63 57 0.079 0.003 Fire Protection Services 442 258 224 173 145 132 0.184 0.007 Policing Services 72 42 37 28 24 21 0.030 0.001 Parks and Recreation Services 1,934 1,127 982 759 634 577 0.056 0.003 Growth Studies 373 217 189 146 122 111 0.162 0.007 Total Municipal Wide Services/Class of Services 6,770 3,944 3,437 2,656 2,220 2,018 2.073 0.083 Municipal-Wide Water Serviced Area Water Services 2,452 1,429 1,245 962 804 556 1.046 0.397 Total Water Serviced Area 9,222 5,373 4,682 3,618 3,024 2,575 3.119 0.480 Urban Wastewater Serviced Area Wastewater Services 601 350 305 236 197 - 0.247 - Total Urban Water and Wastewater Serviced Area 9,823 5,723 4,987 3,854 3,221 2,575 3.366 0.480 Service/Class of Service RESIDENTIAL Report Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Chapter 1 Introduction Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Document This background study has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the D.C.A. (s. 10) and, accordingly, recommends D.C.s and policies for the Municipality of Leamington. The Municipality retained Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (Watson), to undertake the D.C. study process throughout 2021 and early 2022. Watson collaborated with Municipal staff preparing the D.C. analysis and policy recommendations. This D.C. background study, containing the proposed D.C. by-law, will be distributed to members of the public in order to provide interested parties with sufficient background information on the legislation, the study's recommendations, and an outline of the basis for these recommendations. This report has been prepared, in the first instance, to meet the statutory requirements applicable to the Municipality's D.C. background study, as summarized in Chapter 3. It also addresses the requirement for "rules" (contained in Chapter 6) and the proposed by-law to be made available as part of the approval process (included as Appendix G). In addition, the report is designed to set out sufficient background on the legislation (Chapter 3) and the growth anticipated within the Municipality (Chapter 2), to make the exercise understandable to those who are involved. Finally, it addresses post-adoption implementation requirements (Chapter 7) which are critical to the successful application of the new policy. The Chapters in the report are supported by Appendices containing the data required to explain and substantiate the calculation of the charge. A full discussion of the statutory requirements for the preparation of a background study and calculation of a D.C. is provided herein. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 1.2 Summary of the Process The public meeting required under section 12 of the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended (D.C.A.), has been scheduled for May 31, 2022. Its purpose is to present the study to the public and to solicit public input. The meeting is also being held to answer any questions regarding the study's purpose, methodology and the proposed modifications to the Municipality's D.C.s. In accordance with the legislation, the background study and proposed D.C. by-law will be available for public review on May 16, 2022. The process to be followed in finalizing the report and recommendations includes: - consideration of responses received prior to, at, or immediately following the public meeting; - refinements to the report, if required; and - Council consideration of the by-law subsequent to the public meeting. Figure 1-1 outlines the proposed schedule to be followed with respect to the D.C. by-law adoption process. Figure 1-1 Schedule of Key D.C. Process Dates for the Municipality of Leamington Key D.C. Process Timeline 1. Data collection, staff review, D.C. calculations and policy work March 2021 to January 2022 2. Council Workshop May 26, 2021 3. Public release of final D.C. Background study and proposed by-law May 16, 2022 4. Public meeting advertisement placed in newspaper(s) No later than May 9, 2022 5. Public meeting of Council May 31, 2022 6. Council considers adoption of background study and passage of by-law July 26, 2022 7. Newspaper notice given of by-law passage By 20 days after passage 8. Last day for by-law appeal 40 days after passage 9. Municipality makes pamphlet available (where by-law not appealed) By 60 days after in force date Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 1.3 Changes to the D.C.A.: Bill 73 - Smart Growth for our Communities Act, 2015 With the amendment of the D.C.A. (as a result of Bill 73 and O. Reg. 428/15), there are a number of areas that must be addressed to ensure that the Municipality is in compliance with the D.C.A., as amended. The following provides an explanation of the changes to the Act that affect the Municipality's background study and how they have been dealt with to ensure compliance with the amended legislation. 1.3.1 Area Rating Bill 73 has introduced two new sections where Council must consider the use of area- specific charges: 1) Section 2 (9) of the Act now requires a municipality to implement area-specific D.C.s for either specific services that are prescribed and/or for specific municipalities that are to be regulated. (Note that at this time, no municipalities or services are prescribed by the Regulations.); 2) Section 10 (2) c.1 of the D.C.A. requires that, "the development charges background study shall include consideration of the use of more than one development charge by-law to reflect different needs for services in different areas." In regard to the first item, there are no services or specific municipalities identified in the regulations that must be area-rated. The second item requires Council to consider the use of area rating. 1.3.2 Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure The new legislation now requires that a D.C. background study must include an asset management plan (s. 10 (2) c.2). The asset management plan (A.M.P.) must deal with all assets that are proposed to be funded, in whole or in part, by D.C.s. The current regulations provide very extensive and specific requirements for the A.M.P. related to transit services; however, they are silent with respect to how the A.M.P. is to be provided for all other services. As part of any A.M.P., the examination should be consistent with the Municipality's existing assumptions, approaches, and policies on asset management planning. This examination may include both qualitative and Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx quantitative measures such as examining the annual future lifecycle contributions needs (discussed further in Appendix F of this report). 1.3.3 60-Day Circulation of D.C. Background Study Previously, the legislation required that a D.C. background study be made available to the public at least two weeks prior to the public meeting. The amended legislation now provides that the D.C. background study must be made available to the public (including posting on the municipal website) at least 60 days prior to passage of the D.C. by-law. No other changes were made to timing requirements for such things as notice of the public meeting and notice of by-law passage. This D.C. study is being provided to the public on May 16, 2022 to ensure the new requirement for release of the study is met. 1.3.4 Timing of Collection of D.C.s The D.C.A. has been refined by Bill 73 to require that D.C.s are collected at the time of the first building permit. There may be instances where several building permits are to be issued and either the size of the development or the uses will not be definable at the time of the first building permit. In these instances, the Municipality may enter into a delayed payment agreement in order to capture the full development. 1.3.5 Other Changes It is also noted that a number of other changes were made through Bill 73 and O. Reg. 428/15, including changes to the way in which transit D.C. service standards are calculated, the inclusion of waste diversion, and the ability for collection of additional levies; however, these sections do not impact the Municipality's D.C. 1.4 Further Changes to the D.C.A.: Bill 108, 138, 197, and 213 1.4.1 Bill 108: More Homes, More Choice Act - An Act to Amend Various Statutes with Respect to Housing, Other Development, and Various Matters On May 2, 2019, the Province introduced Bill 108, which proposed changes to the D.C.A. The Bill has been introduced as part of the Province's "More Homes, More Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Choice: Ontario's Housing Supply Action Plan". The Bill received Royal Assent on June 6, 2019. While having received royal assent, many of the amendments to the D.C.A. would not come into effect until they are proclaimed by the Lieutenant Governor (many of these changes were revised through Bill 197). At the time of writing, the following provisions have been proclaimed: - Effective January 1, 2020, rental housing and institutional developments will pay D.C.s in six equal annual payments commencing at occupancy. Non-profit housing developments will pay D.C.s in 21 equal annual payments. Interest may be charged on the instalments, and any unpaid amounts may be added to the property and collected as taxes. - Effective January 1, 2020 the D.C. amount for all developments occurring within 2 years of a Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment planning approval (for application submitted after this section is proclaimed), shall be determined based on the D.C. in effect on the day of Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment application. If the development is not proceeding via these planning approvals, then the amount is determined the earlier of the date of issuance of a building permit. On February 28, 2020, the Province released updated draft regulations related to the D.C.A. and the Planning Act. A summary of these changes to take effect upon proclamation by the Lieutenant Governor is provided below: Changes to Eligible Services - Prior to Bill 108, the D.C.A. provided a list of ineligible services whereby municipalities could include growth related costs for any service that was not listed. With Bill 108, the changes to the D.C.A. would now specifically list the services that are eligible for inclusion in the by-law. Further, the initial list of eligible services under Bill 108 was limited to "hard services", with the "soft services" being removed from the D.C.A. These services would be considered as part of a new community benefits charge (discussed below) imposed under the Planning Act. As noted in the next section this list of services has been amended through Bill 197. Mandatory 10% deduction - The amending legislation would remove the mandatory 10% deduction for all services that remain eligible under the D.C.A. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Remaining Services to be Included in a New Community Benefits Charge (C.B.C.) Under the Planning Act - It is proposed that a municipality may, by by-law, impose a C.B.C. against land to pay for the capital costs of facilities, services and matters required because of development or redevelopment in the area to which the by-law applies. The C.B.C. is proposed to include formerly eligible D.C. services that are not included in the above listing, in addition to parkland dedication and bonus zoning contributions. 1.4.2 Bill 138: Plan to Build Ontario Together Act, 2019 On November 6, 2019, the Province release Bill 138 which provided further amendments to the D.C.A. and Planning Act. This Bill received Royal Assent on December 10, 2019 and was proclaimed which resulted in sections related to the D.C.A. (schedule 10) becoming effective on January 1, 2020. The amendments to the D.C.A. included removal of instalment payments for commercial and industrial developments that were originally included in Bill 108. 1.4.3 Bill 197: COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act In response to the global pandemic that began affecting Ontario in early 2020, the Province released Bill 197 which provided amendments to a number of Acts, including the D.C.A. and Planning Act. This Bill also revised some of the proposed changes identified in Bill 108. Bill 197 was tabled on July 8, 2020, received Royal Assent on July 21, 2020, and was proclaimed on September 18, 2020. The following provides a summary of the changes: 1.4.3.1 D.C. Related Changes List of D.C. Eligible Services - As noted above, under Bill 108 some services were to be included under the D.C.A. and some would be included under the C.B.C. authority. Bill 197, however, revised this proposed change and has included all services (with some exceptions) under the D.C.A. These services are as follows: o Water supply services, including distribution and treatment services. o Wastewater services, including sewers and treatment services. o Storm water drainage and control services. o Services related to a highway. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx o Electrical power services. o Toronto-York subway extension. o Transit services. o Waste diversion services. o Policing services. o Fire protection services. o Ambulance services. o Library services o Long-term Care services o Parks and Recreation services, but not the acquisition of land for parks. o Public Health services o Childcare and early years services. o Housing services. o Provincial Offences Act services. o Services related to emergency preparedness. o Services related to airports, but only in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. o Additional services as prescribed. Classes of Services - D.C. Pre-Bill 108/197 legislation (i.e., D.C.A., 1997) allowed for categories of services to be grouped together into a minimum of two categories (90% and 100% services). The Act (as amended) repeals and replaces the above with the four following subsections: - A D.C. by-law may provide for any eligible service or capital cost related to any eligible service to be included in a class, set out in the by-law. - A class may be composed of any number or combination of services and may include parts or portions of the eligible services or parts or portions of the capital costs in respect of those services. - A D.C. by-law may provide for a class consisting of studies in respect of any eligible service whose capital costs are described in paragraphs 5 and 6 of s. 5 of the D.C.A. - A class of service set out in the D.C. by-law is deemed to be a single service with respect to reserve funds, use of monies, and credits. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx As well, the removal of 10% deduction for soft services under Bill 108 has been maintained. Note: an initial consideration of "class" appears to mean any group of services. 10-Year Planning Horizon - The 10-year planning horizon has been removed for all services except transit. 1.4.3.2 C.B.C. Related Changes C.B.C. Eligibility - The C.B.C. is limited to lower-tier and single tier municipalities, whereas upper- tier municipalities will not be allowed to impose this charge. - O. Reg. 509/20 was filed on September 18, 2020. This regulation provides for the following: o A maximum rate will be set as a percentage of the market value of the land the day before building permit issuance. The maximum rate is set at 4%. The C.B.C may only be imposed on developing or redeveloping buildings which have a minimum height of five stories and contain no less than 10 residential units. o Bill 197 states that before passing a C.B.C. by-law, the municipality shall prepare a C.B.C. strategy that (a) identifies the facilities, services, and matters that will be funded with C.B.C.s; and (b) complies with any prescribed requirements. o Only one C.B.C. by-law may be in effect in a local municipality at a time. 1.4.3.3 Combined D.C. and C.B.C. Impacts D.C. vs. C.B.C. Capital Cost - A C.B.C. may be imposed with respect to the services listed in s. 2 (4) of the D.C.A. (eligible services), "provided that the capital costs that are intended to be funded by the community benefits charge are not capital costs that are intended to be funded under a development charge by-law." Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Transition - D.C. and C.B.C. - The specified date for municipalities to transition to the D.C. and C.B.C. is two years after Schedules 3 and 17 of the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act comes into force (i.e., September 18, 2022). - Generally, for existing reserve funds (related to D.C. services that will be ineligible): o If a C.B.C. is passed, the funds are transferred to the C.B.C. special account; o If no C.B.C. is passed, the funds are moved to a general reserve fund for the same purpose; o If a C.B.C. is passed subsequent to moving funds to a general reserve fund, those monies are then moved again to the C.B.C. special account. - For reserve funds established under s. 37 of the Planning Act (e.g., bonus zoning) o If a C.B.C. is passed, the funds are transferred to the C.B.C. special account; o If no C.B.C. is passed, the funds are moved to a general reserve fund for the same purpose; o If a C.B.C. is passed subsequent to moving funds to a general reserve fund, those monies are then moved again to the C.B.C. special account. If a municipality passes a C.B.C. by-law, any existing D.C. credits a landowner may retain may be used towards payment of that landowner's C.B.C. - As a result of the passage of Bill 197, and subsequent proclamation on September 18, 2020, this report has provided the D.C. calculations without the 10% mandatory deduction. At this time, no decision has been made with respect to developing a C.B.C. therefore, this report does not address any Community Benefit Charges at this time. 1.4.4 Bill 213: Better for People, Smarter for Business Act, 2020 On December 8, 2020, Bill 213 received Royal Assent. One of the changes of the Bill that took effect upon Royal Assent included amending the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities Act by introducing a new section that would exempt the payment of D.C.s for developments of land intended for use by a university that receives operating Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1-10 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx funds from the Government. As a result, this mandatory exemption will be included in the D.C. by-law. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Chapter 2 Anticipated Development in the Municipality of Leamington Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 2. Anticipated Development in the Municipality of Leamington 2.1 Requirement of the Act Chapter 2 provides the methodology for calculating a D.C. as per the D.C.A. Figure 3-1 presents this methodology graphically. It is noted in the first box of the schematic that in order to determine the D.C. that may be imposed, it is a requirement of Section 5 (1) of the D.C.A. that "the anticipated amount, type and location of development, for which development charges can be imposed, must be estimated." The growth forecast contained in this chapter (with supplemental tables in Appendix A) provides for the anticipated development for which the Municipality of Leamington will be required to provide services, over a 10-year (early-2022 to early-2032) and longer- term (early-2022 to early-2042) time horizon. 2.2 Basis of Population, Household and Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast The D.C. growth forecast has been derived by Watson, building on the area municipal growth allocation established the County of Essex Official Plan, 2014. In preparing the growth forecast, the following additional information sources were consulted to assess the residential and non-residential development potential for the Municipality over the forecast period, including: - Municipality of Leamington Official Plan - Approved February 5, 2008; - County of Essex Official Plan - Approved April 28, 2014; - 2006, 2011 and 2016 population, household, and employment Census data; - Historical residential and non-residential building permit data over the 2011 to 2020 period; - Residential supply opportunities as provided by the Municipality of Leamington; and - Discussions with municipal staff regarding anticipated residential and non- residential development in the Municipality of Leamington. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 2.3 Summary of Growth Forecast A detailed analysis of the residential and non-residential growth forecasts is provided in Appendix A and the methodology employed is illustrated in Figure 2-1. The discussion provided herein summarizes the anticipated growth for the Municipality and describes the basis for the forecast. The results of the residential growth forecast analysis are summarized in Table 2-1 below, and Schedule 1 in Appendix A. As identified in Table 2-1 and Appendix A, Schedule 1, population in Leamington is anticipated to reach approximately 36,900 by early-2032 and approximately 42,400 by early-2042, resulting in an increase of approximately 6,490 and 12,010 persons, respectively.1 1 The population figures used in the calculation of the 2022 D.C. exclude the net Census undercount, which is estimated at approximately 3.3%. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Figure 2-1 Population and Household Forecast Model Decline in Existing Population Net Population Increase Historical Housing Construction DEMAND SUPPLY Occupancy Assumptions Gross Population Increase Intensification Designated Lands Servicing Capacity Residential Units in the Development Process Employment Market by Local Municipality, Economic Outlook Local, Regional and Provincial Forecast of Residential Units Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 2-1 Municipality of Leamington Residential Growth Forecast Summary Population Institutional Population Farm On-Site Bunk House Population Population Excluding Institutional and Bunk House Population Singles & Semi- Detached Multiple Dwellings2 Apartments3 Other Total Households Farm On-Site Bunk House Beds Equivalent Institutional Households 29,780 28,833 1,778 7,365 955 1,440 55 9,815 1,616 2.938 29,330 28,403 1,873 7,468 974 1,388 34 9,864 1,703 2.879 28,500 27,595 1,640 7,435 1,055 1,490 25 10,005 1,491 2.758 31,390 30,390 1,713 1,468 27,209 7,703 1,103 1,853 25 10,683 1,468 1,557 2.845 38,090 36,882 1,998 3,172 31,712 8,971 1,578 2,002 25 12,576 3,172 1,816 2.933 43,790 42,397 2,231 4,705 35,461 9,898 2,014 2,229 25 14,166 4,705 2,028 2.993 -450 -430 95 103 19 -52 -21 49 87 -830 -808 -233 -33 81 102 -9 141 -212 2,890 2,795 73 268 48 363 0 678 1,468 66 6,700 6,492 285 1,704 2,744 1,268 475 150 0 1,893 1,704 259 12,400 12,007 518 3,237 8,252 2,195 911 376 0 3,483 3,237 471 ¹ Census undercount estimated at approximately 3.3%. Note: Population including the undercount has been rounded. ² Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. ³ Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Derived from County of Essex Official Plan (Approved April 28, 2014) forecast for the Municipality of Leamington and discussions with municipal staff, by Watson & Assoicates Economists Ltd., 2022 Excluding Census Undercount Mid 2016 - Early 2022 Population (Including Census Undercount)¹ Year Housing Units Person Per Unit (P.P.U.): Total Population/ Total Households Historical Early 2022 - Early 2042 Forecast Incremental Early 2022 - Early 2032 Early 2032 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 Mid 2016 Early 2022 Early 2042 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Figure 2-2 Municipality of Leamington Residential Growth Forecast Summary Source: Historical housing activity derived from Statistics Canada building permit data for the Municipality of Leamington , 2012-2021. 1 Growth forecast represents calendar year. 33 19 23 152 90 202 73 164 106 86 185 185 185 185 205 205 205 205 205 170 170 170 170 170 150 150 150 150 150 150 0 50 100 150 200 250 Housing Units Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Provided below is a summary of the key assumptions and findings regarding the Municipality of Leamington D.C. growth forecast: 1. Housing Unit Mix (Appendix A - Schedules 1 and 6) - The housing unit mix for the Municipality was derived from a detailed review of historical development activity (as per Schedule 6), as well as active residential development applications and discussions with municipal staff regarding anticipated development trends for Leamington. - Based on the above indicators, the 2022 to 2042 household growth forecast for the Municipality is comprised of a unit mix of 63% low density units (single detached and semi-detached), 26% medium density (multiples except apartments) and 11% high density (bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom apartments). - The forecast provided herein also accounts for on-farm bunk house development. In accordance with discussions with municipal staff, development charges associated with bunk house developments will be charged on a per-bed basis. As displayed in Table 2-1, there are approximately 3,240 additional on- farm bunk house beds forecast to be added between 2022 and 2042, based on an assumption of one bed per 43,560 sq.ft. of greenhouse development. Population associated with bunk house occupancy is captured within the total Municipal-wide population growth forecast. 2. Geographic Location of Residential Development (Appendix A - Schedule 2) - Schedule 2 summarizes the anticipated amount, type, and location of development by servicing area for the Municipality of Leamington. - In accordance with forecast demand and available land supply, the amount and percentage of forecast housing growth between 2022 and 2042 by development location is summarized below. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 2-2 Municipality of Leamington Residential Housing Growth Summary Development Location Amount of Housing Growth, 2022 to 2042 Percentage of Housing Growth, 2022 to 2042 Full Municipal Water and Wastewater Services (excluding Institutional) 3,263 94% Partial Services (Water only Serviced Area, excluding on- farm bunk houses) 219 6% DCs Total 3,482 100% 3. Planning Period - Short- and longer-term time horizons are required for the D.C. process. The D.C.A. limits the planning horizon for transit services to a 10-year planning horizon. All other services can utilize a longer planning period if the Municipality has identified the growth-related capital infrastructure needs associated with the longer-term growth planning period. 4. Population in New Housing Units (Appendix A - Schedules 3, 4 and 5) - The number of housing units to be constructed by 2042 in the Municipality of Leamington over the forecast period is presented in Figure 2-2. Over the 2022 to 2042 forecast period, the Municipality is anticipated to average 174 new housing units per year. - Institutional population1 is anticipated to increase by approximately 520 people between 2022 to 2042. 1 Institutional population largely includes special care facilities such as nursing home or residences for senior citizens. A P.P.U. of 1.100 depicts 1-bedroom and 2- or more bedroom units in collective households. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx - Population in new units is derived from Schedules 3, 4, and 5, which incorporate historical development activity, anticipated units (see unit mix discussion) and average persons per unit (P.P.U.) by dwelling type for new units. - Schedule 8 summarizes the average P.P.U. assumed for new housing units by age and type of dwelling based on Statistics Canada 2016 custom Census data for the Municipality of Leamington and Essex County. The total calculated 20- year adjusted average P.P.U.s by dwelling type are as follows: o Low density: 3.354 o Medium density: 1.954 o High density:1 1.594 5. Existing Units and Population Change (Appendix A - Schedules 3, 4 and 5) - Existing households for early-2022 are based on the 2016 Census households, plus estimated residential units constructed between mid-2016 and early-2022, assuming a 6-month lag between construction and occupancy (see Schedule 3). - The decline in average occupancy levels for existing housing units is calculated in Schedules 3 through 5, by aging the existing population over the forecast period. The forecast population decline in existing households over the 2022 to 2042 forecast period is approximately 1,490. 6. Employment (Appendix A, Schedules 10a, 10b, 10c) - The employment projections provided herein are largely based on the activity rate method, which is defined as the number of jobs in the Municipality divided by the number of residents. Key employment sectors include primary, industrial, commercial/ population-related, institutional, and work at home, which are considered individually below. - 2016 employment data2 (place of work) for the Municipality of Leamington is outlined in Schedule 10a. The 2016 employment base is comprised of the following sectors: o 1,780 primary (16%); o 750 work-at-home employment (6%); 1 Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2- or more bedroom apartments. 2 2016 employment is based on Statistics Canada 2016 Place of Work Employment dataset by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx o 2,910 industrial (26%); o 3,675 commercial/population related (33%); and o 2,115 institutional (19%). - Total employment, including work at home and N.F.P.O.W. for the Municipality is anticipated to reach approximately 21,730 by Early-2032 and 26,700 by Early- 2042. This represents an employment increase of approximately 5,800 for the 10-year forecast period and 10,770 for the longer-term forecast period. - Schedule 10b, Appendix A, summarizes the employment forecast, excluding work at home employment and N.F.P.O.W. employment, which is the basis for the D.C. employment forecast. The impact on municipal services from work at home employees has already been included in the population forecast. The need for municipal services related to N.F.P.O.W. employees has largely been included in the employment forecast by usual place of work (i.e., employment and gross floor area generated from N.F.P.O.W. construction employment). Furthermore, since these employees have no fixed work address, they cannot be captured in the non-residential gross floor area (G.F.A.) calculation. - Total employment for the Municipality of Leamington (excluding work at home and N.F.P.O.W. employment) is anticipated to reach 18,860 by Early-2032 and approximately 23,080 by Early-2042. This represents an employment increase of approximately 5,000 for the 10-year forecast period and 9,220 for the longer- term forecast period.1 7. Non-Residential Sq.ft. Estimates (G.F.A., Appendix A, Schedule 10b) - Square footage estimates were calculated in Schedule 10b based on the following employee density assumptions: o 20,000 sq. ft. per employee for primary - non-bona fide farming; o 1,200 sq. ft. per employee for industrial; o 550 sq. ft. per employee for commercial/population-related; and o 695 sq. ft. per employee for institutional employment. 1 G.F.A. and employment associated within special care institutional dwellings treated as residential, resulting in an institutional employment difference between Schedules 10a and 10b. Total employment growth in Schedule 10b (excluding work at home and N.F.P.O.W. employment) has been downwardly adjusted to account for institutional employment associated with special care facilities. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2-10 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx - The DCs-wide incremental Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.) is anticipated to increase by 70 million sq. ft. over the 10-year forecast period and 133 million sq. ft. over the longer-term forecast period. - In terms of percentage growth, the 2022 to 2042 incremental G.F.A. forecast by sector is broken down as follows: o Primary - non-bona fide farming - 98%; o Industrial - 1%; o Commercial/population-related - less than 1%; and o Institutional - less than 1%. 8. Geography of Non-Residential Development (Appendix A, Schedule 10c) - Schedule 10c summarizes the anticipated amount, type and location of non- residential development by servicing area for the Municipality of Leamington by area. - The amount and percentage of forecast total non-residential growth between 2022 and 2042 by development location is summarized below in Table 2-3. Table 2-3 Municipality of Leamington Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Growth Summary Development Location Amount of Non- Residential G.F.A., 2022 to 2042 Percentage of Non- Residential G.F.A., 2022 to 2042 Full Services Water and Wastewater Services 1.7 million 1% Partial Services (Water only Serviced Areas) 131.5 million 99% DCs Total 133.2 million 100% Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Chapter 3 The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3. The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge 3.1 Introduction This chapter addresses the requirements of s. 5 (1) of the D.C.A. with respect to the establishment of the need for service which underpins the D.C. calculation. These requirements are illustrated schematically in Figure 3-1. 3.2 Services Potentially Involved Table 3-1 lists the full range of municipal service categories that are provided within the Municipality. A number of these services are defined in s. 2 (4) of the D.C.A. as being ineligible for inclusion in D.C.s. These are shown as "ineligible" on Table 3-1. Two ineligible costs defined in s. 5 (3) of the D.C.A. are "computer equipment" and "rolling stock with an estimated useful life of (less than) seven years." In addition, local roads are covered separately under subdivision agreements and related means (as are other local services). Services which are potentially eligible for inclusion in the Municipality's D.C. are indicated with a "Yes." 3.3 Increase in the Need for Service The D.C. calculation commences with an estimate of "the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development," for each service to be covered by the by-law. There must be some form of link or attribution between the anticipated development and the estimated increase in the need for service. While the need could conceivably be expressed generally in terms of units of capacity, s. 5 (1) 3, which requires that Municipal Council indicate that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be met, suggests that a project-specific expression of need would be most appropriate. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Figure 3-1 The Process of Calculating a Development Charge under the Act that must be followed 8. Specified Local Services The Process of Calculating a Development Charge under the Act that must be followed Anticipated Development 1. Estimated Increase in Need for Service 2. Ineligible Services Ceiling Re: Increased Need Needs That Will Be Met Examination of the Long-term Capital and Operating Costs for Capital Infrastructure D.C. Needs By Service Less: Uncommitted Excess Capacity Less: Benefit To Existing Development Less: Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions D.C. By-law(s) Spatial Applicability D.C. Net Capital Costs Costs for new development vs. existing development for the term of the by-law and the balance of the period Amount of the Charge By Type of Development (including apportionment of costs - residential and non-residential) Financing, Inflation and Investment Considerations 3. 4. 5. 6. 11. 12. 15. 16. 13. 14. 9. Tax Base, User Rates, etc. Subdivision Agreements and Consent Provisions Consideration of exemptions, phase-ins, etc. 1 3 2 Non-Transit Services Historical Service Standard 4a. Transit Services Forward-looking Service Standard 4b. Asset Management Plan for All Capital Projects to be Funded by D.C.s 7. Non-Transit Services Financially Sustainable 7a. Transit Services Detailed Requirements 7b. 10. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 3-1 Categories of Municipal Services to be Addressed as Part of the Calculation Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Description Yes Municipality provides the service - service has been included in the D.C. calculation. No Municipality provides the service - service has not been included in the D.C. calculation. n/a Municipality does not provide the service. Ineligible Service is ineligible for inclusion in the D.C. calculation. Categories of Municipal Services Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery % 1. Services Related to a Highway Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 1.1 Arterial roads 1.2 Collector roads 1.3 Bridges, culverts and roundabouts 1.4 Local municipal roads 1.5 Traffic signals 1.6 Sidewalks and streetlights 1.7 Active transportation 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 2. Other Transportation Services n/a n/a Ineligible Ineligible Yes Yes Ineligible n/a 2.1 Transit vehicles1 & facilities 2.2 Other transit infrastructure 2.3 Municipal parking spaces - indoor 2.4 Municipal parking spaces - outdoor 2.5 Works yards 2.6 Rolling stock1 2.7 Ferries 2.8 Airport 100 100 0 0 100 100 100 100** 1with 7+ year lifetime *Same percentage as service component to which it pertains computer equipment excluded throughout **Airports only eligible for the Region of Waterloo Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Categories of Municipal Services Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery % 3. Stormwater Drainage and Control Services No No No No 3.1 Main channels and drainage trunks 3.2 Channel connections 3.3 Retention/detention ponds 3.4 Monitoring Programs 100 100 100 100 4. Fire Protection Services Yes Yes Yes 4.1 Fire stations 4.2 Fire pumpers, tankers, aerials, and rescue vehicles, etc.1 4.3 Small equipment and gear 100 100 100 5. Parks Services (i.e., Parks and Open Space) Ineligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5.1 Acquisition of land for parks, woodlots, and E.S.A.s 5.2 Development of area municipal parks 5.3 Development of district parks 5.4 Development of municipal-wide parks 5.5 Development of special purpose parks 5.6 Parks rolling stock1 and yards 0 100 100 100 100 100 6. Recreation Services Yes Yes Yes Yes 6.1 Arenas, pools, fitness facilities, community centres, etc. 6.2 Soccer fields, cricket pitches, multi-purposes fields, ball diamonds. 6.3 Recreation vehicles and equipment1 6.4 Recreation Land 100 100 100 100 7. Library Services No n/a n/a 7.1 Public library space (incl. furniture and equipment) 7.2 Library vehicles¹ 7.3 Library materials 100 100 100 8. Emergency Preparedness Services No No No 8.1 Facility space (incl. furniture and equipment) 8.2 Vehicles¹ 8.3 Equipment 100 100 100 1with 7+ year lifetime Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Categories of Municipal Services Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery % 9. Provision of Cultural, Entertainment and Tourism Facilities and Convention Centres Ineligible Ineligible 9.1 Cultural space (e.g., art galleries, museums, and theatres) 9.2 Tourism facilities and convention centres 0 0 10. Wastewater Services Yes Yes No n/a 10.1 Treatment plants 10.2 Sewage trunks 10.3 Local systems 10.4 Vehicles and equipment1 100 100 0 100 11. Water Supply Services No Yes No Yes 11.1 Treatment plants 11.2 Distribution systems 11.3 Local systems 11.4 Vehicles and equipment1 100 100 0 100 12. Waste Management Services Ineligible Ineligible n/a n/a 12.1 Landfill collection, transfer vehicles and equipment 12.2 Landfills and other disposal facilities 12.3 Waste diversion facilities 12.4 Waste diversion vehicles and equipment1 0 0 100 100 13. Policing Services Yes n/a Yes 13.1 Police detachments 13.2 Police rolling stock1 13.3 Small equipment and gear 100 100 100 14. Long-term Care n/a n/a 14.1 Homes for the aged space 14.2 Vehicles1 100 100 15. Child Care and Early Years n/a n/a n/a 15.1 Childcare and Early Years space 15.2 Vehicles1 15.3 Equipment 100 100 100 16. Public Health n/a n/a 16.1 Public Health space 16.2 Public Health vehicles¹ 100 100 17. Housing Services n/a 17.1 Housing Services space 100 1with 7+ year lifetime Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Categories of Municipal Services Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery % 18. Provincial Offences Act (P.O.A.) n/a n/a 18.1 P.O.A. including By-law Enforcement space 18.1 P.O.A. including By-law Enforcement vehicles and equipment1 100 100 19. Social Services ineligible 19.1 Social service space 0 20. Ambulance Services n/a n/a n/a 20.1 Ambulance station space 20.2 Vehicles1 20.3 Equipment and gear 100 100 100 21. Hospital Provision Ineligible 21.1 Hospital capital contributions 0 22. Provision of Headquarters for the General Administration of Municipalities and Area Municipal Boards Ineligible Ineligible Ineligible 22.1 Office space 22.2 Office furniture 22.3 Computer equipment 0 0 0 23. Other Yes Yes 23.1 Studies in connection with acquiring buildings, rolling stock, materials, and equipment, and improving land2 and facilities, including the D.C. background study cost. 23.2 Interest on money borrowed to pay for growth-related capital 0-100 0-100 1with a 7+ year lifetime 2same percentage as service component to which it pertains. 3.4 Local Service Policy Some of the need for services generated by additional development consists of local services related to a plan of subdivision. As such, they will be required as a condition of subdivision agreements or consent conditions. The Municipality's detailed Local Service Policy is provided in Appendix E. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3.5 Capital Forecast Paragraph 7 of s. 5 (1) of the D.C.A. requires that "the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services must be estimated." The Act goes on to require two potential cost reductions and the Regulation sets out the way in which such costs are to be presented. These requirements are outlined below. These estimates involve capital costing of the increased services discussed above. This entails costing actual projects or the provision of service units, depending on how each service has been addressed. The capital costs include: a) costs to acquire land or an interest therein (including a leasehold interest); b) costs to improve land; c) costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures; d) costs to acquire, lease or improve facilities, including rolling stock (with a useful life of 7 or more years), furniture and equipment (other than computer equipment), materials acquired for library circulation, reference, or information purposes; e) interest on money borrowed to pay for the above-referenced costs; f) costs to undertake studies in connection with the above-referenced matters; and g) costs of the D.C. background study. In order for an increase in need for service to be included in the D.C. calculation, Municipal Council must indicate "that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be met" (s. 5 (1) 3). This can be done if the increase in service forms part of a Council-approved Official Plan, capital forecast or similar expression of the intention of Council (O. Reg. 82/98, section 3). The capital program contained herein reflects the Municipality's approved and proposed capital budgets and master servicing/needs studies. 3.6 Treatment of Credits Section 8, paragraph 5, of O. Reg. 82/98 indicates that a D.C. background study must set out "the estimated value of credits that are being carried forward relating to the service." Section 17, paragraph 4, of the same Regulation indicates that "the value of Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx the credit cannot be recovered from future D.C.s," if the credit pertains to an ineligible service. This implies that a credit for eligible services can be recovered from future D.C.s. As a result, this provision should be made in the calculation, in order to avoid a funding shortfall with respect to future service needs. There are no current outstanding credits for inclusion in the D.C. calculations. 3.7 Classes of Services Section 7 of the D.C.A. states that a D.C. by-law may provide for any D.C. eligible service or the capital costs with respect to those services. Further, a class may be composed of any number or combination of services and may include parts or portions of each D.C. eligible service. With respect to growth-related studies, Section 7(3) of the D.C.A. states that: "For greater certainty, a development charge by-law may provide for a class consisting of studies in respect of any service listed in subsection 2 (4) whose capital costs are described in paragraphs 5 and 6 of subsection 5 (3)." These provisions allow for services to be grouped together to create a class for the purposes of the D.C. by-law and D.C. reserve funds. The D.C. calculations and by-law provided herein include a class for growth studies as well as a class for Public Works. These classes are comprised of the following services: - Public Works - Facilities, fleet, and equipment o Services Related to a Highway. - Growth Studies o Water Services; o Wastewater Services; o Services Related to a Highway; o Policing Services; o Fire Protection Services; and o Parks and Recreation Services. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3.8 Existing Reserve Funds Section 35 of the D.C.A. states that: "The money in a reserve fund established for a service may be spent only for capital costs determined under paragraphs 2 to 7 of subsection 5 (1)." There is no explicit requirement under the D.C.A. calculation method set out in s. 5 (1) to net the outstanding reserve fund balance as part of making the D.C. calculation; however, section 35 does restrict the way in which the funds are used in future. For services that are subject to a per-capita-based, service level "cap," the reserve fund balance should be applied against the development-related costs for which the charge was imposed once the project is constructed (i.e., the needs of recent growth). This cost component is distinct from the development-related costs for the next 10-year period, which underlie the D.C. calculation herein. The alternative would involve the Municipality spending all reserve fund monies prior to renewing each by-law, which would not be a sound basis for capital budgeting. Thus, the Municipality will use these reserve funds for the Municipality's cost share of applicable development-related projects, which are required but have not yet been undertaken, as a way of directing the funds to the benefit of the development which contributed them (rather than to future development, which will generate the need for additional facilities directly proportionate to future growth). The Municipality stopped imposing D.C.s in 2014. As a result, the balance in the D.C. reserve funds were transferred to capital reserve funds to be used for similar purposes (i.e., growth-related infrastructure). All reserve funds except for the water D.C. reserve fund (transferred to what is currently called the Water Expansion Reserve Fund), were utilized. As a result, there are no reserve fund balances to be included in the D.C. calculations for those services. The Water Expansion Reserve Fund had a balance of $7,672,010 as of December 31, 2021. As a result, this amount will be transferred back to a D.C. reserve fund and included in the calculations for water services. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-10 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3.9 Deductions The D.C.A. potentially requires that five deductions be made to the increase in the need for service. These relate to: - the level of service ceiling; - uncommitted excess capacity; - benefit to existing development; - anticipated grants, subsidies, and other contributions; and - costs related to services that are ineligible as per the D.C.A. The requirements behind each of these reductions are addressed as follows: 3.9.1 Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling This is designed to ensure that the increase in need included in section 4.3 does "not include an increase that would result in the level of service (for the additional development increment) exceeding the average level of the service provided in the municipality over the 10-year period immediately preceding the preparation of the background study." O. Reg. 82.98 (section 4) goes further to indicate that "both the quantity and quality of a service shall be taken into account in determining the level of service and the average level of service." In many cases, this can be done by establishing a quantity measure in terms of units as floor area, land area or road length per capita and a quality measure, in terms of the average cost of providing such units based on replacement costs, engineering standards or recognized performance measurement systems, depending on circumstances. When the quantity and quality factor are multiplied together, they produce a measure of the level of service, which meets the requirements of the Act, i.e., cost per unit. With respect to transit services, a result of Bill 73, the changes to the Act have provided for an alternative method for calculating the services' standard ceiling. Transit services must now utilize a forward-looking service standard analysis, described later in this section. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-11 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx The average service level calculation sheets for each service component in the D.C. calculation are set out in Appendix B. 3.9.2 Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity Paragraph 5 of s. 5 (1) requires a deduction from the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development that can be met using the Municipality's "excess capacity," other than excess capacity which is "committed." "Excess capacity" is undefined, but in this case must be able to meet some or all of the increase in need for service, in order to potentially represent a deduction. The deduction of uncommitted excess capacity from the future increase in the need for service would normally occur as part of the conceptual planning and feasibility work associated with justifying and sizing new facilities, e.g., if a road widening to accommodate increased traffic is not required because sufficient excess capacity is already available, then widening would not be included as an increase in need, in the first instance. 3.9.3 Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development Section 5 (1) 6 of the D.C.A. provides that, "The increase in the need for service must be reduced by the extent to which an increase in service to meet the increased need would benefit existing development." The general guidelines used to consider benefit to existing development include: - the repair or unexpanded replacement of existing assets that are in need of repair; - an increase in average service level of quantity or quality (compare water as an example); - the elimination of a chronic servicing problem not created by growth; and - providing services where none previously existed (generally considered for water or wastewater services). This step involves a further reduction in the need, by the extent to which such an increase in service would benefit existing development. The level of service cap in section 4.9.1 is related but is not the identical requirement. Sanitary, storm and water trunks are highly localized to growth areas and can be more readily allocated in this regard than other services such as services related to a highway, which do not have a fixed service area. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-12 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Where existing development has an adequate service level that will not be tangibly increased by an increase in service, no benefit would appear to be involved. For example, where expanding existing library facilities simply replicates what existing residents are receiving, they receive very limited (or no) benefit as a result. On the other hand, where a clear existing service problem is to be remedied, a deduction should be made accordingly. In the case of services such as recreation facilities, community parks, libraries, etc., the service is typically provided on a Municipal-wide system basis. For example, facilities of the same type may provide different services (i.e., leisure pool vs. competitive pool), different programs (i.e., hockey vs. figure skating) and different time availability for the same service (i.e., leisure skating available on Wednesday in one arena and Thursday in another). As a result, residents will travel to different facilities to access the services they want at the times they wish to use them, and facility location generally does not correlate directly with residence location. Even where it does, displacing users from an existing facility to a new facility frees up capacity for use by others and generally results in only a very limited benefit to existing development. Further, where an increase in demand is not met for a number of years, a negative service impact to existing development is involved for a portion of the planning period. 3.9.4 Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions This step involves reducing the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services by capital grants, subsidies, and other contributions (including direct developer contributions required due to the local service policy) made or anticipated by Council and in accordance with various rules such as the attribution between the share related to new vs. existing development. That is, some grants and contributions may not specifically be applicable to growth or where Council targets fundraising as a measure to offset impacts on taxes (O. Reg. 82/98, section 6). 3.10 Municipal-wide vs. Area Rating This step involves determining whether all of the subject costs are to be recovered on a uniform municipal-wide basis or whether some or all are to be recovered on an area- specific basis. Under the amended D.C.A., it is now mandatory to "consider" area-rating Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-13 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx of services (providing charges for specific areas and services); however, it is not mandatory to implement area rating. Further discussion is provided in section 6.4.4. 3.11 Allocation of Development This step involves relating the costs involved to anticipated development for each period under consideration and using allocations between residential and non-residential development and between one type of development and another, to arrive at a schedule of charges. 3.12 Asset Management The new legislation now requires that a D.C. background study must include an asset management plan (s. 10 (2) c.2). The asset management plan (A.M.P.) must deal with all assets that are proposed to be funded, in whole or in part, by D.C.s. The current regulations provide very extensive and specific requirements for the A.M.P. related to transit services (as noted in the subsequent subsection); however, they are silent with respect to how the A.M.P. is to be provided for all other services. As part of any A.M.P., the examination should be consistent with the municipality's existing assumptions, approaches, and policies on asset management planning. This examination has been included in Appendix F. 3.13 Transit The most significant changes to the Act over the past four years, relate to the transit service. These changes relate to three areas of the calculations, as follows: A. Transit no longer requires the statutory 10% mandatory deduction from the net capital cost (subsection 5.2 (i) of the D.C.A. B. The background study requires the following in regard to transit costs (as per s. 8 (2) of the Regulations): 1. The calculations that were used to prepare the estimate for the planned level of service for the transit services, as mentioned in s. 5.2 (3) of the Act. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-14 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 2. An identification of the portion of the total estimated capital cost relating to the transit services that would benefit, i. the anticipated development over the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study, or ii. the anticipated development after the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study. 3. An identification of the anticipated excess capacity that would exist at the end of the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study. 4. An assessment of ridership forecasts for all modes of transit services proposed to be funded by the D.C. over the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study, categorized by development types, and whether the forecast ridership will be from existing or planned development. 5. An assessment of the ridership capacity for all modes of transit services proposed to be funded by the D.C. over the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study. C. A new forward-looking service standard (as per s. 6.1 (2) of the Regulations): 1. The service is a discrete service. 2. No portion of the service that is intended to benefit anticipated development after the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study may be included in the estimate. 3. No portion of the service that is anticipated to exist as excess capacity at the end of the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study may be included in the estimate. D. A detailed asset management strategy and reporting requirements (s. 6.1 (3) of the Regulation) that includes lifecycle costs, action plans that will enable the assets to be sustainable, summary of how to achieve the proposed level of service, discussion on procurement measures and risk are required. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3-15 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx The Municipality does currently provide transit services; however, transit services have not been included in the D.C. background study and draft by-law. As a result, the above calculation and reporting requirements are not required. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Chapter 4 D.C.-Eligible Cost Analysis by Service and Class of Service Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4. D.C.-Eligible Cost Analysis by Service and Class of Service 4.1 Introduction This chapter outlines the basis for calculating eligible costs for the D.C.s to be applied on a uniform basis. In each case, the required calculation process set out in s. 5 (1) paragraphs 2 to 7 in the D.C.A. and described in Chapter 3 was followed in determining D.C.-eligible costs. The nature of the capital projects and timing identified in the chapter reflects Council's current intention. Over time, however, Municipality projects and Council priorities change and accordingly, Council's intentions may alter, and different capital projects (and timing) may be required to meet the need for services required by new growth. 4.2 Service Levels and 10-Year Capital Costs for Leamington' D.C. Calculation This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for parks & recreation services and growth studies, over a 10-year planning period. For parks and recreation services, the service component is evaluated on two format sheets: the average historical 10-year level of service calculation (see Appendix B), which "caps" the D.C. amounts; and, the infrastructure cost calculation, which determines the potential D.C. recoverable cost. For the growth studies class of service, the infrastructure cost calculation, which determines the potential D.C. recoverable cost is also provided. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.2.1 Parks and Recreation Services The Municipality currently has 152.75 acres of land for outdoor recreation facilities and park purposes within its jurisdiction. This land consists of various sized parks, a beach, and sport fields. The average level of service provided by the Municipality over the previous 10-year period is 5.4 acres or parkland per 1,000 population. The Municipality also provides approximately 0.53 linear meters of trails per capita. Including parkland development, outdoor recreation facilities and amenities (e.g., playground equipment, storage structures, etc.), and trails, the level of service provided is $1,298 per capita. When applied over the forecast period, this average level of service translates into a D.C.-eligible amount of $8,427,850. With respect to indoor recreation facilities, there are currently various facilities provided by the Municipality, including a community sports complex/arena, soccer facility, marina, and an amphitheater. These facilities currently provide 207,489 sq.ft. of space. The average historical level of service for the previous ten years equates to approximately 6.9 sq.ft. of space per capita or an investment of $2,153 per capita. This service standard provides a D.C.-eligible amount of $13,977,666. The Municipality services the parks and recreation facilities with various vehicles and equipment. The inventory provides for a per capita standard of $34. Over the forecast period, this provides for an additional D.C.-eligible amount of $218,261. In total the historical parks and recreation service standard equates to $22,623,777. Based on the projected growth over the 10-year forecast period, the Municipality has identified $9,380,000 in future growth capital costs for parkland development, various additional amenities, trails, and facilities. Along with these projects, the outstanding growth-related debt, both principal and interest (discounted), for Seacliff Park and the Sports Complex, has been included in the D.C. calculations at a cost of $610,660. Deductions to recognize existing benefit of $5,493,000 have been made. Therefore, the net growth capital cost $4,497,660 has been included in the D.C. calculations. As the predominant users of parks and recreation tend to be residents of the Municipality, the forecast growth-related costs have been allocated 95% to residential and 5% to non-residential. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 4-1 Infrastructure Cost Included in the Development Charges Calculation Parks and Recreation Services Prj. No. Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2031 95% 5% 1 Community Parks - (Bayview Park) Phase 1 2023 410,000 - - 410,000 - - 410,000 389,500 20,500 2 Community Parks - (Bayview Park) Phase 2 2024 1,020,000 - - 1,020,000 - - 1,020,000 969,000 51,000 3 Mersea Park Replacement & Expansion 2022 360,000 - - 360,000 180,000 - 180,000 171,000 9,000 4 Amphitheatre Performance Room and 3 bay Storage Building: new building 2022 310,000 - - 310,000 217,000 - 93,000 88,350 4,650 5 Soccer Complex (including walking trails, lighting large fields, bleachers, irrigation equipment, barrier free play structure, asphalt parking area, and landscaping) 2026-2030 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 700,000 - 300,000 285,000 15,000 6 West Waterfront Lands - Connect Seacliff Beach to Promenade 2026 260,000 - - 260,000 182,000 - 78,000 74,100 3,900 7 Rick Atkin Washrooms and Maintenance Garage Replacement and Expansion 2022 310,000 - - 310,000 217,000 - 93,000 88,350 4,650 8 Waterfront Improvements Phase 1 2023-2025 1,430,000 - - 1,430,000 1,001,000 - 429,000 407,550 21,450 9 Waterfront Improvements Phase 2 2026-2029 3,060,000 - - 3,060,000 2,142,000 - 918,000 872,100 45,900 10 Kinsmen Ball Diamonds Facility Parking Lot creation and driveway upgrades. 2022-2027 1,220,000 - - 1,220,000 854,000 - 366,000 347,700 18,300 Growth-Related Debt: - - 11 Sports Complex Debt Principal (Growth Related Portion Only) 172-11 2022-2026 534,679 - - 534,679 - - 534,679 507,945 26,734 12 Sports Complex Debt Interest (Discounted) (Growth Related Portion Only) 172-11 2022-2026 75,981 - - 75,981 - - 75,981 72,182 3,799 Total 9,990,660 - - 9,990,660 5,493,000 - 4,497,660 4,272,777 224,883 Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Less: Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.2.2 Library Services Leamington currently provides 7,700 sq.ft. of library space. Over the past ten years, the average level of service for library facilities was 0.27 sq.ft. of space per capita which equates to an investment of $95 per capita. This level of service provides the Municipality with a maximum D.C.-eligible amount for recovery over the 10-year forecast period of $619,921. No future capital needs have been identified for the library services at this time, therefore, the D.C. will not recover for library services under the recommended by-law. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.2.3 Growth Studies The D.C.A. permits the inclusion of studies undertaken to facilitate the completion of the Municipality's capital works program. As discussed in Section 3.7, these studies have been allocated as a class of service based on each service to which the study relates. The D.C. studies have been allocated to the class of service based on the proportion of the total net growth-related capital costs as follows: - Services Related to a Highway - 24.6% - Fire Protection Services - 2.9% - Parks and Recreation Services - 4.2% - Policing Services - 0.5% - Water Services - 65.8% - Wastewater Services - 2.0% The remainder of the growth studies are service-specific including: - Public Works Facility Expansion Study (100% services related to a highway); - Pollution Control Plant Capacity Expansion Study (100% wastewater); - Parks Master Plan (100% parks and recreation); - Fire Department Needs Assessment Study (100% fire); - Transportation Master Plan (100% services related to a highway); and - Water System Master Plan (100% water). The cost of these studies is $1,665,440, of which $191,000 is attributable to existing benefit. The net growth-related capital cost of $1,474,440 has been included in the D.C. calculation. These costs have been allocated 56% residential and 44% non-residential based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 10-year forecast period. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 4-2 Infrastructure Cost Included in the Development Charges Calculation Growth Studies Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2031 56% 44% 1 Development Charges Study: 1a Development Charges Study 2022 Services Related to a Highway 14,810 - - 14,810 - - 14,810 8,294 6,516 1b Development Charges Study 2022 Fire Protection Services 1,730 - - 1,730 - - 1,730 969 761 1c Development Charges Study 2022 Policing Services 280 - - 280 - - 280 157 123 1d Development Charges Study 2022 Parks and Recreation Services 2,510 - - 2,510 - - 2,510 1,406 1,104 1e Development Charges Study 2022 Wastewater Services 1,170 - - 1,170 - - 1,170 655 515 1f Development Charges Study 2022 Water Services 35,320 - - 35,320 - - 35,320 19,779 15,541 Sub-total Development Charges Study 55,820 - - 55,820 - - 55,820 31,259 24,561 2 Development Charges Study: 2a Development Charges Study 2027 Services Related to a Highway 14,810 - - 14,810 - - 14,810 8,294 6,516 2b Development Charges Study 2027 Fire Protection Services 1,730 - - 1,730 - - 1,730 969 761 2c Development Charges Study 2027 Policing Services 280 - - 280 - - 280 157 123 2d Development Charges Study 2027 Parks and Recreation Services 2,510 - - 2,510 - - 2,510 1,406 1,104 2e Development Charges Study 2027 Wastewater Services 1,170 - - 1,170 - - 1,170 655 515 2f Development Charges Study 2027 Water Services 35,320 - - 35,320 - - 35,320 19,779 15,541 Sub-total Development Charges Study 55,820 - - 55,820 - - 55,820 31,259 24,561 3 Public Works Facility Expansion Study 2022 Services Related to a Highway 83,800 - - 83,800 - - 83,800 46,928 36,872 4 Pollution Control Plant Capacity Expansion Study 2024 Wastewater Services 510,000 - - 510,000 - - 510,000 285,600 224,400 5 Parks Master Plan 2022 Parks and Recreation Services 100,000 - - 100,000 25,000 - 75,000 42,000 33,000 6 Fire Department Needs Assessment Study 2023 Fire Protection Services 150,000 - - 150,000 75,000 - 75,000 42,000 33,000 7 Transportation MasterPlan 2024 Services Related to a Highway 200,000 - - 200,000 40,000 - 160,000 89,600 70,400 8 Water System Master Plan 2022 Water Services 510,000 - - 510,000 51,000 - 459,000 257,040 201,960 Total 1,665,440 - - 1,665,440 191,000 - 1,474,440 825,686 648,754 Prj. No. Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions (to recognize benefit to non-D.C. services) Service to Which Project Relates Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Less: Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.3 Service Levels and 20-Year Capital Costs for Leamington' D.C. Calculation This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for those services with capital costs associated with the 20-year forecast. 4.3.1 Fire Protection Services The Municipality currently operates its fire services from 6,700 sq.ft. of facility space, providing for a per capita average level of service of approximately 0.24 sq.ft. of building space or $91 per capita. This level of service provides the Municipality with a maximum D.C.-eligible amount for recovery over the forecast period of $1,087,984. Leamington has a current inventory of 11 vehicles providing for an average level of service of $196 per capita which translates into a D.C.-eligible amount of $2,358,939. In addition to vehicles, the fire service also has a variety of small equipment and gear which it provides to its firefighters for use in fire services. This results in an average level of service of $9 per capita. The total D.C.-eligible amount for small equipment and gear is $109,375. The maximum D.C.-eligible amount for recovery over the 20-year forecast period for fire services is $3,556,298. The Municipality has identified the need for a new fire hall facility and additional vehicles at a gross capital cost of $7,388,000. Deductions in the amounts of $576,300 for post- period benefit and $3,694,000 to recognize the benefit to existing development, have been made resulting in a net amount of $3,117,700 being included in the D.C. calculations (as per Table 4-3). The D.C. eligible costs are allocated to residential and non-residential development based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 20-year forecast period. This results in a 57% allocation to residential development and 43% allocation to non-residential development. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 4-3 Infrastructure Cost Included in the Development Charges Calculation Fire Protection Services Less: Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj . No. Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2041 57% 43% 1 New Fire Hall Facility 2030 5,100,000 397,800 - 4,702,200 2,550,000 - 2,152,200 1,226,754 925,446 2 Vehicles - Pumper/Snorkle 2030 895,000 69,800 - 825,200 447,500 - 377,700 215,289 162,411 3 Vehicles - Rescue/Command 2030 782,000 61,000 - 721,000 391,000 - 330,000 188,100 141,900 4 Vehicles - Pumper/Rescue 2030 478,000 37,300 - 440,700 239,000 - 201,700 114,969 86,731 5 Utility Vehicles (2 Pickups) 2030 133,000 10,400 - 122,600 66,500 - 56,100 31,977 24,123 Total 7,388,000 576,300 - 6,811,700 3,694,000 - 3,117,700 1,777,089 1,340,611 Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.3.2 Policing Services Leamington's policing services are currently provided through the Ontario Provincial Police. The Municipality currently provides a police headquarters facility with 19,985 sq.ft. of building area, providing for an average level of service of 0.7 sq.ft. per capita or $270 per capita. This level of service provides the Municipality with a maximum D.C.- eligible amount for recovery over the 20-year forecast period of $3,245,342. The police service contract currently provides an equivalent of 38.94 equipped officers, 15 patrol mobile radios and 8 vehicles for the provision of policing services. This equates to a service standard of $21 per capita. This level of service provides the Municipality with a DC-eligible amount over the forecast period of $248,164 for equipment and gear. The total D.C.-eligible amount over the 20-year forecast period for Policing Services is $3,493,506. The Municipality has identified a provision for additional space in the amount of $510,000 which has been included in the D.C. calculations. The D.C. eligible costs are allocated to residential and non-residential development based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 20-year forecast period. This results in a 57% allocation to residential development and 43% allocation to non-residential development. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-10 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 4-4 Infrastructure Cost Included in the Development Charges Calculation Policing Services Less: Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj . No. Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2041 57% 43% 1 Provision for Additional Space 2025 510,000 - - 510,000 - - 510,000 290,700 219,300 Total 510,000 - - 510,000 - - 510,000 290,700 219,300 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-11 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.3.3 Services Related to a Highway The Municipality currently provides 79.53 kilometres of roads. The kilometres of roads in the Municipality over the historical 10-year period provides the Municipality with an average level of investment of $10,748 per capita, resulting in a D.C.-eligible recovery amount of approximately $129,035,686 over the 20-year forecast period. The Municipality also has 73,767 linear metres of sidewalks, 2,269 streetlights, 21 traffic signals, and 7 pedestrian crossings. This provides an average per capita level of investment of $578 for sidewalks, and $680 for the traffic signals, streetlights, and pedestrian crossings. The D.C.-eligible recovery amount is approximately $6.93 million for sidewalks, and $8.16 million for streetlights, traffic signals and pedestrian crossings over the forecast period. The total service standard for Services Related to a Highway is equal to $144,129,630. Municipal staff identified future capital infrastructure needs for services related to a highway (roads and related infrastructure) which include additional road expansions and upgrades, bridge widenings, construction of new roads, and a multi-use pedestrian and cyclist facility. Additional traffic signalization projects have also been identified. The total program cost is equal to $41,997,000. Along with these projects, the outstanding growth-related debt, both principal and interest (discounted), for East Side Arterial Road (ESAR), has been included in the D.C. calculations at a cost of $306,028. Deductions in the amounts of $7,326,200 for post-period benefit and $8,444,000 for costs that benefit existing development have been made to the calculations. These deductions result in a net D.C.-eligible amount of $26,532,828 to be included in the D.C. calculations. The residential/non-residential capital cost allocation for all services related to a highway is 57% residential and 43% non-residential based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 20-year forecast period. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-12 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 4-5 Infrastructure Cost Included in the Development Charges Calculation Services Related to a Highway Less: Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj . No. Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2041 57% 43% Roads: 1 Seacliff Dr. E. - Phase 1 Cherry Lane to Regatta - Rehabilitation and Widening 2022 2,108,000 - - 2,108,000 401,000 - 1,707,000 972,990 734,010 2 Seacliff Dr. E. - Phase 2- Regatta to Peter St - Rehabilitation and Widening 2026 2,250,000 - - 2,250,000 428,000 - 1,822,000 1,038,540 783,460 3 Seacliff Dr. E. - Phase 3- Peter St to ESAR - Rehabilitation and Widening 2027 4,242,000 - - 4,242,000 806,000 - 3,436,000 1,958,520 1,477,480 4 Oak St. E - ESAR to Road 12 - Rehabilitation and Widening 2030 5,014,000 - - 5,014,000 1,254,000 - 3,760,000 2,143,200 1,616,800 5 Oak St. E - Bridge widening (2 bridges) for Active Transportation 2030 643,000 - - 643,000 129,000 - 514,000 292,980 221,020 6 North/South Bound West Side Arterial - New Road 2035 8,717,000 3,922,500 - 4,794,500 872,000 - 3,922,500 2,235,825 1,686,675 7 Morse Rd (Wilkinson-Hwy 3) - Rehabilitation and Widening 2035 3,151,000 1,418,000 - 1,733,000 315,000 - 1,418,000 808,260 609,740 8 Wilkinson Dr (Hodgins to Morse Rd) - Rehabilitation and Widening 2035 3,832,000 1,724,500 - 2,107,500 383,000 - 1,724,500 982,965 741,535 9 Multi-Use Pedestrian and Cyclist Facility: Pelee Drive Road Right of Way 2026 2,550,000 - - 2,550,000 1,275,000 - 1,275,000 726,750 548,250 10 Reconfigure Talbot/Oak/Fraser Intersection 2031 3,264,000 261,200 - 3,002,800 1,958,000 - 1,044,800 595,536 449,264 11 Oak Street East (Victoria to Pulford) Road Widening 2028 4,040,000 - - 4,040,000 404,000 - 3,636,000 2,072,520 1,563,480 Traffic Signalization: 12 Signalization Sherk @ Ellison 2022 386,000 - - 386,000 97,000 - 289,000 164,730 124,270 13 Signalization Seacliff @ Cherry Lane 2022 643,000 - - 643,000 122,000 - 521,000 296,970 224,030 14 Signalization of Seacliff @ Peter 2026 386,000 - - 386,000 - - 386,000 220,020 165,980 15 Provision for Traffic Signalization 2022-2030 771,000 - - 771,000 - - 771,000 439,470 331,530 Debt and Reserve Adjustment: 16 ESAR Debt Principal (Discounted) (Growth Related Portion Only) 172-11 2022-2026 267,951 - - 267,951 - - 267,951 152,732 115,219 17 ESAR Debt Interest (Discounted) (Growth Related Portion Only) 172-11 2022-2026 38,077 - - 38,077 - - 38,077 21,704 16,373 Total 42,303,028 7,326,200 - 34,976,828 8,444,000 - 26,532,828 15,123,712 11,409,116 Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-13 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.3.4 Public Works (Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment) As per Section 3.7, a D.C. by-law may provide for any D.C.-eligible service to be included in a class set out in the by-law. Public Works is proposed as a class of service comprised of facilities, vehicles and equipment needs. The Municipality operates its Public Works Department out of a number of facilities with 24,960 sq.ft. of current building area. The facility space provided over this historical 10- year period results in an average level of service of 0.88 sq.ft. per capita or a level of investment of $142 per capita. This level of service provides the Municipality with a maximum D.C.-eligible amount for recovery over the 20-year forecast period of $1,702,331. The Municipality's public works fleet inventory includes 50 vehicles and equipment items. The number of items identified over the previous 10-year period provides for an average level of investment of $148 per capita. Over the forecast period, the D.C.- eligible amount for vehicles and equipment is $1,777,128. The maximum D.C.-eligible amount for recovery over the forecast period for public works is $3,479,459. With respect to future growth needs, the Municipality has identified expansion to the equipment storage facility as well as to the fleet of vehicles and equipment at a total cost of $2,113,000. A benefit to existing deduction of $765,000 has been made, resulting in a cost of $1,348,000 which has been included in the D.C. calculations at this time. The D.C. eligible costs are allocated to residential and non-residential development based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 20-year forecast period. This results in a 57% allocation to residential development and 43% allocation to non-residential development. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-14 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 4-6 Infrastructure Cost Included in the Development Charges Calculation Public Works Less: Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj . No. D.C. Eligible Service to Which the Project Relates Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2041 57% 43% 1 Public Works - Expansion - Equipment Storage at Wilkinson Dr. Services Related to a Highway 2025-2040 1,530,000 - - 1,530,000 765,000 - 765,000 436,050 328,950 2 Snow Plow/Salter - (1 additional unit) Services Related to a Highway 2029 190,000 - - 190,000 - - 190,000 108,300 81,700 3 Sidewalk Plow/Salter - (1 additional unit) Services Related to a Highway 2030 50,000 - - 50,000 - - 50,000 28,500 21,500 4 Backhoe/loader- (1 additional unit) Services Related to a Highway 2030 245,000 - - 245,000 - - 245,000 139,650 105,350 5 Pickup truck - (1 additional unit) Services Related to a Highway 2022 49,000 - - 49,000 - - 49,000 27,930 21,070 6 Pickup truck - (1 additional unit) Services Related to a Highway 2022 49,000 - - 49,000 - - 49,000 27,930 21,070 Total 2,113,000 - - 2,113,000 765,000 - 1,348,000 768,360 579,640 Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-15 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.3.5 Water Services The growth-related capital identified for water services includes a new Northwest trunk watermain along with a related environmental assessment (E.A.). This watermain is mainly intended to service growth in the greenhouse industry, however, it will also service growth in on-farm bunk houses. The total gross capital cost is estimated at $60,006,000 and this has been included in the D.C. calculations. The costs for this trunk watermain and E.A. are shared 3%/97% between residential on- farm bunk house growth and the non-residential greenhouse growth. This share is based on the estimated water capacity needs over the 20-year forecast period as follows: Table 4-7 Residential/Non-residential shares for Greenhouse and On-Farm Bunk House Growth over the 20-year Forecast Period There is also a need to upgrade and expand the water service infrastructure for all other residential and non-residential growth in the water service areas of the Municipality. The total cost of the projects identified for upgrade and/or expansion totals $17,606,200. In addition, outstanding growth-related debt of $1,074,566 has been included. This debt was identified as growth-related in the Municipality's previous D.C. study, however with the discontinuation of D.C.s over the past few years, the debt payments have been funded from other Municipal sources over the past years. As the debt was originally identified as growth-related, the remaining future debt payments will again be recovered through D.C.s. A deduction of $7,741,900 has been made to recognize the benefit to existing development. A further deduction of $7,672,010 has been made to recognize the balance in the Water Expansion Reserve Fund (to be transferred back to the Water D.C. reserve fund). Water C apacity R equirements fo r Greenho uses and On-F arm B unk H o uses: C apacity/ Wo rker A ssumptio ns R es/ N o n-R es Split fo r Greenho uses and B unk H o uses Greenhouses - Litres per acre per day 27,000 97% Greenhouses - Average workers per acre 2.5 Litres per day required per worker for On-Farm Bunk Houses 300 Total Litres per acre for bunk houses 750 3% Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-16 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx The total gross cost of all capital needs is therefore, $78,686,766, with a net capital cost of $63,272,856 to be included in the D.C. calculations, after deductions for benefit to existing development and the reserve fund balance have been made. Table 4-8 provides a summary of these costs. The costs for the water services in the serviced areas of the Municipality are shared between the anticipated residential and non-residential growth over the 20-year forecast period. As noted above, the costs associated with the Northwest trunk watermain and E.A. have been allocated based on capacity needs for greenhouses and on-farm bunk houses (97%/ 3%). All other water capital costs have been allocated based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 20-year forecast period (i.e., 77%/23%), excluding the greenhouse and on-farm bunk house growth. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-17 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 4-8 Infrastructure Cost Included in the Development Charges Calculation Water Services Residential Share On-Farm Bunkhouses Non- Residential Share (ICI) Greenhouse 2022-2041 77% 23% 1 Northwest Trunk Watermain 2025 59,700,000 - - 59,700,000 - - 59,700,000 - 1,791,000 - 57,909,000 2 Northwest Trunk Watermain EA 2022 306,000 - - 306,000 - - 306,000 - 9,180 - 296,820 3 Sherk St Watermain- Increase to: 400mm 2023 894,000 - - 894,000 521,500 - 372,500 286,825 - 85,675 - 4 Jane St / Claire St- Increase to 150mm 2023 194,000 - - 194,000 194,000 - - - - - - 5 Audrey St / Margaret St: Increase to 200mm 2023 233,000 - - 233,000 194,200 - 38,800 29,876 - 8,924 - 6 Erie St: Increase to:300mm 2023 87,200 - - 87,200 58,100 - 29,100 22,407 - 6,693 - 7 Talbot Rd: Increase to 300mm 2024 330,000 - - 330,000 165,000 - 165,000 127,050 - 37,950 - 9 Victoria St: Increase to 150mm 2024 199,000 - - 199,000 176,500 - 22,500 17,325 - 5,175 - 11 Montgomery: Increase to 150mm 2024 117,000 - - 117,000 93,600 - 23,400 18,018 - 5,382 - 12 Princess St: Increase to 150mm 2024 133,000 - - 133,000 89,600 - 43,400 33,418 - 9,982 - 14 NE Trunk (Talbot St E to Erie St N/Hwy77): Increase to 400mm 2025 2,520,000 - - 2,520,000 - - 2,520,000 1,940,400 - 579,600 - 15 Talbot Rd: Increase to 400mm 2026 734,000 - - 734,000 305,800 - 428,200 329,714 - 98,486 - 16 Fraser Rd: Increase to 600mm 2026 2,660,000 - - 2,660,000 738,900 - 1,921,100 1,479,247 - 441,853 - 17 Bryon St and Warren Ave: Increase to 150mm 2027 230,000 - - 230,000 205,400 - 24,600 18,942 - 5,658 - 19 Maxon Ave / Wigle St / Sherman St / James St: Increase to 150mm 2027 469,000 - - 469,000 437,400 - 31,600 24,332 - 7,268 - 21 Seacliff Dr W: Increase to 600mm 2029 6,830,000 - - 6,830,000 3,415,000 - 3,415,000 2,629,550 - 785,450 - 22 Sherk St: Increase to 400mm 2030 820,000 - - 820,000 478,300 - 341,700 263,109 - 78,591 - 23 Malborough St E: Increase to 150mm 2030 97,000 - - 97,000 77,600 - 19,400 14,938 - 4,462 - 24 Martin Dr: Increase to 150mm 2030 71,000 - - 71,000 56,800 - 14,200 10,934 - 3,266 - 25 Grace Ave: Increase to 150mm 2030 56,000 - - 56,000 44,800 - 11,200 8,624 - 2,576 - 26 Danforth: Increase to 300mm 2033 881,000 - - 881,000 489,400 - 391,600 301,532 - 90,068 - 27 Outstanding Growth Related Debt (Principal) 2022-2025 1,074,566 - - 1,074,566 - - 1,074,566 827,416 - 247,150 - 28 Water Services- New Vehicle 2022 51,000 - - 51,000 - - 51,000 39,270 - 11,730 - Reserve Fund Adjustment 7,672,010 - (7,672,010) (920,641) (230,160) (306,880) (6,214,328) Total 78,686,766 - - 78,686,766 15,413,910 - 63,272,856 7,502,286 1,570,020 2,209,059 51,991,492 Prj. No. Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Less: Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-18 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 4.4 Service Levels and Fully Serviced Area (Urban) 20-Year Capital Costs for Leamington's D.C. Calculation This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for wastewater services within the urban serviced area for 20-year capital costs. 4.4.1 Wastewater Services The Municipality owns and operates the wastewater treatment plant servicing some residents and businesses within the Municipality. The treatment plant went through several phases of reconstruction over the past years to assist in expanding capacity to service growth. The outstanding growth-related debt, both principal and interest (discounted), for the capital works, has been included in the D.C. calculations at a cost of $6,972,651. Deductions to recognize existing benefit of $4,839,699 have been made. Therefore, the net growth capital cost $2,132,952 has been included in the D.C. calculations. The costs for all wastewater services are shared 80%/20% between residential and non-residential based on the population to employment ratio over the fully serviced urban 20-year forecast period. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4-19 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 4-9 Infrastructure Cost Included in the Development Charges Calculation Wastewater Services - Fully Serviced Water & Wastewater Areas of the Municipality Residential Share Non- Residential Share 2022-2041 80% 20% 1 Debt Principal on Phase 1 & Portion of Phase 2 2022-2026 1,084,267 - 1,084,267 752,587 331,680 265,344 66,336 2 Debt Interest (Discounted) on Phase 1 & Portion of Phase 2 2022-2026 63,979 - 63,979 44,408 19,571 15,657 3,914 3 Debt Principal on Portion of Phase 2 - Growth Component Only 2022-2024 906,871 - 906,871 629,457 277,414 221,931 55,483 4 Debt Interest (Discounted) on Portion of Phase 2 - Growth Component Only 2022-2024 52,598 - 52,598 36,508 16,090 12,872 3,218 5 Debt Principal on Phases 3-5 - Growth Component Only 2022-2031 3,273,283 - 3,273,283 2,271,977 1,001,306 801,045 200,261 6 Debt Interest (Discounted) on Phases 3-5 - Growth Component Only 2022-2031 375,529 - 375,529 260,654 114,875 91,900 22,975 7 Debt Principal on Phases 3-5 - Growth Component Only 2022-2032 1,197,505 - 1,197,505 831,185 366,320 293,056 73,264 8 Debt Interest (Discounted) on Phases 3-5 - Growth Component Only 2022-2032 18,619 - 18,619 12,923 5,696 4,557 1,139 Total 6,972,651 - - 6,972,651 4,839,699 - 2,132,952 1,706,362 426,590 Potential D.C. Recoverable Cost Prj. No. Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2022$) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Less: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Chapter 5 D.C. Calculation Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 5. D.C. Calculation For water and wastewater services, the D.C.s are calculated on a 20-year planning horizon based on the service areas as follows: o For wastewater services, Table 5-1 provides for uniform D.C.s to be imposed for the urban wastewater the serviced area. o For water services Table 5-2 provides for uniform D.C.s to be imposed for the water serviced areas for industrial, commercial & institutional growth, greenhouse growth, on-farm bunk house growth and residential (non-on-farm bunk house) growth. Table 5-3 calculates the proposed uniform D.C. to be imposed on anticipated development for Municipal-wide services/classes of service over a 20-year planning horizon. Table 5-4 calculates the proposed uniform D.C. to be imposed on anticipated development for Municipal-wide services/classes of service over a 10-year planning horizon. The calculation for residential development is generated on a per capita basis and is based upon six forms of housing types (singles and semi-detached, apartments with 2 or more bedrooms, bachelor and one-bedroom apartments, special care/special dwelling units, on-farm bunk houses, and other multiples). The non-residential D.C. have been calculated on a per sq.ft. of G.F.A. basis for all types of non-residential development and is differentiated for industrial, commercial, and institutional growth, vs. growth in the greenhouse industry. The D.C.-eligible costs for each service component were developed in Chapter 4 for all Municipality services and classes, based on their proposed capital programs. For the residential calculations, the total cost is divided by the "gross" (new resident) population to determine the per capita amount. The eligible D.C. cost calculations set out in Chapter 4 are based on the net anticipated population increase (the forecast new unit population less the anticipated decline in existing units). The cost per capita is then multiplied by the average occupancy of the new units (Appendix A, Schedule 5) to calculate the charge in Tables 5-1 through 5-4. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx With respect to non-residential development, the total costs in the uniform charge allocated to non-residential development (based on need for service) have been divided by the anticipated development over the planning period to calculate a cost per sq.ft. of G.F.A. for industrial, commercial, and institutional growth or greenhouse growth, as applicable. Table 5-5 summarizes the total D.C. that are applicable based on the serviced areas for the anticipated growth and Table 5-6 summarizes the gross capital expenditures and sources of revenue for works to be undertaken during the five-year life of the by-law. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 5-1 Municipality of Leamington Development Charge Calculation Urban Wastewater Services 2022 to 2041 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost Residential Non-Residential S.D.U. per sq.ft. Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Greenhouses Industrial, Commercial & Institutional per sq.ft. Greenhouses per sq.ft. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1. Wastewater Services 1.1 Facilities 1,706,362 426,590 601 0.25 426,590 - 0.247 - 1,706,362 426,590 601 0.25 426,590 - 0.247 - TOTAL $1,706,362 $426,590 $601 $0.25 426,590 $0.00 0.247 - D.C.-Eligible Capital Cost $1,706,362 $426,590 $426,590 - 20-Year Gross Population/GFA Growth (sq.ft.) 9,526 1,729,200 1,729,200 - Cost Per Capita/Non-Residential GFA (sq.ft.) $179.13 $0.25 $0.247 $0.000 By Residential Unit Type P.P.U. Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.354 $601 Other Multiples 1.954 $350 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + 1.703 $305 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.316 $236 Special Care/Special Dwelling Units 1.100 $197 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost SERVICE/CLASS Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 5-2 Municipality of Leamington Development Charge Calculation Municipal-Wide Water Services 2022 to 2041 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost Residential (Non-On-Farm Bunk Houses) Residential On-Farm Bunk Houses Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Greenhouses Residential (Excluding On- Farm Bunk Houses) S.D.U. Residential On- Farm Bunk Houses per capita Industrial, Commercial & Institutional per sq.ft. Greenhouse per sq.ft. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2. Water Services 2.1 Distribution System 7,502,286 1,570,020 2,209,059 51,991,492 2,452 485 1.046 0.397 7,502,286 1,570,020 2,209,059 51,991,492 2,452 485 1.046 0.397 TOTAL $7,502,286 $1,570,020 $2,209,059 $51,991,492 $2,452 $485 $1.046 $0.397 D.C.-Eligible Capital Cost $7,502,286 $1,570,020 $2,209,059 $51,991,492 20-Year Gross Population/GFA Growth (sq.ft.) 10,261 3,237 2,111,600 131,080,000 Cost Per Capita/Non-Residential GFA (sq.ft.) $731.15 $485.02 $1.046 $0.397 By Residential Unit Type P.P.U. Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.354 $2,452 $0 Other Multiples 1.954 $1,429 $0 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + 1.703 $1,245 $0 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.316 $962 $0 Special Care/Special Dwelling Units 1.100 $804 $0 On-Farm Bunk Houses - per capita 1.000 $0 $485 SERVICE/CLASS 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 5-3 Municipality of Leamington Development Charge Calculation Municipal-wide Services and Classes of Service 2022 to 2041 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost Residential Non-Residential S.D.U. per sq.ft. Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Greenhouses Industrial, Commercial & Institutional per sq.ft. Greenhouses per sq.ft. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3. Services Related to a Highway 3.1 Roads and Related Infrastructure 15,123,712 11,409,116 3,758 0.086 3,298,992 8,110,124 1.562 0.062 15,123,712 11,409,116 3,758 0.086 3,298,992 8,110,124 1.562 0.062 4. Public Works 4.1 Services Related to a Highway 768,360 579,640 191 0.004 167,605 412,035 0.079 0.003 768,360 579,640 191 0.004 167,605 412,035 $0.079 $0.003 5. Fire Protection Services 5.1 Fire facilities, vehicles & equipment 1,777,089 1,340,611 442 0.010 387,643 952,968 0.184 0.007 1,777,089 1,340,611 442 0.010 387,643 952,968 $0.184 $0.007 6. Policing Services 6.1 Facilities 290,700 219,300 72 0.002 63,411 155,889 0.030 0.001 290,700 219,300 72 0.002 63,411 155,889 $0.030 $0.001 TOTAL 17,959,861 $13,548,667 $4,463 $0.102 3,917,651 $9,631,016 $1.855 $0.073 D.C.-Eligible Capital Cost $17,959,861 $13,548,667 $3,917,651 $9,631,016 20-Year Gross Population/GFA Growth (sq.ft.) 13,498 133,191,600 2,111,600 131,080,000 Cost Per Capita/Non-Residential GFA (sq.ft.) $1,330.56 $0.102 $1.855 $0.073 By Residential Unit Type P.P.U. Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.354 $4,463 Other Multiples 1.954 $2,600 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + 1.703 $2,265 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.316 $1,751 Special Care/Special Dwelling Units 1.100 $1,465 On-Farm Bunk Houses - per capita 1.000 $1,330 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost SERVICE/CLASS 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 5-4 Municipality of Leamington Development Charge Calculation Municipal-wide Services and Classes 2022 to 2031 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost Residential Non-Residential S.D.U. per sq.ft. Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Greenhouses Industrial, Commercial & Institutional per sq.ft. Greenhouses per sq.ft. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7. Parks and Recreation Services 7.1 Parkland Development, Amenities, Trails, Recreation Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment 4,272,777 224,883 1,934 0.003 69,776 155,107 0.056 0.003 8. Growth Studies 8.1 Water Services 296,598 233,042 134 0.003 72,307 160,734 0.058 0.003 8.2 Wastewater Services 286,910 225,430 130 0.003 69,945 155,484 0.056 0.003 8.3 Services Related to a Highway 153,115 120,305 69 0.001 37,328 82,977 0.030 0.001 8.4 Policing Services 314 246 - - 76 170 - - 8.5 Fire Protection Services 43,938 34,522 20 - 10,711 23,811 0.009 - 8.6 Parks and Recreation Services 44,811 35,209 20 - 10,924 24,284 0.009 - 825,686 648,754 373 0.007 201,293 447,461 0.162 0.007 TOTAL $5,098,463 $873,637 $2,307 $0.010 271,068 602,568 $0.218 $0.010 D.C.-Eligible Capital Cost $5,098,463 $873,637 $271,068 $602,568 10-Year Gross Population/GFA Growth (sq.ft.) 7,408 70,244,700 1,244,700 69,000,000 Cost Per Capita/Non-Residential GFA (sq.ft.) $688.24 $0.010 $0.218 $0.010 By Residential Unit Type P.P.U. Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.354 $2,308 Other Multiples 1.954 $1,345 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + 1.703 $1,173 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.316 $906 Special Care/Special Dwelling Units 1.100 $757 On-Farm Bunk Houses - per capita 1.000 $688 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost SERVICE/CLASS Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 5-5 Municipality of Leamington Development Charge Calculation Total All Services and Classes 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost Residential Non-Residential Residential (Non- On-Farm Bunk Houses) S.D.U. Residential On- Farm Bunk Houses per capita Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Greenhouses Industrial, Commercial & Institutional per sq.ft. Greenhouses per sq.ft. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Urban Wastewater Services 20 Year 1,706,362 426,590 601 0 426,590 - 0.247 - 9,072,305 54,200,550 2,452 485 2,209,059 51,991,492 1.046 0.397 Municipal-wide Services/Classes 20 Year 17,959,861 13,548,667 4,463 1,330 3,917,651 9,631,016 1.855 0.073 Municipal-wide Services/Classes 10 Year 5,098,463 873,637 2,307 688 271,068 602,568 0.218 0.010 $32,130,630 $68,622,854 $9,222 $2,504 $6,397,779 $62,225,075 $3.119 $0.480 TOTAL URBAN CHARGES $33,836,991 $69,049,444 $9,823 $2,504 $6,824,369 $62,225,075 $3.366 $0.480 Municipal-wide Water Services 20 Year 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost 2022$ D.C.-Eligible Cost SERVICE/CLASS TOTAL MUNICIPAL-WIDE CHARGES Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table 5-6 Municipality of Leamington Gross Expenditure and Sources of Revenue Summary for Costs to be Incurred over the Life of the By-law Sources of Financing Tax Base or Other Non-D.C. Source D.C. Reserve Fund Other Deductions Benefit to Existing Other Funding Residential Non-Residential 1. Wastewater Services 1.1 Facilities 2,107,715 0 1,462,960 0 0 515,804 128,951 2. Water Services 2.1 Distribution System 68,158,200 0 2,537,200 0 0 6,123,730 59,497,270 3. Services Related to a Highway 3.1 Roads and Related Infrastructure 8,751,333 0 2,323,000 0 0 3,664,150 2,764,183 4. Public Works 4.1 Services Related to a Highway 289,250 0 95,625 0 0 110,366 83,259 5. Fire Protection Services 5.1 Fire facilities, vehicles & equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6. Policing Services 6.1 Facilities 510,000 0 0 0 0 290,700 219,300 7. Parks and Recreation Services 7.1 Parkland Development, Amenities, Trails, Recreation Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment 6,081,667 0 3,184,167 0 0 2,752,625 144,875 8. Growth Studies 8.1 Water Services 545,320 0 51,000 0 0 276,819 217,501 8.2 Wastewater Services 511,170 0 0 0 0 286,255 224,915 8.3 Services Related to a Highway 298,610 0 40,000 0 0 144,822 113,788 8.4 Policing Services 280 0 0 0 0 157 123 8.5 Fire Protection Services 151,730 0 75,000 0 0 42,969 33,761 8.6 Parks and Recreation Services 102,510 0 25,000 0 0 43,406 34,104 Total Expenditures & Revenues $87,507,785 $0 $9,793,952 $0 $0 $14,251,802 $63,462,031 Post D.C. Period Benefit Total Gross Cost Service/Class Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Chapter 6 D.C. Policy Recommendations and D.C. By-law Rules Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 6. D.C. Policy Recommendations and D.C. By-law Rules 6.1 Introduction Subsection 5 (1) 9 states that rules must be developed: "to determine if a development charge is payable in any particular case and to determine the amount of the charge, subject to the limitations set out in subsection (6)." Paragraph 10 of the section goes on to state that the rules may provide for exemptions, phasing in and/or indexing of D.C.s. Subsection 5 (6) establishes the following restrictions on the rules: - the total of all D.C.s that would be imposed on anticipated development must not exceed the capital costs determined under s. 5 (1) 2-7 for all services involved; - if the rules expressly identify a type of development, they must not provide for it to pay D.C.s that exceed the capital costs that arise from the increase in the need for service for that type of development; however, this requirement does not relate to any particular development; and - if the rules provide for a type of development to have a lower D.C. than is allowed, the rules for determining D.C.s may not provide for any resulting shortfall to be made up via other development. With respect to "the rules," s. 6 states that a D.C. by-law must expressly address the matters referred to above re s. 5 (1) paragraphs 9 and 10, as well as how the rules apply to the redevelopment of land. The rules provided are based on the Municipality's existing policies; with consideration for the recent changes to the D.C.A. resulting from Bills 108, 197 and 213. However, there are items under consideration at this time and these may be refined prior to adoption of the by-law. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 6.2 D.C. By-law Structure It is recommended that: - classes of services be established for public works and growth studies; - the Municipality uses a uniform Municipal-wide D.C. calculation for all municipal services and classes except water and wastewater services; - water services be imposed on the municipal-wide water service area of the Municipality; - wastewater services be imposed on the urban wastewater service area of the Municipality; and - one municipal D.C. by-law be used for all services and classes of services referenced above. 6.3 D.C. By-law Rules The following sets out the recommended rules governing the calculation, payment, and collection of D.C.s in accordance with s. 6 of the D.C.A. It is recommended that the following sections provide the basis for the D.C.s.: 6.3.1 Payment in any Particular Case In accordance with the D.C.A., s. 2 (2), a D.C. be calculated, payable and collected where the development requires one or more of the following: "(a) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by- law under section 34 of the Planning Act; (b) the approval of a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act; (c) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50 (7) of the Planning Act applies; (d) the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act; (e) a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act; (f) the approval of a description under section 9 of the Condominium Act, 1998; or Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx (g) the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 in relation to a building or structure." 6.3.2 Determination of the Amount of the Charge The following conventions be adopted: 1) Costs allocated to residential uses will be assigned to different types of residential units based on the average occupancy for each housing type constructed during the previous decade. Costs allocated to non-residential uses will be assigned based on the amount of square feet of G.F.A. constructed for eligible uses (i.e., primary, industrial, commercial, and institutional). 2) Costs allocated to residential and non-residential uses are based upon a number of conventions, as may be suited to each municipal circumstance, e.g. - for growth studies, the costs have been based on a population vs. employment growth ratio (56%/44%) for residential and non-residential uses, respectively over the 10-year forecast period; - for parks and recreation services, a 5% non-residential attribution has been made to recognize use by the non-residential sector; - for services related to a highway, fire protection services, police services and public works a 57% residential/43% non-residential attribution has been made based on a population vs. employment growth ratio over the 20-year forecast period; - for water services: o capital related to all growth except greenhouse and on-farm bunk house growth, the costs have been based on a population vs. employment ratio (77%/23%) growth over the 20-year forecast period for the water serviced area; and o capital related to greenhouses and on-farm bunk houses, the costs have been based on the anticipated capacity of water needs per bunk house based on 2.5 workers per acre of greenhouse and the capacity required for greenhouse growth (3%/97%) over the 20- year forecast period; and - for wastewater services, the costs have been shared 80%/20% between residential and non-residential based on the benefiting lands associated Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx with the wastewater facility works over the urban wastewater services area 20-year forecast period. 6.3.3 Application for Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) Where, as a result of the redevelopment of land, a building or structure existing on the same land within three years prior to the date of payment of D.C.s in regard to such redevelopment was, or is to be demolished, in whole or in part, or converted from one principal use to another principal use on the same land, in order to facilitate the redevelopment, the D.C.s otherwise payable with respect to such redevelopment shall be reduced by the following amounts: 1) the number of dwelling units demolished/converted multiplied by the relevant D.C.s when the D.C.s are calculated with respect to the redevelopment; 2) the G.F.A. of the building demolished/converted multiplied by the relevant D.C.s when the D.C.s are calculated with respect to the redevelopment. The credit can, in no case, exceed the amount of D.C.s that would otherwise be payable. 6.3.4 Exemptions (full or partial) a) Statutory exemptions: - industrial building additions of up to and including 50% of the existing G.F.A. (defined in O. Reg. 82/98, section 1) of the building; for industrial building additions that exceed 50% of the existing G.F.A., only the portion of the addition in excess of 50% is subject to D.C.s (subsection 4 (3) of the D.C.A.); - buildings or structures owned by and used for the purposes of any municipality, local board, or Board of Education (section 3); - residential development in existing buildings: development that results only in the enlargement of an existing dwelling unit, or that results only in the creation of up to two additional dwelling units (based on prescribed limits set out in section 2 of O. Reg. 82/98); Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx - residential development in new dwellings: development that includes the creation of up to one additional dwelling units (based on prescribed limits set out in section 2 of O. Reg. 82/98); and - land vested in or leased to a university that receives regular and ongoing operating funds from the government for the purposes of post-secondary education is exempt from development charges imposed under the Development Charges Act, 1997 if the development in respect of which development charges would otherwise be payable is intended to be occupied and used by the university. b) Non-statutory exemptions: - Agricultural buildings excluding: o On-farm bunk houses; o Greenhouses; - Residential accessory buildings if a service connection already exists for the lot but excludes bunk houses; - Private schools 6.3.5 Phasing in No provisions for phasing in the D.C. are provided in the D.C. by-law. 6.3.6 Timing of Collection The D.C.s for all services and classes are payable upon issuance of the first building permit for each dwelling unit, building, or structure, subject to early or late payment agreements entered into by the Municipality and an owner under s. 27 of the D.C.A. or as otherwise provided for in the D.C.A. Rental housing and institutional developments will pay D.C.s in six equal annual payments commencing at occupancy. Non-profit housing developments will pay D.C.s in 21 equal annual payments commencing at occupancy. Moreover, the D.C. amount for all developments occurring within 2 years of a Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment planning approval (for applications submitted after January 1, 2020), shall be determined based on the D.C. in effect on the day of the applicable Site Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment application. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Installment payments and payments determined at the time of Site Plan or Zoning By- law Amendment application are subject to annual interest charges calculated based on the Municipality's D.C. Interest Rate Policy, as may be amended from time to time. 6.3.7 Indexing Indexing of the D.C.s shall be implemented annually on January 1st of each year, commencing from by-law passage and every year thereafter, in accordance with the Statistics Canada Quarterly, Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index (Table 18-10-0135-01)1 for the most recent year-over-year period. 6.3.8 The Applicable Areas The charges developed herein provide for varying charges within the Municipality, as follows: - all municipal-wide services/classes - the full residential and non-residential charges will be imposed on all lands within the Municipality; and - water - the full residential and non-residential charge will be imposed on the municipal-wide water serviced areas of the Municipality. - wastewater - the full residential and non-residential charge will be imposed on the urban service areas of the Municipality. 6.4 Other D.C. By-law Provisions It is recommended that: 6.4.1 Categories of Services/Classes for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes It is recommended that eight (8) separate reserve funds be created: Public Works, Fire Protection Services, Parks and Recreation Services, Services Related to a Highway, Policing Services, Growth Studies, Water Services and Wastewater Services. 1 O. Reg. 82/98 referenced "The Statistics Canada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics, catalogue number 62-007" as the index source. Since implementation, Statistics Canada has modified this index twice and the above-noted index is the most current. The draft by-law provided herein refers to O. Reg. 82/98 to ensure traceability should this index continue to be modified over time. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Additionally, it is recommended that the balance in the Water Expansion Reserve Fund be transferred to the water D.C. reserve fund. Appendix D outlines the reserve fund policies that the Municipality is required to follow as per the D.C.A. 6.4.2 By-law In-force Date A by-law under the D.C.A. may come into force as early as the day after which the by- law is passed by Council. Currently the draft by-law is anticipated to come into effect on July 27, 2022 (rates will be indexed on January 1, 2023). 6.4.3 Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter- Reserve Fund Borrowing The minimum interest rate is the Bank of Canada rate on the day on which the by-law comes into force (as per s. 11 of O. Reg. 82/98). 6.4.4 Area Rating As noted earlier, Bill 73 has introduced two new sections where Council must consider the use of area-specific charges: 1. Section 2 (9) of the Act now requires a municipality to implement area-specific D.C.s for either specific services that are prescribed and/or for specific municipalities that are to be regulated (note that at this time, no municipalities or services are prescribed by the Regulations). 2. Section 10 (2) c.1 of the D.C.A. requires that "the development charges background study shall include consideration of the use of more than one development charge by-law to reflect different needs for services in different areas." In regard to the first item, there are no services or specific municipalities identified in the regulations that must be area rated. The second item requires Council to consider the use of area rating. It is recommended that the Municipality's by-law provide for wastewater services on an urban area basis. All other Municipal services are to be recovered based on a uniform, Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipal-wide basis. There have been several reasons why area-rating has not been imposed on these services, including: 1. All Municipal services, with the exception of water and wastewater, require that the average 10-year service standard be calculated. This average service standard multiplied by growth in the Municipal, establishes an upper ceiling on the amount of funds that can be collected from all developing landowners. Section 4 (4) of O. Reg. 82/98 provides that "if a development charge by-law applies to a part of the municipality, the level of service and average level of service cannot exceed that which would be determined if the by-law applied to the whole municipality." Put in layman terms, the average service standard multiplied by the growth within the specific area would establish an area-specific ceiling which would significantly reduce the total revenue recoverable for the Municipality hence potentially resulting in D.C. revenue shortfalls and impacts on property taxes. 2. Expanding on item 1, attempting to impose an area charge potentially causes equity issues in transitioning from a Municipal-wide approach to an area-specific approach. For example, if all services were now built (and funded) within Area A (which is 75% built out) and this was funded with some revenues from Areas B and C, moving to an area-rating approach would see Area A contribute no funds to the costs of services in Areas B and C. The D.C.s would be lower in Area A (as all services are now funded) and higher in Areas B and C. As well, funding shortfalls may then potentially encourage the Municipality to provide less services to Areas B and C due to reduced revenue. 3. Many services that are provided (roads, parks & recreation facilities) are not restricted to one specific area and are often used by all residents. For example, arenas located in different parts of the Municipality will be used by residents from all areas depending on the programing of the facility (i.e., a public skate is available each night, but at a different arena; hence usage of any one facility at any given time is based on programming availability). For the reasons noted above, it is recommended that Council calculate the charges on a uniform Municipal-wide basis for all services/classes of services other than wastewater, which is recommended to be imposed on an urban area basis. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 6.5 Other Recommendations It is recommended that Council: "Whenever appropriate, request that grants, subsidies and other contributions be clearly designated by the donor as being to the benefit of existing development or new development, as applicable;" "Adopt the assumptions contained herein as an 'anticipation' with respect to capital grants, subsidies, and other contributions;" "Classes of service be established for growth studies and public works (facilities, vehicles, and equipment);" "Adopt the D.C. approach to calculate the services on a uniform Municipal-wide basis (except for wastewater services);" "Adopt the D.C. approach to calculate the wastewater charges on an area- specific basis;" "Approve the capital project listing set out in Chapter 4 of the D.C.s Background Study dated May 16, 2022, subject to further annual review during the capital budget process;" "Approve the D.C. Background Study dated May 16, 2022, as amended (if applicable);" "Determine that no further public meeting is required;" and "Approve the D.C. by-law as set out in Appendix G." Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Chapter 7 By-law Implementation Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 7. By-law Implementation 7.1 Public Consultation Process 7.1.1 Introduction This chapter addresses the mandatory, formal public consultation process (section 7.1.2), as well as the optional, informal consultation process (section 7.1.3). The latter is designed to seek the co-operation and participation of those involved, in order to produce the most suitable policy. Section 7.1.4 addresses the anticipated impact of the D.C. on development from a generic viewpoint. 7.1.2 Public Meeting of Council Section 12 of the D.C.A. indicates that before passing a D.C. by-law, Council must hold at least one public meeting, giving at least 20 clear days' notice thereof, in accordance with the Regulation. Council must also ensure that the proposed by-law and background report are made available to the public at least two weeks prior to the (first) meeting. Any person who attends such a meeting may make representations related to the proposed by-law. If a proposed by-law is changed following such a meeting, Council must determine whether a further meeting (under this section) is necessary (i.e., if the proposed by-law which is proposed for adoption has been changed in any respect, Council should formally consider whether an additional public meeting is required, incorporating this determination as part of the final by-law or associated resolution. It is noted that Council's decision, once made, is final and not subject to review by a Court or the Ontario Land Tribunal (O.L.T.) (formerly the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (L.P.A.T.)). 7.1.3 Other Consultation Activity There are three broad groupings of the public who are generally the most concerned with municipal D.C. policy: 1. The first grouping is the residential development community, consisting of land developers and builders, who are typically responsible for generating the majority of the D.C. revenues. Others, such as realtors, are directly impacted by D.C. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx policy. They are, therefore, potentially interested in all aspects of the charge, particularly the quantum by unit type, projects to be funded by the D.C. and the timing thereof, and municipal policy with respect to development agreements, D.C. credits and front-ending requirements. 2. The second public grouping embraces the public at large and includes taxpayer coalition groups and others interested in public policy. 3. The third grouping is the industrial/commercial/institutional development sector, consisting of land developers and major owners or organizations with significant construction plans, such as hotels, entertainment complexes, shopping centres, offices, industrial buildings, and institutions. Also involved are organizations such as Industry Associations, the Chamber of Commerce, the Board of Trade, and the Economic Development Agencies, who are all potentially interested in municipal D.C. policy. Their primary concern is frequently with the quantum of the charge, G.F.A. exclusions such as basements, mechanical or indoor parking areas, or exemptions and phase-in or capping provisions in order to moderate the impact. 7.2 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development The establishment of sound D.C. policy often requires the achievement of an acceptable balance between two competing realities. The first is that high non- residential D.C.s can, to some degree, represent a barrier to increased economic activity and sustained industrial/commercial growth, particularly for capital intensive uses. Also, in many cases, increased residential D.C.s can ultimately be expected to be recovered via housing prices and can impact project feasibility in some cases (e.g., rental apartments). On the other hand, D.C.s or other municipal capital funding sources need to be obtained in order to help ensure that the necessary infrastructure and amenities are installed. The timely installation of such works is a key initiative in providing adequate service levels and in facilitating strong economic growth, investment, and wealth generation. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 7.3 Implementation Requirements 7.3.1 Introduction Once the Municipality has calculated the charge, prepared the complete background study, conducted the public process, and passed a new by-law, the emphasis shifts to implementation matters. These include notices, potential appeals and complaints, credits, front-ending agreements, subdivision agreement conditions and finally the collection of revenues and funding of projects. The sections that follow present an overview of the requirements in each case. 7.3.2 Notice of Passage In accordance with s. 13 of the D.C.A., when a D.C. by-law is passed, the Municipal Clerk shall give written notice of the passing and of the last day for appealing the by-law (the day that is 40 days after the day it was passed). Such notice must be given no later than 20 days after the day the by-law is passed (i.e., as of the day of newspaper publication or the mailing of the notice). Section 10 of O. Reg. 82/98 further defines the notice requirements which are summarized as follows: - notice may be given by publication in a newspaper which is (in the Clerk's opinion) of sufficient circulation to give the public reasonable notice, or by personal service, fax, or mail to every owner of land in the area to which the by- law relates; - subsection 10 (4) lists the persons/organizations who must be given notice; and - subsection 10 (5) lists the eight items that the notice must cover. 7.3.3 By-law Pamphlet In addition to the "notice" information, the Municipality must prepare a "pamphlet" explaining each D.C. by-law in force, setting out: - a description of the general purpose of the D.C.s; - the "rules" for determining if a charge is payable in a particular case and for determining the amount of the charge; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx - the services to which the D.C.s relate; and - a description of the general purpose of the Treasurer's statement and where it may be received by the public. Where a by-law is not appealed to the O.L.T., the pamphlet must be readied within 60 days after the by-law comes into force. Later dates apply to appealed by-laws. The Municipality must give one copy of the most recent pamphlet without charge, to any person who requests one. 7.3.4 Appeals Sections 13 to 19 of the D.C.A. set out the requirements relative to making and processing a D.C. by-law appeal and O.L.T. hearing in response to an appeal. Any person or organization may appeal a D.C. by-law to the O.L.T. by filing a notice of appeal with the Municipal Clerk, setting out the objection to the by-law and the reasons supporting the objection. This must be done by the last day for appealing the by-law, which is 40 days after the by-law is passed. The Municipality is conducting a public consultation process in order to address the issues that come forward as part of that process, thereby avoiding or reducing the need for an appeal to be made. 7.3.5 Complaints A person required to pay a D.C., or his agent, may complain to the Municipal Council imposing the charge that: - the amount of the charge was incorrectly determined; - the reduction to be used against the D.C. was incorrectly determined; or - there was an error in the application of the D.C. Sections 20 to 25 of the D.C.A. set out the requirements that exist, including the fact that a complaint may not be made later than 90 days after a D.C. (or any part of it) is payable. A complainant may appeal the decision of Municipal Council to the O.L.T. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 7.3.6 Credits Sections 38 to 41 of the D.C.A. set out a number of credit requirements, which apply where a municipality agrees to allow a person to perform work in the future that relates to a service in the D.C. by-law. These credits would be used to reduce the amount of D.C.s to be paid. The value of the credit is limited to the reasonable cost of the work which does not exceed the average level of service. The credit applies only to the service to which the work relates unless the Municipality agrees to expand the credit to other services for which a D.C. is payable. 7.3.7 Front-Ending Agreements The Municipality and one or more landowners may enter into a front-ending agreement that provides for the costs of a project that will benefit an area in the Municipality to which the D.C. by-law applies. Such an agreement can provide for the costs to be borne by one or more parties to the agreement who are, in turn, reimbursed in future by persons who develop land defined in the agreement. Part III of the D.C.A. (sections 44 to 58) addresses front-ending agreements and removes some of the obstacles to their use which were contained in the Development Charges Act, 1989. Accordingly, the Municipality assesses whether this mechanism is appropriate for its use, as part of funding projects prior to Municipality funds being available. 7.3.8 Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions Section 59 of the D.C.A. prevents a municipality from imposing directly or indirectly, a charge related to development or a requirement to construct a service related to development, by way of a condition or agreement under s. 51 or s. 53 of the Planning Act, except for: - "local services, related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under section 51 of the Planning Act;" and - "local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under section 53 of the Planning Act." Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx It is also noted that s. 59 (4) of the D.C.A. requires that the municipal approval authority for a draft plan of subdivision under s. 51 (31) of the Planning Act, use its power to impose conditions to ensure that the first purchaser of newly subdivided land is informed of all the D.C.s related to the development, at the time the land is transferred. In this regard, if the municipality in question is a commenting agency, in order to comply with s. 59 (4) of the D.C.A. it would need to provide to the approval authority information regarding the applicable municipal D.C.s related to the site. If the Municipality is an approval authority for the purposes of s. 51 of the Planning Act, it would be responsible to ensure that it collects information from all entities that can impose a D.C. The most effective way to ensure that purchasers are aware of this condition would be to require it as a provision in a registered subdivision agreement, so that any purchaser of the property would be aware of the charges at the time the title was searched prior to closing a transaction conveying the lands. Appendices Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix A Background Information on Residential and Non- Residential Growth Forecast Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 1 Municipality of Leamington Residential Growth Forecast Summary Population Institutional Population Farm On-Site Bunk House Population Population Excluding Institutional and Bunk House Population Singles & Semi- Detached Multiple Dwellings2 Apartments3 Other Total Households Farm On-Site Bunk House Beds Equivalent Institutional Households 29,780 28,833 1,778 7,365 955 1,440 55 9,815 1,616 2.938 29,330 28,403 1,873 7,468 974 1,388 34 9,864 1,703 2.879 28,500 27,595 1,640 7,435 1,055 1,490 25 10,005 1,491 2.758 31,390 30,390 1,713 1,468 27,209 7,703 1,103 1,853 25 10,683 1,468 1,557 2.845 38,090 36,882 1,998 3,172 31,712 8,971 1,578 2,002 25 12,576 3,172 1,816 2.933 43,790 42,397 2,231 4,705 35,461 9,898 2,014 2,229 25 14,166 4,705 2,028 2.993 -450 -430 95 103 19 -52 -21 49 87 -830 -808 -233 -33 81 102 -9 141 -212 2,890 2,795 73 268 48 363 0 678 1,468 66 6,700 6,492 285 1,704 2,744 1,268 475 150 0 1,893 1,704 259 12,400 12,007 518 3,237 8,252 2,195 911 376 0 3,483 3,237 471 ¹ Census undercount estimated at approximately 3.3%. Note: Population including the undercount has been rounded. ² Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. ³ Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding Derived from County of Essex Official Plan (Approved April 28, 2014) forecast for the Municipality of Leamington and discussions with municipal staff, by Watson & Assoicates Economists Ltd., 2022 Excluding Census Undercount Mid 2016 - Early 2022 Population (Including Census Undercount)¹ Year Housing Units Person Per Unit (P.P.U.): Total Population/ Total Households Historical Early 2022 - Early 2042 Forecast Incremental Early 2022 - Early 2032 Early 2032 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 Mid 2016 Early 2022 Early 2042 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Figure A-1 Municipality of Leamington Annual Housing Forecast Source: Historical housing activity derived from Statistics Canada building permit data for the Municipality of Leamington , 2012-2021. 1 Growth forecast represents calendar year. 33 19 23 152 90 202 73 164 106 86 185 185 185 185 205 205 205 205 205 170 170 170 170 170 150 150 150 150 150 150 0 50 100 150 200 250 Housing Units Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 2 Municipality of Leamington Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed 2022 - 2032 1,141 475 150 1,766 4,993 -603 4,390 285 0 4,675 2022 - 2042 1,976 911 376 3,263 9,008 -982 8,026 518 0 8,544 2022 - 2032 127 0 0 127 426 -313 113 0 1,704 1,817 2022 - 2042 219 0 0 219 734 -509 225 0 3,237 3,462 2022 - 2032 1,268 475 150 1,893 5,419 -916 4,503 285 1,704 6,492 2022 - 2042 2,195 911 376 3,482 9,743 -1,491 8,252 518 3,237 12,006 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes accessory apartments, bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Forecast by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Water only Serviced Areas Municipality of Leamington Institutional Population Location Residential Units In New Units Population Change Water and Wastewater Serviced Areas Farm On-Site Bunk House Population Net Population Including Institutional and Bunk House Population Development Timing Single & Semi- Detached Multiples1 Apartments2 Total Gross Population Existing Unit Net Population Increase, Excluding Institutional and Bunk House Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 3 Municipality of Leamington Current Year Growth Forecast Mid-2016 to Early-2022 Mid 2016 Population 27,595 Occupants of Units (2) 678 New Housing Units, multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 2.326 Mid 2016 to Early 2022 gross population increase 1,577 1,577 Occupants of New Units 66 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 1.100 Mid 2016 to Early 2022 gross population increase 72 72 Occupants of New Units 1,468 Bunk House Dwellings multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 1.000 Mid 2016 to Early 2022 gross population increase 1,468 1,468 Decline in Housing Units (4) 10,005 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5) -0.032 Mid 2016 to Early 2022 total decline in population -322 -322 Population Estimate to Early 2022 30,390 Net Population Increase, Mid 2016 to Early 2022 2,795 (1) 2016 population based on Statistics Canada Census unadjusted for Census undercount. (2) (3) Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.357 40% 1.327 Multiples (6) 1.897 7% 0.133 Apartments (7) 1.621 53% 0.867 Total 100% 2.326 ¹ Based on 2016 Census custom database ² Based on Building permit/completion activity (4) 2016 households taken from Statistics Canada Census. (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. % Distribution of Estimated Units² Estimated residential units constructed, Mid-2016 to the beginning of the growth period assuming a six-month lag between construction and occupancy. Population Structural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) Weighted Persons Per Unit Average Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 4 Municipality of Leamington Ten-Year Growth Forecast Mid-2022 to Mid-2032 Early 2022 Population 30,390 Occupants of Units (2) 1,893 New Housing Units, multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 2.863 Early 2022 to Early 2032 gross population increase 5,419 5,419 Occupants of New Units 259 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 1.100 Early 2022 to Early 2032 gross population increase 285 285 Occupants of New Units 1,704 Bunk House Dwellings multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 1.000 Early 2022 to Early 2032 gross population increase 1,704 1,704 Decline in Housing Units (4) 10,683 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5) -0.086 Early 2022 to Early 2032 total decline in population -916 -916 Population Estimate to Early 2032 36,882 Net Population Increase, Early 2022 to Early 2032 6,492 (1) Early 2022 Population based on: (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.354 67% 2.246 Multiples (6) 1.954 25% 0.491 Apartments (7) 1.594 8% 0.126 one bedroom or less 1.316 two bedrooms or more 1.703 Total 100% 2.863 ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2016 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) Early 2022 households based upon 2016 Census (10,005 units) + Mid 2016 to Early 2022 unit estimate (678 units) = 10,683 units. (5) (6) Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. Structural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) % Distribution of Estimated Units² Weighted Persons Per Unit Average Population 2016 Population (27,595) + Mid 2016 to Early 2022 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (678 x 2.326 = 1,577) + (66 x 1.1 = 72) + (10,005 x -0.032 = -322) = 30,390 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 5 Municipality of Leamington Longer-Term Growth Forecast Mid-2022 to Mid-2042 Early 2022 Population 30,390 Occupants of Units (2) 3,483 New Housing Units, multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 2.797 Early 2022 to Early 2042 gross population increase 9,743 9,743 Occupants of New Units 471 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 1.100 Early 2022 to Early 2042 gross population increase 518 518 Occupants of New Units 3,237 Bunk House Dwellings multiplied by P.P.U. (3) 1.000 Early 2022 to Early 2042 gross population increase 3,237 3,237 Decline in Housing Units (4) 10,683 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by P.P.U. decline rate (5) -0.140 Early 2022 to Early 2042 total decline in population -1,491 -1,491 Population Estimate to Early 2042 42,397 Net Population Increase, Early 2022 to Early 2042 12,007 (1) Early 2022 Population based on: (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) is assumed to be: Singles & Semi Detached 3.354 63% 2.114 Multiples (6) 1.954 26% 0.511 Apartments (7) 1.594 11% 0.172 one bedroom or less 1.316 two bedrooms or more 1.703 Total 100% 2.797 ¹ Persons per unit based on Statistics Canada Custom 2016 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) Early 2022 households based upon 2016 Census (10,005 units) + Mid 2016 to Early 2022 unit estimate (678 units) = 10,683 units. (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom+ apartments. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Structural Type Persons Per Unit¹ (P.P.U.) % Distribution of Estimated Units² Weighted Persons Per Unit Average 2016 Population (27,595) + Mid 2016 to Early 2022 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (678 x 2.326 = 1,577) + (66 x 1.1 = 72) + (10,005 x -0.032 = -322) = 30,390 Population Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 6a Municipality of Leamington Summary of Vacant Land Supply Housing Potential as of January 2022 100 9 0 109 92% 8% 0% 100% 303 125 0 428 71% 29% 0% 100% 109 170 0 279 39% 61% 0% 100% 1,813 0% 0% 0% 100% Total 512 304 0 2,629 % Breakdown 63% 37% 0% 100% Source: Municipality of Leamington Development Services Department as of 01/2022. 1 Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Stage of Development Municipality of Leamington Full Services Density Type Singles & Semi- Detached Multiples1 Apartments2 Total Registered Not Built % Breakdown Draft Plans Approved % Breakdown % Breakdown Vacant lands designated for Residential % Breakdown Application Under Review Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 6b Municipality of Leamington Summary of Vacant Land Supply Housing Potential as of January 2022 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 1,540 0% 0% 0% 100% Total 0 0 0 1,540 % Breakdown 0% 0% 0% 100% Source: Municipality of Leamington Development Services Department as of 01/2022. 1 Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. % Breakdown Vacant lands designated for Residential % Breakdown Municipality of Leamington Partial Services Stage of Development Density Type Singles & Semi- Detached Multiples1 Apartments2 Total Registered Not Built % Breakdown Draft Plans Approved % Breakdown Application Under Review Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-10 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 6c Municipality of Leamington Summary of Vacant Land Supply Housing Potential as of January 2022 100 9 0 109 92% 8% 0% 100% 303 125 0 428 71% 29% 0% 100% 109 170 0 279 39% 61% 0% 100% 0 0 0 3,353 0% 0% 0% 100% Total 512 304 0 4,169 % Breakdown 63% 37% 0% 100% Source: Municipality of Leamington Development Services Department as of 01/2022. 1 Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. % Breakdown Vacant lands designated for Residential % Breakdown Registered Not Built % Breakdown Draft Plans Approved % Breakdown Application Under Review Municipality of Leamington Total Stage of Development Density Type Singles & Semi- Detached Multiples1 Apartments2 Total Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-11 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 7 Municipality of Leamington Historical Residential Building Permits Years 2012 to 2021 Residential Building Permits Total 2012 24 3 6 33 2013 15 0 4 19 2014 21 0 2 23 2015 30 9 113 152 2016 39 21 30 90 Sub-total 129 33 155 317 Average (2012 - 2016) 26 7 31 63 % Breakdown 40.7% 10.4% 48.9% 100.0% 2017 53 10 139 202 2018 52 4 17 73 2019 56 4 104 164 2020 56 7 43 106 2021 24 3 59 86 Sub-total 241 28 362 631 Average (2017 - 2021) 48 6 72 126 % Breakdown 38.2% 4.4% 57.4% 100.0% 2012 - 2021 Total 370 61 517 948 Average 37 6 52 95 % Breakdown 39.0% 6.4% 54.5% 100.0% 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Singles & Semi Detached Multiples1 Apartments2 Year Source: Historical housing activity derived from Statistics Canada building permit data for the Municipality of Leamington , 2012-2021. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-12 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 8a Municipality of Leamington Person Per Unit by Age and Type of Dwelling (2016 Census) Age of Singles and Semi-Detached Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 20 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 - - - 3.565 - 3.357 6-10 - - - 3.188 - 3.553 (0.024) 11-15 - - - 3.291 3.615 3.313 3.354 16-20 - - - 3.253 - 3.222 3.354 20-25 - - - 2.804 - 2.850 3.354 25-35 - - - 3.008 - 2.978 35+ - 1.176 2.019 2.838 4.673 2.710 3.354 Total - 1.300 2.048 2.939 4.309 2.855 Age of All Density Types Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 1-5 - - - 3.407 - 3.313 6-10 - - - 3.217 - 3.221 11-15 - - 1.750 3.009 3.917 2.878 16-20 - - 1.853 3.050 - 2.770 20-25 - - 1.618 2.780 - 2.529 25-35 - 1.290 2.139 2.953 - 2.599 35+ - 1.295 1.949 2.841 4.714 2.504 Total - 1.317 1.920 2.905 4.543 2.601 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 3 Adjusted based on 2001-2016 historical trends. Note: Does not include Statistics Canada data classified as 'Other' P.P.U. Not calculated for samples less than or equal to 50 dwelling units, and does not include institutional population. 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-13 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 8b Essex County Person Per Unit by Age and Type of Dwelling (2016 Census) Age of Multiples1 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 20 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 - - 1.612 2.465 - 1.897 6-10 - 1.545 1.903 2.394 - 2.090 11-15 - - 1.626 2.293 - 1.949 1.954 16-20 - - 1.770 2.757 - 2.389 1.954 20-25 - - 1.884 3.036 - 2.458 1.954 25-35 - 1.000 2.045 3.124 - 2.641 35+ - 1.251 1.887 2.830 4.053 2.297 Total 0.857 1.252 1.835 2.778 4.321 2.278 Age of Apartments2 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 20 Year Average Adjusted 1-5 - 1.133 2.333 - - 1.621 6-10 - 1.421 1.784 2.083 - 1.676 11-15 - 1.395 1.534 2.083 - 1.536 1.594 16-20 - 1.506 1.764 2.400 - 1.707 1.594 20-25 - 1.288 1.732 2.667 - 1.614 1.594 25-35 0.826 1.201 1.763 3.229 - 1.529 35+ 1.101 1.193 1.878 2.645 - 1.494 Total 1.052 1.212 1.816 2.653 2.300 1.523 Age of All Density Types Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total 1-5 - 1.267 1.820 3.201 4.675 3.014 6-10 - 1.474 1.862 3.217 4.524 3.017 11-15 - 1.377 1.709 3.200 4.327 2.973 16-20 - 1.515 1.803 3.082 4.109 2.891 20-25 - 1.303 1.881 2.973 3.752 2.731 25-35 1.091 1.211 1.905 2.921 3.643 2.525 35+ 1.176 1.221 1.819 2.579 3.600 2.233 Total 1.217 1.239 1.820 2.785 3.965 2.458 2 Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 3 Adjusted based on 2001-2016 historical trends. Note: Does not include Statistics Canada data classified as 'Other' P.P.U. Not calculated for samples less than or equal to 50 dwelling units, and does not include institutional population. 1 Includes townhouses and apartments in duplexes. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-14 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 9 Municipality of Leamington Person Per Unit Structural Type and Age of Dwelling (2016 Census) 3.36 3.55 3.31 3.22 2.85 2.98 2.71 1.90 2.09 1.95 2.39 2.46 2.64 2.30 1.62 1.68 1.54 1.71 1.61 1.53 1.49 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 20-25 25-35 35+ Persons Per Dwelling Age of Dwelling Singles and Semi-Detached Multiples Apartments Multiple and Apartment P.P.U.s are based on Essex County. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-15 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 10a Municipality of Leamington Employment Forecast, 2022 to 2042 Employment Mid 2006 28,833 0.071 0.055 0.102 0.130 0.073 0.431 0.034 0.466 2,060 1,595 2,945 3,740 2,100 12,440 982 13,422 10,845 Mid 2011 28,403 0.072 0.019 0.102 0.139 0.073 0.404 0.042 0.447 2,050 535 2,885 3,945 2,070 11,485 1,199 12,684 10,950 Mid 2016 27,595 0.065 0.027 0.105 0.133 0.077 0.407 0.042 0.449 1,780 750 2,910 3,675 2,115 11,230 1,155 12,385 10,480 Early 2022 28,922 0.164 0.028 0.102 0.131 0.083 0.509 0.042 0.551 4,753 810 2,955 3,793 2,408 14,719 1,215 15,934 13,909 Early 2032 33,710 0.243 0.035 0.103 0.133 0.087 0.602 0.043 0.645 8,203 1,180 3,486 4,497 2,933 20,299 1,433 21,732 19,119 Early 2042 37,692 0.300 0.040 0.101 0.133 0.090 0.665 0.044 0.708 11,307 1,508 3,822 5,028 3,392 25,057 1,643 26,700 23,549 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 -430 0.001 -0.036 -0.001 0.009 0.000 -0.027 0.008 -0.019 -10 -1,060 -60 205 -30 -955 217 -738 105 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 -808 -0.0077 0.0083 0.0039 -0.0057 0.0038 0.0026 -0.0003 0.0023 -270 215 25 -270 45 -255 -44 -299 -470 Mid 2016 - Early 2022 1,327 0.0998 0.0008 -0.0033 -0.0020 0.0066 0.1020 0.0001 0.1021 2,973 60 45 118 293 3,489 60 3,549 3,429 Early 2022 - Early 2032 4,788 0.0790 0.0070 0.0012 0.0023 0.0037 0.0932 0.0005 0.0937 3,450 370 531 704 525 5,580 218 5,798 5,210 Early 2022 - Early 2042 8,770 0.1356 0.0120 -0.0008 0.0023 0.0067 0.1559 0.0016 0.1575 6,554 698 867 1,235 984 10,338 428 10,766 9,640 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 -86 0.0001 -0.0073 -0.0001 0.0018 0.0000 -0.0054 0.0016 -0.0038 -2 -212 -12 41 -6 -191 43 -148 21 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 -162 -0.0015 0.0017 0.0008 -0.0011 0.0008 0.0005 -0.0001 0.0005 -54 43 5 -54 9 -51 -9 -60 -94 Mid 2016 - Early 2022 241 0.0182 0.0001 -0.0006 -0.0004 0.0012 0.0185 0.0000 0.0186 595 12 9 24 59 698 12 710 686 Early 2022 - Early 2032 479 0.0079 0.0007 0.0001 0.0002 0.0004 0.0093 0.0001 0.0094 345 37 53 70 53 558 22 580 521 Early 2022 - Early 2042 439 0.0068 0.0006 0.0000 0.0001 0.0003 0.0078 0.0001 0.0079 328 35 43 62 49 517 21 538 482 Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. ¹ Statistics Canada defines no fixed place of work (N.F.P.O.W.) employees as "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift". Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc. Total (Excluding Work at Home and N.F.P.O.W.) Incremental Change Annual Average Total Including NFPOW N.F.P.O.W.1 Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Population Related Total Employment (Including N.F.P.O.W.) Institutional N.F.P.O.W.1 Activity Rate Period Population (Excluding Bunk House Population) Primary Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Population Related Institutional Total Employment Primary Total Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-16 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 10b Municipality of Leamington Employment and Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.) Forecast, 2022 to 2042 Mid 2006 28,833 2,060 2,945 3,740 2,100 10,845 41,200,000 3,534,000 2,057,000 1,544,600 7,135,600 Mid 2011 28,403 2,050 2,885 3,945 2,070 10,950 41,000,000 3,462,000 2,169,800 1,522,500 7,154,300 Mid 2016 27,595 1,780 2,910 3,675 2,115 10,480 35,600,000 3,492,000 2,021,300 1,555,600 7,068,900 Early 2022 28,922 4,753 2,955 3,793 2,357 13,858 Early 2032 33,710 8,203 3,486 4,497 2,674 18,860 Early 2042 37,692 11,307 3,822 5,028 2,921 23,078 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 -430 -10 -60 205 -30 105 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 -808 -270 25 -270 45 -470 Mid 2016 - Early 2022 1,327 2,973 45 118 242 3,378 Early 2022 - Early 2032 4,788 3,450 531 704 317 5,002 69,000,000 637,200 387,200 220,300 70,244,700 Early 2022 - Early 2042 8,770 6,554 867 1,235 564 9,220 131,080,000 1,040,400 679,200 392,000 133,191,600 Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 -86 -2 -12 41 -6 21 Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 -162 -54 5 -54 9 -94 Mid 2016 - Early 2022 241 541 8 21 44 614 Early 2022 - Early 2032 479 345 53 70 32 500 6,900,000 63,720 38,720 22,030 7,024,470 Early 2022 - Early 2042 439 328 43 62 28 461 6,554,000 52,020 33,960 19,600 6,659,580 Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. 1 Square Foot Per Employee Assumptions Primary - Non-Bona Fide Farming 20,000 Industrial 1,200 Commercial/ Population Related 550 Institutional 695 2 Primary industry includes cannabis growing operation related employment. 3 Forecast institutional employment and gross floor area has been adjusted downward to account for employment associated with special care units. 4 Non-bona fide farming is defined as cannabis growing operation related employment for G.F.A. purposes in Schedules 10b and 10c. Note: Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding. Period Population Employment Gross Floor Area in Square Feet (Estimated)¹ Primary2 Annual Average Primary - Non- Bona Fide Farming4 Industrial Commercial/ Population Related Institutional Total Incremental Change Industrial Commercial/ Population Related Institutional3 Total Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-17 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 10c Municipality of Leamington Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Non-Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed 2022 - 2032 - 637,200 387,100 221,500 1,245,800 1,552 2022 - 2042 - 832,800 543,300 353,100 1,729,200 2,190 2022 - 2032 69,000,000 - - - 69,000,000 3,450 2022 - 2042 131,080,000 207,600 135,900 38,900 131,462,400 7,030 2022 - 2032 69,000,000 637,200 387,200 220,300 70,244,700 5,002 2022 - 2042 131,080,000 1,040,400 679,200 392,000 133,191,600 9,220 1 Square feet per employee assumptions: Primary - Non-Bona Fide Farming 20,000 Industrial 1,200 Commercial 550 Institutional 695 2 Non-bona fide farming is defined as cannabis growing operation related employment for G.F.A. purposes in Schedules 10b and 10c. 3 Forecast institutional employment and gross floor area has been adjusted downward to account for employment associated with special care units. 4 Employment Increase does not include No Fixed Place of Work. Development Location Timing Primary - Non- Bona Fide Farming G.F.A. S.F. 1 2 Industrial G.F.A. S.F.1 Commercial G.F.A. S.F.1 Employment Increase4 Water and Wastewater Serviced Areas Institutional G.F.A. S.F.1 3 Total Non- Residential G.F.A. S.F. Water only Serviced Areas Municipality of Leamington Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2022. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-18 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 11 Municipality of Leamington Non-Residential Construction Value Years 2007 to 2016 (000's 2018 $) New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total 2007 15,517 5,506 18,624 39,647 4,685 2,102 4,074 10,861 114 508 2,910 3,532 20,316 8,115 25,608 54,040 2008 2,660 827 798 4,284 2,866 1,402 1,033 5,301 11 720 0 732 5,537 2,949 1,831 10,317 2009 44,445 470 1,752 46,667 5,748 2,946 1,017 9,711 2,262 994 1,487 4,744 52,456 4,410 4,256 61,122 2010 5,441 1,753 875 8,069 161 2,265 0 2,425 10,513 424 3,791 14,728 16,115 4,441 4,666 25,222 2012 8,347 1,763 9,428 19,538 337 2,637 2,573 5,547 0 1,088 2,005 3,093 8,683 5,489 14,006 28,178 2013 7,534 3,297 10,152 20,983 1,436 3,016 421 4,873 17 3,391 284 3,691 8,987 9,704 10,857 29,548 2014 6,107 1,886 25,692 33,686 34 2,636 0 2,670 636 472 0 1,107 6,777 4,994 25,692 37,463 2015 12,981 917 8,807 22,705 2,075 3,705 549 6,329 10,600 1,361 0 11,961 25,656 5,983 9,356 40,995 2016 31,484 1,108 22,469 55,061 1,656 4,083 697 6,437 28,314 148 410 28,872 61,455 5,339 23,576 90,370 Subtotal 166,029 24,304 110,739 301,071 22,132 25,939 10,363 58,434 53,696 9,433 10,886 74,015 241,856 59,676 131,988 433,520 Percent of Total 55% 8% 37% 100% 38% 44% 18% 100% 73% 13% 15% 100% 56% 14% 30% 100% Average 16,603 2,430 11,074 30,107 2,213 2,594 1,480 5,843 5,966 943 1,814 7,402 24,186 5,968 13,199 43,352 2007 - 2011 Period Total 149,098 32,579 25,291 206,968 2007 - 2011 Average 29,820 6,516 5,058 41,394 % Breakdown 72.0% 15.7% 12.2% 100.0% 2012 - 2016 Period Total 151,973 25,855 48,724 226,552 2012 - 2016 Average 30,395 5,171 9,745 45,310 % Breakdown 67.1% 11.4% 21.5% 100.0% 2007 - 2016 Period Total 301,071 58,434 74,015 433,520 2007 - 2016 Average 30,107 5,843 7,402 43,352 % Breakdown 69.4% 13.5% 17.1% 100.0% Source: Statistics Canada Publication, 64-001-XIB Note: Inflated to year-end 2017 (January, 2018) dollars using Reed Construction Cost Index YEAR Industrial Commercial Institutional Total Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-19 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule 12 Municipality of Leamington Employment to Population Ratio by Major Employment Sector, 2006 to 2016 2006 2011 2016 06-11 11-16 Primary Industry Employment 11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 3,010 2,190 2,000 -820 -190 21 Mining and oil and gas extraction 0 45 20 45 -25 Sub-total 3,010 2,235 2,020 -775 -215 Industrial and Other Employment 22 Utilities 10 25 15 15 -10 23 Construction 315 435 345 120 -90 31-33 Manufacturing 1,805 1,395 1,510 -410 115 41 Wholesale trade 410 525 615 115 90 48-49 Transportation and warehousing 535 570 465 35 -105 56 Administrative and support 120 70 120 -50 50 Sub-total 3,195 3,020 3,070 -175 50 Population Related Employment 44-45 Retail trade 1,405 1,600 1,525 195 -75 51 Information and cultural industries 50 60 65 10 5 52 Finance and insurance 390 270 290 -120 20 53 Real estate and rental and leasing 155 195 150 40 -45 54 Professional, scientific and technical services 235 320 375 85 55 55 Management of companies and enterprises 0 0 0 0 0 56 Administrative and support 120 70 120 -50 50 71 Arts, entertainment and recreation 140 135 150 -5 15 72 Accommodation and food services 1,035 755 855 -280 100 81 Other services (except public administration) 525 700 430 175 -270 Sub-total 4,055 4,105 3,960 50 -145 Institutional 61 Educational services 575 500 560 -75 60 62 Health care and social assistance 1,320 1,320 1,370 0 50 91 Public administration 285 305 250 20 -55 Sub-total 2,180 2,125 2,180 -55 55 Total Employment 12,440 11,485 11,230 -955 -255 Population 28,833 28,403 27,595 -430 -808 Employment to Population Ratio Industrial and Other Employment 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 Population Related Employment 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 Institutional Employment 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.00 Primary Industry Employment 0.10 0.08 0.07 -0.03 -0.01 Total 0.43 0.40 0.41 -0.03 0.00 Source: Statistics Canada Employment by Place of Work Note: 2006-2016 employment figures are classified by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code NAICS Year Categories which relate primarily to industrial land supply and demand Categories which relate primarily to population growth within the municipality Employment by industry Comments Change Categories which relate to local land-based resources Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix B Level of Service Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix B: Level of Service Cost (per capita) Services Related to a Highway - Roads $10,747.60 0.0028 km of roadways $3,838,429 per km $129,035,686 Services Related to a Highway - Sidewalks and Active Transportation $577.60 2.5899 Linear metres of sidewalks $223 per km $6,934,666 Services Related to a Highway - Traffic Signals & Streetlights $679.60 0.0776 No. of Traffic Signals $8,758 per signal $8,159,278 Public Works - Facilities $141.79 0.8750 square feet. of building area $162 per sq.ft. $1,702,331 Public Works - Vehicles & Equipment $148.02 0.0016 No. of vehicles and equipment $92,513 per vehicle $1,777,128 Fire Protection Services - Facilities $90.62 0.2354 sq.ft. of building area $385 per sq.ft. $1,087,984 Fire Protection Services - Vehicles & Equipment $196.48 0.0004 No. of vehicles $491,200 per vehicle $2,358,939 Fire Protection Services - Small Equipment and Gear $9.11 0.0011 No. of equipment and gear $8,282 per item $109,375 Policing Services - Facilities $270.31 0.7021 sq.ft. of building area $385 per sq.ft. $3,245,342 Policing Services - Small Equipment and Gear $20.67 0.0022 No. of equipment and gear $9,395 per item $248,164 Parks and Recreation Services - Parkland Development $529.20 0.0054 Acres of Parkland $98,000 per acre $3,435,566 Parks and Recreation Services - Outdoor Recreation and Park Amenities $700.56 0.0608 No. of parkland amenities $11,522 per item $4,548,036 Parks and Recreation Services - Trails $68.43 0.5297 Linear Metres of Paths and Trails $129 per linear metre $444,248 Parks & Recreation Services - Vehicles and Equipment $33.62 0.0009 No. of vehicles and equipment $37,356 per item $218,261 Parks and Recreation Services - Recreation Facilities $2,153.06 6.9050 sq.ft. of building area $312 per sq.ft. $13,977,666 Library Services Library Services - Facilities $95.49 0.2705 sq.ft. of building area $353 per sq.ft. $619,921 SUMMARY OF SERVICE STANDARDS AS PER DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ACT, 1997, AS AMENDED Service/Clas of Service Category Sub-Component 10 Year Average Service Standard Maximum Ceiling LOS Quantity (per capita) Quality (per capita) Service Related to a Highway Parks & Recreation Services Public Works Fire Protection Services Policing Services Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Services Related to a Highway - Roads Unit Measure: km of roadways Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/km) Arterial Talbot Street 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 $4,195,000 Oak Street 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56 $4,195,000 Seacliff Drive 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 5.46 $4,195,000 Erie Street 11.35 11.35 11.35 11.35 11.35 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 $4,195,000 Sherk Street 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 2.81 $4,195,000 Collector Erie Street 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 $4,016,000 Carter Ave 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 $3,660,000 Robson Road 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 $3,660,000 Monarch Lane 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 $3,660,000 Cherry Lane 1.58 1.58 1.58 1.58 1.58 1.58 1.58 1.58 1.58 1.58 $3,660,000 Ellison Avenue 3.48 3.48 3.48 3.48 3.48 3.48 3.48 3.48 3.48 3.48 $3,660,000 Pulford Avenue 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77 $3,660,000 Danforth Avenue 3.22 3.22 3.22 3.22 3.22 3.22 3.22 3.22 3.22 3.22 $3,660,000 Plumbrook Drive 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 $3,660,000 Eastern Street 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 $3,660,000 Bennie Avenue 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 $3,660,000 Sherman Street 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 $3,660,000 Alderton Street 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.78 $3,660,000 Chestnut Street 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 $3,660,000 Fox Street 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 $3,660,000 Victoria Street 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 $3,660,000 Wigle Street 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 $3,660,000 Whitwam Avenue 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 $3,660,000 Lutsch Avenue 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 $3,660,000 Marlborough Street 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.88 2.88 $3,660,000 Orange Street 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 $3,660,000 Elliot Street 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 $3,660,000 John Street 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 $3,660,000 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Services Related to a Highway - Roads Unit Measure: km of roadways Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/km) Clark Street 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.59 $3,660,000 Ivan Street 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 $3,660,000 Wilkinson Drive 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 $3,660,000 Sturgeon Meadows 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 $3,660,000 Clarence Avenue 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.78 0.78 $3,660,000 Peter Avenue 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 $3,660,000 Carolina Woods 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 $3,660,000 Augusta Drive - - - - - 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 $3,660,000 Total 78.17 78.17 78.17 78.17 78.17 79.12 79.12 79.12 79.53 79.53 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028 0.0027 0.0027 0.0026 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0028 Quality Standard $3,838,429 Service Standard $10,748 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $10,748 Eligible Amount $129,035,686 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Services Related to a Highway - Sidewalks and Active Transportation Unit Measure: Linear metres of sidewalks Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/Linear Metre) Sidewalks 73,299 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 $223 Total 73,299 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 73,767 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 2.60 2.63 2.65 2.68 2.67 2.63 2.57 2.53 2.48 2.44 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 2.5899 Quality Standard $223 Service Standard $578 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $578 Eligible Amount $6,934,666 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Services Related to a Highway - Traffic Signals & Streetlights Unit Measure: No. of Traffic Signals Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/item) Streetlights 2,059 2,080 2,080 2,080 2,256 2,263 2,263 2,263 2,269 2,269 $6,800 Traffic Signals - Full 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 $235,800 Traffic Signals - Mid-Block Pedestrian 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $127,500 Pedestrian Crossing - PXO Flashing - - - - - - - 6 7 7 $56,200 Total 2,078 2,099 2,099 2,099 2,276 2,283 2,283 2,290 2,297 2,297 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0737 0.0749 0.0755 0.0761 0.0825 0.0814 0.0796 0.0787 0.0774 0.0761 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0776 Quality Standard $8,758 Service Standard $680 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $680 Eligible Amount $8,159,278 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Class of Service: Public Works - Facilities Unit Measure: square feet. of building area Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Bld'g Value ($/sq.ft.) Value/sq.ft. with land, site works, etc. Public Works Garage 7,910 7,910 7,910 7,910 7,910 7,910 7,910 7,910 7,910 7,910 $162 $190 Public Works Office 3,420 3,420 3,420 3,420 3,420 3,420 3,420 3,420 3,420 3,420 $236 $272 Back (Well) Building 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 $69 $88 Salt Shed 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 $66 $84 Gasoline Storage Building 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 $240 $276 Sign Storage Building 460 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $24 $38 Fleet Services - Hwy 77 - Maintenance Building 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 $142 $163 Fleet Services - Hwy 77 - Salt Shed 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 $83 $98 Total 24,420 24,960 24,960 24,960 24,960 24,960 24,960 24,960 24,960 24,960 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.8657 0.8909 0.8982 0.9052 0.9045 0.8903 0.8703 0.8574 0.8405 0.8268 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.8750 Quality Standard $162 Service Standard $142 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $142 Eligible Amount $1,702,331 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Class of Service: Public Works - Vehicles & Equipment Unit Measure: No. of vehicles and equipment Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/Vehicle) 2020 Johnston VT652 Vacuum Sweeper #39 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $409,000 2012 International 7400 Tandem 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $224,000 00 Red Intl Tandum Dump/Salter - - - - - - - - - - $261,000 2012 John Deere 544K Loader 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $180,000 2019 International 7500 with Dump Body (#36) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $273,000 2014 John Deere Grader model 770G 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $409,000 2017 Freightliner 108 SD diesel cab and chassis 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $310,000 2017 Ford Haul-All Solid Waste 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $176,000 2018 Freightliner Dump/Plow/Salter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $265,000 2019 Freightliner 108SD diesel cab and chassis #37 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $267,000 2005 444J John Deere Loader 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $135,000 Caterpillar 416F2ST Backhoe Loader 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $133,800 00 Red GMC 3500HD Dump Truck - - - - - - - - - - $99,000 2001 White Intl 3 Ton Truck 1 1 - - - - - - - - $94,000 UTILITY FARM TRACTOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $76,000 2012 Red Ford F550 Dump Truck 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $70,000 2017 Ford F550 4x2 Chas Sign Truck 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $129,700 2018 Ford Super Duty F-5 Cab & Chassis with Dump/Plow 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $131,000 Wood Chipper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $57,600 Leaf Vacuum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $53,300 Utility Tractor - John Deere 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $51,000 Utility Tractor - John Deere 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $40,900 Dump Box/Salter 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - $45,000 2017 Dodge Ram Pickup SXT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $36,000 Leaf Vacuum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $49,400 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4WD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $40,000 2005 Chevrolet 1500 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $41,100 ASPHALT SPREADER 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $36,800 2000 Ford F-150 - Pickup - - - - - - - - - - $45,000 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4WD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $40,000 Tiger Boom Flail 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $34,600 2011 Red GMC Sierra - Pickup 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $33,000 Stump Cutter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $37,000 Compaction Equipment - Bomag roller 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $33,500 Loader Wing 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $29,100 Loader Broom 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - $23,000 GPS Units 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $18,900 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Class of Service: Public Works - Vehicles & Equipment Unit Measure: No. of vehicles and equipment Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/Vehicle) MOWER - BUSH HOG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $18,200 90 IT18 Cat Loader Attacment: Tree Spade 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - $24,000 Retroreflectometer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $14,900 Line Painter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $13,100 Loader Plow 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - $15,000 Sidewalk Salters 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $13,300 ASPHALT SPREADER - - - - - - - - - - $13,000 Pothole Patcher 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $9,800 Spreader Control System 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $9,800 Trailer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $10,100 88 730A Champion Grader Attachment: Wing 1 1 - - - - - - - - $13,000 2015 RAM 1500ST Quad Cab 4x4 (#13) - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $35,600 2016 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 $40,600 2020 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 WT 4WD - - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 $39,300 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4WD - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 $41,500 Delta Power Tractor - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 $56,200 John Deere Z920 Riding Mower - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 $12,600 John Deere Tractor 3046R - - - - - - - 1 1 1 $51,000 John Deere Tractor 3046R - - - - - - - 1 1 1 $51,000 Woods TBW180 Turf Mower - - - - - - - 1 1 1 $23,800 2020 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 WT 4WD - - - - - - - - 1 1 $39,300 2020 Ford SuperDuty F-5 XL 2WD - - - - - - - - 1 1 $52,100 2017 Ford F-5 - CAB & CHASSIS WITH SALTER & PLOW - - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 $122,700 Total 44 44 42 43 42 44 45 48 50 50 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0016 0.0016 0.0015 0.0016 0.0015 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 0.0017 0.0017 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0016 Quality Standard $92,513 Service Standard $148 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $148 Eligible Amount $1,777,128 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-10 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Fire Protection Services - Facilities Unit Measure: sq.ft. of building area Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Bld'g Value ($/sq.ft.) Value/sq.ft. with land, site works, etc. 5 Clark Street West 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 $323 $385 Total 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.2375 0.2391 0.2411 0.2430 0.2428 0.2390 0.2336 0.2302 0.2256 0.2219 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.2354 Quality Standard $385 Service Standard $91 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $91 Eligible Amount $1,087,984 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-11 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Fire Protection Services - Vehicles & Equipment Unit Measure: No. of vehicles Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/Vehicle) Pumper / Rescues 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $512,900 Pumper / Snorkle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $961,700 Tanker / Pumper 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $735,500 Rescue / Command 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $839,800 Chief's /4 Wheel Drive S/U Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $59,700 Deputy Chief's 4 Wheel Drive Pickups 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $99,700 Rescue Boat / 23 Foot 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $77,900 95 Foot Aerial / Platform Pumper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $1,488,700 Fire Prevention Van 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $49,500 Total 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0004 Quality Standard $491,200 Service Standard $196 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $196 Eligible Amount $2,358,939 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-12 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Fire Protection Services - Small Equipment and Gear Unit Measure: No. of equipment and gear Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/item) Equipped Firefighters F/T 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $8,200 Equipped Firefighters P/T 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 $8,200 Full Time Fire Prevention Inspector 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 $4,300 Total 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 33 33 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0011 0.0011 0.0012 0.0012 0.0012 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0011 Quality Standard $8,282 Service Standard $9 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $9 Eligible Amount $109,375 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-13 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Policing Services - Facilities Unit Measure: sq.ft. of building area Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Bld'g Value ($/sq.ft.) Value/sq.ft. with land, site works, etc. Headquarters 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 $323 $385 Total 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 19,985 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.7085 0.7133 0.7192 0.7248 0.7242 0.7128 0.6969 0.6865 0.6730 0.6620 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.7021 Quality Standard 385 Service Standard $270 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $270 Eligible Amount $3,245,342 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-14 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Policing Services - Small Equipment and Gear Unit Measure: No. of equipment and gear Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/item) Equipped Officers* 38.94 38.94 38.94 38.94 38.94 38.94 38.94 38.94 38.94 38.94 $5,000 Patrol Mobile Radios 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 $10,400 Vehcile Equipment 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 $29,700 Total 61.94 61.94 61.94 61.94 61.94 61.94 61.94 61.94 61.94 61.94 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0021 0.0021 0.0021 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0022 Quality Standard $9,395 Service Standard $21 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 20 Year Forecast Population 12,006 $ per Capita $21 Eligible Amount $248,164 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-15 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Parks and Recreation Services - Parkland Development Unit Measure: Acres of Parkland Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/Acre) Community Park and Beach 42.71 42.71 42.71 42.71 42.71 42.71 42.71 42.71 42.71 42.71 $132,000 Neighbourhood Parks 27.76 27.76 27.76 27.76 27.76 27.76 27.76 27.76 27.76 27.76 $87,600 Sports Fields 82.28 82.28 82.28 82.28 82.28 82.28 82.28 82.28 82.28 82.28 $85,000 Total 152.75 152.75 152.75 152.75 152.75 152.75 152.75 152.75 152.75 152.75 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0054 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055 0.0054 0.0053 0.0052 0.0051 0.0051 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0054 Quality Standard $98,000 Service Standard $529 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 6,492 $ per Capita $529 Eligible Amount $3,435,566 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-16 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Parks and Recreation Services - Outdoor Recreation and Park Amenities Unit Measure: No. of parkland amenities Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/item) Carolina Woods 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 $4,000 Chestnut Park 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 $8,400 Donald Park 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $18,700 Downtown Core 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 $400 Eastside Park 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 $10,000 Garrison Memorial Gardens 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 $5,700 Henry Park 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 $5,600 Hyatt Park 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 $8,500 Kinsmen Ball Diamonds 243 243 243 243 243 243 243 243 243 243 $5,800 Leash Free Dog Park 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 $500 Legion Park 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 $6,400 Lloyd Wilkinson Park 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 $17,300 Marina Park 79 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 $11,500 Mersea Park 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 $1,900 Mill Street Park 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 $9,400 Pearl Park 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 $5,800 Rickway Park 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $2,400 Scout Memorial Park 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 $6,700 Seacliff Park 209 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 $27,400 Selkirk Park 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 $2,400 Soccer Field Complex 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 $134,600 Warren Park 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 $9,600 Water Front Promenade/Robson Rd Park 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 $33,400 Wilhelm Park 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 $10,500 William Simpson Memorial Park 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 $18,800 Amenities along Trails (e.g. Benches, Receptacles, etc.) 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 $2,000 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-17 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Parks and Recreation Services - Outdoor Recreation and Park Amenities Unit Measure: No. of parkland amenities Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/item) Marina slips (number of slips) 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 $11,900 Marina Jet-ski docks - - - 7 7 13 19 19 25 25 $2,300 Total 1,714 1,720 1,720 1,727 1,727 1,733 1,739 1,739 1,745 1,745 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0608 0.0614 0.0619 0.0626 0.0626 0.0618 0.0606 0.0597 0.0588 0.0578 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0608 Quality Standard $11,522 Service Standard $701 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 6,492 $ per Capita $701 Eligible Amount $4,548,036 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-18 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Parks and Recreation Services - Trails Unit Measure: Linear Metres of Paths and Trails Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/ Linear Metre) Robson Road to Seacliff Drive 536 536 536 536 536 536 536 536 536 536 $150 Pulford to Oak 851 851 851 851 851 851 851 851 851 851 $220 Seacliff to Pulford 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 $220 Erie to Sherk 376 376 376 376 376 376 376 376 376 376 $150 Ellison to Talbot 1,146 1,146 1,146 1,146 1,146 1,146 1,146 1,146 1,146 1,146 $240 Hazelton to Erie (Municipal Office adjacent) 361 361 361 361 361 361 361 361 361 361 $280 Talbot to Hazelton - 735 735 735 735 735 735 735 735 735 $160 Mersea Rd #3 Trail from 83 Wilkinson to County Rd 31 (TR-504 & 505) - - - 3,048 3,048 3,048 3,048 3,048 3,048 3,048 $120 Serenity Trail from Leamington Hospice to Trail 711 (TR-725) - - - 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 $170 Trans Can Trail from County Rd 18 to County Rd 8 (TR-431, 447, 477, 478, 495, 499, 500, and 502) - - - 10,918 10,918 10,918 10,918 10,918 10,918 10,918 $70 Wilkinson to Smith (TR-714) - - - - 436 436 436 436 436 436 $450 Asphalt Trail TR-720 (from TR-707 to TS-10) - - - - - - 270 270 270 270 $300 Total 3,790 4,525 4,525 19,291 19,727 19,727 19,997 19,997 19,997 19,997 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.1344 0.1615 0.1628 0.6996 0.7149 0.7036 0.6973 0.6869 0.6734 0.6624 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.5297 Quality Standard $129 Service Standard $68 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 6,492 $ per Capita $68 Eligible Amount $444,248 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-19 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Parks & Recreation Services - Vehicles and Equipment Unit Measure: No. of vehicles and equipment Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/Vehicle) 1/2 TON PICKUP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $25,600 Ice Resurfacer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $118,600 Ice Resurfacer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $116,800 Karcher Scrubber - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $14,300 Tennant Speedscrub Walkbehind SPNSTK - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $16,100 Scissor Lift 30-35' Electric - - - - - - - 1 1 1 $25,800 Scissor Lift 10-13' Electric - - - - - - - 1 1 1 $13,600 Golf cart #79 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $4,800 Golf cart (s/n 2794028) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $6,100 Golf cart with dump box 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $6,100 14' Rotary Mower - John Deere 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $16,600 Beach Surface Rake 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $49,500 Utility Tractor - John Deere #58, #61, #63 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 $51,300 Bannerman Turf Topper - Top Dresser 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $33,400 Utility Vehicle (Gator) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $10,900 Riding Mower - John Deere Z-Trak #68 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $12,700 Riding Mower - Z-Trak #57 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $18,500 Woods Tow Behind Gang Mower #82 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $23,900 Plug Aerator 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $4,500 Bannerman Disc Seeder #70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $4,500 Riding Mower #67 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $79,800 Bannerman Rake 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $8,500 03 Red GMC 4x4 Sierra 1500 - 1/2 Ton Pickup 1 1 1 - - - - - - - $8,500 2015 Ford F550 - CAB & CHASSIS WITH SALTER & PLOW (#33) (Previously 06 RED GMC) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $109,700 2012 International Terrastar - 1/2 ton (#23) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $77,600 2005 Red Chev 4x4 Ext. Cab - 1/2 Ton Pickup 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - $8,500 2008 Chevy Colorado Pickup truck - - - - - - - - 1 1 $30,000 Utility Tractor #59 - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 $56,700 John Deere TX 4x2 Gator #65 - - - - - - - - 1 1 $14,500 Utility Trailer #99 - - - - - - - 1 1 1 $8,400 Utility Trailer #188 - - - - - - - - 1 1 $3,200 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-20 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Parks & Recreation Services - Vehicles and Equipment Unit Measure: No. of vehicles and equipment Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Value ($/Vehicle) Trail Pro TP60 Groomer #104 - - - - - - - - 1 1 $22,100 Marina Pump-out - - - - - - - 1 1 1 $26,000 Marina Fuel Distribution System - - - - - - - - 1 1 $331,300 Total 22 22 23 23 22 22 23 29 34 34 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0010 0.0011 0.0011 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.0009 Quality Standard $37,356 Service Standard $34 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 6,492 $ per Capita $34 Eligible Amount $218,261 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-21 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Parks and Recreation Services - Recreation Facilities Unit Measure: sq.ft. of building area Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Bld'g Value ($/sq.ft.) Value/sq.ft. with land, site works, etc. Sports Complex / Arena 179,000 179,000 179,000 179,000 179,000 179,000 179,000 179,000 179,000 179,000 $283 $324 Picnic Shelter Pavilion (ID 8674) 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 $67 $74 Marina (ID 8670) 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 $283 $319 Soccer Facility - - - - - 10,149 10,149 10,149 10,149 10,149 $91 $100 Baseball Fieldhouse - - - - - - 6,270 6,270 6,270 6,270 $91 $100 Seacliff Beach Amphitheatre - - - - - - 3,120 3,120 3,120 3,120 $562 $620 Total 187,950 187,950 187,950 187,950 187,950 198,099 207,489 207,489 207,489 207,489 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 6.6628 6.7082 6.7635 6.8160 6.8110 7.0659 7.2349 7.1275 6.9871 6.8732 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 6.9050 Quality Standard $312 Service Standard $2,153 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 6,492 $ per Capita $2,153 Eligible Amount $13,977,666 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-22 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Municipality of Leamington Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Library Services - Facilities Unit Measure: sq.ft. of building area Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Bld'g Value ($/sq.ft.) Value/sq.ft. with land, site works, etc. Library Complete Building (ID 8711) 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 $283 $353 Total 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 Population 28,209 28,018 27,789 27,575 27,595 28,036 28,679 29,111 29,696 30,188 Per Capita Standard 0.2730 0.2748 0.2771 0.2792 0.2790 0.2746 0.2685 0.2645 0.2593 0.2551 10 Year Average 2012-2021 Quantity Standard 0.2705 Quality Standard $353 Service Standard $95 D.C. Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 6,492 $ per Capita $95 Eligible Amount $619,921 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix C Long-Term Capital and Operating Cost Examination Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix C: Long-Term Capital and Operating Cost Examination Municipality of Leamington Annual Capital and Operating Cost Impact As a requirement of the D.C.A. under s. 10 (2) (c), an analysis must be undertaken to assess the long-term capital and operating cost impacts for the capital infrastructure projects identified within the D.C. As part of this analysis, it was deemed necessary to isolate the incremental operating expenditures directly associated with these capital projects, factor in cost saving attributable to economies of scale or cost sharing where applicable and prorate the cost on a per unit basis (i.e., sq.ft. of building space, per vehicle, etc.). This was undertaken through a review of the Municipality's approved 2020 Financial Information Return (F.I.R.). In addition to the operational impacts, over time the initial capital projects will require replacement. This replacement of capital is often referred to as lifecycle cost. By definition, lifecycle costs are all the costs that are incurred during the life of a physical asset, from the time its acquisition is first considered, to the time it is taken out of service for disposal or redeployment. The method selected for lifecycle costing is the sinking fund method which provides that money will be contributed annually and invested, so that those funds will grow over time to equal the amount required for future replacement. Table C-1 provides for the factors were utilized to calculate the annual replacement cost of the capital projects (annual contribution = factor X capital asset cost) and are based on an annual growth rate of 2% (net of inflation) over the average useful life of the asset: Table C-1 Municipality of Leamington Lifecycle Cost Factors and Average Useful Lives Average Useful Life Factor Water and Wastewater Infrastructure 100 0.0032 Facilities 50 0.0118 Services Related to a Highway 50 0.0118 Parkland Development and Amenities 40 0.0166 Vehicles 15 0.0578 Small Equipment & Gear 10 0.0913 Lifecycle Cost Factors Asset Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table C-2 depicts the annual operating impact resulting from the proposed gross capital projects at the time they are all in place. It is important to note that, while Municipality program expenditures will increase with growth in population, the costs associated with the new infrastructure (i.e., facilities) would be delayed until the time these works are in place. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Table C-2 Municipality of Leamington Operating and Capital Expenditure Impacts for Future Capital Expenditures SERVICE/CLASS OF SERVICE GROSS COST LESS BENEFIT TO EXISTING ANNUAL LIFECYCLE EXPENDITURES ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES 1. Wastewater Services 1.1 Facilities 2,132,952 - 2,661,722 2,661,722 2. Water Services 2.1 Distribution System 63,272,856 1,609,489 6,176,504 7,785,993 3. Services Related to a Highway 3.1 Roads and Related Infrastructure 33,859,028 1,067,763 2,394,537 3,462,300 4. Public Works 4.1 Services Related to a Highway 1,348,000 52,448 95,332 147,780 5. Fire Protection Services 5.1 Fire facilities, vehicles & equipment 3,694,000 175,281 993,378 1,168,659 6. Policing Services 6.1 Facilities 510,000 16,230 2,473,643 2,489,873 7. Parks and Recreation Services 7.1 Parkland Development, Amenities, Trails, Recreation Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment 4,497,660 156,846 2,356,956 2,513,802 8. Growth Studies 8.1 Water Services 529,640 - - - 8.2 Wastewater Services 512,340 - - - 8.3 Services Related to a Highway 273,420 - - - 8.4 Policing Services 560 - - - 8.5 Fire Protection Services 78,460 - - - 8.6 Parks and Recreation Services 80,020 - - - Total 110,788,936 3,078,057 17,152,072 20,230,129 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix D Development Charge Reserve Fund Policy Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix D: Development Charge Reserve Fund Policy D.1 Legislative Requirements The Development Charges Act, 1997 (D.C.A.) requires development charge (D.C.) collections (and associated interest) to be placed in separate reserve funds. Sections 33 through 36 of the Act provide the following regarding reserve fund establishment and use: - A municipality shall establish a reserve fund for each service to which the D.C. by-law relates; s. 7 (1), however, allows services to be grouped into categories of services for reserve fund (and credit) purposes and for classes of services to be established. - The municipality shall pay each D.C. it collects into a reserve fund or funds to which the charge relates. - The money in a reserve fund shall be spent only for the "capital costs" determined through the legislated calculation process (as per s. 5 (1) 2 to 8). - Money may be borrowed from the fund but must be paid back with interest (O. Reg. 82/98, s. 11 (1) defines this as Bank of Canada rate either on the day the by-law comes into force or, if specified in the by-law, the first business day of each quarter). - D.C. reserve funds may not be consolidated with other municipal reserve funds for investment purposes and may only be as an interim financing source for capital undertakings for which D.C.s may be spent (s. 37). Annually, the Treasurer of the municipality is required to provide Council with a financial statement related to the D.C. by-law(s) and reserve funds. This statement must be made available to the public and may be requested to be forwarded to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. The D.C.A. does not prescribe how the statement is to be made available to the public. We would recommend that a resolution of Council make the statement available on the municipality's website or upon request. Subsection 43 (2) and O. Reg. 82/98 prescribes the information that must be included in the Treasurer's statement, as follows: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx - opening balance; - closing balance; - description of each service and/or service category for which the reserve fund was established (including a list of services within a service category); - transactions for the year (e.g. collections, draws) including each assets capital costs to be funded from the D.C. reserve fund and the manner for funding the capital costs not funded under the D.C. by-law (i.e. non-D.C. recoverable cost share and post-period D.C. recoverable cost share); - for projects financed by D.C.s, the amount spent on the project from the D.C. reserve fund and the amount and source of any other monies spent on the project. - amounts borrowed, purpose of the borrowing and interest accrued during previous year; - amount and source of money used by the municipality to repay municipal obligations to the D.C. reserve fund; - list of credits by service or service category (outstanding at beginning of the year, given in the year and outstanding at the end of the year by holder); - for credits granted under s. 14 of the previous D.C.A., a schedule identifying the value of credits recognized by the municipality, the service to which it applies and the source of funding used to finance the credit; and - a statement as to compliance with s. 59 (1) of the D.C.A., whereby the municipality shall not impose, directly or indirectly, a charge related to a development or a requirement to construct a service related to development, except as permitted by the D.C.A. or another Act. Based upon the above, Figure 1, and Attachments 1 and 2, set out the format for which annual reporting to Council should be provided. D.2 D.C. Reserve Fund Application Section 35 of the D.C.A. states that: "The money in a reserve fund established for a service may be spent only for capital costs determined under paragraphs 2 to 7 of subsection 5 (1)." Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx This provision clearly establishes that reserve funds collected for a specific service are only to be used for that service, or to be used as a source of interim financing of capital undertakings for which a D.C. may be spent Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Figure D-1 Municipality of Leamington Annual Treasurer's Statement of Development Charge Reserve Funds Services to which the Development Charge Relates Description Services Related to a Highway Public Works Fire Protection Services Policing Services Parks and Recreation Services Growth Studies Wastewater Services Water Services Opening Balance, January 1, ________ 0 Plus: Development Charge Collections 0 Accrued Interest 0 Repayment of Monies Borrowed from Fund and Associated Interest1 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less: Amount Transferred to Capital (or Other) Funds2 0 Amounts Refunded 0 Amounts Loaned to Other D.C. Service Category for Interim Financing 0 Credits3 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Closing Balance, December 31, ________ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Source of funds used to repay the D.C. reserve fund 2 See Attachment 1 for details 3 See Attachment 2 for details The Municipality is compliant with s.s. 59.1 (1) of the Development Charges Act , whereby charges are not directly or indirectly imposed on development nor has a requirement to construct a service related to development been imposed, except as permitted by the Development Charges Act or another Act. Total Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Figure D-2a Municipality of Leamington Attachment 1 Annual Treasurer's Statement of Development Charge Reserve Funds Amount Transferred to Capital (or Other) Funds - Capital Fund Transactions D.C. Recoverable Cost Share Non-D.C. Recoverable Cost Share D.C. Forecast Period Post D.C. Forecast Period Capital Fund Transactions Gross Capital Cost D.C. Reserve Fund Draw D.C. Debt Financing Grants, Subsidies Other Contributions Post-Period Benefit/ Capacity Interim Financing Grants, Subsidies Other Contributions Other Reserve/Reser ve Fund Draws Tax Supported Operating Fund Contributions Rate Supported Operating Fund Contributions Debt Financing Grants, Subsidies Other Contributions Services Related to a Highway Capital Cost A Capital Cost B Capital Cost C Sub-Total - Services Related to Highways $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Wastewater Services Capital Cost D Capita Cost E Capital Cost F Sub-Total - Water $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Parks and Recreation Services Capital Cost G Capita Cost H Capital Cost I Sub-Total - Wastewater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Figure D-2b Municipality of Leamington Attachment 1 Annual Treasurer's Statement of Development Charge Reserve Funds Amount Transferred to Operating (or Other) Funds - Operating Fund Transactions D.C. Reserve Fund Draw Post D.C. Forecast Period Non-D.C. Recoverable Cost Share Operating Fund Transactions Principal Interest Principal Interest Source Principal Interest Source Services Related to a Highway Capital Cost J Capita Cost K Capital Cost L Sub-Total - Services Related to a Highway $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Wastewater Services Capital Cost M Capita Cost N Capital Cost O Sub-Total - Water $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Parks and Recreation Services Capital Cost P Capita Cost Q Capital Cost R Sub-Total - Wastewater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Annual Debt Repayment Amount Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Figure D-3 Municipality of Leamington Attachment 2 Annual Treasurer's Statement of Development Charge Reserve Funds Statement of Credit Holder Transactions Credit Holder Applicable D.C. Reserve Fund Credit Balance Outstanding Beginning of Year ________ Additional Credits Granted During Year Credits Used by Holder During Year Credit Balance Outstanding End of Year ________ Credit Holder A Credit Holder B Credit Holder C Credit Holder D Credit Holder E Credit Holder F Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix E Local Service Policy Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix E: Local Service Policy Municipality of Leamington This Appendix sets out the Municipality's General Policy Guidelines on Development Charges (D.C.) and local service funding for Services Related to a Highway, Stormwater Management, Water Works, Wastewater Works, and Parkland Development. The guidelines outline, in general terms, the size and nature of engineered infrastructure that is included in the study as a development charge project, versus infrastructure that is considered as a local service, to be emplaced separately by landowners, pursuant to a development agreement. The following policy guidelines are general principles by which staff will be guided in considering development applications. Each application will be considered, however, in the context of these policy guidelines as subsection 59 (2) of the Development Charges Act, 1997 (D.C.A.), on its own merits having regard to, among other factors, the nature, type and location of the development and any existing and proposed development in the surrounding area, as well as the location and type of services required and their relationship to the proposed development and to existing and proposed development in the area. 1. Services Related to a Highway A highway and services related to a highway are intended for the transportation of people and goods via many different modes including, but not limited to passenger automobiles, commercial vehicles, transit vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The highway shall consist of all land and associated infrastructure built to support (or service) this movement of people and goods regardless of the mode of transportation employed, thereby achieving a complete street. A complete street is the concept whereby a highway is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to enable pedestrians, cyclists, public transit users and motorists to safely and comfortably be moved, thereby allowing for the efficient movement of persons and goods. The associated infrastructure to achieve this concept shall include, but is not limited to: road pavement structure and curbs; grade separation/bridge structures (for any vehicles, railways and/or pedestrians); grading, drainage and retaining wall features; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx culvert structures; storm water drainage systems; utilities; traffic control systems; signage; gateway features; street furniture; active transportation facilities (e.g. sidewalks, bike lanes, multi-use trails which interconnect the transportation network, etc.); transit lanes & lay-bys; roadway illumination systems; boulevard and median surfaces (e.g. sod & topsoil, paving, etc.); street trees and landscaping; parking lanes & lay-bys; (excluding on-street parking in the downtown) and driveway entrances; noise attenuation systems; railings and safety barriers. Infrastructure Assets Constructed by Developers: All infrastructure assets constructed by Developers must be designed in accordance with the Municipality's Development Manual as revised. All infrastructure assets shall be conveyed in accordance with the Municipality's Development Manual as revised. Any Parks and Open Space infrastructure assets approved to be built by the developer on behalf of the Municipality shall be in accordance with the Municipality's Development Manual as revised. Local and Collector Roads including Land: 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. Collector roads internal to development, inclusive of all land and associated infrastructure. (under s.59). b. Collector roads external to development, inclusive of all land and associated infrastructure - if needed to support a specific development or required to link with the area to which the plan relates. (under s.59); otherwise, included in D.C. calculation to the extent permitted under s.5(1). c. Local roads internal to development. d. Local roads external to development being roads connecting developments- if needed to support a specific development or required to Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx link with the area to which the plan relates. (under s.59); otherwise, included in D.C. calculation to the extent permitted under s.5(1). Arterial Roads including Land: 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. n/a 2) The costs of the following items shall be paid through D.C.s: a. New, widened, extended, or upgraded arterial roads, inclusive of all associated infrastructure. (under s. 5(1)). b. Land acquisition for arterial roads on existing rights-of-way (ROW) to achieve a complete street: dedication under the Planning Act provisions (s. 41, 51 and s. 53) through development lands; in area with limited development. c. Land acquisition for arterial roads on new rights-of-way to achieve a complete street: dedication, where possible, under the Planning Act provisions (s. 51 and s. 53) through development lands up to the ROW specified in the Official Plan. d. Land acquisition beyond normal dedication requirements to achieve transportation corridors as services related to highways including grade separation infrastructure for the movement of pedestrians, cyclists, public transit and/or railway vehicles. Rural Roads: 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. Rural roads internal to development, inclusive of all land and associated infrastructure (under s.59). b. Rural roads external to development, inclusive of all land and associated infrastructure - if needed to support a specific development or required to Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx link with the area to which the plan relates. (under s.59); otherwise, included in D.C. calculation to the extent permitted under s.5(1)) c. Rural Roads external to the development that require upgrades and/or rehabilitation to the satisfaction of the Municipality as determined by the municipal engineer. 2) The costs of the following items shall be paid through D.C.s: a. Local roads external to development being roads connecting developments or crossing hydro corridors. (to the extent permitted under s.5(1)). Traffic Control Systems, Signals, and Intersection Improvements 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. Traffic control systems, signals, and intersection improvements on any roads, or for any private site entrances, related to a specific development. (under s.59). 2) The costs of the following items shall be paid through D.C.s: a. Traffic control systems, signals and intersection improvements on arterial roads, arterial road improvements, collector roads and collector road improvements unrelated to a specific development. b. Intersection improvements, new or modified signalization, signal timing & optimization plans, area traffic studies for highways attributed to growth and unrelated to a specific development. (under s.5(1)) Streetlights 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. Streetlights on all roads required as a result of a specific development. (under s.59). Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 2) The costs of the following items shall be paid through D.C.s: a. Streetlights on new arterial roads and arterial road improvements: considered part of the complete street and included as part of the road costing funded through D.C.'s or in exceptional circumstances, may be direct developer responsibility through local service provisions (under s.59). b. Streetlights on non-arterial roads external to development, needed to support a specific development or required to link with the area to which the plan relates: considered part of the complete street. Transportation-Related Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. Sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle tracks, and bike lanes, inclusive of all required infrastructure, located within or linking to road corridors internal to development: direct developer responsibility through local service provisions (under s.59). 2) The costs of the following items shall be paid through D.C.s: a. Sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle tracks, and bike lanes, inclusive of all required infrastructure, located within arterial roads, County roads and provincial highway corridors: considered part of the complete street and included in D.C.'s, or, in exceptional circumstances, may be direct developer responsibility. b. Other sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle tracks, and bike lanes, inclusive of all required infrastructure, located within non-arterial road corridors external to development. c. Multi-use trails (not associated with a road), inclusive of all land and required infrastructure, that go beyond the function of a (parkland) recreational trail and form part of the Municipality's active transportation network for cycling and/or walking. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Noise Abatement Measures 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. Noise abatement measures external and internal to development where it is related to, or a requirement of a specific development. (under s.59) 2) The costs of the following items shall be paid through D.C.s: a. Noise abatement measures on new arterial roads and arterial road improvements abutting an existing community and unrelated to a specific development Stormwater Management Stormwater Management facilities will be the responsibility of the developing landowners, designed and constructed to the Municipality's satisfaction and fulfilling the Municipality's objective for larger, regional facilities. 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. Stormwater facilities for quality and/or quantity management, including downstream erosion works, inclusive of land and all associated infrastructure, such as landscaping and perimeter fencing. b. Erosion works, inclusive of all restoration requirements, related to a development application. c. Storm sewer systems and drainage works that are required for a specific development, either internal or external to the area to which the plan relates. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Underground Services (Stormwater, Water and Sanitary Sewers) Underground services (linear infrastructure for stormwater, water, and sanitary services) within the road allowance are not included in the cost of road infrastructure and are treated separately. The responsibility for such services as well as stormwater management ponds and pumping stations, which are undertaken as part of new developments or redevelopments, will be determined by the following principles: 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service: a. providing all underground services internal to the development, including storm, water, and sanitary services; b. providing service connections from existing underground services to the development; c. providing new underground services or upgrading existing underground services external to the development if the services are required to service the development. If external services are required by two or more developments, the developer for the first development will be responsible for the cost of the external services and may enter into front-ending/cost-sharing agreements with other developers independent of the Municipality; d. providing stormwater management ponds and other facilities required by the development including all associated features such as landscaping and fencing; e. water booster pumping stations, reservoir pumping stations and/or sanitary pumping stations serving individual developments; 2) The costs of the following items shall be paid through development charges: a. external underground services involving infrastructure attributed to growth and unrelated to a specific development. (under s.5(1)) b. water, reservoir and/or sanitary pumping stations not required for the individual development. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx c. water treatment, storage facilities, transmission mains, including pump stations, re-chlorination/sampling stations and wells associated with municipal service areas. d. wastewater treatment plants and transmission mains associated with municipal service areas. Parkland Development Parkland 1) The costs of the following items shall be direct developer responsibilities as a local service for Parkland development for Community Parks, District Parks, Neighbourhood Parks, and Village Squares: a. Clearing and grubbing. Tree removals as per the subdivision's tree preservation and removals plan. b. Topsoil Stripping, screening, and stockpiling. c. Rough grading (pre-grading) to allow for positive drainage of the Park, with minimum slopes of 2%. If necessary, this may include some minor drainage tile work and grading as per the overall subdivision grading design complete with any required swales or catch basins. Runoff from the development property shall not drain into the park unless approved by the Municipality's Manager of Engineering or designate. d. Spreading of topsoil to 150mm depth (import topsoil if existing on-site is insufficient to reach required depth). e. Seeding of site with Municipality-approved seed mix. Maintenance of seed until acceptance by Municipality. f. Parks shall be free of any contaminated soil or subsoil. g. Parks shall not be mined for fill. h. Parks shall be conveyed free and clear of all encumbrances. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-10 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx i. 100% of perimeter fencing to the Municipal standards where such fencing is deemed appropriate by the Municipality. When Park parcels cannot be developed in a timely manner, they shall be graded to ensure positive drainage and seeded to minimize and dust. These shall be maintained by the developer until construction commences thereon. j. The Park block shall not be used for topsoil or other construction material, equipment storage, or sales pavilions. k. Required heritage features within the Park as set out within the Development Approvals conditions. 2) The costs of the following items shall be paid through D.C.s: Program facilities, amenities, and furniture, within parkland: are included in D.C.'s. Landscape Buffer Blocks, Features, Cul-de-sac Islands, Berms, Grade Transition Areas, Walkway Connections to Adjacent Arterial Roads, Open Space, etc. 1) The cost of developing all landscape buffer blocks, landscape features, cul-de- sac islands, berms, grade transition areas, walkway connections to adjacent arterial roads, open space and other remnant pieces of land conveyed to the Municipality shall be a direct developer responsibility as a local service. Such costs include but are not limited to: a. Pre-grading, sodding or seeding, supply and installation of amended topsoil, (to the Municipality's required depth), landscape features, perimeter fencing and amenities and all planting. b. Perimeter fencing to the Municipal standard located on the public property side of the property line adjacent land uses (such as but limited to arterial roads) as directed by the Municipality. Natural Heritage System (NHS) NHS includes engineered and in situ stream corridors, natural buffers for woodlots, wetland remnants, etc. as well as subwatersheds within the boundaries of the Municipality. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-11 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 1) Direct developer responsibility as a local service provision including but not limited to the following: a. Riparian planting and landscaping requirements (as required by the Municipality, Conservation Authority or other authorities having jurisdiction) as a result of creation of, or construction within in the N.H.S. and associated buffers. b. Perimeter fencing of the N.H.S. to the Municipal standard located on the public property side of the property line adjacent land uses (residential, industrial, commercial) as required by the Municipality. All works to be constructed to the satisfaction of the municipal engineer for stream corridors, natural buffers and subwatersheds areas as directed by the approved studies and reports. Note: for any and all of the above, the Municipality may facilitate cost sharing agreements. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE F-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix F Asset Management Plan Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE F-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix F: Asset Management Plan The D.C.A. (s. 10 (2) (c.2)) requires that the background study must include an asset management plan (A.M.P.) related to new infrastructure. Section 10 (3) of the D.C.A. provides: "The asset management plan shall, (a) deal with all assets whose capital costs are proposed to be funded under the development charge by-law; (b) demonstrate that all the assets mentioned in clause (a) are financially sustainable over their full life cycle; (c) contain any other information that is prescribed; and (d) be prepared in the prescribed manner." In regard to the above, s. 8 of the Regulations was amended to include s. (2), s. (3) and s. (4) which set out for specific detailed requirements for transit (only). For all services except transit, there are no prescribed requirements at this time thus requiring the municipality to define the approach to include within the background study. For transit, the amended regulations provide for a prescriptive evaluation (as discussed later in this Appendix). At a broad level, the A.M.P. provides for the long-term investment in an asset over its entire useful life along with the funding. The schematic below identifies the costs for an asset through its entire lifecycle. For growth-related works, the majority of capital costs will be funded by the D.C. Non-growth-related expenditures will then be funded from non-D.C. revenues as noted below. During the useful life of the asset, there will be minor maintenance costs to extend the life of the asset along with additional program related expenditures to provide the full services to the residents. At the end of the life of the asset, it will be replaced by non-D.C. financing sources. It should be noted that with the recent passing of the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act (I.J.P.A.) municipalities are now required to complete A.M.P.s, based on certain criteria, which are to be completed by 2022 for core municipal services and 2024 for all other services. The amendments to the D.C.A. do not require municipalities to complete these A.M.P.s (required under I.J.P.A.) for the D.C. background study, rather Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE F-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx the D.C.A. requires that the D.C. background study include information to show the assets to be funded by the D.C. are sustainable over their full lifecycle. Purchase Install Commission Operate Maintain Monitor (Throughout Life of Assets) (To End of Useful Life) Removal/Decommission Disposal New Assets Replacement Assets Reserves/Reserve Funds Debentures User Fees Grants Other Proceeds on Disposal Funding of Disposal / Decommissioning Costs Operating Budget Financing Methods Purchase Install Commission Operate Maintain Monitor (Throughout Life of Assets) (To End of Useful Life) Removal/Decommission Disposal In 2012, the Province developed Building Together: Guide for municipal A.M.P.s which outlines the key elements for an A.M.P., as follows: State of local infrastructure: asset types, quantities, age, condition, financial accounting valuation and replacement cost valuation. Desired levels of service: defines levels of service through performance measures and discusses any external trends or issues that may affect expected levels of service or the municipality's ability to meet them (for example, new accessibility standards, climate change impacts). Asset management strategy: the asset management strategy is the set of planned actions that will seek to generate the desired levels of service in a sustainable way, while managing risk, at the lowest lifecycle cost. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE F-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Financing strategy: having a financial plan is critical for putting an A.M.P. into action. By having a strong financial plan, municipalities can also demonstrate that they have made a concerted effort to integrate the A.M.P. with financial planning and municipal budgeting and are making full use of all available infrastructure financing tools. Commensurate with the above, the Municipality prepared an A.M.P. in early 2022 for its existing assets; however, it did not take into account future growth-related assets. As a result, the asset management requirement for the D.C. must be undertaken in the absence of this information. In recognition to the schematic above, the following table (presented in 2022$) has been developed to provide the annualized expenditures and revenues associated with new growth. Note that the D.C.A. does not require an analysis of the non-D.C. capital needs or their associated operating costs so these are omitted from the table below. Due to the timing of the A.M.P. updated currently underway, not all capital costs included in the D.C.-eligible capital costs are included in the Municipality's A.M.P. Hence the following does not represent a fiscal impact assessment (including future tax/rate increases) but provides insight into the potential affordability of the new assets: 1. The non-D.C. recoverable portion of the projects which will require financing from municipal financial resources (i.e., taxation, rates, fees, etc.). This amount has been presented on an annual debt charge amount based on 20-year financing. 2. Lifecycle costs for the 2022 D.C. capital works have been presented based on a sinking fund basis. The assets have been considered over their estimated useful lives. 3. Incremental operating costs for the D.C. services (only) have been included. 4. The resultant total annualized expenditures are $22.73 million. 5. Consideration was given to the potential new taxation and user fee revenues which will be generated as a result of new growth. These revenues will be available to finance the expenditures above. The new operating revenues are $19.72 million. This amount, totaled with the existing revenues of $92.77 million, provide annual revenues of $112.49 million by 2041. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE F-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 6. In consideration of the above, the capital plan is deemed to be financially sustainable. Table F-1 Municipality of Leamington Asset Management - Future Expenditures and Associated Revenues 2022$ 2041 (Total) Expenditures (Annualized) Annual Debt Payment on Non-Growth Related Capital1 1,923,272 Annual Debt Payment on Post Period Capital2 581,480 Lifecycle: Annual Lifecycle $3,078,057 Incremental Operating Costs (for D.C. Services) $17,152,072 Total Expenditures $22,734,881 Revenue (Annualized) Total Existing Revenue3 $92,774,442 Incremental Tax and Non-Tax Revenue (User Fees, Fines, Licences, etc.) $19,719,875 Total Revenues $112,494,317 3 As per Sch. 10 of FIR 1 Non-Growth Related component of Projects 2 Interim Debt Financing for Post Period Benefit Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-1 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Appendix G Proposed Development Charges By-law Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-2 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx The Corporation of the Municipality of Leamington By-Law No. 2022-xxx A By-law to establish Development Charges for the Municipality of Leamington Whereas the Development Charges Act, 1997 (the "Act") provides that the council of a municipality may by by-law impose development charges against land to pay for increased capital costs required because of increased needs for services; And whereas a Development Charges Background Study has been completed in accordance with the Act; And whereas Council has before it a report entitled "Municipality of Leamington Development Charge Background Study" prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. dated May 16, 2022; And whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Leamington has given notice of and held a public meeting on the 31st day of May, 2022 in accordance with the Act and the regulations thereto; Now therefore the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Leamington hereby enacts as follows: 1.0 Definitions In this by-law, "Act" means the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended, or any successor thereto; "Accessory use" means where used to describe a use, building or structure, that the use, building, or structure is naturally and normally incidental, subordinate in purpose of floor area or both, and exclusively devoted to a principal use, building or structure, but is not an ancillary residential building; "Agricultural Use" means use or intended use for bona fide farming purpose: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-3 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx (a) including (but not limited to): i. cultivation of crops on open land, including (but not limited to) fruit, vegetables, herbs, grains, field crops, cannabis, sod, trees, shrubs, flowers, and ornamental plants; ii. raising of animals, including (but not limited to) cattle, horses, pigs, poultry, livestock, fish; and iii. agricultural animal husbandry, dairying, equestrian activities, horticulture, fallowing, pasturing, and market gardening; (b) but excluding: i. retail sales activities; including but not limited to restaurants, banquet facilities, hospitality facilities and gift shops; and ii. services related to grooming, boarding, or breeding of household pets. "ancillary residential building" means a residential building that would be ancillary to a detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling, or row dwelling. "apartment unit" means any residential dwelling unit within a building containing three or more dwelling units where access to each residential unit is obtained through a common entrance or entrances from the street level and the residential units are connected by an interior corridor; "back-to-back townhouse dwelling" means a building containing more than two dwelling units separated vertically by a common wall, including a rear common wall, which do not have rear yards; "bedroom" means a habitable room larger than seven square metres, including a den, study, or other similar area, but does not include a living room, dining room or kitchen; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-4 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx "Board of Education" has the same meaning as that specified in the Education Act or any successor thereto; "building permit" means a permit pursuant to the Building Code Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended; "Building Code Act" means the Building Code Act, 1992, as mended; or any successor thereto; "Bunk House" means a temporary dwelling used for the housing of seasonal farm workers which is intended not to be used year-round and not used as a permanent residence and includes a communal kitchen, bathrooms, and sleeping facilities and may include a mobile home; "cannabis plant" means a plant that belongs to the genus Cannabis. "calculation date" means the date on which the first building permit is issued by the local municipality, unless otherwise stipulated in this by-law; "capital cost" means costs incurred or proposed to be incurred by the municipality or a local board thereof directly or by others on behalf of and as authorized by the municipality or local board, i. to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest, ii. to improve land, iii. to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures, iv. to acquire, construct or improve facilities including: a. furniture and equipment other than computer equipment, and b. materials acquired for circulation, reference or information purposes by a library board as defined in the Public Libraries Act, and Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-5 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx c. rolling stock with an estimated useful life of seven years or more, and v. to undertake studies in connection with any matter under the Act and any of the matters in clauses (i) to (iv), including the development charge background study required for the provision of services designated in this by-law within or outside the municipality, including interest on borrowing for those expenditures under clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) that are growth- related; "commercial purpose" means used, designed, or intended for use for or in connection with the purchase and/or sale and/or rental of commodities; the provision of services for a fee; or the operation of a business office, and includes hotels and motels; "correctional group home" means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed-use building containing a single housekeeping unit supervised on a 24-hour basis on site by agency staff on a shift rotation basis, and funded wholly or in part by an government or its agency, or by public subscription or donation, or by any combination thereof, and licensed, approved or supervised by the Province of Ontario as a detention or correctional facility under any general or special act and amendments or replacement thereto. A correction group home may contain an office provided that the office is used only for the operation of the correctional group home in which it is located. A correctional group home shall not include any detention facility operated or supervised by the Federal Government nor any correctional institution or secure custody and detention facility operated by the Province of Ontario; "Council" means the Council of the municipality; "County" means the County of Essex; "development" means the construction, erection or placing of one or more buildings or structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of increasing the size or usability thereof, Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-6 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx and includes redevelopment; notwithstanding the foregoing, development does not include temporary structures, including but not limited to, seasonal hoop structures, seasonal fabric structures, tents, or produce sales stands; "development charge" means a charge imposed with respect to this by-law. "dwelling room" means either: a) each bedroom used, designed, or intended for use by one or more persons living together in a lodging home, dormitories, or b) in the case of a special care/special dwelling unit/room, each individual room or suite of rooms used, designed, or intended for use by one or two persons with or without exclusive sanitary and/or culinary facilities. "dwelling unit" means any part of a building or structure used, designed, or intended to be used as a domestic establishment in which one or more persons may sleep and are provided with culinary and sanitary facilities for their exclusive use; "existing industrial building" means a building or buildings existing on site in the Municipality of Leamington on July 28, 2022, or the first building constructed and occupied on a vacant site pursuant to site plan approval under Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. c.P.13 of the Planning Act subsequent to this by-law coming to effect for which full development charges were paid, and is being used for or in conjunction with: i. the production, compounding, processing, packaging, crating, bottling, packing, or assembling of raw or semi-processed goods or materials in not less than seventy-five percent of the total gross floor area of the building or buildings on a site ("manufacturing") or warehousing related to the manufacturing use carried on in the building or buildings; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-7 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx ii. research or development in connection with manufacturing in not less than seventy-five percent of the total gross floor area of the building or buildings on a site; iii. retail sales by a manufacturer, if the retail sales are at the site where the manufacturing is carried out, such retail sales are restricted to goods manufactured at the site, and the building or part of a building where such retail sales are carried out does not constitute greater than twenty-five percent of the total gross floor area of the building or buildings on the site; or iv. Office or administrative purposes, if they are, a. carried out with respect to manufacturing or warehousing; and b. In or attached to the building or structure used for such manufacturing or warehousing; "farm building" means that part of a bona fide farming operation encompassing barns, silos, and other ancillary development to an agricultural use, but excluding a residential use; "garden suite" means a one-unit detached residential structure containing bathroom and kitchen facilities that is ancillary to an existing residential structure and that is designed to be portable; "greenhouse" means a structure that is used for growing plants in regulated temperatures, humidity, and ventilation. A greenhouse can range from a small room carrying a few plants over the winter, to an immense heated building called a hothouse or conservatory, covering acres of ground and used for growing fruits, vegetables, flowers, or cannabis; "grade" means the average level of finished ground adjoining a building or structure at all exterior walls; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-8 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx "granny flat" means a one-unit detached, temporary residential structure, containing culinary and sanitary facilities, which is ancillary to an existing residential structure and that is designed to be temporary; "gross floor area" means the total area of all floors above grade of a dwelling unit measured between the outside surfaces of exterior walls or between the outside surfaces of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the dwelling unit from other dwelling unit or other portion of a building; In the case of a non-residential building or structure, or in the case of a mixed-use building or structure in respect of the non-residential portion thereof, the total area of all building floors above or below grade measured between the outside surfaces of the exterior walls, or between the outside surfaces of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing a non- residential use and a residential use, except for: - a room or enclosed area within the building or structure above or below grade that is used exclusively for the accommodation of heating, cooling, ventilating, electrical, mechanical or telecommunications equipment that service the building; - loading facilities above or below grade; and - a part of the building or structure below grade that is used for the parking of motor vehicles or for storage or other accessory use; "group home" means a residential building or the residential portion of a mixed- use building containing a single housekeeping unit which may or may not be supervised on a 24-hour basis on site by agency staff on a shift rotation basis, and funded wholly or in part by any government or its agency, or by public subscription or donation, or by any combination thereof and licensed, approved or supervised by the Province of Ontario for the accommodation of persons under any general or special act and amendments or replacements thereto. A group home may contain an office provided that the office is used only for the operation of the group home in which it is located; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-9 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx "hospice" means a building or portion of a mixed-use building designed and intended to provide palliative care and emotional support to the terminally ill in a home or homelike setting so that quality of life is maintained, and family members may be active participants in care; "industrial use" means land, buildings or structures used for or in connection with manufacturing by: (a) manufacturing, producing, and processing goods for a commercial purpose, as well as storing and/or distribution of goods manufactured, produced, or processed on site; (b) research or development in connection with manufacturing, producing, or processing good for a commercial purpose; (c) retail sales by a manufacturer, producer, or processor of goods they manufactured, produced, or processed, if the retail sales are at the site where the manufacturing, production or processing takes place; (d) office or administrative purposes if it is: i. carried out with respect to manufacturing, producing, processing, storage or distributing of something; and ii. in or attached to the building or structure used for that manufacturing, producing, processing, storage, or distribution; "institutional" means lands, buildings or structures used or designed or intended for use by an organized body, society, or religious group for promoting a public or non-profit purpose and shall include, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, places of worship, and special care facilities; "live/work unit" means a unit which contains separate residential and non- residential areas intended for both residential and non-residential uses concurrently, and shares a common wall or floor with direct access between the residential and non-residential areas; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-10 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx "local board" means a municipal service board, transportation commission, public library board, board of health, police services board, planning board, or any other board, commission, committee, body or local authority established or exercising any power or authority under any general or special Act with respect to any of the affairs or purposes of one or more local municipalities or the County, but excluding a board of education, a conservation authority, any municipal services corporation that is not deemed to be a local board under O. Reg. 599/06 made under the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended. "local services" means those services, facilities or things which are under the jurisdiction of the municipality and are related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates in respect of the lands under Sections 51 or 53 of the Planning Act as amended or any successor thereto; "lodging home" means a boarding, lodging, or rooming house in which lodging is provided for more than four persons in return for renumeration or for the provision of services, or for both, and in which the lodging rooms do not have both bathrooms and kitchen facilities for the exclusive use of individual occupants; "long term care home" means homes, nursing homes or homes for the aged where the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care funds the care provided in such homes and application for accommodation is made through a Community Care Access Centre; "mezzanine" means an intermediate floor assembly between the floor and ceiling of any room or storey and includes an interior balcony; "mixed-use building" means a building or structure used for both residential and non-residential use; "mobile home" means any dwelling that is designed to be made mobile, and constructed or manufactured to provide a permanent residence for one or more persons, but does not include a travel trailer or tent trailer; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-11 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx "multiplex dwelling" means a residential building containing three or more dwelling units, each of which unit has a separate entrance to grade; "municipality" means The Corporation of the Municipality of Leamington; "non-profit housing development" means development of a building or structure intended for use as residential premises by, a) a corporation to which the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing; b) a corporation without share capital to which the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act applies, that is in good standing under that Act and whose primary object is to provide housing; or c) a non-profit housing co-operative that is in good standing under the Co- operative Corporations Act, or any successor legislation. "non-residential building" means a building or structure used exclusively for non- residential use, including the non-residential component of a live/work unit; "non-residential use" means a building or structure of any kind whatsoever used, designed, or intended to be used for other than a residential use and includes all commercial, industrial, and institutional uses; "other multiple" means all residential units other than a single detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling, apartment dwelling or a special care/special dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, row dwellings, multiplex, back-to-back townhouse dwelling, stacked townhouse dwelling, and the residential component of live/work units; "Official Plan" means the Official Plan adopted for the Municipality, as amended, and approved; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-12 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx "owner" means the owner of land or a person who has made application for an approval for the development of land upon which a development charge is imposed; "parking structure" means buildings or structures used for the parking of motor vehicles; "place of worship" means that part of a building or structure that is exempt from taxation as a place of worship under the Assessment Act, as amended or any successor thereto; "premise" means one or more dwelling units and/or one or more square feet used for non-residential use; "redevelopment" means the construction, erection or placing of one or more buildings on land where all or part of a building on such land has been previously demolished, or changing the use of all or part of a building from a residential purpose to a non-residential purpose or from a non-residential purpose to a residential purpose, or changing all or part of a building from one form of residential development to another form of residential development or from one form of non-residential development to another form of non-residential development; "Regulation" means any regulation made pursuant to the Act. "rental housing" means development of a building or structure with four or more dwelling units all of which are intended for use as rented residential premises; "residential dwelling" means a building, occupied or capable of being occupied as a home, residence or sleeping place by one or more persons, containing one or more dwelling units but not including motels, hotels, tents, truck campers, tourist trailers, mobile camper trailers or boarding, lodging or rooming houses; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-13 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx "residential use" means land or buildings, or structures of any kind whatsoever used, designed, or intended to be used as living accommodations for one or more individuals; "row dwelling" means a building containing three or more attached dwelling units in a single row, each of which dwelling units has an independent entrance from the outside and is vertically separated from any abutting dwelling unit; "semi-detached dwelling" means a dwelling unit in a residential building consisting of two dwelling units having one vertical wall or one horizontal walls, but no other parts, attached or another dwelling unit where the residential units are not connected by an interior corridor; "service" (or "class of service") means those services designated in Schedule "A" to this by- law; "servicing agreement" means an agreement between a landowner and the municipality relative to the provision of municipal services to specified lands within the municipality; "single detached dwelling unit" means a residential building consisting of one dwelling unit and not attached to another structure and includes mobile homes. "special care/special dwelling" means a residence: a) containing two or more dwelling rooms, which rooms have common entrance from street level; and b) where the occupants have the right to use in common with other occupants, halls, stairs, yards, common room, and accessory buildings; and c) that is designed to accommodate persons with specific needs, including but not limited to, independent permanent living arrangements; and where support services, such as meal preparation, grocery shopping, laundry, housing, nursing, respite care and attending services are provided at Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-14 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx various levels; and includes but is not limited to retirement homes or lodges, group homes, dormitories, and hospices; "stacked townhouse dwelling" means a building containing two or more dwelling units where each dwelling unit is separated horizontally and/or vertically from another dwelling unit by a common wall or floor; "student residence" means a Residential Development that is solely owned by a University, college of applied arts and technology or other accredited post- secondary institution, designated, or intended to be used for sleeping and living accommodations by students of the university, college of applied arts and technology or other accredited post-secondary institution that owns the Residential Development. "use" means either residential use or non-residential use. 2.0 Designation of Services and Classes 2.1 The categories of services and classes of services for which development charges are imposed under this by-law are as follows: (a) Services Related to a Highway; (b) Public Works; (c) Fire Protection Services; (d) Parks and Recreation Services; (e) Policing Services; (f) Wastewater Services; (g) Water Services; and (h) Growth Studies. 2.2 The components of the services and classes designated in subsection 2.1 are described in Schedule A. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-15 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3.0 Application of By-law Rules 3.1 Development charges shall be payable in the amounts set out in this by-law where: (a) the lands are located in the area described in Section 3.2; and (b) the development of the lands requires any of the approvals set out in subsection 3.4(a). Area to Which By-law Applies 3.2 Subject to subsection 3.3, this by-law applies to all lands in the geographic area of the Municipality of Leamington. 3.3 This by-law shall not apply to lands that are owned by and used for the purposes of: (a) The Municipality of Leamington or a local board thereof; (b) A board as defined in section 1(1) of the Education Act; (c) The Corporation of the County of Essex or a local board thereof. Approvals for Development 3.4 (a) Development charges shall be imposed on all lands, buildings or structures that are developed for residential or non-residential uses if the development requires: (i) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by-law under section 34 of the Planning Act; (ii) the approval of a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act; (iii) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50 (7) of the Planning Act applies; Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-16 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx (iv) the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act; (v) a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act; (vi) the approval of a description under section 50 of the Condominium Act; or (vii) the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 in relation to a building or structure. (b) No more than one development charge for each service designated in subsection 2.1 shall be imposed upon any lands, buildings, or structures to which this by-law applies even though two or more of the actions described in subsection 3.4(a) are required before the lands, buildings or structures can be developed. (c) Despite subsection 3.4(b), if two or more of the actions described in subsection 3.4(a) occur at different times, additional development charges shall be imposed if the subsequent action has the effect of increasing the need for services. Exemptions Rules with Respect to Exemptions for Intensification of Existing Housing or New Housing 3.5 Notwithstanding the provisions of this By-law, development charges shall not be imposed with respect to developments or portions of developments as follows: a) the enlargement to an existing residential dwelling unit; b) the creation of up to two additional dwelling units in existing dwellings as the following table sets out: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-17 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Item Name of Class of Existing Residential Building Description of Class of Existing Residential Buildings Maximum number of Additional Dwelling Units Restrictions 1 Existing single detached dwellings Existing residential buildings, each of which contains a single dwelling unit, which are not attached to other buildings. Two The total gross floor area of the additional dwelling unit or units must be less than or equal to the gross floor area of the dwelling unit already in the building. 2 Existing semi- detached dwellings or row dwellings Existing residential buildings, each of which contains a single dwelling unit, which have one or two vertical walls, but no other parts, attached to other buildings. One The gross floor area of the additional dwelling unit must be less than or equal to the gross floor area of the dwelling unit already in the building. 3 Existing rental residential buildings Existing residential rental buildings, each of which contains four or more dwelling units. Greater of one and 1% of the existing units in the building None. 4 Other existing residential buildings An existing residential building not in another class of residential building described in this table. One The gross floor area of the additional dwelling unit must be less than or equal to the gross floor area of the smallest dwelling unit already in the building c) the creation of a second dwelling unit in prescribed classes of proposed new residential buildings, including structures ancillary to dwellings, subject to the following restrictions: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-18 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Item Name of Class of Proposed New Residential Buildings Description of Class of Proposed New Residential Buildings Restrictions 1 Proposed new detached dwellings Proposed new residential buildings that would not be attached to other buildings and that are permitted to contain a second dwelling unit, which being either of the two dwelling units, if the units have the same gross floor area, or the small of the dwelling units. The proposed new detached dwelling must only contain two dwelling units. The proposed new detached dwelling must be located on a parcel of land on which no other detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling, or row dwelling would be located. 2 Proposed new semi-detached dwellings or row dwellings Proposed new residential buildings that have one or two vertical walks, but no other parts, attached to other buildings and that are permitted to contain a second dwelling unit, which being either of the two dwelling units, if the units have the same gross floor area, or the small of the dwelling units. The proposed new semi-detached dwelling or row dwelling must only contain two dwelling units. The proposed new semi-detached dwelling or row dwelling must be located on a parcel of land on which no other detached dwelling, semi- detached dwelling, or row dwelling would be located. 3 Proposed new residential buildings that would be ancillary to a proposed new detached dwelling, semi- detached dwelling, or row dwelling Proposed new residential buildings that would be ancillary to a proposed new detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling, or row dwelling and that are permitted to contain a single dwelling unit. The proposed new detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling, or row dwelling, to which the proposed new residential building would be ancillary, must only contain one dwelling unit. The gross floor area of the dwelling unit in the proposed new residential building must be equal to or less than the gross floor area of the detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling, or row dwelling to which the proposed new residential building is ancillary. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-19 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3.5.1 Notwithstanding subsection 3.5(b), development charges shall be imposed if the total gross floor area of the additional one or two units exceeds the gross floor area of the existing dwelling unit. 3.5.2 Notwithstanding subsection 3.5(d), development charges shall be imposed if the additional unit has a gross floor area greater than: (a) in the case of a semi-detached or row dwelling, the gross floor area of the existing dwelling unit; and (b) in the case of any other residential building, the gross floor area of the smallest dwelling unit already contained in the residential building. 3.6 Exemption for Industrial Development: 3.6.1 For the purpose of sections 3.6.2 to 3.7.3 inclusive, the term "existing industrial building" shall have the same meaning as that term has in the Regulation and shall not include self-storage or mini-storage facilities. 3.6.2 Notwithstanding any other provision of this By-law, but subject to sections 3.7.2 and 3.7.3 below, no development charge is payable with respect to the enlargement of the total floor area of an existing industrial building where the total floor area is enlarged by 50 percent or less: 3.7 If the total floor area of an existing industrial building is enlarged by greater than 50 percent, the amount of the development charge payable in respect of the enlargement is the amount of the development charge that would otherwise be payable multiplied by the fraction determined as follows: a) determine the amount by which the enlargement exceeds 50 percent of the total floor area before the enlargement; b) divide the amount determined under subsection 3.7(a) by the amount of the enlargement. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-20 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3.7.1 For greater certainty in applying the exemption in this section, the total floor area of an existing industrial building is enlarged where there is a bona fide increase in the size of the existing industrial building, the enlarged area is attached to the existing industrial building, there is a direct means of ingress and egress from the existing industrial building to and from the enlarged area for persons, goods and equipment and the existing industrial building and the enlarged area are used for or in connection with an industrial purpose as set out in subsection 1(1) of the Regulation. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the exemption in this section shall not apply where the enlarged area is attached to the existing industrial building by means only of a tunnel, bridge, canopy, corridor, or other passageway, or through a shared below- grade connection such as a service tunnel, foundation, footing or parking facility. 3.7.2 The exemption for an existing industrial building provided by this section shall be applied up to a maximum of 50 percent of the total floor area before the first enlargement for which an exemption from the payment of development charges was granted pursuant to this By-law or any previous development charges by-law of the Municipality made pursuant to the Act or its predecessor legislation. Development charges shall be imposed in accordance with Schedule B with respect to the amount of floor area of an enlargement that results in the total floor area of the industrial building being increased by greater than 50 percent of the total floor area of the existing industrial building. 3.7.3 For the purposes of this section, despite any new sites created which result in an existing industrial building being on a site separate from its enlargement or enlargements for which an exemption was granted under this section, further exemptions, if any, pertaining to the existing industrial building shall be calculated in accordance with section 3.7.2 on the basis of its site prior to any division. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-21 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 3.8 Other Exemptions/Reductions Notwithstanding the provision of this By-law, development charges shall not be imposed with respect to: - Residential accessory buildings if a service connection already exists for the lot but excludes bunk houses; - Private schools; - Agricultural buildings excluding bunk houses and greenhouse uses; - Land vested in or leased to a university that receives regular and ongoing operating funds from the government for the purposes of post-secondary education is exempt from development charges imposed under the Development Charges Act, 1997 if the development in respect of which development charges would otherwise be payable is intended to be occupied and used by the university. Reduction of Development Charges with Respect to Redevelopment and Conversion 3.9 Despite any other provision of this By-law, where, as a result of the redevelopment of land, a building or structure existing on the same land within 3 years prior to the date of payment of development charges in regard to such redevelopment was, or is to be demolished, in whole or in part, or converted from one principal use to another principal use on the same land, in order to facilitate the redevelopment, the development charges otherwise payable with respect to such redevelopment shall be reduced by the following amounts: a) in the case of a residential building or structure, or in the case of a mixed-use building or structure, the residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure, an amount calculated by multiplying the applicable development charge under subsection 3.10 of this by-law by the number, according to type, of dwelling units that have been or will be demolished or converted to another principal use; and provided that such amounts shall not exceed, in total, the amount of the Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-22 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx development charges otherwise payable with respect to the redevelopment. b) in the case of a non-residential building or structure or, in the case of mixed-use building or structure, the non-residential uses in the mixed- use building or structure, an amount calculated by multiplying the applicable development charges under subsection 3.11 by the gross floor area that has been or will be demolished or converted to another principal use; provided that such amounts shall not exceed, in total, the amount of the development charges otherwise payable with respect to the redevelopment. c) Where an existing Building is converted in whole or in part from one use (hereinafter referred to in this Section as the "First Use") to another use, (i) the amount of Development Charges payable shall be reduced by the amount, calculated pursuant to this By-law at the current Development Charges rates in respect of the First Use; (ii) the First Use shall be the use as confirmed through the Municipality's Building Division and related permit records; (iii) for greater certainty, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no credit shall be allowed where the converted Building or part thereof would have been exempt pursuant to this By-law; and (iv) the amount of any credit pursuant to this Section shall not exceed, in total, the amount of the Development Charges otherwise payable pursuant to this By-law with respect to the Redevelopment. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-23 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Amount of Charges Residential 3.10 The development charges set out in Schedule B to this By-law shall be imposed on residential uses of lands, buildings, or structures, including a dwelling unit accessory to a non-residential use and, in the case of a mixed-use building or structure, on the residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure, including the residential component of a live/work unit, according to the type of residential unit, and calculated with respect to each of the services according to the type of residential use. Non-Residential 3.11 The development charges described in Schedule B to this By-law shall be imposed on non-residential uses of lands, buildings, or structures, and, in the case of a mixed-use building or structure, on the non-residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure, including the non-residential component of a live/work unit, and calculated with respect to each of the services according to the gross floor area of the non-residential use. Time of Calculation and Payment of Development Charges 3.12 Development charges imposed under this By-law are calculated, payable, and collected upon issuance of the first building permit for the development. 3.13 Notwithstanding subsection 3.12, the timing of calculation and payment of the services related to a highway component of development charge with respect to an approval of a Plan of Subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990 as amended, shall be addressed in the subdivision agreement, subject to any applicable exemptions contained in this By-law, and calculated in accordance with subsections 3.10 and 3.11 of this by-law. 3.14 Notwithstanding subsections 3.12 and 3.13, development charges for rental housing and institutional developments are due and payable in 6 installments Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-24 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx commencing with the first installment payable on the date of occupancy, and each subsequent installment annually, including interest as provided in the Municipality's Council approved development charge interest policy, as may be revised from time to time. 3.15 Notwithstanding subsections 3.12 and 3.13, development charges for non-profit housing developments are due and payable in 21 installments commencing with the first installment payable on the date of occupancy, and each subsequent installment annually, including interest as provided in the Municipality's Council approved development charge interest policy, as may be revised from time to time. 3.16 Where the development of land results from the approval of a site plan or zoning by-law amendment received on or after January 1, 2020, and the approval of the application occurred within two years of building permit issuance, the development charges under subsections 3.10 and 3.11 shall be calculated on the rates set out in Schedule "B" on the date of the planning application, including interest. Where both planning applications apply development charges under subsections 3.10 and 3.11 shall be calculated on the rates, including interest as provided in the Municipality's Council approved development charge interest policy, as may be revised from time to time, payable on the anniversary date each year thereafter, set out in Schedule "B" on the date of the later planning application, including interest. 3.17 Despite subsections 3.12 to 3.16, and in accordance with section 27 of the Act, Council from time to time, and at any time, may enter into agreements providing for all or any part of a development charge to be paid before or after it would otherwise be payable. 4.0 Alternative Payment Agreements 4.1 Council may enter into an agreement under section 27 of the Act, in a form and having content satisfactory to the Municipality's solicitor and having content satisfactory to the Treasurer, with any person who is required to pay a Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-25 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx development charge providing for all or any part of the development charge to be paid before or after it would otherwise be payable. 4.2 Council directs the Chief Building Official or his or her designate to withhold the issuance of a building permit in relation to a building on land to which the development charge applies unless the development charge has been paid. 5.0 Payment by Services 5.1 Payment of development charges shall be by debit, bank draft or certified cheque or as otherwise approved at the sole discretion of the Treasurer. 5.2 In the alternative to payment by the means provided in section 5.1 herein, the Municipality may, by a written agreement entered into with the owner, accept the provision of services in full or partial satisfaction of the development charges otherwise payable. 5.3 If the Municipality and the owner cannot agree as to the reasonable cost of doing the work under section 5.2, the dispute shall be referred to Council whose decision shall be final and binding. 5.4 Nothing in this By-law prevents Council from requiring, as a condition of any approval given under the Planning Act, that the owner, at the owner's expense, install such local services as Council may require or that local connections to storm drainage facilities be installed at the owner's expense. 5.5 Any refund or credit required to be given by the Municipality to an owner shall be in relation to a service as per subsection 39(1) of the Act. The Municipality may agree by agreement to provide a credit in relation to another service as per subsection 39(3) of the Act or may provide for another basis for recovery. 5.6 If development charges or any part thereof payable pursuant to this By-law remain unpaid after such charges are payable, the amount unpaid shall be added to the tax roll and shall be collected in the same manner as taxes. Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-26 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx 6.0 Indexing 6.1 Development charges imposed pursuant to this by-law shall be adjusted annually on January 1st of each year, without amendment to this by-law in accordance with the Act, beginning on January 1, 2023. 7.0 Schedules 7.1 The following schedules to this by-law form an integral part thereof: Schedule A - Components of Services Designated in subsection 2.1 Schedule B - Residential and Non-Residential Development Charges 8.0 Date By-law in Force 8.1 This By-law shall come into force on the 27th day of July, 2022. 9.0 Date By-law Expires 9.1 This By-law will expire on the 27th day of July, 2027 unless it is repealed at an earlier date. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 26th DAY OF JULY, 2022. READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 26th DAY OF JULY, 2022. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF LEAMINGTON ________________________________________ Mayor, Hilda MacDonald _________________________________________ Clerk, Brenda Percy Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-27 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule "A" To By-law 22-___ Components of Services and Classes of Services Designated in Subsection 2.1 D.C.-Eligible Services: Services Related to a Highway Roads and Related Infrastructure Fire Protection Services Fire Facilities Fire Vehicles Fire Small Equipment and Gear Parks and Recreation Services Parkland Development Parkland Amenities Park Trails Parks and Recreation Vehicles and Equipment Recreation Facilities Policing Services Policing Facilities Policing Equipment and Gear Wastewater Services Treatment and Collection System Water Services Distribution System Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-28 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule "A" To By-law 22-___ Components of Services and Classes of Services Designated in Subsection 2.1 D.C.-Eligible Classes: Public Works Facilities Vehicles and Equipment Growth Studies Services Related to a Highway Water Services Wastewater Services Fire Protection Services Parks and Recreation Services Policing Services Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-29 H:\Leamington\2022 DC\Report\Leamington DC Report - Final.docx Schedule "B" To By-law 22-___ Schedule of Development Charges NON-RESIDENTIAL Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Other Multiples Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Special Care/Special Dwelling Units On-Farm Bunk Houses (per capita) Industrial, Commercial & Institutional (per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Greenhouse (per sq.ft. of Gross Floor Area) Municipal Wide Services/Class of Service: Services Related to a Highway 3,758 2,189 1,908 1,475 1,232 1,120 1.562 0.062 Public Works 191 111 97 75 63 57 0.079 0.003 Fire Protection Services 442 258 224 173 145 132 0.184 0.007 Policing Services 72 42 37 28 24 21 0.030 0.001 Parks and Recreation Services 1,934 1,127 982 759 634 577 0.056 0.003 Growth Studies 373 217 189 146 122 111 0.162 0.007 Total Municipal Wide Services/Class of Services 6,770 3,944 3,437 2,656 2,220 2,018 2.073 0.083 Municipal-Wide Water Serviced Area Water Services 2,452 1,429 1,245 962 804 556 1.046 0.397 Total Water Serviced Area 9,222 5,373 4,682 3,618 3,024 2,575 3.119 0.480 Urban Wastewater Serviced Area Wastewater Services 601 350 305 236 197 - 0.247 - Total Urban Water and Wastewater Serviced Area 9,823 5,723 4,987 3,854 3,221 2,575 3.366 0.480 Service/Class of Service RESIDENTIAL